Q A_22_through_31.pdf

5 February 2016

FA4452‐16‐R‐0004

LOGISTICS INTEGRATION AND WEAPON SYSTEMS LOGISTIC NETWORK (LOGNET) SUPPORT

QUESTION AND ANSWERS

Questions 22 through 31

Q22. Reference RFP Pg. 51 Volume II Past Performance. Can the government confirm that any Attachment 7s and Attachment 8s are not counted against the Volume page limit of 25 pages?

A22. See Amendment 0001 for revised RFP, pg. 48, Paragraph 1.2.1. Attachments 7 and 8 have been added to the list of items that do not count against the Volume page limit.

Q23. The RFP states that the text size shall be no less than 12 point; however, the Past

Performance Information Sheets (Attachment 6) is in 11 point font. Should offerors continue using 11 point font on the Past Performance Information Sheets?

A23. See Amendment 0001 for revised RFP, pg. 47, Paragraph 1.2. Past Performance

Information Sheet, Attachment 6, should be filled out in 12 point. The page limit for the Past

Performance Volume is increased from 25 to 30 pages and pages per reference are increased from 5 to 6.

Q24. Attachment_2_‐_TO_PWS_14_Jan ‐ In Table 4, the Performance Threshold column appears to be misaligned to the Title column in the table. It appears some of them are off by one row. Can the Government please provide an amended table?

A24. See Amendment 0001 for revised Attachment 2, task order 0001 PWS Paragraph 4, Table

4, Services Summary. The title Updated Floor Plans has been removed and the matrix is realigned with correct performance thresholds.

Q25. RFP ‐ Can the Government confirm that the Technical Proposal Checklist is excluded from the 25 page Tech volume limit?

A25. See Amendment 0001, RFP, pg. 48, Paragraph 1.2.1, The Technical Proposal Checklist is not part of the technical volume page limit.

Q26. RFP ‐ FAR 52.222‐41 has been included in the RFP. Will Offerors receive the Wage

Determination schedules associated with the support locations subject to the Services Contract

Act? The schedules are required for Offerors and potential subcontractors to determine applicability.

A26. See Amendment 0001, RFP, FAR 52.222‐41 was inadvertently included. RFP has been changed to uncheck 52.222‐41 from the clause list in FAR 52.212‐5.

Q27. Attachment_2_‐_TO_PWS_14_Jan ‐ Please identify the total number of items offerors will be responsible for supporting under Task 3 ‐ ITEC Support. Items in Table 2 are only a small subset of the items supported today.

A27. IAW TO PWS Paragraph 2.3.2.1, there are two types of accountable equipment that will be tracked. First, there are the sensitive IT assets that are required to track as defined in AFMAN 33‐153 (e.g., laptop, desktop, server, tablet, smartphone, etc.). Second, there are items non‐sensitive IT assets that are tracked (e.g. desktop phones, monitors, non‐network displays, KVMs, etc.) In total, there are currently 2,470 items being tracked for accountability.

See Amendment 0001, task order 0001 PWS, Table 2 has been revised to reflect the non‐ sensitive items.

Q28. RFP ‐ Please verify if the start date for transition period (CLIN 0005) is 21 Sept 2016, within the base period? (On the B‐table, for CLIN 0005, the start date for transition is 21 Aug 2016.)

A28. See Amendment 0001, the ordering period for CLIN 0005 of the over‐arching IDIQ has been revised from “21 September 2016 through 20 August 2021” to “21 August 2016 through 20 August 2021.” Task order 0001 transition‐in period is 21 August 2016 through 20 September 2016.

Q29. RFP – Should the out years for all CLINs x0001 be 12 months? There appears to be a conflict in “4.2.5 Rounding” of the RFP which states “Extended prices MUST be divisible by 11 for base period and 12 for option periods” when the Base and Options have a POP of 11 months.

A29. See Amendment 0001, task order 0001 RFP is revised to correct the Period of Performance for options years to be 21 August 20XX through 20 August 20XX. The correct Period of Performance was reflected on Page 13, Delivery Information.

Q30. RFP – There are multiple labor categories requiring descriptions. To fully address labor category descriptions can be lengthy when there are multiple special skills. Would the Government consider allowing them to be placed in an Appendix to Volume I and outside the 25 page count?

A30. See Amendment 0001, the RFP has been revised to require labor category descriptions be attached to Attachment 5 which has no page limit.

Q31. Task Order PWS – Table 5 calls for CDRL A026 for a Quality Assurance Report. Will the Government please provide CDRL 026?

A31. See Amendment 0001, the task order 0001 PWS page 16 para 3.10 has been revised to remove Quality Assurance Reports. Additionally, the task order 0001 PWS page 18, table 5

CDRL A024 and A026 have been removed and the transition out plan has been renumbered from A025 to A024.