Attachment_6_-_Past_Performance_Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY19-24 Davis-Monthan SABER Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA487719RA017
About this file
This document is a contractor performance questionnaire for a solicitation seeking construction services. The solicitation is for the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements contract to provide repair, sustainment, renovation, and construction services for facilities at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona. Services include carpentry, road repair, roofing, electrical, HVAC, plumbing, sheet metal, painting, demolition, concrete, masonry, and welding with individual task orders ranging from $2,000 to $750,000. Responses to the questionnaire are due to 355 CONS/MSCAC by January 15, 2020 and will be used to evaluate contractors for award of the SABER contract to provide these facility support services at Davis-Monthan AFB between 2020 and 2024.
SOW Attachment 6
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
FY19-24 Davis-Monthan SABER Solicitation has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The below-named contractor is being considered for award of a contract for Solicitation: FA4877-19-R-A007, Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) Contract. The scope of work includes efforts involving repair, sustainment, renovation and/or construction of facilities on Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707.
A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments. Return the completed questionnaire to the following address:
355 CONS/MSCAC
Attn: Mr. Joshua Drawdy 3180 S. Craycroft Road Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707-3522
Please refer any questions to: Mr. Joshua Drawdy at (520) 228-5612 or you may email him at the following address: joshua.drawdy.2@us.af.mil
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Contractor’s Name:_____________________________________________________________ Address:______________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________ Point of Contact: _______________________
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Name: __________________________________ Title: _____________________________
Organization & Address: ________________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________ Fax: ________________ Email: ____________________
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION
Contract Number/Title: __________________________________________________________ Period of Performance: _________________ Dollar Amount of Contract: _________________ Services Performed: ______________________________________________________________________________
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE RATING
A ACCEPTABLE - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
UA UNACCEPTABLE – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE
Please use the above ratings to describe the contractor’s performance in the following areas:
1. HISTORY COMPLETING EFFORTS INVOLVING DESIGN, CARPENTRY, ROAD REPAIR, ROOFING, EXCAVATION, INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL, HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING, PLUMBING, SHEET METAL, PAINTING, DEMOLITION, CONCRETE MASONRY, AND WELDING.
(PRICE RANGE OF $2,000.00 THROUGH $750,000.00)
| a. Contractor had professional and qualified management team |
| A UA N/A |
| b. Contractor provided submittals timely |
| A UA N/A |
| c. Contractor was able to complete project within budget |
| A UA N/A |
| d. Contractor successfully completed construction as designed |
| A UA N/A |
e. Were Contractor change order/equitable adjustment requests reasonable
A UA N/A
| f. Contractor’s overall quality of service |
| A UA N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS
| a. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements. |
| A UA N/A |
| b. Contractor maintained appropriate staffing levels (number/ qualifications) |
| A UA N/A |
| c. Contractor effectively managed materials requirements (i.e., maintained adequate stock levels) |
| A UA N/A |
| d. Contractor effectively oversaw/managed subcontractors |
| A UA N/A |
| e. Contractor’s overall management effectiveness |
| A UA N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. QUALITY OF SERVICE AND WORKMANSHIP
| a. Contractor maintained acceptable standards of workmanship |
| A UA N/A |
| b. Contractor provided acceptable-quality materials |
| A UA N/A |
| c. Contractor’s overall quality of service |
| A UA N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. TIMELINESS/ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULES
| a. Contractor completed scheduled tasks within stated time frames |
| A UA N/A |
| b. Contractor was proactive in keeping you informed of schedule changes if they were going to occur |
| A UA N/A |
| c. Contractor responded to emergency requirements in a timely manner |
| A UA N/A |
| d. Overall contractor timeliness |
| A UA N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. QUALITY CONTROL
| a. Contractor provided an adequate quality control plan |
| A UA N/A |
| b. Contractor adhered to its quality control plan |
| A UA N/A |
| c. Contractor’s quality control resulted in little/no work on your part to achieve acceptable service (i.e.-few failed inspections) |
| A UA N/A |
| d. Contractor documented its quality control checks/corrective actions |
| A UA N/A |
| e. Contractor’s overall quality control |
| A UA N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| a. Contractor maintained a professional working relationship |
| A UA N/A |
| b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in resolving customer complaints |
| A UA N/A |
| c. Contractor was flexible in responding to customer requirements |
| A UA N/A |
| d. Overall customer satisfaction |
| A UA N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL/LABOR/SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
| a. Environmental requirements |
| A UA N/A |
| b. Labor laws |
| A UA N/A |
| c. Workplace safety |
| A UA N/A |
| d. Overall compliance |
| A UA N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. OVERALL PAST PERFORMANCE RATING: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. If a Government contract, did the contractor receive any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices? __________ If yes, please describe:
10. If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this contractor? Please explain response below.
FA4877-13-R-0001
Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .