Atch 8 Past Performance Survey.doc
DOC document 61 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Aircraft Fire Training Facility
- Solicitation number
- FA4479-10-R-0001
About this file
Atch 8 - Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION FA4479-10-R-0001
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE SURVEY
FOR OFFICIAL USED ONLY (When Filled In)
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
| Contract Number: |
| Dollar Amount: |
Contract Period or Dates of Performance:
Type of Contract:
Contractor performed as the FORMCHECKBOX Prime Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Sub-Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Key Personnel.
B.
EVALUTION PERFORMED BY:
Name: _____________________________ Title: _______________________________
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
C. FAX OR EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
Kees Negaard, Contract Specialist kees.negaard@mcchord.af.mil &
Terry Seaverns, Contracting Officer terry.seaverns@mcchord.af.mil Fax: 253-982-5207 D.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2. COMMENTS ARE ALWAYS ENCOURAGED.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Neutral |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
| CONTRACTOR’S NAME: |
| CONTRACT NUMBER: |
Construction Contracts:
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 3. |
| Provided adequate project supervision; Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 5. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements in accordance with Quality Control Plan. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 6. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 8. |
| Identified risks/problems as they occurred ; suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 9. |
| Developed and met realistic/established progress schedules. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 10. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 11. |
| Was responsive to contract changes and provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 12. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 13. |
| Demonstrated ability to obtain performance and payment bonds |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 14. |
| Were design resubmittals required because of poor A-E performance |
| YES |
| NO |
| 15. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES |
| NO |
| 16. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES |
| NO |
| CONTRACTOR’S NAME: |
| CONTRACT NUMBER: |
Remarks:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 FA4479-10-R-0001
ATTACHMENT 8
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .