B-17 - PPQ - as of 15 Dec 09.doc
DOC document 59 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aircraft Corrosion Control Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4427-09-R-0017
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B-17 - Amend 0008 - as of 19 Mar 10.pdf | ||
| A-1 - PWS - as of 19 Mar 2010.pdf | ||
| Q A - as of 19 Mar 2010.pdf | ||
| Amend 0007 - as of 12 Mar 2010.pdf | ||
| B-17 - Amend 0006 - 04 Mar 10.pdf | ||
| A-1 - PWS - 24 Feb 2010.pdf | ||
| B-17 - solicitation - as of 21 Dec 09.pdf | ||
| B-17 - Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| A-1 - PWS - as of 15 Dec 09.pdf | ||
| B-17 - solicitation - as of 21 Dec 09.pdf | ||
| B-17 - PP - as of 10-09-09.pdf | ||
| B-17 - Amend 0005 - as of 15 Dec 09.pdf | ||
| B-17 - Q A - Ltr to Prospective Offerors - as of 18 Dec 09.pdf | ||
| Amend 0004 - as of 12-14-09.pdf | ||
| Amend 0003 - pdf - extending to 15 Dec 09.pdf | ||
| Amend 0002 - pdf.pdf | ||
| Amend 1 pg pdf.pdf | ||
| A-1 - PWS - 21 Apr 09 - as of 10-09-09.pdf | ||
| B-17 - Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| B-17 - Past Performance Questionnaire - as of 10-09-09.pdf | ||
| solicitation - as of 10-09-09.pdf | ||
| B-17 - PP - as of 10-09-09.pdf |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PPT
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO: Whom it May Concern
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Corrosion Control Services contract at Travis AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, contact the Contract Specialist, Bernadette Cruz Breeding, at (707) 424-7734 or bernadette.breeding@travis.af.mil.
CORA L. ARMSTRONG
Contracting Officer
Atch
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
Atch 4
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contractor’s responding to solicitation FA4427-09-R-0017 shall send this Past Performance Questionnaire for their references to fill out.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _____________________ Telephone Number: _____________________________
Address: ______________________________ Fax Number: __________________________________
______________________________ Point of Contact: _______________________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ________________________________________________*
What specific aircraft(s) was included in the performance of the contract and at what wash frequency per year?
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ___________________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________
* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
________________________________ Title: _____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________________________ _____________________________ Fax Number:________________________________________
Email Address: ______________________________________
C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: bernadette.breeding@travis.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Limited or No Confidenc.
| Number |
| Rating |
| Description |
| 1 |
| SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| 2 |
| SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| 3 |
| LIMITED CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| 4 |
| NO |
CONFIDENCE
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
| 5 |
| UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE |
| No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _____________________CONTRACT # ________________________ (Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts.)
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 4. |
| The contractor provided fully certified qualified individuals. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 5. |
| The contractor kept training current and up to date to maintain qualifications for each employee |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6. |
| The contractor provided adequate supplies & equipment to perform services in accordance with the PWS? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 7. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 8. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 9. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 10. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 11. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 12. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 13. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 14. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 15. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 16. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in "remarks." |
| YES |
| NO |
| 17. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in "remarks." |
| YES |
| NO |
| 18. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES |
| NO |
Remarks: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Amendment 0005 Dated: 15 Dec 09
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .