Attachment12-PPQ.pdf
PDF 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SABER Construction Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4626-14-R-0003
About this file
Attach 12 - PPQ
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule_B.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| KTR-Q-As_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA4626-14-R-0003-0002.pdf | ||
| 14-R-0003-Amend01.pdf | ||
| 14-R-0003_Updated_Amend01.pdf | ||
| KTR-Q-As-Clarification.docx | DOCX document | |
| Historical_Data.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| KTR-Q-As.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment13-Subcontractor_Consent_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment4-MT59.pdf | ||
| Attachment7-MT78.pdf | ||
| Attachment16-SampleInvoice.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment15-Base_Entry.pdf | ||
| Attachment11-MT19.pdf | ||
| Attachment9-MT67.pdf | ||
| Attachment5-MT41.pdf | ||
| Attachment8-MT76.pdf | ||
| Attachment14-EAL.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment2-TechSpecs.pdf | ||
| SABER-14-R-0003.pdf | ||
| Attachment1-SOW.pdf | ||
| Attachment17-SampleAdminDocs.zip | ZIP file | |
| Attachment6-MT32.pdf | ||
| Attachment10-MT80.pdf | ||
| Attachment3-MT63.pdf |
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 12
Solicitation: FA4626-14-R-0003
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________
__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
(The government enters the following information based on list of references provided by the offeror. The offeror will enter this information if the solicitation requires him to submit questionnaires to the references.)
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ________________________________________*
Summary Description:
Electrical:
Mechanical:
Structural:
Civil:
Fire System:
Security System:_
Special Features:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________ _____________________________ Email Address: _____________________
C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
341 CONS/LGCA
ATTN: Jennifer George or Melanie Dewing 7015 Goddard Drive, Bldg 145 Malmstrom AFB, MT 59402
FAX: (406) 731-3748
EMAIL: jennifer.george.3@us.af.mil and melanie.dewing@us.af.mil DUTY PHONE: Jennifer George (406) 731-4647 or Melanie Dewing (406) 731-4354
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E G S M U N
Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets/met contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
mailto:jennifer.george.3@us.af.mil mailto:melanie.dewing@us.af.mil
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E G S M U N
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Followed approved quality control plan.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9. Identified problems as they occurred.
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12. Developed realistic progress schedules.
13. Met established project schedules.
14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15. Was responsive to contract changes.
The contractor: E G S M U N
16. Provided adequate project supervision.
17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
Remarks:______________________________________________________________________
Note: These questions are generic and will likely require some degree of tailoring. Also, when tailoring the form, consider leaving space between questions for comments.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .