Attachment 5 - Past Performance.pdf
PDF 256 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA452825QTA01
About this file
This document is a Past and Present Performance Information Form (PPIF) that is part of a federal contract opportunity. It requests respondents to provide information on their past performance, including details on project scope, contract value, period of performance, and an assessment of the contractor's performance on various criteria using a rating scale. The PPIF is related to Solicitation Number FA452825QTA01 for Hoods and Ducts Cleaning/Inspection at Minot Air Force Base. The solicitation is for a service to clean, inspect, and service exhaust hoods, ducts, filters, and other related equipment at various locations on the base. The PPIF is a standard form used to evaluate a contractor's past performance as part of the source selection process for this federal contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104 WHEN FILLED IN
FA4528-25-Q-TA01
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM (PPIF)
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone :
Email:
Point of Contact:
Submitting Survey as Prime or Sub-Contractor (please circle one) If submitting as Sub-Contractor, Prime Contractors Name:
Address: Email.
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Detailed Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name and Title of Evaluator:
Company Name:
Address: Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
Theodore Arneson EMAIL: theodore.arneson@us.af.mil
DUTY PHONE: (701) 723-3949
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E G S M U N
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E G S M U N
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
The contractor: E G S M U N mailto:theodore.arneson@us.af.mil
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Followed approved quality control plan.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9. Identified problems as they occurred.
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12. Developed realistic progress schedules.
13. Met established project schedules.
14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15. Was responsive to contract changes.
16. Provided adequate project supervision.
17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
24. Is the contractor rated in CCASS? YES/NO
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER
Remarks:
| PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM (PPIF) |
| Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .