Atch 5 - PPQ Form WSS 20210921.docx

DOCX document 39 KB Posted

Attached to
WACoE Support Services at Moody AFB Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA483021QS017
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

This document contains a performance evaluation questionnaire for a past or present federal contractor providing Warrior Athlete Center of Excellence Support Services at Moody Air Force Base in Georgia. The services required include personal Exercise Physiologist and Certified Athletic Trainer services as well as non-personal Administrative Assistant services for the 93rd Air Ground Operations Wing. Responses to the questionnaire are due by September 27, 2021 at 2:00 PM Eastern Time and should be emailed to the identified Contracting Specialist and Contracting Officer. The questionnaire contains five sections rating management effectiveness, quality of service and workmanship, manpower efficiencies, quality control, and customer satisfaction on a scale of exceptional to unsatisfactory. Space for additional comments is also provided. Completion of the questionnaire will assist the agency in evaluating a contractor's performance for a potential award.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to WACoE Support Services at Moody AFB, newest first.
File Type Posted
Letter - Amendment 04.pdf PDF
Letter - Amendment 03.pdf PDF
Atch 7 - Contractor Information 20210923.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 20210923.pdf PDF
Letter - Amendment 02.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 20210921.pdf PDF
Atch 7 - Contractor Information 20210921.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 20210916.pdf PDF
Letter - Amendment 01.pdf PDF
Atch 5 - PPQ Form WSS 20210916.docx DOCX document
Atch 2 - PWS WACoE Support Services.pdf PDF
Atch 5 - PPQ Form WSS.docx DOCX document
Atch 7 - Contractor Information.pdf PDF
Atch 8 - AFMS BAA.docx DOCX document
RFQ - WACoE Support Service.pdf PDF
Atch 3 - Pricing Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 4 - WD 2015-4493 Rev 15.pdf PDF
Atch 6 - Insurance Compliance.pdf PDF
Atch 1 - Provisions and Clauses.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA483021QS017

Attachment 5

PRESENT / PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE WACoE SUPPORT SERVICES, MOODY AFB, GA

SOLICITATION NO: FA483021QS017

FORM COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete questionnaire by typing for legibility purposes, and email the results to the Contracting Specialist, SrA Jesseca Edralin at jesseca.edralin.1@us.af.mil and to the Contracting Officer, Gerard Entwisle at gerard.entwisle.2@us.af.mil. Please submit completed questionnaire via email.

Please direct questions to SrA Jesseca Edralin at 229-257-3676 or Gerard Entwisle at 229-257-2509. Your Participation is greatly appreciated.

PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 27 September 2021, at 2:00 PM (Eastern Standard Time)

Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the attached performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated. This survey measures the present/past performance of the prospective Contractor for providing WACoE Support Services at Moody AFB, GA.

Name and Address of Contractor questionnaire is being completed for:

Point of Contact/Email Address/Phone Number:

CAGE Code:

DUNS Number:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Performance Period (base plus any options):

Total Contract Dollar Value:

Description of Services Performed:

Contractor Performed As:

Prime

Subcontractor

Joint Venture Team Member

Is performance on this contract being reported in CPARS:

Yes

No

Name of Agency/Company completing questionnaire:

Name/Title of person completing questionnaire:

Phone number/email of person completing questionnaire:

Date questionnaire is being completed:

RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on pages 2-4.

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
No record exists.
N/A
(Not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.

NOTE: For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.

CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY FOR SERVICES

N/A
Neutral
Unsatisfactory
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Exceptional

1.)Management Effectiveness:

a. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.

b. The Contractor provided qualified personnel in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract requirements.

c. Recruited, placed and retained qualified personnel with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions.

d. The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

e. Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

f. Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Contracting Officer were apprised of any schedule issues.

g. Contractor demonstrated effective management of its subcontractor(s) and or teaming partner as it relates to the contract.

h. Contractor’s overall management effectiveness.

PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS ON LAST PAGE IF RATED ABOVE OR BELOW SATISFACTORY

2.) Quality of Service and Workmanship:

a. Contractor provided professional staff.

b. Contractor maintained quality of staff care.

c. Contractor provided complete and accurate qualifying documentation for contractor personnel in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.

d. Tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

e. Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

g. Contractor promptly notified the COR and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS ON LAST PAGE IF RATED ABOVE OR BELOW SATISFACTORY

3.) Manpower Efficiencies

a. Contractor provided new hires in a timely manner

b. Labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

c. Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract without frequent turnover and minimal operation disruption.

d. Contractor illustrated the capability to manage large workforce at one location (25+ employees)

PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS ON LAST PAGE IF RATED ABOVE OR BELOW SATISFACTORY

4.) Quality Control

a. Contractor provided an adequate quality control plan.

b. Contractor adhered to its quality control plan.

c. Contractor documented its quality control checks/corrective actions.

d. Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

e. Contractor demonstrated ability to adequately address performance problems.

f. Contractor’s overall quality control.

PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS ON LAST PAGE IF RATED ABOVE OR BELOW SATISFACTORY

5.) Customer Satisfaction

a. Services provided adequately met the needs of the program.

b. Contractor was able to perform with minimal direction from the COR or the Contracting Officer.

c. Contractor's reasonableness, cooperation, and commitment to customer satisfaction.

d. I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS ON LAST PAGE IF RATED ABOVE OR BELOW SATISFACTORY

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY:

Would you award this firm another contract? Yes No

If you answered No provide an explanation in the additional comments section

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

________________________________________________________________
SignatureDate

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .