Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted Mar 26, 2025

Attached to: FY26 CES Snow Removal Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: FA462025RA905
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Mar 26, 2025

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Snow Removal Services at Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington State. The questionnaire is part of solicitation FA462025RA905, which is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside procurement for snow removal services. The document is designed to collect detailed performance feedback from previous contractors, with evaluation criteria covering areas such as recruitment effectiveness, personnel performance, timeline adherence, professional relationships, and overall contract execution.

The questionnaire must be completed and returned by 25 April 2025 at 1:00 PM Pacific Time, with submissions preferred via email to two Air Force personnel: A1C Valerie Lawrence and TSgt Branden Lawson. Respondents are asked to rate contractor performance on a 5-point scale across 13 different performance categories, including employee knowledge, responsiveness to changes, deficiency correction, and whether the respondent would award another contract to the contractor. The evaluation will help assess prospective offerors' capabilities for providing snow removal services at Fairchild AFB, utilizing NAICS code 561790 with a size standard of $9,000,000.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to FY26 CES Snow Removal, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
25RA905 Amendment 0001.pdf	PDF	Apr 24, 2025
Attachment 5 - Government Responses to RFIs.pdf	PDF	Apr 24, 2025
Attachment 2 - Wage Determination 2015-5537 (Rev. 24).pdf	PDF	Mar 26, 2025
FA462025RA905 Combo.pdf	PDF	Mar 26, 2025
Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf	PDF	Mar 26, 2025
Attachment 3 - Pricing Schedule.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 26, 2025

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES

FAIRCHILD AFB, WA

COLICITATION NO: FA462025RA905

1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the below present/past performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated since this survey will measure the present/past performance of each prospective offeror for providing Snow Removal Services at Fairchild

AFB, WA.

2. INSTRUCTIONS FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand or electronically and email the results to A1C Valerie Lawrence, at valerie.lawrence@us.af.mil and TSgt Branden Lawson at branden.lawson@us.af.mil. Email submissions are preferred but you can also return by mail to the following address:

92 CONS/PKA

Attn: TSgt Branden Lawson 110 W. Ent St Fairchild AFB, WA 99011

3. Please direct questions to TSgt Branden Lawson at (509) 247-2163. Your participation is greatly appreciated.

4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 25 April 2025, at 1:00 PM (Pacific)

Section A: Contractor Information.

Contractor’s name and address:

a. Point of Contact:

b. Phone #:

c. Contract Number:

d. Project Title:

e. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

a. Respondent’s name and address: Organization: _

Address:

City: _ State: _ Zip: _

b. Respondent’s Name and Title:

c. Signature:

d. Commercial Phone #: DSN Phone #:

Fax #: E-Mail:

e. Contract Type (i.e.: Firm Fixed Price):

f. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $

g. What was the job title for this project?

FA462025RA905

Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

1083596917A Highlight

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract?

If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please call TSgt Branden Lawson @ 509-247-2163..

For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.

1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Good Exceptional

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

CONTRACTOR PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. How effective was the contractor’s recruitment plan for filling the required positions and providing replacements for personnel that discontinued employment under this contract?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. How well did contract personnel perform assigned duties?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

3. How well did the contractor meet timelines?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

FA462025RA905

Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

4. Were the contract employees knowledgeable and experienced in their position?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

5. How well did the contractor correct deficiencies and valid customer complaints in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

6. Was the contractor responsive to contract changes?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

7. How effective was the contractor in maintaining professional business relationships with government personnel and in resolving contract issues?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

8. Did the contractor offer competitive pricing on repair items?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

9. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

10. Did contract personnel possess all required licensing and certifications prior to start date? Yes/No ____

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

11. Were Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR) issued, Yes/No ____ Were they addressed appropriately? Yes/No ______ If so, how?

12. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? Yes/No ___

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

13. Would you award another contract to this contractor? Yes/No ____ Please explain in "remarks”.

REMARKS:

Contractors name and address:

Point of Contact:

Phone:

Contract Number:

Project Title:

Period of Performance:

Respondents name and address Organization:

Address:

City:

Respondents Name and Title:

Commercial Phone:

DSN Phone:

Fax:

EMail:

Contract Type ie Firm Fixed Price:

Award Amount:

Final Amount:

What was the job title for this project:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 1:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 2:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 3:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 4:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 5:

replacements for personnel that discontinued employment under this contract:

undefined:

5_2:

2_2:

1_2:

undefined_2:

3 How well did the contractor meet timelines:

5_3:

2_3:

1_3:

undefined_3:

5_4:

2_4:

1_4:

4_2:

3_2:

1_5:

4_3:

3_3:

1_6:

4_4:

3_4:

1_7:

4_5:

3_5:

1_8:

5 1:

5 2:

4_6:

3_6:

1_9:

10 Did contract personnel possess all required licensing and certifications prior to start date YesNo:

11 Were Contract Discrepancy Reports CDR issued YesNo:

Were they addressed appropriately YesNo:

If so how 1:

If so how 2:

13 Would you award another contract to this contractor YesNo:

REMARKS 1:

REMARKS 2:

1_10:

2_5:

1_11:

2_6:

1_12:

2_7:

1_13:

2_8:

1_14:

2_9:

1_15:

2_10:

1_16:

2_11:

1_17:

2_12:

1_18:

2_13:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Mar 26, 2025.