AISS_III_-_RFP_-_Addendum_to_FAR_52.212-1,_Attachment_4_-_PPQ.docx

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

1. Prime or Subcontractor for this contract: _________________________

1. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

1. Contract number: ______________________________________

1. Contract type: ______________________________

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________ Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL - During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

FA4452-17-R-0003

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Attachment 4

T1: How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide Level 3 knowledge of software and systems?

Remarks:

T2: How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide Expertise in Enterprise Support Services which pertains to the tasks and work specific to engineering efforts defined in the PWS?

T3: How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide Mature requirements analysis and tracking processes?

T4: How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide Effective 24/7/365, on-call Level 3 Technical and Engineering Support of production and infrastructure systems as defined in PWS?

T5: How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide Expertise in upgrading, sustainment, and maintenance of the various MAF C2, ITV/Business System environments and infrastructures as defined in PWS?

T6: How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide Expertise exercising and supporting multiple Continuity of Operations Plans as defined in PWS?

T7: 8570 Compliance. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to comply with DODD 8570.01-M?

T8: Quality Control. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to adhere to their proposed Quality Control Plan (QCP) that described the process the firm would use to systematically provide for early identification of non-conforming supplies or services, develop metrics to track performance trends, detail the corrective actions required to ensure timely and acceptable delivery/performance in accordance with the PWS, and detail the partnering approach with the government to ensure mission objectives are met? Did the QCP also comply with ISO 10007?

T9: Testing Plan. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to execute their proposed testing plan that included methodology for reporting test results, managing multiple test activities, assisting in fault isolation, managing dynamic testing schedules for multiple test events, etc?

T10: Training Plan. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to execute their proposed training plan?

T11: Staffing Plan. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to execute their proposed staffing plan? Were there any issues with the personnel they proposed? If so, were they able to adequately resolve issues?

T12: Phase-In. How would you rate the contractor's ability to execute their phase-in plan ensuring the necessary skill sets (as outlined in the staffing approach) were in place prior to full performance start date?

T13: Configuration Management. How would you rate the contractor's ability to execute their Configuration Management Plan (CMP)? Were they able to properly execute their plan IAW their integrated configuration management program?

P1: How would you rate the contractor's expertise in MAF C2, ITV/Business Systems enclave backbone architecture storage and data replication support?

P2: How would you rate the contractor's expertise in MAF C2 ITV/Business Systems program-specific software and hardware hosted on the MAF C2 ITV/Enclave?

P3: How would you rate the contractor's expertise in Training for systems utilized DoD wide to include Classroom, web based, and customized, as well as development of user manuals and CBTs

P4: How would you rate the contractor's expertise in Testing AF systems to include test plans, test reports, and JITC testing?

P5: How would you rate the contractor's expertise in LAN/WAN network communication within TACC, AMC and USTC?

P6: How would you rate the contractor's expertise in Configuration and asset management for multiple networks and systems?

P7: How would you rate the contractor's expertise in Support of DoD/AF Security, accreditation and IA activities?

1. Please discuss every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in remarks section of each of the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire by email to:

E-mail to: john.hofmann@us.af.mil