R0006_B729 Parking Lot_Q and A_Answered.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- B729 Parking Lot Improvements, Tyndall AFB, FL
- Solicitation number
- FA481923R0006
About this file
This document provides details for a federal solicitation seeking parking lot improvements at Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida. The opportunity is set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses as a SDVOSB Set-Aside. Offerors must provide all information required by the solicitation by emailing submissions to listed points of contact no later than March 13, 2023 by 2:00 PM CST. A pre-proposal site visit will be held on February 22, 2023 at 0900 at the base visitor's center parking lot. Offerors are limited to two personnel and must RSVP with names by February 14. The work includes design, permitting, and construction services to complete parking lot improvements over a projected 220 calendar day period. The Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question Owner | Question | Answer |
| 325 CES | In Section L, Volume II Qualifications, it states: iv. Designer of Record (DOR) 1. Identify the architectural and/or |
engineering firm that will work on the design, calculations, and drafting of the plans, certify that all construction submittals meet the specifications, and validate, and certify the as-builts.
In the SOW, it states: A. It is assumed that the team will consist of a Construction contractor and paving subcontractor, the design team will consist of a licensed surveyor which will provide initial existing grade verification, then design and construction.
B. The Contractor shall be responsible for all professional services, A/E design, permits, equipment, labor, tools, materials, and ancillary items necessary to complete the tasks defined by the SOW, including the disposal of all resulting waste materials and project clean up.
| Please clarify if we need an A/E or a surveyor for the DOR. | IAW FAR 36.601-4(a)(4), This requirement consists of A/E services, to include surveyor. SOW has been revised/updated. | ||
| 325 CES | Are we required to have a civil engineer stamp the design or will a survey suffice? | The DOR is required to stamp the design. | |
| 325 CES | Can the superintendent Triple hat ( Super-CQC-SSHO)? | Yes, the Superintendant may triple hat and Super, SSHO and CQC provided that person has the required certifications and experience. | |
| 325 CES | How many design submissions are required? |
If only 95% and 100% according to the table of deliverables the project would require at least 120 days for design.
95% 40 days after NTP Government review of 30 days 100% 20 days after review Government Review of 30 days Govt requires at least three design submittals (35%, 95% and 100%). 120 Calendar days for design is acceptable. SOW has been updated.
325 CES General Requirements 1.1 Paragraph B states Duration of 90 days; the table of deliverables says implementation of 100-200 Days. If only 95% and 100% are required, the project would at a minimum be 220 days (120 for design + 100
| for implementation). Please confirm the actual job requirements and duration. | PoP may be increased to 220 days total. SOW has been updated. | ||
| 325 CES | Will Civil CAD drawings be provided to the successful bidder? | Autocad .dwg drawings are not available. Refer to Attachments 3-6 in solicitation. | |
| 325 CES | Does the project scope include raising the existing gas meter? | If the existing gas meter needs to be raised to meet UFC and code, then this should be provided in design. | |
| 325 CES | What is the existing asphalt pavement section? | ||
| Specifically, the subbase material and thickness, base material and thickness, and surface course thickness. | Existing asphalt section is unknown. | ||
| 325 CES | Does the project include raising the grade on the front side of the building facing Suwannee Road? | This project does not include raising grade at the front side of existing Building 729 to Suwannee road. Appendix A 2.0 SOW has been modified to read - "Where soils meets new asphalt, there shall be a swale of constant grade which will direct waters toward Suwannee Road" | |
| 325 CONS | Please confirm past performance will not be a required volume of the proposal | Per Section M, Basis of Award, proposals will be evaluated on Technical (qualifications, technical understanding of requirement, and project schedule) and Pricing. Past Performance is not discussed as basis of award for LPTA. Reference FAR 15.101-2. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .