Attachment_10._Asbestos-LBP_Survey_Hgr_300.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Maintain Exterior Paint Bldg. 300 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA466419BA007
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Reserve Command

About this file

Attachment 10. Asbestos-LBP Survey Report dated 12 August 2019

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

On-Site Environmental, Inc.

10022 Dewey Dr, Suite 101. Garden Grove, CA 92840 Ph (714) 920-3833 Fx (714) 530-7108 E-mail jamesmcqcal@aol.com

August 12, 2019 Project No: OSE 2007 Sean Lee Hazardous Materials / Waste Manager 452nd MSG/Civil Engineers US Air Force Reserve Command 610 Meyer Dr., Bldg. 2403 March ARB, CA 92518-2188

Re: Pre‐renovation Lead Exterior Survey Hanger B‐300 March ARB, California.

Dear Mr Lee, On August 8, 2019 California CDPH, and DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant, Robert McQuade (CAC #19‐6486, CDPH P/M 25996) of On‐Site Environmental, Inc. (On‐Site) performed a lead paint inspection of the above location at March ARB, California. The purpose of the inspection was pre‐renovation lead survey to determine the presence of lead in the exterior of Hanger B‐300. During that inspection a suspect asbestos mesh was indentified on the hanger doors and sampled for asbestos.

Summary of Findings:

The following suspect materials were sampled for asbestos: Building 300, March ARB, CA

Material Description

Sample Number

Material Location Material Condition

Estimated Percent Damaged

Approximate Quantity

Percent & Type of Asbestos

Hangar Door Panel Mesh

OSE‐2007‐01 Applied on top of exterior side of hangar door panels.

Damaged 20% 2,400 sf 8% Chrysotile asbestos

Summary of Findings:

The following suspect Paint materials were sampled for lead: Building 300, March ARB, CA

Material Description

Sample Number

Material Location Material Condition

Estimated Percent Damaged

Percentage of Lead.

Lead content (mg/kg =ppm)

Hangar door paint

OSE‐2007‐L‐01 Hangar doors Very Poor 30% 0.025% 250 ppm

White paint OSE‐2007‐L‐02 Paint Patch around door on runway side of building

Good <5% 0.23% 2,300 ppm

Red paint OSE‐2007‐L‐03 On ground concrete around building exterior

Very Poor 50% 6.4% 64,000 ppm

Red Paint OSE‐2007‐L‐04 On hangar door bumpers at ends of hangar door tracks

Poor 20% 18% 180,000 ppm

Attachment 10 to FA466419BA007

1 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019) jamesmcqcal@aol.com

Material Description

Sample Number

Material Location Material Condition

Estimated Percent Damaged

Percentage of Lead.

Lead content (mg/kg =ppm)

Yellow/Black Paint

OSE‐2007‐L‐05 Painted on ground concrete at entrances to the building ( in doorways)

Poor 10% 0.12% 1,200 ppm

Yellow / Green OSE‐2007‐L‐06 Exterior paint on walls and windows

Poor 25% 0.33% 3,300 ppm

Brown Paint OSE‐2007‐L‐07 Door paint from the street side of the building

Poor 20% 5.4% 54,000 ppm

Brown Paint OSE‐2007‐L‐08 Door paint from the runway side of the building.

Poor 20% 3.5% 35,000 ppm

*see attached drawing, Chain of Custody, full Sample result, and Lab Accreditation.

Properties Description The subject property is a single‐story CMU / Concrete hangar. The property is occupied and scheduled for renovations.

At the time of this inspection, the suspect materials were in poor condition.

Scope of Work On August 8, 2019 Robert McQuade (CAC #19‐6486) of On‐Site Environmental, Inc. conducted a lead paint inspection at the subject location. During that inspection a suspect asbestos mesh was identified and sampled on the hanger doors.

The suspect Materials were visually inspected for the purpose of identifying any suspect asbestos or lead containing materials. Once the inventory of suspect materials was created, physical bulk samples were collected of the materials from representative locations. Samples were collected in airtight containers. Upon collection, sample numbers, descriptions, and collection locations were entered on to a chain of custody for transportation to AmeriSci Los Angeles a NVLAP accredited laboratory.

Sample Protocol/Analysis Samples were collected in accordance with the Asbestos School Hazard Emergency Response Act (40 CFR 763 Subpart E) as mandated by Cal/OSHA (Title 8 Section 1529).

The lead paint chip samples were analyzed in accordance with EPA method 3050/7000B.

Physical bulk samples were analyzed by AmeriSci Los Angeles. AmeriSci Los Angeles is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (200346‐0) and CA ELAB 2322 Lab # 100530. The method of asbestos analysis was Polarized Light Microscopy (EPA 600/M4‐82‐020).

Recommendations A). Based upon the sample results, the asbestos containing materials should be removed or stabilized prior to renovation or demolition. These materials should be removed or stabilized by an Asbestos abatement contractor registered with the Division of Occupational Safety and Health and Licensed in the State of California.

B). The lead‐based paint should be removed or stabilized by trained personal.

Disclaimer Destructive sampling was conducted at the subject property. If additional suspect materials are discovered during Demolition or renovation, all work should cease until a Certified Asbestos Consultant is contracted to ascertain the possibility of asbestos content. This inspection was performed in accordance with current regulations and state of the art practices. The inventory of asbestos containing materials and determination of their condition are based upon conditions observed at the time of inspection. On‐Site does not assume responsibility for future regulatory changes or changes in the condition of the building.

2 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019) jamesmcqcal@aol.com

Enclosed is the laboratory analysis report. Please contact our office if there are any questions regarding this inspection.

Sincerely, James McQuade Certified Asbestos Consultant No. 10‐4608

Enclosure attachments:

Laboratory Results, Sample Location Drawing

3 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

4 of 16(Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-01

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-L-01

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-L-02

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-L-03

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-L-04

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-L-05

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-L-06

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-L-07

Robert McQuade Text Box

OSE-2007-L-08

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Line

Robert McQuade Text Box Building 300 Sample Locations

5 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

6 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

7 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

8 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

9 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

10 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

11 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

12 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

13 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

14 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019) tbrul Textbox

15 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

16 of 16 (Amendment 0001, 6 September 2019)

File details come from the government source that posted it.