FA4610-17-R-0007-0001.pdf

PDF 114 KB Posted

Attached to
XUMU 16-6131C Renovate Wildland Fire Team Training Center
Solicitation number
FA4610-17-R-0007
Issued by

About this file

FA4610-17-R-0007 Amendment 0001

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

XUMU 16-6131C

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to add CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003 and provision FAR 52.217-4 w hich w ere omitted from the original solicitation.

In addition Section M subsection M-2 paragraph B has been revised to clarify the meaning of overall proposed price w ith regards to the 3 CLINs.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 28-Mar-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA461017R0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Mar-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Mar-2017

CODE

FA4610 - 30TH CONS

1515 ICELAND AVE. (BLDG 8500), RM 150

VANDENBERG AFB CA 93437-5212

FA4610 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA461017R0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0002 is added as follows:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0002 1 Job Construct Additions to Bldg 860

FFP

The contractor shall design and construct additions of Rooms 109-114 and Room

128 to Bldg 860.

FOB: Destination

SIGNAL CODE: A

NET AMT

PSC Code: Z2JZ

CLIN 0003 is added as follows:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0003 1 Job OPTION Construct Vehicle Pad and Canopy

FFP

The contractor shall design and construct a new vehicle canopy to Bldg 860.

FOB: Destination

SIGNAL CODE: A

NET AMT

PSC Code: Z2JZ

SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

The following Acceptance/Inspection Schedule was added for CLIN 0002:

INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

Destination Government Destination Government

The following Acceptance/Inspection Schedule was added for CLIN 0003:

INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

Destination Government Destination Government

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been added by reference:

52.217-4

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS

M-1 SOURCE SELECTION

A. Basis for Contract Award This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal

Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

(AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix A, and Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FARSite, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. The Government will select the proposal with the lowest evaluated price from among those meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors. Contract(s) may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the

FAR Subpart 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and sub-factors, to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

B. Number of Contracts to be Awarded The Government intends to award one contract in response to this solicitation.

C. Discussions The Government intends to award without discussions; therefore, offerors should submit proposals that represent their best efforts. If, during the evaluations, it is determined in the best interest of the Government, the PCO may enter into discussions. A competitive range will be established and Evaluation Notices (ENs) if required, will be transmitted to offerors within the competitive range. Final proposal revisions will then be requested from those offerors and will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal

Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

D. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or sub-factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

E. Evaluation Process The evaluation process to be used is as follows:

Step 1: Perform price evaluations on all responsive proposals and rank them from lowest to highest;

Step 2: Conduct technical evaluations beginning with the lowest priced responsive proposal. If the lowest priced responsive proposal is determined to be technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced responsive proposal will be evaluated. Technical evaluations will continue until the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal is identified. The Government, at its discretion, may continue technical evaluations until the

Contracting Officer determines that a sufficient number of technically acceptable proposals have been identified to permit determination of price fair and reasonable based on adequate price competition.

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. The Government reserves the right to perform both price and technical evaluations on non-responsive offerors to determine if it is in its interest to open discussions. Only those offerors determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

M-2 EVALUATION FACTORS

A. Evaluation Factors and Sub-factors The following evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors or sub-factors.

Factor 1: Price

Factor 2: Technical

Sub-factor 1: Technical and Management Capabilities

Sub-factor 2: Proposed Schedule

B. Price Factor Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable or unbalanced will not be considered for award.

(1) The offeror’s Price proposal will be evaluated by reviewing the overall proposed price (total of CLINs 0001, 0002 and 0003) proposed by the Offeror in Section B. The evaluated price must be determined “reasonable.”

Proposals will then be ranked from lowest overall price to highest.

C. Technical Factor For the purposes of technical evaluation, the term “offeror” will include any proposed teaming arrangements.

The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each sub-factor. Any sub-factor evaluated as

“Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, not eligible for award. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical sub-factors:

Sub-factor 1: Technical and Management Capabilities

Description: This sub-factor evaluates the offeror's management approaches to risk management, logistics, mobilization, safety, quality control, and resolution of potential issues and challenges; the offeror's design approach;

and the offeror's construction approaches to the construction effort.

Standard: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal provides an effective approach to include: (Factor must be met at time of proposal submission) A narrative detailing:

1. A management approach that demonstrates a reasonable and effective approach to accomplish the requirements identified in the Statement of Work to include: risk management, logistics, mobilization, safety, quality control and resolution of potential issues and challenges.

2. A design approach that demonstrates a thorough understanding of the design effort required, including but not limited to, required permits, applicable codes and disciplines, and a list of required drawings.

3. A construction approach that provides evidence of a thorough understanding of the construction effort and environmental compliance required as detailed in the Statement of Work.

Sub-factor 2: Proposed Schedule

Description: This sub-factor evaluates the schedule proposed by the offeror.

Standard: This requirement is met when the offeror submits a schedule that captures all SOW requirements, execution timelines and critical path items. The schedule must demonstrate coordination of the work activities, phasing, and potential weather considerations.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .