FA4890-19-R-0006-0001_Amendment_DASD_SETA.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

A. Incorporate Performance Work Statement dated 31 Oct 18 as Atch 1. The document titled "DASD SETA SPT SOW" w as deleted as Atch 1.

B. Revise Section L, "Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents."

C. Revise Section M, "Evaluation Factors for Aw ard."

D. Change the contract type from "FFP" to "FFP-LOE."

E. Revise all CLINs and SLINs extended descriptions.

F. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 32

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 31-Oct-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA489019R0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-Oct-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

31-Oct-2018

CODE

ACC AMIC/PKD

129 ANDREWS AVE, STE 110

LANGLEY AFB VA 23665

FA4890 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA489019R0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0001

The contract type has changed from FFP to FFP-LOE.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW SOW section 3.3.

To:

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 7.0.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Lot Transition In/Out

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 7.0.

FOB: Destination

SIGNAL CODE: A

NET AMT

CEILING PRICE

CLIN 0002

DASD A&AS - Position 1

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Counter Narcotics and Global Threats (DASD-CNGT)

SUBCLIN 0002AA

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW SOW section 3.2

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.2

0002AA 1 Lot Task 1 - Program Support (Legislative)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.2

CLIN 0003

DASD A&AS - Position 2

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 0003AA

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.3.

0003AA 3 Lot Task 2 - Program Support (Budget)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.3.

CLIN 0004

DASD A&AS - Position 3

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 0004AA

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW SOW section 3.4.

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.4.

0004AA 1 Lot Task 3 - Program Support (Performance)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.4.

CLIN 0005

DASD A&AS - Position 4

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 0005AA

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW SOW section 3.5.

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.5.

0005AA 5 Lot Task 4-Program Support (Policy Support)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.5.

CLIN 0006

The contactor shall provide Event Coordination and Support services IAW SOW section 5.3.

The contactor shall provide Event Coordination and Support services IAW PWS section 5.3.

CLIN 0007

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The Contractor shall provide up to 600 additional hours of support for the Base year. Additional hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the SOW. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and end dates, performance period, and any other details appropriate to implementation additional hours of support. Reference SOW section 3.6.

The Contractor shall provide up to 600 additional hours of support for the Base year. Additional hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the PWS. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and end dates, performance period, and any other details appropriate to implementation additional hours of support. Reference PWS section 3.6.

0007 1 Lot Additional Support Hours

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide up to 600 additional hours of support for the Base year. Additional hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the PWS. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and end dates, performance period, and any other details appropriate to implementation additional hours of support. Reference PWS section 3.6.

CLIN 0008

The USG may require the Contractor to perform Temporary Duty assignment (TDY) travel as required in the performance of this PWSSOW and as specified in the requirements to include CONUS and OCONUS travel. The numbers of trips and numbers of personnel traveling shall be limited to the minimum required to accomplish work requirements and shall be coordinated with and approved by the COR/PM in writing prior to departure. The Contractor shall conduct all travel in accordance with FAR 31.205-46, “Travel Costs,” and the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR). The USG will only reimburse allowable costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46 and the current Joint Travel Regulation. The Contractor shall be required to provide travel receipts to the COR as attachments in iRAPT. Reference SOW Section 5.1 for more information.

The USG may require the Contractor to perform Temporary Duty assignment (TDY) travel as required in the performance of this PWS and as specified in the requirements to include CONUS and OCONUS travel. The numbers of trips and numbers of personnel traveling shall be limited to the minimum required to accomplish work requirements and shall be coordinated with and approved by the COR/PM in writing prior to departure. The Contractor shall conduct all travel in accordance with FAR 31.205-46, “Travel Costs,” and the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR). The USG will only reimburse allowable costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46 and the current Joint Travel Regulation. The Contractor shall be required to provide travel receipts to the COR as attachments in iRAPT. Reference PWS Section 5.1 for more information.

CLIN 1001

OPTION DASD A&AS - Position 1

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 1001AA

1001AA 1 Lot OPTION Task 1 - Program Support (Legislative)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.2

CLIN 1002

OPTION DASD A&AS - Position 2

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 1002AA

1002AA 3 Lot OPTION Task 2 - Program Support (Budget)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.3.

CLIN 1003

OPTION DASD A&AS - Position 3

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 1003AA

1003AA 1 Lot OPTION Task 3 - Program Support (Performance)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.4.

CLIN 1004

OPTION DASD A&AS - Position 4

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 1004AA

1004AA 5 Lot OPTION Task 4-Program Support (Policy Support)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.5.

CLIN 1005

CLIN 1006

The contract type has changed from FFP to COST.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The Contractor shall provide up to 600 additional hours of support for the Base year. Additional hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the SOW. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the PWS. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and end dates, performance period, and any other details appropriate to implementation additional

1006 1 Lot OPTION Additional Support Hours

COST

The Contractor shall provide up to 600 additional hours of support for the Base year. Additional hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the PWS. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and end dates, performance period, and any other details appropriate to implementation additional hours of support. Reference PWS section 3.6.

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN 2001

OPTION DASD A&AS - Position 1

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 2001AA

2001AA 1 Lot OPTION Task 1 - Program Support (Legislative)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.2

CLIN 2002

OPTION DASD A&AS - Position 2

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 2002AA

2002AA 3 Lot OPTION Task 2 - Program Support (Budget)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.3.

CLIN 2003

OPTION DASD A&AS - Position 3

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 2003AA

2003AA 1 Lot OPTION Task 3 - Program Support (Performance)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.4.

CLIN 2004

OPTION DASD A&AS - Position 4

FFP-LOE

Program and Policy Support to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for

SUBCLIN 2004AA

2004AA 5 Lot OPTION Task 4-Program Support (Policy Support)

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide support at ODASD (CN&GT) IAW PWS section 3.5.

CLIN 2005

CLIN 2006

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The Contractor shall provide up to 600 additional hours of support for the Base year. Additional hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the SOW. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the PWS. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and

2006 1 Lot OPTION Additional Support Hours

FFP-LOE

The Contractor shall provide up to 600 additional hours of support for the Base year. Additional hours may be required for any of the positions/tasks prescribed in the PWS. Additional support will be pre-coordinated between the USG and Contractor and mutually agreed upon before implementation. This pre-coordination will include discussion of Task(s) supported, start and end dates, performance period, and any other details appropriate to implementation additional hours of support. Reference PWS section 3.6.

CLIN 2007

The USG may require the Contractor to perform Temporary Duty assignment (TDY) travel as required in the performance of this PWSSOW and as specified in the requirements to include CONUS and OCONUS travel. The numbers of trips and numbers of personnel traveling shall be limited to the minimum required to accomplish work requirements and shall be coordinated with and approved by the COR/PM in writing prior to departure. The Contractor shall conduct all travel in accordance with FAR 31.205-46, “Travel Costs,” and the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR). The USG will only reimburse allowable costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46 and the current Joint Travel Regulation. The Contractor shall be required to provide travel receipts to the COR as attachments in iRAPT. Reference SOW Section 5.1 for more information.

The USG may require the Contractor to perform Temporary Duty assignment (TDY) travel as required in the performance of this PWS and as specified in the requirements to include CONUS and OCONUS travel. The numbers of trips and numbers of personnel traveling shall be limited to the minimum required to accomplish work requirements and shall be coordinated with and approved by the COR/PM in writing prior to departure. The Contractor shall conduct all travel in accordance with FAR 31.205-46, “Travel Costs,” and the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR). The USG will only reimburse allowable costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46 and the current Joint Travel Regulation. The Contractor shall be required to provide travel receipts to the COR as attachments in iRAPT. Reference PWS Section 5.1 for more information.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by full text:

5352.209-9000 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCT 2010)

(a) The following restrictions and definitions apply to prevent conflicting roles which may bias the Contractor's judgment or objectivity, or to preclude the Contractor from obtaining an unfair competitive advantage in concurrent or future acquisitions.

(1) Descriptions or definitions:

"Contractor" means the business entity receiving the award of this contract, its parents, affiliates, divisions and subsidiaries.

"Development" means all efforts towards solution of broadly-defined problems. This may encompass research, evaluating technical feasibility, proof of design and test, or engineering of programs not yet approved for acquisition or operation.

"Proprietary Information" means all information designated as proprietary in accordance with law and regulation, and held in confidence or disclosed under restriction to prevent uncontrolled distribution. Examples include limited or restricted data, trade secrets, sensitive financial information, and computer software; and may appear in cost and pricing data or involve classified information.

"System" means the system that is the subject of this contract.

"System Life" means all phases of the system's development, production, or support.

"Systems Engineering" means preparing specifications, identifying and resolving interface problems, developing test requirements, evaluating test data, and supervising design.

"Technical Direction" means developing work statements, determining parameters, directing other Contractors' operations, or resolving technical controversies.

(2) Restrictions: The Contractor shall perform systems engineering and/or technical direction, but will not have overall contractual responsibility for the system's development, integration, assembly and checkout, or production.

The parties recognize that the Contractor shall occupy a highly influential and responsible position in determining the system's basic concepts and supervising their execution by other Contractors. The Contractor's judgment and recommendations must be objective, impartial, and independent. To avoid the prospect of the Contractor's judgment or recommendations being influenced by its own products or capabilities, it is agreed that the Contractor is precluded for the life of the system from award of a DoD contract to supply the system or any of its major components, and from acting as a subcontractor or consultant to a DoD supplier for the system or any of its major components.

5352.209-9001 POTENTIAL ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCT 2010)

(a) There is potential organizational conflict of interest (see FAR Subpart 9.5. Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest) due to services directly related to this acquisition. Accordingly:

(1) Restrictions are needed to ensure that there are no unfair competitive advantages obtain by an offeror.

(2) As a part of the proposal, the offeror shall provide the Contracting Officer with complete information of previous or ongoing work that is in any way associated with the contemplated acquisition.

(b) if award is made to the offeror, the resulting contract may include an organizational conflict of interest limitation applicable to subsequent Government work, at either a prime contract level, at any subcontract tier, or both. During evaluation of proposals, the Government may, after discussions with the offeror and consideration of ways to avoid the conflict of interest, insert a special provision in the resulting contract which shall disqualify the offeror from further consideration for award of future contracts.

(c) The organizational conflict of interest clause included in this solicitation may be modified or deleted during negotiations.

The following have been deleted:

5352.209-9000

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 DASD SETA SPT SOW 24-OCT-2018 Attachment 2 DD254 24-OCT-2018 Attachment 3 DASD SETA Support

Pay Matrix

24-OCT-2018

Attachment 4 GS Pay Scale (Washington D.C. Area)

24-OCT-2018

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 DASD SETA SPT PWS 31-OCT-2018 Attachment 2 DD254 24-OCT-2018 Attachment 3 DASD SETA Support

Pay Matrix

24-OCT-2018

Attachment 4 GS Pay Scale (Washington D.C. Area)

24-OCT-2018

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS

L-1 SPECIAL NOTICE TO OFFERORS

L-1.1 This requirement is solicited as a Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside.

The applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code for this requirement is 541611, Administrative management and general management consulting services. To submit a proposal, offerors shall be registered under the applicable NAICS code.

L-1.2 The exclusive responsibility for Source Selection will reside with the Government. Each individual involved in this acquisition has executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement with ACC AMIC.

L-1.3 Proprietary information submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clearly marked as such and will be protected from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Procurement Policy Act as amended (41 USC 423) (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) as implemented in the FAR. Any unmarked proprietary information will be considered releasable under the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act.

L-1.4 The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

L-2 FORMAL COMMUNICATIONS

Any formal communication such as requests for clarification, discussions, and information concerning this solicitation shall be submitted in writing (by e-mail) to the Contracting Officer (CO), Captain Crystal Champion, at crystal.champion.2@us.af.mil and the Contract Manager (CM), Mr. Delvin Whitlock, at delvin.whitlock.1@us.af.mil.

L-3 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

L-3.1 The offerors’ proposal shall be submitted via email to the CO and CM listed in section L-2. If any proposal submission packages exceeds the Government’s email capability (25MB), all offerors are to submit proposals via AMRDEC SAFE at www.safe.amrdec.army.mil. AMRDEC SAFE e-mail capacity is 2GB. Please note, it is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure the Government receives their proposal.

L-3.2 Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in an unacceptable proposal that the Government eliminates from consideration for award. The Government will not accept changes to Offerors’ proposals after the closing date of this solicitation (see FAR 15.208 for further information regarding late proposals).

L-3.3 Proposals in response to this solicitation will be valid for 90 calendar days. Block 12 of the SF 33 shall be completed to read 90 calendar days.

L-3.4 Contact Information. Offeror shall provide:

L-3.4.1 Names, Companies Cage Code, and DUNS, TIN titles, addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

If a partner arrangement or joint venture is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement as stated above. Joint ventures for SDVOSB are subject to 13 CFR125.15(b) and FAR 19.101, paragraph 7 requirements.

L-3.4.2 Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

L-4 DISPOSITION OF UNSUCCESSFUL PROPOSALS

In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Extra copies of unsuccessful proposals will be destroyed. No destruction certificate will be provided.

L-5 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

L-5.1 The instructions below prescribe the format of proposals and describe the approach for development and presentation of proposed data. Proposals shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions.

Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) will be considered unacceptable.

L-5.2 A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will enable the Government to easily understand and perform a thorough and fair evaluation. The Government may incorporate into this contract, by reference or full text, portions of the successful Offeror’s proposal submitted in response to this solicitation as revised and supplemented through the final proposal revision.

L-5.3 Proposal Format. A complete proposal consists of three (3) separate volumes: Technical, Past Performance, and Price.

L-5.3.1 Page Format. The proposal text shall be printed single-sided versus duplex. Type size for text shall not be smaller than Microsoft Word Times New Roman 10 point font, single column, normal proportional spacing and one inch (1”) margins (top, bottom, left and right). The text for charts, tables, graphs, and figures shall be no smaller than Microsoft Word, Times New Roman or Arial Narrow, 8 point font, and used only when absolutely necessary.

Text lines and table lines of text shall be single-spaced. Page color for each page of the proposal submission shall be white or ivory. Information submitted shall not exceed the pages limits established in L-5.3.3 below.

L-5.3.2 Electronic Copies. Proposal information for each volume shall be submitted as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file using Acrobat Adobe 9.0 or latest version. Offerors shall NOT submit any documents in PDF that are copied as images. Offerors may use JPEG images for charts or screen shots. Volume III Price – Schedule B, Pricing Table, shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel 2003, 2007, or 2010. Offerors shall name files in an unambiguous manner, using plain language text, which facilitates the evaluator’s ease of accessing the files for evaluation, using standard naming conventions (e.g., Offeror Name-Volume Name). Each volume shall be in a single searchable file, with copy/paste capability, and stored in a folder that corresponds to the proposal volume it represents. All charts in the proposal shall be searchable. Offerors shall insert the file name in the header of each document.

L-5.3.3 Organization/Copies/Page Limit. Information submitted shall not exceed the page limits stated below for each volume. Evaluators will only read up to the maximum number of pages specified. If the page limit is exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit will be removed from the applicable volume and will not be considered as part of the evaluation. Copy requirements and page limitations are as follows:

Volume Electronic Copy Page Limit Due Date I – Technical 1 PDF File 15 pages

As indicated in Block 9 of the RFP

II – Past Performance 1 PDF File 8 pages

III – Price 1 PDF File

1 Excel File (Pricing Table)

NONE

L-5.3.4 Cross-Referencing. Offerors shall not cross-reference among volumes. Each volume shall be written as a stand-along document so that its contents may be evaluated without cross-referencing to another volume.

Information included in another volume but not included in the designated volume for proposal evaluation purposes, will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

L-5.3.5 What Counts as a Page. A page shall be an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper. Fold-outs shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be used only where a single 8 ½” x 11” page cannot accommodate a table or other graphic.

Fold-outs shall not exceed (11” x 17”), and shall count as one page. All material shall be contained within the page limit identified for each volume. All appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc., are included in the page count, with exception of items stated in L-5.3.6.

L-5.3.6 Pages Not Included in Page Count. The organizational chart, acronym list, and overview section will not be included in the page count. Covers for volumes, tables of contents, indices, title pages, and section dividers/tables will not be included in the page count if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. They will be counted if they contain any other information, e.g., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

L-6 EXCEPTIONS

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions; therefore, Offerors are advised that taking exception to any requirements specified in this solicitation may result in the Government finding the proposal unacceptable. The Government may consider any included Assumptions as an Offeror taking exception to the Government’s requirements which may result in the Government finding the proposal unacceptable. Clarification of Government requirements shall be handled by submitting questions/recommendations prior to submission of proposals. If Offerors still find it necessary to take exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation (Sections A through M, to include the PWS and all other attachments), clearly identify each exception in the overview section of the appropriate volume along with a complete explanation of why the exception was taken and the resulting benefit to the Government. Exception to solicitation requirements may require the Government to amend the solicitation to reflect a changed requirement. The Government will consider the absence of a stated exception to mean the Offeror takes no exception to the applicable volume and the proposal will be evaluated as submitted.

L-7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME I, TECHNICAL (FACTOR 1)

L-7.1 To facilitate evaluation, the Technical Volume shall be specific, detailed, and complete to clearly and fully demonstrate that Offerors have a thorough understanding of the requirements. Statements that Offerors understand, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced AF publications, etc.); statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof (including applicable AF publications, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used,” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Offerors should note that data submitted prior to the proposal submission will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation;

therefore, such data should not be relied upon or incorporated in the Technical proposal by reference.

L-7.2 Acronym List. Offerors shall provide an acronym list as an attachment within the Technical Volume.

L-7.3 Purpose and Contents. The purpose of this section is to set forth, in the most comprehensive manner, an Offeror’s understanding of the program requirements and to demonstrate an Offeror’s ability to meet the evaluation requirements of Section M, Factor 1, Technical. This section shall present a clear, concise description of how Offerors plan to meet award requirements. This section shall not contain any pricing data. Offerors shall submit a Technical Volume containing the following:

L-7.3.1 Subfactor 1: Staffing/Management Approach.

• Describe how candidates meet the minimum Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities required in the PWS.

• Describe an effective staffing approach to attract, train, recruit, hire, and retain qualified personnel to meet PWS requirements.

• Describe an effective management approach to ensure continuity of services during personnel absences due to sickness, leave, security violations, and voluntary or involuntary termination from employment to avoid disruption of needed services.

• Describe an effective approach to accomplish a phase-in to meet PWS requirements at contract start and include a logical timeline to ensure a smooth start of the contract tasks without interruption or degradation of service levels.

L-7.3.3 Subfactor 2: Mission Understanding.

• The offeror’s proposal describes and demonstrates effective knowledge of DoD’s Planning, Programming, Budget, and Execution System (PPBES) cycles, processes, and the intricacies that are unique to counter narcotics funding.

• The offeror’s proposal describes and demonstrates effective knowledge and understanding of DASD (CN&GT) programs, policies, budget, and mission areas, to fulfill PWS requirements.

L-7.3.4 Subfactor 3: Facility Clearance.

• In order to be considered for award of this contract, interested offerors, including all entities which comprise a joint venture, and the joint venture itself, shall possess a Defense Security Service (DSS) Top Secret facility clearance (FCL), issued in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), DoD 5220.2 at the time of proposal submission.

L-8 INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME II, PAST PERFORMANCE (FACTOR 2)

L-8.1 Contents. Offerors shall submit a Past Performance Volume containing the following:

L-8.1.1 Past Performance Information. Offerors shall provide up to three (3) contract references considered most relevant in demonstrating the ability to perform CN&GT Support Services requirements as described in the PWS. If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past contracts of relevance. The Government will evaluate no more than three (3) contract references for each party of a first time joint effort. Offerors shall submit contract references in accordance with (IAW) the page limitation set forth in the table at L-5.3.3.

L-8.1.1.1 Types of PPI References. Offerors may provide various contracts as PPI references, to include C-type contracts or a single task/call/delivery/purchase order. Offerors may also submit an ID/IQ or Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) as a PPI reference; in these cases, the Government will only assess performance at the ID/IQ or BPA level and not performance on each individual, underlying task/delivery order.

L-8.1.1.2 Recency Determination. Each relevant contract shall have active work/services that was/were performed during the last three (3) years preceding the date of issuance of this solicitation. This includes contracts that were awarded prior to this period, but still had a minimum of six (6) months of active performance during the previous three (3) years. References for contracts with less than 6 months of performance will not be considered.

L-8.1.1.3 Relevancy Determination. Offerors shall submit performance information on contracts they consider relevant to this effort. Offerors shall describe how each reference is relevant in demonstrating the ability to perform the PWS requirements. As applicable, address how the proposed reference provided relates to each of the two (2) technical subfactors shown in paragraph L-7.3/M-3.2.

L-8.1.2 PPI Summary. Offerors shall submit a narrative that provides frank, concise statements regarding the Contractor(s)’ performance on all of the PPI references provided. Offerors shall describe how each reference is relevant in demonstrating the ability to perform CN&GT Support Services IAW PWS requirements and the relevancy definitions at M-3.3.2. The PPI Summary shall meet the page limitation set forth in the table at L-5.3.3.

L-9 INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME III, PRICE (FACTOR 3)

L-9.1 The Price Proposal shall be clear and concise and provide sufficient detail so the Government can ensure the proposed price reflects the work to be performed. Offerors shall complete Schedule B of the RFP and provided a Microsoft Excel Pricing Table. The offerors shall complete Schedule B of the solicitation (Schedule of Supplies and Services (CLINS)) by inserting the price elements (unit price and extended amount) for all contract line item numbers (CLINS), including Transition, Base, and all Option years. For ease of administration, all pricing should be rounded to two (2) decimal places. A Not to Exceed (NTE) CLIN has been pre-established for Travel and Event Coordination Support Cost Reimbursable CLINs. This NTE amount is to be included in the offerors proposal with the application of indirect rates added to the pre-established amounts. Offerors shall not change the pre-established NTE amount for the CLINs.

Offerors shall provide the following per RFP Section B and Pricing Table:

L-9.1.1 Labor Rates. Offerors shall propose loaded labor rates including G&A, overhead, fringe, etc., for each labor category. One rate is required for each labor category for each year of the contract. In addition to offeror compliance with all of the PWS requirements, the Government’s foremost concern is each offer’s ability to meet service summary requirements for retention and turnover of qualified personnel.

L-9.1.2 Indirect Rates. Offerors shall propose indirect rates for the items specified in Section B.

L-9.2 Supporting Price Backup Data. Supporting data is requested and should explain the methodology used in developing proposed labor rates. Offerors should provide support for all indirect rates proposed based on the Offeror’s accounting system and any applicable Forward Pricing Rate Agreements. Offerors should also provide their profit rates. Supporting data shall be submitted in a format selected by the offeror. The Government reserves the right to request additional pricing information after receipt and evaluation of proposals. Certified cost or pricing data may also be required.

L-9.3 Proposal Documentation. Offerors shall provide the following as a separate section contained in the Price Volume and shall be completed as follows:

L-9.3.1 Section A. Complete in its entirety the “Offeror” portion of the Standard Form (SF 33). An official having the authority to contractually bind the company shall sign the SF 33 IAW FAR 4.102. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.

L-9.3.2 Sections C through I. Complete the necessary fill-ins and provide any information requested. The Offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

L-9.3.3 Section K. Complete all required Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors, and provide a copy of information completed in the System for Award Management (SAM) located at https://www.sam.gov.

L-9.3.4 Amendments. Offerors shall acknowledge any and all amendments per the directions on the amendment cover page (Standard Form 30). Failure to acknowledge any amendments to the solicitation may result in the Offeror being deemed nonresponsive. Award CANNOT be made to a nonresponsive Offeror.

L-9.3.5 Exceptions and Deviations. Describe any exception(s) and deviation(s) to the RFP. See paragraph L-6.

L-9.3.6 Adequate Accounting System. Offerors shall provide evidence of an adequate accounting system (certified or compliant) to adequately track, segregate, accumulate and report incurred costs for each CLIN as applicable.

Offerors shall provide the name and address of the cognizant Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and any point(s) of contact in that office if applicable. If an Offeror has never dealt with DCAA, the Offeror shall review the website at www.dcaa.mil and identify the cognizant DCAA office. If DCAA has already determined the Offeror’s accounting system adequate, the Offeror shall provide the referenced DCAA audit report number and date. Offerors shall provide any information that pertains to a recent Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) or DCAA financial capability assessment or any other independent audit showing that the Offeror’s accounting system is adequate for government cost type contracts.

L-10 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Organizational Conflict of Interest: The Contracting Officer has determined that this acquisition may give rise to a potential organizational conflict of interest. Accordingly, prospective Offerors are directed to FAR Subpart 9.5 - Organizational Conflicts of Interest. The restriction is as follow:

(1). If the offeror, through performance of this contract, performs services directly related to this acquisition. The offeror shall be ineligible be to perform work described in this solicitation as the prime. Particularly, the contractors holding contracts identified below are unable submit proposals as prime contractors. This restriction shall remain in effect until after contract award.

FA489016D0001

FA489016D0002

FA489016D0003

FA489016D0004

FA489016D0005

FA489016D0006

FA489016D0007

FA489016D0008

FA489016D0009

FA489016D0010

FA489016D0011

FA489016D0012

FA489016D0013

FA489016D0014

FA489016D0015

L-11 DEBRIEFING OF OFFERORS

Successful or unsuccessful Offerors may request debriefings by providing a written request to the Procuring Contracting Officer. Debriefings shall be conducted IAW FAR 15.505 for pre-award debriefings and FAR 15.506 for post-award debriefings.

L-12 CHANGES RESULTING FROM DISCUSSIONS

In the event any adjustment of price becomes necessary to reflect changes made to technical proposals resulting from discussions, if discussions are held, a complete traceable trail shall be provided to show how the changes took place.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SECTION M

M-1 BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

M-1.1 This competitive best value source selection will be conducted using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process IAW FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, Department of Defense (DoD) Source Selection Procedures effective 31 March 2016, and Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Mandatory Procedures 5315.3, Source Selection dated 25 May 2018.

M-1.2 Award will be made to one Offeror deemed responsible IAW FAR Part 9.1, whose proposals conform to the solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, with the lowest total evaluated prices and with an “Acceptable” rating in all Technical subfactors and an “Acceptable” rating for Past Performance. If an Offeror fails to meet all solicitation requirements, the Government may not make an award to that Offeror.

M-1.3 The Government reserves the right to award without discussions and make award based on initial proposals, but may conduct discussions if the Government determines it is necessary. If it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, the SSA, with CO concurrence, will make a Competitive Range determination, evaluation notices may be issued to Offerors in the competitive range, responses will be requested from applicable Offerors, and discussions will be opened. The competitive range may include proposals rated as “Unacceptable” at the sole discretion of the Government. Offerors should be aware that a complete understanding as to price, technical, and all other terms and conditions of the proposed contract must exist between the Offeror and the Government at the conclusion of discussions.

M-2 FINAL PROPOSAL REVISION

M-2.1 If the Government conducts and concludes discussions, the Government will request a Final Proposal Revision (FPR) from all Offerors remaining in the competitive range once discussions are closed. Formal responses to FPRs will be considered in making the award decision.

M-2.2 Any revision or non-concurrence to contract terms and conditions submitted in the FPR may not be subject to further discussion, and may render the offer unacceptable to the Government. This provision is not intended to restrict the Offeror’s opportunity to revise figures (e.g., prices, discounts, percentages, rates, etc.); rather, it is intended to preclude any misunderstandings by the Government, which could result if new or revised terms and conditions are submitted in the FPR that have not been fully disclosed, discussed and understood during discussions.

Hence, such new or revised terms and conditions are not solicited and, if submitted in the FPR, may render the offer unacceptable to the Government.

M-2.3. If, upon submission of the FPR, an Offeror materially changes its proposal such that the price is no longer fair and reasonable or sufficient to keep them among the lowest priced Offeror, or other factor inputs change their ranking among other Offerors, the Offeror may be removed from consideration for award.

M-3 EVALUATION FACTORS AND METHODOLOGY

Proposals will be evaluated using three (3) evaluation factors:

(1) Technical;

(2) Past Performance; and

(3) Price

M-3.1 Evaluation Methodology.

M-3.1.1 Initial Proposals. The Government will evaluate the minimum number of three (3) proposals for efficiency and to maintain adequate competition, as specified in this section. Upon receipt of the Technical, Past Performance and Price proposals, the Government will:

M-3.1.1.1 Step 1: Rank by Initially Proposed Total Price. The Government intends to rank all proposals by the initially proposed total price, from lowest to highest by strictly reviewing price for mathematical accuracy and completeness. The initially proposed total price includes the sum of all option / performance years. The Total Overall Evaluated Price (TOEP) will consist of the sum of all FFP and CR CLINs, including optional CLINs, for the Phase-In period, base year, all option years, plus the same price of the second option year for the 6-month extension option. Evaluation and determination of the proposed TOEP as fair, reasonable, realistic, and balanced will occur as specified in Step 2 below, paragraph M-3.1.1.2.3, and paragraph M-3.4. The Government intends to establish an initial evaluation pool of the three (3) lowest price proposals. The Government will then evaluate technical proposals of offerors in the initial evaluation pool. Those outside the initial evaluation pool will NOT be evaluated, however, the Government reserves the right to pull in the next lowest priced proposal(s) to ensure adequate competition, if necessary, or if the PCO determines it is in the best interest of the Government.

M-3.1.1.2 Step 2: Factor Evaluations. Upon establishment of the evaluation pool as described above, the Government will evaluate each factor, as follows:

M-3.1.1.2.1 Technical Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the technical proposals of Offerors in the evaluation pool as specified in paragraph M-3.2. If any of the proposals receives any “Unacceptable” ratings, the Government reserves the right to pull in the next lowest priced proposal(s) to ensure adequate competition, or until all proposals are evaluated.

M-3.1.1.2.2 Past Performance Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the past performance of the Offerors in the evaluation pool. Past performance will be evaluated as specified in paragraph M-3.3.

M-3.1.1.2.3 Price Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the price proposals of the Offerors in the evaluation pool. Price proposals will be evaluated as specified in paragraph M-3.4.

M-3.1.2 Award Decision. See M-1.

M-3.2 Factor 1: Technical. The Technical Factor evaluation provides an assessment of each Offeror’s capability to satisfy the Government’s minimum requirements. The Technical Factor consists of two (2) subfactors: (1) Technical/Staffing/Management Approach and (2) Mission Understanding. Technical proposals will be assessed a rating of "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" at the subfactor level IAW Table C-1 of the DoD Source Selection Procedures effective 31 March 2016, as show below:

The Government will not search for data to cure problems or address inconsistencies in an Offeror’s proposal.

Proposals that exceed the evaluation criteria will not receive higher ratings. To be eligible for award, an “Acceptable” rating for all technical subfactors is required. The Government may incorporate into this contract, by reference or full text, portions of the successful Offeror’s proposal submitted in response to this solicitation as revised and supplemented through the final proposal revision. Below are the subfactors:

M-3.2.1 Subfactor 1: Staffing/Management Approach. The offeror’s proposal shall demonstrate the offeror’s ability to organize effectively/efficiently to successfully execute PWS requirements. The proposal shall address the labor categories described within the PWS and decision-making authority levels to include integration of teaming partners into the contractor’s organization.

RATING DESCRIPTION

ACCEPTABLE Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

• Criteria 1: The offeror’s approach describes and effectively demonstrates how candidates meet the Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities required in the PWS.

• Criteria 2: The offeror’s approach describes and effectively demonstrates how the offeror will attract, recruit, hire, train, and retain qualified personnel and shall provide a detailed description of how they will accomplish a phase-in to meet full operational capability on contract start and throughout the life of the contract (ie sick leave, security violations, involuntary dismissals, etc.). The offeror's plan shall also describe and demonstrate an effective approach to hire incumbent personnel or phase-in trained/qualified personnel with the appropriate security clearances required to assume contract tasks and responsibilities Day 1 of the contract.

M-3.2.3 Subfactor 2: Mission Understanding. The offeror shall provide a description of its understanding of the tasks to fulfill PWS requirements. This is not intended to be a technical approach response; however, it should demonstrate the offeror’s understanding of the requirements.

• Criteria 1: The offeror’s proposal describes and demonstrates effective knowledge of DoD’s Planning, Programming, Budget, and Execution System (PPBES) cycles, processes, and the intricacies that are unique to counter narcotics funding.

•…