Attachment_12_-_PPQ.docx

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

1. Prime or Subcontractor for this contract: _________________________

1. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

1. Contract number: ______________________________________

1. Contract type: ______________________________

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________ Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL - During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

FA4452-17-R-0021

Attachment 12

T1. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide both high-level strategic and tactical-level technical geospatial consulting to include Enterprise Architecture consultation and provide Geospatial Program advancement recommendations based on enterprise spatial solutions principles and expertise to DoD entities, including the USAF?

Remarks:

T2. How would you rate the contractor's ability to deliver non-geospatial, niche capabilities? Non-geospatial, niche capabilities may include activities such as formal Business Analyst-performed requirements gathering and synthesis, workshop/conference/event coordination and administration, DoD IT system Certification and Accreditation package development, and DoD IT Portfolio Management including but not limited to Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and Business Enterprise Architecture (BEA).

T3. How would you rate the contractor's capability to providing new, emerging geospatial data collection technologies including UAV/Drone and "street-view”?

T4. How would you rate the contractor's capability to providing new, emerging geospatial data collection technologies including UAV/Drone and "street-view” and managing geospatial data according to formal data standards (for DoD contracts such as SDSFIE)?

T5. How would you rate the contractor's capability performing military geospatial program management and support using experience applying the principles and techniques of Agile Development?

T6. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to provide on-site geospatial program support of all types (managerial, technical, non-technical, etc.) at military installations and their experience supporting USAF GeoBase, USN GeoReadiness, USMC GeoFidelis, and/or Army Installation Geospatial Information and Services programs?

T7. How would you rate the contractor’s capability in designing, implementing, operating, and sustaining U.S. military geospatial information systems residing on USAF or other DoD information networks?

S1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

S2. How effective were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) used by the contractor in accomplishing the effort without Government intervention?

S3. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality and skills of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?

S4. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel?

1. Please discuss every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in remarks section of each of the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire by email to:

E-mail to: pamela.bragg@us.af.mil and brett.barnes.2@us.af.mil