Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 128 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Renovate Travis AFB B977 Air Freight Terminal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA442720R0004
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractors under consideration for a construction contract at Travis Air Force Base in California. The questionnaire requests ratings and narrative responses on a contractor's performance on metrics such as management and supervision, quality control, scheduling, cost proposals, and modifications to fire alarm and sprinkler systems. Respondents are asked to evaluate whether the contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors, delegated proper authority, identified and resolved problems, developed realistic schedules, paid subcontractors on time, and was ever issued a cure notice. The completed survey is to be emailed to the contracting officer by January 16, 2020 to inform the source selection process.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a construction contract at Travis AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact MSgt Marcus Thomas at (707) 424-7736 or marcus.thomas.3@us.af.mil
BRYAN ARMSTRONG
Contracting Officer
1 Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire mailto:marcus.thomas.3@us.af.mil
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _________________________________________________________
Address: _________________________________________________________________
Phone Number: ____________________________________________________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________
Dollar Amount: ____________________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Email Address: ___________________
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
60th Contracting Squadron Attn: MSgt Marcus Thomas marcus.thomas.3@us.af.mil mailto:marcus.thomas.3@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
1 2 3 4 5 Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: 1 2 3 4 5
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
5. Identified problems as they occurred.
6. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
7. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
8. Developed realistic progress schedules.
9. Met established project schedules.
10. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
11. Provided adequate project supervision.
12. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
13. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
14. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
15. Completed projects involving mechanical, electrical and plumbing renovations.
16. Is familiar with Unified Facilities Criteria’s (UFCs) for HVAC, Plumbing and Interior Electrical Systems.
17. Modified fire alarm systems and wet pipe fire sprinkler systems.
The contractor: 1 2 3 4 5
18. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes
☐ No
19. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes
☐ No
| 2020-01-16T08:10:58-0800 | |
| ARMSTRONG.BRYAN.D.1175356637 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .