Consolidated_Industry_QA_as_of_24_May_18.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 48 KB Posted May 24, 2018

Attached to: Sources Sought Notice
Solicitation number: FA4890-18-R-0006
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

From the source

Updated consolidated list of industry Q&A as of 24 May 2018

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
EC-130H_A-10C_Award_Synopsis.doc	DOC document	Nov 14, 2018
Amendment_0003.docx	DOCX document	May 29, 2018
A10_EC130_Final_PWS_Version_06_dated_24_May_18.doc	DOC document	May 24, 2018
Amendment_0002.docx	DOCX document	May 24, 2018
Sign-In_Sheet_from_9_May_18.pdf	PDF	May 14, 2018
EC-130A-10_Pre-Proposal_Conference_Slides_9_May_18.pptx	PPTX presentation	May 14, 2018
Consolidated_Industry_QA_as_of_14_May_18.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	May 14, 2018
Amendment_0001.docx	DOCX document	May 14, 2018
A10_EC130_Final_PWS_Version_05_dated_14_May_18.doc	DOC document	May 14, 2018
Pre-solicitation_Q&A__12_Apr_18.docx	DOCX document	Apr 30, 2018
Solicitation_FA4890-18-R-0006_Synopsis.doc	DOC document	Apr 24, 2018
ATCH_4-Combined_CBA_and_WD_for_DM_C2.pdf	PDF	Apr 24, 2018
Solicitation_FA4890-18-R-0006.docx	DOCX document	Apr 24, 2018
ATCH_5-Combined_CBA_and_WD_for_DM_BGI.pdf	PDF	Apr 24, 2018
ATCH_2-DD_254_EC-130_A-10_Draft_Part_1.pdf	PDF	Apr 24, 2018
ATCH_6-Combined_CBA_and_WD_for_Moody_BGI.pdf	PDF	Apr 24, 2018
ATCH_3-DD_254_EC-130_A-10_Draft_Part_2.pdf	PDF	Apr 24, 2018
ATCH_1-A10_EC130_Final_PWS_Version_04_dated_24_Apr_18.doc	DOC document	Apr 24, 2018
EC-130H_A-10C_Pre-Proposal_Conference_Date_Change.docx	DOCX document	Apr 16, 2018
A10_EC130_PWS_Version_0.2_dated_22_Mar_18_Draft_Final.doc	DOC document	Mar 22, 2018
Pre-Solicitation_Industry_Q_and_A.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 22, 2018
Pre-Solicitation_Industry_Q_and_A_Posted_20_Mar_18.pdf	PDF	Mar 20, 2018
A-10_EC-130_PWS_Version_0.1_5_Mar_18_Draft_Final.doc	DOC document	Mar 20, 2018
Atch_5)_DM_CBA_EC130_A10_Aug_2015.pdf	PDF	Feb 28, 2018
Atch_3)_2015_BGI-DM_Training_Association_Final_CBA.pdf	PDF	Feb 28, 2018
Atch_4)_2015_BGI_Moody_IAMAW_Final_CBA.pdf	PDF	Feb 28, 2018
Atch_1)_A-10_EC-130_PWS_28__Feb_18_Draft_Final.doc	DOC document	Feb 28, 2018
Draft_Solicitation_FA4890-18-R-0006_EC-130H_A-10C.docx	DOCX document	Feb 28, 2018
Atch_2)_Draft_DD254.pdf	PDF	Feb 28, 2018
EC-130H_A-10C_PreSolicitation_Notice.docx	DOCX document	Feb 28, 2018
Draft_A-10_EC-130_PWS_9_Nov_17.doc	DOC document	Nov 15, 2017
Draft_DD254.pdf	PDF	Nov 15, 2017

Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Consolidated Q&A

	#	Date - Question #	Solicitation Ref #	Offeror's Question	Answer
				PRE-SOLICITATION Q&A
	1	3/8/18	PWS para 4.4.19.	Paragraph 4.4.19 requires the Prime to “possess, or acquire prior to release of final solicitation, a facility clearance.” Given the use of the new All Small Business Mentor/Protégé program that could eliminate some credible bidders from the evaluation. In the past this requirement had to be in place by award. Will the Government consider changing this requirement?	Paragraph 4.4.19. Facility Clearance, of Draft PWS Version 0.1, dated 5 Mar 2018 has been changed to read: Facility Clearance. The contractor must possess, or acquire a Top Secret Facility Clearance prior to award.
	2	3/9/18	PWS para 4.4.19.	It will be difficult for SDVOSB concerns that are waiting on FCL approvals from the DSS to compete for this contract. DSS has openly stated they have a significant backlog. Will the government consider changing this
requirement so as to allow for award of the required FCL either at contract start of services or at a minimum contract award date?	Paragraph 4.4.19. Facility Clearance, of Draft PWS Version 0.1, dated 5 Mar 2018 has been changed to read: Facility Clearance. The contractor must possess, or acquire a Top Secret Facility Clearance prior to award.
	3	3/11/18	PWS 1.5.2	Draft PWS 1.5.2 requires submission of an Instructional Systems Development (ISD) Management Plan with the proposal. Under what Technical Subfactor should the ISD Management Plan be included?	The ISDMP is not required as part of the proposal submittal. The final PWS to be issued with the RFP has been updated in several areas and paragraph 1.5.2.1 has been updated to state the following: After contract award, the contractor will submit the ISDMP as a stand-alone document not later than 10 days prior to the start of performance and the TSME and CWSME will review the ISDMP and submit it to the COR for approval.
	4	3/11/18	PWS 1.5.2	Does the ISD Management Plan count against the 75-page limit? If yes, would the government consider increasing the page limit to 100 to accommodate the detail required in the ISD Management Plan?	Not required at time of proposal submittal. The page count will remain at 75 pages.
	5	3/15/18	PWS para 4.4.19.	Will the government consider adjusting this requirement to allow consideration of SDVOSB JVs who will have the required FCL at the start of contract services or, if required, at the contract award date, as I have seen in other similar solicitations.	Paragraph 4.4.19. Facility Clearance, of Draft PWS Version 0.1, dated 5 Mar 2018 has been changed to read: Facility Clearance. The contractor must possess, or acquire a Top Secret Facility Clearance prior to award.
	6	3/20/18	PWS para 4.4.17.	PWS paragraph number 4.4.17 is used twice: Reporting Requirements and again on the Security Manager Appointment paragraph.	Paragraph numbering has been corrected. The Security Manager Appointment paragraph numbering has been changed to read 4.4.23.
	7	3/20/18	PWS para 1.9.14.	Removal of PWS paragraph 1.9.14 Recruitment and Retention Plan: Based on the current Draft RFP, removal of PWS Paragraph 1.9.14 impacts the instructions to Offerors (ITO). The ITO Technical Volume still requires responses as listed in Subfactor A, Aspect III – Recruitment, Training and Retention Plan.	This paragraph has been re-inserted into the PWS.
	8	4/9/18	PWS Page 13, Para 1.7.5.5.8, second sentence.	PWS reference states, “…brief/debrief support links and a brief/debrief program (WEdge), and SLATE (1.7.8) and a central pubs/scenario SharePoint for worldwide A-10C access (1.7.9). However, WEdge and SLATE are discussed in Para 1.7.7 and the SharePoint discussion is in Para 1.7.8. Question: Should the reference be changed to cite Para 1.7.7 and 1.7.8?	Paragraph references have been updated.
	9	4/9/18	PWS Page 18, Para 1.9.14 (2).	PWS reference call for “Training Capability to provide training for new instructor pilot and sensor operators if Government training resources are not available.” These appear to be RPA crew positions. Question: Should the crew positions be changed to “A-10C pilot and EC-130H flight deck and mission crew positions”?	Sentence was changed to read “instructor pilots, flight deck instructors and mission crew instructors…”.
	10	4/9/18	PWS Page 35, Para A1.1, first sentence.	PWS reference states, “This appendix reflects projected Programmed Flying Training (PFT) schedules for Fiscal Years 2014 (FY14) through 2018 (FY18).” Question: Should period of performance be changed to Contract Year 19-23?	Changed to Contract Years 2019 through 2023.
	11	4/9/18	PWS Page 35, Table A1.1, line titled “FD”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “FD” academics?	FD academics are taught by either a pilot, navigator or flight engineer.
	12	4/9/18	PWS Page 35, Table A1.1, line titled “PLT/NAV”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “PLT/NAV” academics?	PLT/NAV academics are taught by either a pilot or navigator.
	13	4/9/18	PWS Page 35, Table A1.1, line titled “PLT/FE”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “PLT/FE” academics?	PLT/FE academics are taught by a pilot or flight engineer.
	14	4/9/18	PWS Page 35, Table A1.1, line titled “FDI TOP OFF”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “FDI TOP OFF” academics?	Pilot, or flight engineer.
	15	4/9/18	PWS Page 35, Table A1.1, line titled “SIM REF”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “SIM REF” academics?	Majority is the Flight Engineer, with a few being taught by a pilot.
	16	4/9/18	PWS Page 36, Table A1.3, line titled “AO/ANO”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “AO/ANO” academics?	Acquisitions Operators or Analysis Operators
	17	4/9/18	PWS Page 36, Table A1.3, line titled “Instructor”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “Instructor” academics?	Majority is taught by a Mission Crew instructor with a few crew position specific being taught by a navigator.
	18	4/9/18	PWS Page 36, Table A1.3, Note 1	States, “Includes Navigator Instructor Upgrade Academics.” Question: What percentage of the “Instructor” academics is devoted to Nav Instructor Upgrade Academics?	12%
	19	4/9/18	PWS Page 37, Table A1.4, line titled “AO/ANO”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “AO/ANO” PTTs?	Acquisitions Operators or Analysis Operators
	20	4/9/18	PWS Page 37, Table A1.4, line titled “Instructor”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “Instructor” PTTs?	Acquisitions Operators, Analysis Operators, Airborne Maintenance Technician, Mission Crew Commander and Navigator
	21	4/9/18	PWS Page 37, Table A1.4, Note 1	States, “Includes Navigator Instructor Upgrade PTTs.” Question: What percentage of the “Instructor” PTTs is devoted to Nav Instructor Upgrade PTTs?	33%
	22	4/9/18	PWS Page 37, Table A1.6, Column F titled “Total Events/FY”	Shows formula “D=BE.” Question: Should formula be changed to “F=BE”?	Formula changed to F=B*E
	23	4/9/18	PWS Page 40, Table A1.12, line titled “MCS/ANO”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “MCS/ANO” CCMCS events?	Acquisitions Operators or Analysis Operators
	24	4/9/18	PWS Page 40, Table A1.12, line titled “MCS/AO”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “MCS/AO” CCMCS events?	Acquisitions Operators or Analysis Operators
	25	4/9/18	PWS Page 41, Table A1.13, line titled “MCS/ANO”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) participate in the “MCS/ANO” CCMCS events? Is there a percentage split between MCS and ANO participation?	Acquisitions Operators, Analysis Operators, Mission Crew Supervisor, Mission Crew Commander
	26	4/9/18	PWS Page 41, Table A1.13, line titled “MCS/AO”	Question: Which crew specialty(ies) participate in the “MCS/AO” CCMCS events? Is there a percentage split between MCS and AO participation?	No, Usually a CCMCS event would include all mission crew positions, not all having a PFT requirement.
	27	4/9/18	PWS Page 41, Table A1.14, line titled “AMT/FE PFT”	Question: Is there a percentage split between AMT and FE flying instructor participation?	50%
	28	4/9/18	PWS Page 41, Table A1.14, line titled “AMT/FE CT”	Question: Is there a percentage split between AMT and FE flying instructor participation?	50%
	29	4/9/18	PWS Page 42, Table A1.17, Column E titled “Total Instructor Hours”	At bottom of chart, “TOTAL” line for this column shows “3852.” Column actually adds up to 3,842 for total instructor hours. Question: Should total be changed to reflect 3,842?	Changed to 3,842.
	30	4/9/18	PWS Page 44, Table A1.20, Column E titled “Total Hours 5% Reteach”	On the first line, titled “PLTIQ,” the calculation result in Column E is shown as “163.9.” However, actual calculation per formula given in Column E is “184.8.” The line total for “PLTIQ” is correct, but the column total in Column E changes from 478.9 to 499.8.	Changed calculation to 184.8.
	31	4/9/18	PWS Page 47, Table A1.27, Column titled “New Lesson Equivalent”	Line titled “ICW/CBT” shows total of “7.00” NLEs. However, actual calculation yields “8.00” NLEs. Question: Should total NLEs be changed to reflect 8.00?	Changed NLE to 8.
	32	4/9/18	PWS Page 47, Para A1.7.5.3, title.	States, “Estimated EC-130H Flight Deck CWD for FY16-FY18.” Question: Should period of performance be changed to Contract Year 19-23?	Changed to Contract Years 19-23
	33	4/9/18	PWS Page 47, Para A1.7.5.3	Reference discussed flight deck courseware development requirements. Question: Could the Government please provide a percentage breakout of CWD among the flight deck crew positions (similar to that provided for mission crew positions in Para 1.7.5.2)?	FD courseware to include system refresher and SIM refresher breaks down approximately as follows: Pilot 32% Navigator 38% Flight Engineer 30 %
	34	4/9/18	PWS Page 49, Para A3.2.1.1	Reference lists Strike Mitigation Plan as a deliverable with the proposal. However, PWS Para 1.2 states, “The contractor shall submit a stand-alone version of this plan during Phase-in, not later than 10 days prior to the start of performance.” Also, the RFP shows no Subfactor/Aspect requiring this plan as part of the proposal submission. Question: Should the Strike Mitigation Plan be moved to Para A3.2.3 to be shown as a Phase-In deliverable?	1.1. Para 1.2. states “The contractor shall submit a stand-alone version of this plan during Phase-in, not later than 10 days prior to the start of performance”. Moved reference to A3.2.3
	35	4/9/18	PWS Page 49, Para A3.2.1.3	Reference lists ISD Management Plan as a deliverable with the proposal. However, Para A3.2.3.1 lists the ISDMP as a Phase-In deliverable. PWS Para 1.5.2, last sentence, states, “This plan shall be submitted with the offeror's proposal.” Finally, the RFP shows no Subfactor/Aspect requiring the ISDMP as part of the proposal submission. Question: Could the Government please clarify when the ISD Management Plan is required to be submitted (with proposal or during Phase-In)?	Para 1.5.2.1. states not more than 30 calendar days after contract award, the contracting officer (CO) and COR will notify the contractor if any modifications are required.
	36	4/9/18	PWS Page 49, Para A3.2.1.4	Reference lists Quality Control Plan as a deliverable with the proposal. PWS Para 1.9.7, first sentence, states, “…the contractor shall provide a Quality Control Plan (QCP) that shall be integral with the ISD Management Plan (refer to para 1.5.2.).” However, the RFP shows no Subfactor/Aspect requiring the Quality Control Plan as part of the proposal submission. Question: Could the Government please clarify when the Quality Control Plan is required to be submitted (with proposal or during Phase-In)?	1.1.1.1. PWS para 1.9.7 states “The contractor shall provide a Quality Control Plan (QCP) that shall be integral with the ISD Management Plan (refer to para 1.5.2.)”. PWS para 1.5.2 states Not more than 30 calendar days after contract award, the contracting officer (CO) and COR will notify the contractor if any modifications are required”.
	37	4/9/18	PWS Page 42, Table A1.14 title	References an optional CLIN for flying instruction; however, RFP shows no optional CLINs for flying instruction. Question: Could the Government please clarify what CLIN will serve to cover flying instruction?	Optional Flying CLIN was inadvertently left off the RFP. The Flying optional CLIN was added to the RFP.
	38	4/9/18	PWS Page 10, Para 1.6.8	Reference discusses A-10C Debrief Support/DOW Program Manager. Question: Could the Government please clarify what CLIN will serve to cover the Brief/Debrief/DOW Program Manager position?	Brief/Debrief/ DOW will be covered under CWD.
	39	4/9/18	Page 120, RFP Section 6, ITO, Para 5.3	Paragraph titled “Pages Not Included in Page Count” lists “…,and Volume I – Technical, Section 1-Prerequisite Documentation will not be included in the page count.” Question: What does the Section 1-Prerequisite Documentation refer to?	Sentence has been changed to read: The organizational chart, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, cross-reference matrix will not be included in the page count.
	40	4/12/18	5352.215-9001 NOTICE OF PRE-BID/PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE	Will the U.S. Government (USG) please provide an SMO code for JPAS to allow Offerors to submit personal pre-registration information for the Pre-Bid/Pre-Proposal Conference?	Offerors can submit conference registration information securly through AMRDEC SAFE at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx
	41	4/12/18	Draft Solicitation FA4890-18-R-006 EC-130H A10C, Section 3 – Schedule of Supplies and Services	Can the USG provide the specific PWS sections that apply to each CLIN?	Appendix 1 provides the workload offerors are to use in development of manpower. Section 4 of the PWS provides the required/desired employee qualifications.
	42	4/12/18	Draft Solicitation FA4890-18-R-006 EC-130H A10C, Section 6.0 – Instructions for Volume I – Technical Capability (Factor I)	Throughout Section 6, the solicitation references PWS Appendix 1 in reference to determining proposed manpower. However, the enclosed PWS Appendix 1 refers to the Technical Factor Cross-Reference Matrix. Can the USG provide the specific PWS Appendix 1 tables that apply to each CLIN in the RFP?	Appendix 1 in Section 6 of the RFP is the Cross-Reference Matrix offerors are to use to explain what section, paragraph, etc., of their proposal relates to the evaluation criteria in Section 7 of the RFP. Appendix 1 in the PWS is the estimated workload offerors are to use in determining their proposed manpower.
	43	4/12/18	2015 BGI-D-M Training Association Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) 2015 BGI-Moody CBA 2015 C2- Davis-Monthan CBA	Existing CBAs list current wage rates only through 10-01-18 (FY19). a. What CBA rates shall be used in cost proposal for BY and OYs 1-4?

b. Should the wage rates be escalated in OYs 1-4, and if yes, at what escalation factor?

a. Offerors shall price their proposals using the FY19 CBA rates for base year and all option years. b. NO – offerors shall not escalate wage rates for non-exempt employees. See response to question (a) above.
44	4/12/18	2015 BGI-D-M Training Association Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) 2015 BGI-Moody CBA 2015 C2- Davis-Monthan CBA	Existing Prime CBAs discuss sick/personal leave. a. Is sick/personal leave completely separate from and in addition to paid vacation? b. If an incumbent prime employee were a “5-15 years of service employee” does that mean that employee is entitled to 35 days of paid days off each year? (10 holidays, 15 days (120 hours) vacation, 10 days sick/personal)? c. In above example 2080 hours in year – 80 hours holiday – 120 hours vacation – 80 hours sick/personal = only 1800 hrs per work year for this FT employee?	Offerors are required by FAR Part 22 and 41 U.S.C. 6707(c) to abide by all wage and fringe benefits within the Collective Bargaining Agreement(s).
45	4/12/18	A10 EC130 Performance Work Statement (PWS) Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Section 1.5.3.10.3, Learning Management System	Will the USG please identify what LMS is currently in use?	The current LMS system is proprietary (contractor built and managed). The information contained on the system is government owned which will be transferred to the awardee prior to performance start.
46	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018 Section 1.5.3.10.1 CBT Courseware Tool	Will the USG please identify what courseware development tool (e.g. DreamWeaver or MS FrontPage) is the current courseware being produced in?	The computers and software are contractor furnished equipment. It is up to each offeror to propose what hardware/software they intend to use.
47	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018 Section 1.7.5.5.10 Academic Datedbase Hardware	Can USG provide an existing incumbent HW list that supports all existing LMS, SLATE, and academic/training datedbase development/maintenance?	Incumbent contractor uses a mixture of COTS/propriety/AF-owned systems to support all LMS, SLATE, and academic/training databases.
48	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018 Section 1.7.7 SLATE Section 1.7.5.5.10 Academic Datedbase Hardware – “All equipment for LMS, SLATE, and academic/training datedbase development/maintenance and use, shall be purchased and maintained by the contractor.” Draft Solicitation FA4890-18-R-006 EC-130H	SLATE tablet labor and SLATE equipment costs are identified under CLINs xx10 and xx11 respectively, but RFP does not appear to include CLINs for LMS and academic/training datedbase. a. Should LMS and Academic/training datedbase labor and equipment cost be included under CLINs XX10 and xx11? Or Should this labor and equipment cost be proposed separately? If separately, what CLIN shall they be included under? b. Can USG provide the required specifications for SLATE and specifically the handheld wireless devices that support SLATE? c. Can USG provide the required specifications for LMS that supports SLATE? d. Can USG provide list of existing LMS hardware and specifications in use and/or required? e. What CLIN shall include contractor cost for the LMS hardware? f. Can USG provide HW specific list and required specifications for all “servers both on and off base in support of the A-10C and EC-130H operations”	a. Specific hardware/software to support both A10 and EC130 operations is at the discretion of the contractor provided it meets the terms of the PWS. - -All equipment/hardware/software is Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE). Contrators are required to submit a list of all proposed CFE as part of the evaluation criteria. All CFE shall be priced as part of the Phase-In costs. - -Offeror will be provided the opportunity to ask questions at the pre-proposal conference. A demonstration of the current LMS will be provided to give offerors a brief overview of the system. b. SLATE is government owned contractor maintained. The labor to support SLATE and reoccuring cost to maintain the SLATE system is to be price separately IAW the RFP. c. The LMS does not support SLATE. d. Incumbent contractor uses a mixture of COTS/propriety/AF-owned systems to support all LMS, SLATE, and academic/training databases. e. All equipment/hardware/software is Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE). Contrators are required to submit a list of all proposed CFE as part of the evaluation criteria. All CFE shall be priced as part of the Phase-In costs and all CFE will be installed and operational on contract start. f. Specific hardware required to support both EC-130/A-10 operations is at the discretion of the contractor, provided it meets the terms of the PWS.
49	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018 Section 1.7.7 SLATE	a. Is the contractor required to purchase and install “commercial grade high speed wireless internet access” or just identify the required level of service to USG for USG purchase and install? b. Can USG provide the existing incumbent specifications and service provided in support of “contractor shall provide commercial grade high-speed wireless internet access at all primary training locations (355 TRS, 357 FS, 47 FS.) and establish/ maintain a main infrastructure of wireless access at 355 TRS with secure dated storage of devices not in use” and/or USG specification requirements?	a. Contractor is required to provide, NOT install, commercial grade high-speed wireless internet access at all primary training locations (355 TRS, 357 FS, 47 FS.) b. Contractor is required to provide, NOT install, commercial grade high-speed wireless internet access at all primary training locations (355 TRS, 357 FS, 47 FS.)
50	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018 Section 1.7.6 Academic Datedbase Software	a. Does this PWS statement “Any software allocated for the Academic Datedbase and bought within the scope of this contract shall be purchased with prior coordination and approval of the CO” indicate this is a cost reimbursable CLIN? b. Should the cost of “software allocated for the Academic Datedbase” be identified in the contractor’s proposal, including the proposed cost of that equipment? c. Can USG provide the required software specifications?	a. All equipment/hardware/software is Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE). Contrators are required to submit a list of all proposed CFE as part of the evaluation criteria. All CFE shall be priced as part of the Phase-In costs and all CFE will be installed and operational on contract start. NO, this is not a cost reimbursable CLIN. All CFE is part Phase-In costs. b. A list of all CFE is to be provided in the proposal to include a cost break out. Please see the evaluation criteria in Section 7 of the RFP. c. NO. The software is at the discretion of the contractor, provided it meets the terms of the PWS.
51	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018 Section 3.4.7 “contractor shall provide the equipment and supplies for printing courseware products to include student guides subsequent to courseware product acceptance.”	Can USG quantify an estimated number of pages of printed courseware per year	Estimated at 125,000 pages per year based on current student throughput.
52	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018 Section 3.5.3 LAN Server – “contractor shall provide the hardware and software equipment including server/s, switch, smart uninterruptible power supply (UPS) and computer equipment as required by the base Communication Squadron (CS) to attach to the base network”.	Should this cost be included with Phase-in costs? (like in PWS 3.2.4, 3.5.1)	Yes. All CFE is to be priced as part of the Phase-In costs.
53	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Section 3.5.4 Contract Flying Instructor Flight Uniform/Equipment – “The contractor will be responsible to purchase all flight uniforms and equipment”.	Should this cost be included with Phase-in costs? (like in PWS 3.2.4, 3.5.1)	Yes.
54	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. The PWS references “Optional CLIN” in approximately 14 different locations, but the RFP does not list any specific Optional CLINs other than the OPTION YEARS.	Will the USG please clarify if “Optional CLIN” refers to OPTION YEAR CLINs?	The draft RFP did not include the Optional CLIN. In the Final RFP, an Optional CLIN has been added to the Base Year and Each Option Year. This Optional CLIN is for the Live Fly Instruction. Contractors are required to price this CLIN as part of their proposal.
55	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Section 1.1 Scope of Work. Draft DD254	The solicitation states: “A phase-in period is planned for 1 Dec 18 – 31 Jan 19;” however, the DD254 identifies contract phase-in 1 Aug – 30 Sept, with contract Period of Performance (PoP) as 1 Oct – 30 Sept 19. Will the USG please clarify the PoP for Phase-In?	The DD254 has been updated to reflect the correct dates.
56	4/12/18	Draft Solicitation FA4890-18-R-006 EC-130H. Section 5.0 Proposal Preparation Instructions	There is a reference to ‘Technical Volume Section 1-Prerequisite Documents’ within the paragraph titled “Pages Not Included in Page Count” but no other reference to Section 1-Prerequisite Documents Will the USG please clarify requirements, if any, for Section 1-Prerequisite Documents?	The reference ‘Technical Volume Section 1-Prerequisite Documents’ has been removed from the RFP.
57	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Table 1.29	Table 1.29 includes a math discrepancy. Total Hours row indicates 9,400; however, if you add the individual hours the total is 9,460. Please clarify.	Table 1.29 was updated with the correct number of hours.
58	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Section 4.2.7.1.1, Required Qualifications	PWS 4.2.7.1.1 Required Qualifications states “Previous EC-130H instructor/evaluator in the SME crew position. Please define “SME crew position”?	A SME crew position is Pilot, Flight Engineer, AO/ANO etc. They must be qualified in that particular position.
59	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Section 4.2.2, Instructor Qualifications. 2015 BGI-D-M Training Association CBA. 2015 BGI-Moody CBA. 2015 C2- Davis-Monthan CBA	PWS 4.2.2 Instructor Qualifications states “instructors shall meet the following requirements according to their specialty” and then goes on to list the different levels of required qualifications according to instructor specialty. However, the existing CBAs list only one type of instructor at each site “Instructor/SME” and includes language addressing “Lead Instructor” pay as required. a. Are all instructors, regardless of PWS required qualifications/specialty, regardless of achieved qualifications/specialty, and regardless of use of those instructors on the PWS/CLIN requirements for which they are qualified, to receive the exact same CBA pay in offeror’s proposal? b. How does USG distinguish between base or lower levels of qualifications vs. higher required qualifications regarding CBA pay structure? c. How does that apply to offeror’s proposal?	a. Instructors are paid IAW the applicable CBA (i.e., the instructors working on the A-10 at Davis-Monthan will be paid IAW that CBA). b. The CBA does not make that distinction. c. Although the PWS distinguishes between the levels of qualifications, the CBA does not; therefore, it does not apply.
60	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. 2015 BGI-D-M Training Association CBA. 2015 BGI-Moody CBA. 2015 C2- Davis-Monthan CBA Article 15, FTU Pay for Instructor SME	For Attachment 3 (2.15 BGI-DM Trainign Association CBA) and Attachment 5 (2015 C2-Davis Monthan CBA), Article 15 states that “all FTU Instructor/SMEs shall receive FTU pay per hour above their standard hourly wage rate as follows…”. There are zero requirements for “FTU Instructor/SMEs” addressed in Appendix 1 Workload Estimates. a. Where in PWS is requirement or qualification listed for FTU Instructor/SME? b. Or are ALL instructor/SMEs considered FTU instructors once they have graduated from the Central Instructor Course? c. For proposal manning purposes, what percentage (or how many total I/SME personnel) of incumbent DM Instructor/SMEs are NOT “FTU Instructor/SMEs”	a/b/c. All instructors at Davis-Monthan (EC-130/A-10) receive the FTU Recognition Pay.
61	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. 2015 BGI-D-M Training Association CBA. 2015 C2- Davis-Monthan CBA	Davis-Monthan CBAs list a labor category and rate of pay for “Courseware Production Specialist”, but PWS does not require this position. a. Please elaborate on function/role of incumbent Courseware Production Specialist, and verify that PWS does not require this position, or that the requirement for this labor category has not been renamed/repackaged under some other required position? b. Is the CBA “Courseware Production Specialist” fulfilling the requirement PWS “CBT Specialist”?	Currently there is no Courseware Production Specialist utilized.
62	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Section 1.9.14, Recruitment and Retention Plan	There does not appear to be any requirement in PWS nor PWS Appendix 1 workload for a separately qualified “sensor operator” instructor. Please verify that paragraph 2 wording “sensor operators” is an error.	That reference has been removed.
63	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Appendix 1, Tables and Positions	Request USG verify following PWS Appendix 1 Tables and Positions support following CLIN requirements: - Table A1.23 “Group/TRS” position = CLIN xx03 A-10C OSS Wing Scheduling DM

- Table A1.23 “FTU” position = CLIN xx04 A-10C FTU Scheduling DM

- Table A1.24 “FTU” position = CLIN xx14 EC-130H FTU Scheduling DM

- Table A1.25 “TRS” position = CLIN xx09 A-10C Registrar Support DM

- Table A1.23 “Group/TRS” position = CLIN xx03 A-10C OSS Wing Scheduling DM: YES - Table A1.23 “FTU” position = CLIN xx04 A-10C FTU Scheduling DM: YES - Table A1.24 “FTU” position = CLIN xx14 EC-130H FTU Scheduling DM: YES - Table A1.25 “TRS” position = CLIN xx09 A-10C Registrar Support DM: YES
64	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Tables A1.23, A1.24, and A1.25	Are any of the positions listed in PWS tables A1.23, A1.24, A1.25 considered “Lead” Schedulers (for CBA Lead Scheduler pay purposes)? If yes, which ones?	The workload tables do not make that distinction.
65	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Table A1.25	a. Since Table A1.25 A-10C Registrar “TRS” position is listed within a PWS section titled “Davis-Monthan AFB Scheduler Workload”, is the TRS position to be proposed at a CBA rate? (note: no CBA listed for Registrar). b. If yes, what CBA rate is to be used for Table A1.25 Registrar “TRS” position?	a. Yes. b. The Registrar position was added on late in the contract performance. The registrar positon is priced at the Scheduler rate.
66	4/12/18	2015 BGI-D-M Training Association CBA. 2015 BGI-Moody CBA. 2015 C2- Davis-Monthan CBA	CBAs list incumbent “Word Processor II” labor category. a. Request USG identify specific requirement, roles, responsibilities that Word Processor II would fulfill? b. If WPII is being used to fulfill a CWD production team role, request USG identify the specific requirements of that role.	a. This is an internal contractor support position. The position is dedicated to supporting this contract only. b. This position does not support CWD.
67	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Attachment 9, Exam Package	Attachment 9 Exam Package states “contractor will prepare and deliver examination questions for each lesson identified in the syllabus as being a testable lesson.” For labor scope purposes, request USG provide syllabus listing total number of “testable lessons” required per each requirement of ILT, ICW, A-10 TDs, EC-130 TDs	Approximately 300 EC-130H lessons and 270 A-10 lessons but can vary based on syllabus changes.
68	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Table 1.1, Training Media Chart	Table 1.1 Training System Media Chart, EC-130H Training Devices documents (Mission Kit, Gradesheets, Mission Scenarios). a. Are all of these documents/deliverables included as part of PWS Attachment 14 “EC-130H WST Scenario Development” requirements? Or are they separate “Lesson Support Document” requirements? b. If they are separate, what PWS Attachment defines the requirements?	a. Yes, they are included in Attachment 14 and this covers the WST (Flight deck sim) and CCMCS (Mission sim). b. N/A
69	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Tables A1.15 and A1.16	Table A1.15 Note and Table A1.16 Note states “Each WST NSE is projected for a workload of 200 hours.” Does this mean that USG has estimated offeror labor for each hour of New Scenario Equivalent at 200 total labor hours per 1.0 hour of WST NSE?	Affirmative
70	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Table 1.1, training System Media Chart	“Support Documents” (for ILT and ICW/CBT) and “Lesson Support Documents” (for A-10C TD and EC-130H TD) are listed as required working document deliverables. For labor scope purposes, request USG define specific requirements of Support Documents and Lesson Support Documents for ILT, ICW, A-10 TD, and EC-130 TD packages.	The lesson supporting documents for both the A-10 and EC-130 training devices would include any document required to accomplish the training task outside of the normal courseware documents (i.e. mission planning forms, charts, maps, FLIP, performance data, weather briefings, etc.) Scenarios may require some or all of the documents to facilitate the desired training outcome.
71	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Table 1.1, training System Media Chart	Student Workbooks/Workbooks/Graphics requirements are not discussed anywhere in PWS. Request USG identify specific Student Workbook (and supporting graphics) requirements and which ILT, ICW, A-10 TD, and EC-130 TD packages they complement.	Student workbooks and associated graphics are maintained through the CWD schedule. The syllabi drives this requirement.
72	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. Table 1.1, training System Media Chart	Table 1.1 Training System Media Chart shows a requirement for A-10C Training Devices (FMT, HOTAS, CFT) and associated deliverables. PWS list requirements for A-10C DM HOTAS Instructor Hours (Table A1.20), but PWS does not appear to list any requirements for New Equivalent nor New Scenario Equivalent in support of A-10C Training Devices (FMT, HOTAS, CFT) deliverables. What PWS Appendix 1 paragraph/table quantifies a development rate or new equivalent hours for A-10C TD (FMT, HOTAS, CFT) media development?	There is no requirement for scenario development for the A-10C. This is accomplished under the New Lesson Equivalent, reference Table A.1.26 (A-10C Annual Requirements Contract Year 19 – 23).
73	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. General Question.	Can USG provide WD for Georgia and Arizona	Yes. The CBA WDs have been attached to each respective CBA and will be issued in the Final RFP.
74	4/12/18	A10 EC130 PWS Version 0.2 dated 22 March 2018. General question	Can the last FY Training Review Panel or Board minutes be made available for review in identifying areas we may be able to develop improvements and efficiencies for?	No. However, contractors are invited to the review board but are not part of the formal process or required to attend. Contractor personnel do not write the syllabi.
75	4/23/18	RFP General Question	Will the Government be providing electronic bidder’s library to include syllabi, PFT, courseware samples, etc.?	No. This is not normally provided for the CAT/CWD contracts.
76	4/23/18	RFP General Question	Question: How many users (accounts) are on the contractor-provided LAN for academic/training database, EGB, LMS, WEdge, etc.?	Approximately 400 students and instructors. Number will fluctuate with FTU manning and student throughput.
77	4/23/18	PWS Para 1.4.1. Academic instruction will include platform training, remedial training and monitoring of computer-based and self-paced instruction periods.	Question - Is there currently some remedial training developed? If not, can we approach the development in a way that we think is best?	This is handled on a case by basis depending on student need. New courseware isn’t required.
78	4/23/18	PWS Appendix 1, section A1.1 General Information. This appendix reflects projected Programmed Flying Training (PFT) schedules for Fiscal Years 2014 (FY14) through 2018 (FY18).	Question: Each of the tables in Appendix 1 lists the estimates for Contract Year 19-23. Please confirm that the data reflected in the tables is for CY 19-23 is correct, and the reference of Section A1.1 should be revised to FY19-FY23.	Table A1.1 has been updated to reflect Contract Year 19-23.
79	4/23/18	PWS Para 1.5.3.3 General Question	Question- Is there a USAF approved Style Guide for new courseware development?	No the PWS defines courseware deliverables that required and follow ISD principles.
80	4/23/18	PWS 1.5.3.4. General Question	Question – Will the Government provide native files for courseware changes/revisions?	No, the incumbent contractor will provide native files.
81	4/23/18	PWS 1.5.3.8. The revised courseware shall be completed by the contractor within 14 calendar days of notification or completed and approved by the CWSME prior to instruction (whichever is later).	Question – Depending on scope (volume) of changes associated with a major change in the MDS -1 series T.O. etc., 14 days is a relatively short time period to have all changes completed and approved. Is there opportunity to extend period of revision when scope warrants longer periods?	Usually changes are minor in nature and 14 days would be the goal, each situation is handled on a case by case basis.
82	4/23/18	PWS 6.4.3.1 . All interactive courseware will be created in an internet-based language (See PWS para 4.6.32.). Programs used to design, develop, run and maintain CBTs will be provided to the government. This includes the exact software packages and user documentation used for production. Also included will be authoring languages, authoring systems, flow diagram generation programs, script storyboard generation programs, graphic and animation generation programs, set up and installation files (explanations) and an index/listing of all files.

	Question – Is the authoring system for CW Government provided or Contractor provided?	Contractor provided.
	83	4/23/18	Table A1.17. DM Academic Instruction Contract Year 19-23	Question – What does the 322.3 figure signify in the Total cell at the bottom?	Administrative error, figure will be removed.
	84	4/23/18	Table A1.20. DM HOTAS Training Contract Year 19-23	Question – Is the hour figure incorrect in PLTIQ 5% Reteach column? Figure should be 184.8 according to formula.	Most recent PWS has correct figure.
				POST SOLICITATION Q&A
	85	4/30/18	Aspect III - Transition Plan, list item c) requests: c) Provides a spreadsheet that clearly depicts all Phase In actions with appropriate start and completion dates which ensures the offeror is prepared on the contract start date.	a) Where is this spreadsheet to be provided? b) Does it count toward the page limit?	a) This is to be provided with the proposal. b) It counts toward the page count.
	86	4/30/18	Section 5.4 Electronic Copies states: “Volume II - Price shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel 2010 or later.” Section 7.0 includes instructions to include a completed Section 3 of the solicitation, 1449, reps and certs, and price backup data - none of these items is a Microsoft Excel file, except potentially the backup data.	Does the Government intend for the entire volume to be submitted in Microsoft Excel?	No, just the supporting price back-up data.
	87	4/30/18	Clarification is required with regard to storage of classified material, which could include SCI level. There are three parts to the DD 254 provided within the RFP. The actual DD 254 and its continuation sheet, Attachment 1 (Security Guidance Addendum to DD 254) and Attachment 2 (Continued) Release of SCE and/or Non-SCI Intelligence Information to DoD Contractors (although it is not clear what Attachment 2 is continued from). Page 3 (Continuation sheet of DD 254) Ref 11a states the government will provide storage capability for all classified information is support of this contract, Ref 11j specifies the contractor will follow base and unit Operations Security guidance. However, Attachment 2 (Continued) paragraph 1f states SCI will be stored, discussed and maintained only in properly accredited SCI facilities (SCIF) at the contractor location…	Please clarify that the awarded contractor does not need to have an accredited SCI facility (SCIF) at the contractor facility (office). Also, please clarify the listing of attachments as referenced in Section 5 List of Attachments as it currently states there are an Attachment 2 and Attachment 3 with regard to the DD 254 whereas there is only the actual DD 254 with a continuation sheet, Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 (Continued), there is no Attachment 3.	DD254 block 11A states “Have access to classified information only at another contractor’s facility or a government activity”. All classified work will be conducted at the government facility. Currently there is no attachment 3 to the DD254.
	88	4/30/18	Section 7.1 of the RFP states: “The offeror shall complete Section 3 of the solicitation” Section 3 is provided in Microsoft Word.	Will the Government be providing a Microsoft Excel format for completion by Offerors?	No, offerors are to complete Section 3 provided in the solicitation.
	89	5/3/18	PWS Section 1.6 page 8 and again on page 19	PWS Section 1.6 page 8 and page 19 references DOW program manager. Can you provide clarification on DOW…is it an organization symbol or an acronym?	DOW: A-10C Debrief Support / DOW Program Manager. Attachment 15 has been updated to include this acronymn.
	9 May 18: Pre-Proposal Conference Questions
	90	5/9/18		Does the Incumbent Contractor do any of the flight instruction or is that a different contract?	The Incumbet Contrator does peform PFT that is accomplished in the WST and CCMCS. Live flight instuction will be included in the proposed PWS as an option al CLIN. Current live fly instruction is performed under a different contract.
	91	5/9/18		What level of difficulty has it been to fill pilot positions?	EC-130H pilot positons have been filled for the duration of the current contract.
	92	5/9/18		What version of SCORM do they use for courseware?	1.2
	93	5/9/18		What version of Moodle are they on for the LMS for C2 Learn?	2.5.1
	94	5/9/18		What is the Electonic Gradebook built with?	ASP 3.0, HTML, Database is Microsoft SQL
	95	5/9/18		Will the EGB get handed over or just the data (i.e., is the program proprietary)?	The EGB is government owned.
	96	5/9/18		Does the EGB interface with the LMS/C2 Learn?	No
	97	5/9/18		Does the EC-130 and A-10 use the same EGB?	Yes
	98	5/9/18		Is SLATE an Air Force Program?	Yes
	99	5/9/18		Is WEDGE and Air Force Program?	Yes
	100	5/9/18		Does WEDGE interact with LMS/C2 Learn?	No
	101	5/9/18		For mission crew positions, do individuals teach specific lessons or can anyone who is "quallified" teach any position.	If the individual instuctor is qualified to teach the lesson crew position doesn't matter, i.e. a FE can teach hydraulics to pilots and a EWO could teach tactics to AO/ANO's.
	102	5/9/18		Can the government provide complete copies of each course syllabi?	No due to releasability restrictions.
	103	5/9/18		What estimated percentage of overall courseware is unclassified?	75% unclassified
	104	5/9/18		Section A1.2 Programmed Flying Time states “contractor shall be responsible for increases in the total estimated workload up to 10% without a contract modification.” Can USG provide historical data (frequency and total % workload increase to contract) for the current 5 year contract so that offeror may estimate possibility of occurrence and impact of 0-10% increase?	During the course of the current contract there has only been one surge in CWD which resulted in no increase manning.
	105	5/9/18		Please clarify which CBA at DMAFB applies to which aircraft?	For the A-10C effort at D-M AFB, the following CBA applies: CBA between BGI, LLC and D-M Training Association. For the EC-130H effort at D-M AFB, the following CBA applies: CBA between C2 Technologies, Inc and the IAMAW. For the A-10C effort at Moody AFB, the following CBA applies: CBA between BGI, LLC and the IAMAW.
	106	5/9/18		So that offerors may have access to the same syllabus information that incumbent has, can USG provide copies of all syllabi associated with Titles listed in Appendix 4 table A4.1?	No due to releasability restrictions.
	107	5/9/18		There are two CBAs for Davis Monthan AFB. These CBAs carry different rates
for labor categories listed therein. Can the Government provide clarification on which crew positions/airframes are governed by each CBA?	For the A-10C effort at D-M AFB, the following CBA applies: CBA between BGI, LLC and D-M Training Association. For the EC-130H effort at D-M AFB, the following CBA applies: CBA between C2 Technologies, Inc and the IAMAW. For the A-10C effort at Moody AFB, the following CBA applies: CBA between BGI, LLC and the IAMAW.
	108	5/9/18		The Database Administrator will provide duties in support of the Student Learning Attack Training Environment (SLATE) program to include, but not limited to: issuing SLATE systems to students, establishing/maintaining secure wireless internet access, maintaining a current publication database, pushing software updates, maintaining a virtual classroom interface and virtual blackboard features, and coordinating repairs/replacements.
Can the Government provide a description of what the SLATE system is comprised of?	Tablets (Microsoft Surface Pro) using HTML 5, C# Server Wifi and associated equipment to support 3 locations
	109	5/9/18

The contractor shall provide A-10C/EC-130H academic/training database. The databases shall provide an internet based LMS/Courseware Management System and EGB that identifies and tracks student progress and deficiencies, tracks mission/task effectiveness, provides graduate critiques and serves as a central location for instructor and student academic/courseware needs.

Can the Government define how current Electronic Grade Books are administered? Does the Government currently use GTIMS to accomplish Training Management requirements for this program?

The EGB is built using ASP 3.0, HTML, Database is Microsoft SQL.

GTIMS is not in use at DMAFB or Moody.

	110	5/9/18	Section 6 – Instructions to Offerors: Aspect III Recruitment, Training and Retention Plan (PWS 1.9.1)
“b) Clearly explains how the offeror will train and certify new personnel and provides a plan for training new instructors if Government training resources are not available.”	Can the Government please provide a list of items classified as “Government training resources”?	US Government Flight Instuctor
	111	5/9/18	A10 EC130 PWS Final Version, dated 24 April 2018 App 1 tables A1.1 – A1.25

Request the USG define the following abbreviations and acronyms that are not defined in Att 15:

- ACUP

-PLT

-MPD

-FD

-TX

-TPS

-PLTIQ

-SOC

Aircraft Commander Upgrade PLT Pilot MPD Mobility Pilot Development FD Flight Deck TX Transition TPS Threat Protection System PLTIQ Pilot Initial Qualification SOC Senior Officer Course

Post Conference Questions
112	5/11/18	PWS Table A1.29	PWS Table A1.29 outlines a number of tasks and at least three separate job titles. Is it the governments\'s expectation that all labor in this table is at the Programmer IV labor category in the CBA? If not, will the DOL WD be provided?	Table A1.29 has been updated. All categories under Table A1.29 fall under the programmer effort.
113	5/11/18	CLINS XX10 SLATE Labor.	CLINS XX10 are labled SLATE Labor. Which PWS workload estimates should be priced against these CLINS? In other words, should labor pricing associated with Table A1.29 be allocated across more than one CLIN?	See Table A1.29 for SLATE workload.
114	5/14/18	A10 EC130 PWS Final Version, dated 24 April 2018 Appendix 1, Table A1.7, line titled “Engine Run CT PTT”	Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “Engine Run CT PTT” events?	Any qualified IOS operator.
115	5/14/18	A10 EC130 PWS Final Version, dated 24 April 2018 Appendix 1, Table A1.8, line titled “PTT”	Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “PTT” events?	Any qualified CCMCS operator.
116	5/14/18	A10 EC130 PWS Final Version, dated 24 April 2018 Appendix 1, Table A1.8, line titled “PFT/CT/DMO”	Which crew specialty(ies) instruct(s) the “PFT/CT/DMO” events?	Any qualified CCMCS operator.
117	5/14/18	A10 EC130 PWS Final Version, dated 24 April 2018, Appendix 1 , Table A1.15, line titled “CCMCS Scenario Development”	Which crew specialty(ies) develop(s) the “CCMCS” scenarios?	All mission crew positions.
118	5/14/18	A10 EC130 PWS Final Version, dated 24 April 2018, Appendix 1 , Table A1.16, line titled “WST Scenario Development”	Which crew specialty(ies) develop(s) the “WST” scenarios?	All flight deck crew specialties.
119	5/14/18	Contractor Furnished Equipment	Would the government please provide a list of current Contractor Furnished Equipment and their allocations by squadron or area?	Contractor furnished equipment is not inventoried by the government. Please reference para 3.5.1 in the PWS for CFE requirements.
120	5/14/18	Multiple Positions	If a SME is qualified in an upgraded position, but was qualified in a non-graded position can he instruct simultaneously both positions?	Under normal circumstances no. For situations such as instructor upgrade the ISME would be responsible for the Instructor upgrade candidate and the unqualified student.
121	5/15/18	A10 EC130 Amendment 001 PWS Final Version, dated 14 May 2018 Appendix 1 , Table A1.29	Amendment 001 has removed USG workload estimates for Database Administrator and Debrief Support/DOW Program Mgr positions. Can USG quantify required workload for these positions?	The Database Administrator will be performing the SLATE duties. The Debrief Support/DOW Program Mgr is still required. The workload for these positions are in Table A1.29.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it.