A1-2_JB-MDL_EOS_Fieldcraft_PPIQuestionaire_20160406.pdf

FA4484-16-R-0020

EXPEDITIONARY OPERATIONS SSCHOOL

FIELDCRAFT SUPPORT SERVICE

QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

MEMORANDUM FOR <Contractor: Insert Date>

FROM:

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation Number FA4484-16-R-0020

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Contracting Squadron (JB-MDL CONS) is in the process of selecting a contractor for a Fieldcraft requirement. The Fieldcraft requirement consists of providing professional, technically qualified personnel to perform as contingency skills instructors, opposing forces (OPFOR) and role player support personnel for USAF just-in-time (JIT) training courses at the Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst (JB MDL), NJ.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We have referenced your contract number <contractor: Insert contract number> with our company as a candidate for providing past/present performance information. JB-MDL CONS is depending on information received from agencies and companies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with our company, for the evaluation of our performance on the identified contract.

The areas of interest regarding our performance are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. We sincerely request that you please complete the questionnaire and send it directly to the Contracting Officer (Karen Thorngren) for the Fieldcraft solicitation by the date set for receipt of proposals, 08 Jun 16. This schedule will allow JB-MDL CONS sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of discussions, if held.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out either electronically or by hand, or e-mailed to the attention of jose Pacheco jose.pacheco@us.af.mil. If you have any questions, or if receipt of your questionnaire is not acknowledged. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection. Thank you.

<Contractor: Insert your signature block>

Atch:

Present/Past Performance Questionnaire, 2 pgs

UA. GENERAL INFORMATION:U Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work: Fieldcraft. Provides provide professional, technically qualified personnel to perform as contingency skills instructors, opposing forces (OPFOR) and role player support personnel for USAF just-in-time (JIT) training courses at the Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst (JB MDL), NJ.

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

UB. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address: Telephone Number:

Fax Number: Email Address:

UC. FAX/SCAN/EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:U Jose Pacheco at 29TUjose.pacheco@us.af.milU29T.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS.

PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION

(5) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

(4) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

(3) Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory.

(2) Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(1) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(0) Not Applicable Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area is not applicable to the effort assessed.

mailto:jose.pacheco@us.af.mil

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER

Remarks:_____________________________________________________________________________________

The contractor:

1. Provided experienced site manager, instructors, role players and opposing force personnel with the technical expertise and administrative abilities to meet contract mission and contingency skills training requirements.

0 1 2 3 4 5

2. Demonstrated the ability to manage and execute an academic schedule and graduate students on time.

0 1 2 3 4 5

3. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

0 1 2 3 4 5

4. Corrected deficiencies with instructor, role player and opposing forces in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

0 1 2 3 4 5

5. Identified training issues as they occurred and displayed initiative to solve problems with a timely resolution.

0 1 2 3 4 5

6. Proactive with suggestions on overall course improvement. 0 1 2 3 4 5

7. Developed/met realistic progress schedules. 0 1 2 3 4 5

8. Responsive to contract modifications/changes. 0 1 2 3 4 5

9. What rating would the instructor’s professionalism merit? 0 1 2 3 4 5

10. What rating would the contingency skills training merit? 0 1 2 3 4 5

11. What rating would the role player’s merit? (If provided) 0 1 2 3 4 5

12. What rating would the opposing forces merit? (If provided) 0 1 2 3 4 5

13. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

0 1 2 3 4 5

14. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? 0 1 2 3 4 5

15. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES/NO

16. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” YES/NO

17. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO