FA4890-15-R-0019_Qs As.pdf
PDF 337 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Tactical Vehicle Procurement and Training Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4890-15-R-0019
About this file
Questions and answers regarding the solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30_FA4890-15-R-0019-0002.pdf | ||
| Conformed_Copy_Solicitation_FA4890-15-R-0019-0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_Performance_Work_Statement_19_Aug_16.pdf | ||
| FA4890-15-R-0019_Qs As_1Jul_2016.pdf | ||
| REVISION__1_Attachment_1_-_Subfactor_3_Scenario_16Jun16.pdf | ||
| REVISION__1_Attachment_2_-_Performance_Work_Statement_16Jun16.pdf | ||
| REVISION__1_FINAL_RFP_Jeep_J8_16Jun16.pdf | ||
| Jeep_J8_Pre-Proposal_Conference_Participants_16Jun16.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_4_-_PWS_Appendix_D.pdf | ||
| Jeep_J8_Redacted_J A.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_OCONUS_Scenario.pdf | ||
| FINAL_RFP_Jeep_J8_6Jun16.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_-_PWS_Appendix_C.pdf | ||
| Sources_Sought_Notification_11Feb16.docx | DOCX document | |
| Draft_PWS_Jeep_J8_11_Feb_15.docx | DOCX document | |
| Draft_PWS_Jeep_J8_RFI.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA4890-15-R-0019: Questions and Answers
Question
No.
Ref. Question/Comment Government Response
Instruction for Volume
II, Pricing
Factor 2
(page 42)
Instruction for Volume II, Pricing
Factor 2 (page 42) states: The offeror shall complete Schedule B of the solicitation (Schedule of
Supplies and Services (CLINS)) by inserting the price elements (unit price and extended amount) for all
Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract line item numbers (CLINS) for all ordering periods.
Question: Is Schedule B a separate attachment, or are we to create a spreadsheet or just complete pages
3-35 with the unit price and max amount?
The offeror will create a spreadsheet, titled Schedule B, and will complete pages 3-35 with the unit price and max amount.
Page 50 of the RFP
Page 50 of the RFP states: “Place of manufacture” means the place where an end product is assembled out of components, or otherwise made or processed from raw materials into the finished product that is to be provided to the
Government. If a product is disassembled and reassembled, the place of reassembly is not the place of manufacture.
Question: Does the USG have an issue if the “place of Manufacture” is outside the United States but in a friendly country?
No, but the USG needs to know the place of manufacture.
Ref. Question/Comment Government Response
Attachment 1
(OCONUS
Scenario)
Attachment 1 (OCONUS Scenario) states: FOB: Destination.
Question: Should we use the port as the final destination for this scenario or is there a specific location that should be used?
A specific location will be used:
Physical Address of Delivery:
Embajada De Los Estados
Unidos De America
Attn: MILGRP
Avenida Reforma 7-01, Zona 10
Guatemala, Guatemala 01010
Shipment Consignee:
Embajada De Los Estados
Unidos De America
Attn: MILGRP
Avenida Reforma 7-01, Zona 10
Guatemala, Guatemala 01010
Shipment Point of Contact: Mr.
Kevin P. Koob
Page 40 of the RFP
Page 40 of the RFP (pages Not include in Page Count) states: The organizational chart, acronym list, ISO registration verification, and overview section (for exceptions) will not be included in the page count.
Question: Is it acceptable to provide a company overview outside of the page count?
No, a company overview will be included in the page count.
Ref. Question/Comment Government Response
Page 20 of the PWS
The Performance Work Spec
(PWS) on page 20 states: the
Management Plan will be submitted as part of the contract proposal and will be incorporated into the contract. It is also covered in
Deliverable 1’s requirements. This requirement was not covered in the
Instructions for Volume 1, Technical on page 41 of the RFP or the evaluation factors on page 48.
Question: Should the management plan as outlined in the PWS be covered in Subfactor 3 (OCONUS
Scenario) and what will be the criteria for evaluation?
The Government has removed the requirement for a
Management/Staffing Plan
(Deliverable 01) from PWS
Table 2 and Paragraph 7.4.1.
These sections are marked as
“Reserved.” The contractor’s proposal shall address its management and staffing approach used to satisfy PWS requirements under Sub-Factors
1 through 3, as applicable. The
Government will provide a revised PWS in a RFP amendment.
(Deliverable
9) of the
PWS
Page 21 (Deliverable 9) of the PWS states: The Equipment
Composition List will be submitted with the initial proposal. This requirement was not covered in the
Instructions for Volume 1, Technical on page 41 of the RFP or the evaluation factors on page 48.
Question: Should the Equipment
Composition Listing be covered in
Subfactor 2 (MOST), and we would like to clarify what sections of the
Deliverable 9 should be included in the proposal?
The equipment composition list will be evaluated under Factor 2, Price. All three sections of
Deliverable 09, as identified in
PWS, Paragraph 7.4.9 shall be included in the proposal. The
Government revised the PWS, Paragraph 7.4.9 to update
Equipment Composition Listing
(D09) information requirements.
The Equipment Composition
Listing (D09), Sections 1, 2, and
3 will be evaluated as part of
Factor 2, Price; however, the contractor shall use the
Government-provided, not to exceed, plug number to build its total evaluated price.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .