Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Swiftship Missile Retriever Repower
- Solicitation number
- FA481920R0012
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The United States Air Force at Tyndall AFB is soliciting proposals for a Missile Retriever Repower at the 82nd ATRS Squadron, requiring modifications to marine engines on three missile retrieval vessels. Responses to the past performance questionnaire are due by August 20, 2020 and should be sent to the contracting officers listed, to assist in evaluating the contractor's experience with repowering marine vessels. Specific areas of past performance include cost, schedule, technical performance, warranties, marine repower experience, and knowledge of Detroit Diesel 12V92MTA or Caterpillar C32 engines and 120-foot missile retrieval vessels.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment FA481920R00120002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Missile Retriever Repower Site Visit Attendance Sheet.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers for FA481920R0012.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - Instructions to offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 7 - Past Performance Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Amendment FA481920R00120001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Instructions to offerors Corrected.docx | DOCX document | |
| MR Site Visit Guidelines.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - FA481920R0012.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - DD Form 1423 - CDRLs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Evaluation Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 - Instructions to offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 - Missile Retriever Supplemental Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 - Missile Retriever RePower PWS.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire
The United States Air Force at Tyndall AFB is conducting a Source Selection Request for Proposal. (Name of Your Company) has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Solicitation Number, FA4819-20-R-0012 is for Missile Retriever Repower at the 82nd ATRS Squadron, Tyndall AFB, Florida.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance, and return via email no later than 4:00 P.M Central Standard Time on 20 August 2020 to both Karl Deffert, Karl.Deffert@us.af.mil and Aleatha Walker, Aleatha.Walker@us.af.mil.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contractor Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Telephone Number:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract Number:
Task Order Number:
Type of Contract:
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services:
MAGNITUDE
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value:
COMPLEXITY
Number of FTEs:
Associated Labor Categories:
Facility Type:
Contractor performed on this contract as:
| Prime |
| Subcontractor |
| Teaming Partner |
| Joint Venture |
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Overall Contract Execution
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Cost: Executed the project according to defined budget and/or cost estimates.
Schedule: Completed the project within the defined schedule and their ability to communicate/resolve schedule conflicts.
Performance: Delivered a product/service that met the technical/ performance requirements that were agreed upon.
Warranty: Responded to and executed any warranty claim(s) for a product/service.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Marine Repower Performance
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Performed modifications to a ship/vessel to facilitate a repower.
Performed the removal and/or installation of a marine engine on an existing ship/vessel.
Executed the test and evaluation (sea trials) of a ship during and/or after a repower.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
General Knowledge and Experience
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Demonstrated knowledge and expertise of the Detroit Diesel 12V92MTA, Caterpillar C32, or equivalent marine engines.
Demonstrated knowledge and expertise of a ship/vessel similar to the USAF Swiftships 120ft. Missile Retriever Vessel.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: Date:
Print Name:
Title:
Telephone:
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .