JB-MDL_Fieldcraft_Suppport_Questions_20160714.pdf

EOS Fieldcraft Support Q&A

FA4484-16-R-0020

1. Page 5, Paragraph 1.3, PWS dated 07 July 16, states “The USAF EOS is responsible for developing and conducting Air Force Exercise EAGLE FLAG, Fieldcraft Training for the Hostile Environment (FC‐H), Uncertain Environment (FC‐U), and Fieldcraft CENTCOM (FC‐C). However, when asked in Questions 82 if

Eagle Flag support was included under this work, the answer was no. Question: Is Air Force Exercise

Eagle Flag support included under this contract?

Answer: No, paragraph 1.3 is a background paragraph. Reference PWS para. 1.5 for scope of work.

2. Page 6 & Page 9, PWS requires the Site Manager and C‐IED Instructors to have valid Secret and Top

Secret security clearances respectively. Will the DD254 Form be updated to reflect new security clearance requirements for the Site Manager and C‐IED instructors?

Answer: The DD Form 254 will be provided by the security manager after award.

3. Page 10, Question 71 indicates that “Fieldcraft Contingency Response training only requires Role‐ players and OPFOR support”. However, Questions 23, 90b, 90c and 127 indicate that only OPFOR support will be provided for the FC‐CR course. Question: What type of contractor support is actually required for the Fieldcraft Contingency Response Course?

Answer: Only OPFOR support is required for the FC‐CR course. Reference PWS table 2.12.

4. Page 37, Question 189 answer indicates that the contractor will not be allowed to bill the government for medical consumables. However, Paragraph 2.4 of the PWS dated 07 July 16 states that “The government is to provide all consumables used under this contract with the exception of fuel for the

SUV vehicles used to support the High Threat Driving course.” Question: Can the contractor assume that the government will provide all consumables to include medical consumables, less high threat driving vehicle fuel, under this contract?

Answer: Yes, per PWS Para 2.4.

5. RFP, Amendment 1, Page 6 specifies typing for the proposal shall not be less than 12 pitch. As is normal accepted practice, will font of no less than 8 or 9 be acceptable for tables, charts and figures?

Answer: No, see amendment FA4484‐16‐R‐0020‐0004.

6. Will the government consider extending the proposal due date by one week given the volume of answers and changes to the solicitation documents?

Answer: No.

7. Page 31, Question 161 of EOS Fieldcraft Support Q&A directs the contractor to Attachment B of the

PWS for TCCC course student to instructor ratios. However, there are no ratios indicated in the attachment for this course. Can the government provide the student to instructor ratio for the TCCC course?

Answer: Reference PWS table on page 34, 1.4. Instructors/Student Ratio.

*******No futher questions will be accepted***********