B-17 - Amend 0006 - 04 Mar 10.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATIONIMODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

II.CONTRA~TID CODE I PAGEOF PAGES

1 I 7

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICA nON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISIllON/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 15. PROJECTNO.(lfapplicable)

0006 04-M3r~2010

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA4427 7. ADMINISTERED BY (Ifotherthan item6) CODE I 6J CONSlLGCB See Item 6;l5O HANGARAVE AnN: BERNIEBREEDING 707-424-7734

TRAVISAFBCA 9453&-2632

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, COlmty, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMEND.MENT OF SOLICIT ATION NO.

FA4427 -09-R-0017

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM II)

09-Oct-2009 lOA. MOD. OF CONTRACT /ORDER NO.

lOB. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE IFN~IT.IT y rODE

II. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMEND.MENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

~The abovenurmered solicitation is amended as set furth in Item 14. The hour and date specified fOrreceipt ofOfli:r o is extended, D is not extended.

Ofli:r Il1Ist acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one ofthe fOllowing methods:

(a) By convieting Items 8 and 15, and returning --- copies ofthe amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy ofthe ofli:r submtted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegramwhich includes a refureDce to the solicitation and amendment nurmers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT1O BE RECEIVED ATTHE PLACE DESIGN ATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR 10 THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MA Y RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. Ifby virtue of this amendment you desire to change an oJJer already submitted, such change nuy be nude by tel egram or letter, provided each telegram or letternnkes rei:rence to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DA T A (If required)

13. nils ITEM APPLIES ONL Y TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS'ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT /ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM lOA.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLE.MENT AL AGREE.MENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORT ANT: Contractor D is not, D is required to sign this docwnent and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMEND.MENT !MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter \\here feasible.) , See Page 2

Except as provided herein, all tertrfi and conditions of the docutrent rei:renced in ltem 9A or lOA, as hereto-fDrechanged, rermins unchanged and in full 1Drceand efICct.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL: .

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 03-M3r-2010 (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting OffiCer)

EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

30-105-04 Sf ANDARD FORM 30 (Rev.'1 0-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR(48CFR) 53.243

________________________________ •••••~ ~_.. ••.••• --------- ••:s=_

FA4427-09-R-0017

Page 20f7

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS MAKE CONTRACTUAL CHANGES lAW FAR 15.206(a) TO INCLUDE EXTENDING THE CLOSING DATE DUE; CHANGING THE

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS SPECIFICALLY THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT; AND

UPDATING THE PWS WITH HISTORICAL DATA AND GFP FOR LUBING.

A. The required response date/time has changed from 12 January 2010 04:30 to 16 March 201004:30.

B. SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET The following have been modified: The Instructions to offerors, Amendment 0005, dated 18 December 2009 is hereby replaced with Instructions to offerors, Amendment 0006, dated 04 March 2010 as shown below.

THIS SECTION IS FOR THE SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL BE

PHYSICALLY REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD, BUT WILL BE DEEMED

INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.212-lINSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS

52.212-1 52.215-5

252.209-7001

Instruction to Offerors - Commercial Items Facsimile Proposals

(707) 424-0288 Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of A Terrorist Country lun 2008 Oct 2007

Oct 2006

Addendum to 52.2l2-l(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows: "The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers."

ADDENDUM TO 52.212.1 PROPOSAL PREP ARA TION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts, Part I - Price Proposal- Part II - Technical Proposal, and Part III

- Past Performance Information.

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at anytime during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists offerors may be required to submit information other than cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness.

C. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I - PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit original and one (1) hard copy .

. (a) Complete blocks 12, l7a, and 30a, b, and C of the SF 1449. In doing so the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation, with attachments. The solicitation constitutes the model contract.

(b) Insert proposed unit and extended prices for each item listed in the Pricing Schedule. The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. The proposal(s) must be submitted for the base year plus four (4) Option Years.

Page 3 of7

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ihs and certifications in provisions. The provisions in 52.212-3 and 52.212-7000 shall be returned along with the proposal.

2. PART II --'TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - limited to no more than 10 pages. Submit original plus two (2) hard copies.

(a) Subfactor - Manning. The offeror shall furnish a manning plan for KC-10, C-5, and C-17. Contractor must meet the minimum number of recommended personnel as required in accordance with aircraft TOs. For Wash KC-IO (TO #IClO(K)A-2-12-22-00); C-5 (TO#IC-5A-23), and C-17 (TO #ICI7A-2-12JG-IO-I). For Towing KC-lO (TO #lC-1O(K)A-2-9); C-5 (TO #IC-5A-2-ICL-I); and C-17 (TO #IC-17A-2-09JG-1O-I).

3 . PART III- PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Only references for same or similar type contract desired. Submit original and two (2) hard copies.

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years: Provide information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

(b) Past Performance Surveys: The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Provide a list of no more than five (5), ofthe most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years. Relevant contracts include services for Corrosion Control Services. Relevancy definitions are as follows:

Very Relevant Past/present performance effort involved essentially the same magnitude of effort and complexities for the C-5, KC-IO and C-17 as indicated in the PWS, or equivalent commercial aircraft. .

Relevant Past/present performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities for the C-5, KC-I 0 and C-17 as indicated in the PWS, or equivalent commercial aircraft.

Somewhat Past/present performance effort involved some of the magnitude of effort and complexities Relevant for the C-5, KC-10 and C-17 as indicated in the PWS, or equivalent commercial aircraft.

Not Relevant Past/present performance effort did not involve any ofthe magnitude of effort and complexities for the C-5, KC-I 0 and C-17 as indicated in the PWS, or equivalent commercial aircraft.

A performance confidence rating of "Unknown Confidence" will be assigned if no performance record is identifiable or the offerors performance records is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The evaluation of past performance infonnation will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition.

Furnish the following information for each contract referenced:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance (vii)Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX & telephone number of the contracting officer

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

FA4427-09-R~00 17

Page 4 of7

(x) Comment on how your reference(s) meet the above relevancy defmition.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner . .If this is a first time joint effort, eacr party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts. Note: Each teaming partner will be considered a prime contractor and past performance will be considered jointly.

(c) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor's consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor. .

(d) Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the solicitation (Contract Line Items (CLINs) and Performance Work Statement, and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award

3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in 52.212-1 will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal

4. Format for proposal Parts I, II, and III shall be as follows:

(a) A page is defmed as one face of an 8 liz" x 11" sheet of paper containing information.'

(b) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

(c) Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

5. Past Performance questionnaires.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Submit past performance to Bernadette Cruz Breeding, Contract Specialist, at .

bernadette.breeding@travis.af.mil by 4:30 P.M. (PST) 12 Jan 2010.

INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL: Allowable means oftransmittingldelivering proposals. Hand carried proposals must be delivered to the 60th Contracting Squadron, 350 Hangar Avenue, Building 549, Travis AFB, CA. The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal must be marked "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" and must show the time and date specified for receipt, the Solicitation Number, and the name and address of the offeror.

Offerors are cautioned that Travis AFB, CA, has a visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HAND CARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the 60th Contracting Squadron Offices PRIOR to the time specified for receipt. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) "Late Submission, Modifications, Revisions, and Withdrawals of Proposals."

SITE VISIT NOTICE: An organized site visit has been scheduled for:

Date:

Time:

21 Oct 09 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time mailto:bernadette.breeding@travis.af.mil

FA4427-09-R-00I7

Page 5 of7

Location: 60th Contracting Squadron 350 Hangar Avenue, Building 549 Main Conference Room Travis AFB, CA 94535

Contractor may be required to furnish the following information to obtain access to Travis AFB: Full name, Social Security Number, Date of Birth, Valid Driver's License and consent to background check on TAFB Fm 251. If you intend to participate in the site visit contact Bernadette Cruz Breeding at (707) 424-7734 or via e-mail at bernadette. breeding@travis.af.mil.

FEDERAL HOLIDAYS: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year's Day 1 January Martin Luther King's Birthday Third Monday in January Presidents Day Third Monday in February Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day 4 July Labor Day First Monday in September Columbus Day Second Monday in October Veterans Day II November Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Christmas Day 25 December

JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENTS. Joint Ventures are allowable on competitive 8(a) set-asides, however, the joint venture agreement must be received bySBA prior to proposal due date and approved before award of any resulting contract. If you are contemplating a joint venture on this project, you must advi.se your assigned SBA Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) as soon as possible. It is also recommended that the agreement be submitted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established regulations. Any corrections and/or changes needed can be made only when your BOS has adequate time for a thorough review before the proposal due date. NO

CORRECTIONS AND/OR CHANGES ARE ALLOWED AFTER TIME OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL OR

BIDS.

52.212-2 EVALVA TION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

(a) The government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) TECHNICAL

(2) PRICE

(3) PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance and technical ratings are significantly more important than price when being evaluated.

(b) Options. The government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2:

mailto:breeding@travis.af.mil.

Page 6 of7

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive selection in which competing offerors past and present performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than price. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in clause FAR 52.212-1, Instructions To Offerors, the offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract and all such offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Technical Acceptability. Initially, the government technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on a pass/fail basis, assigning ratings Of Acceptable, Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable, or.Unacceptable. The proposals shall be evaluated against the following subfactor:

(a) Subfactor - Manning. The Government will evaluate offerors to determine if they submitted manning in accordance with technical orders for Wash KC-lO(TO #lCIO(K)A-2-12-22-00); C-5 (TO #lC-5A-23), and C-17 (TO #lC17A-2-12JG-10-1). For Towing KC-10 (TO #lC-1O(K)A-2-9); C-5 (TO #lC-5A-2-1CL-1); and C-17 (TO #IC-17 A-2-09JG-1 0-1). Contractor must furnish the minimum number of recommended personnel in accordance with TOs.

B. Price Evaluation. Next, the government shall rank all technically Acceptable and Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable offers by price, including any option prices if applicable. An offeror's proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the estimated quantities identified in Section B by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number or Subcontract Line Item Number to confIrm the extended amount for each. When applicable, the price evaluation adjustment f9r HUBZone small business concerns will be applied in accordance with FAR 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns, to arrive at an evaluated price. The price evaluation will document reasonableness of the proposed total evaluated price.

C. Performance Confidence Assessment. Using questionnaires, the contracting officer shall seek relevant performance information on all offerors based on (1) the past and present efforts provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other Government and commercial sources;

D. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving Corrosion Control Services that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation, including relevancy .

definitions found at Addendum to 52.212-1, Proposal Preparation Instructions, Paragraph 3(b). The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the government to assess the offeror's ability to perform the effort described in this solicitation, based on the offeror's demonstrated present and past performance. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence as shown below

Ratio!! Descriotioo SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror's perfonnance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfulJV nerfonn the reauired effort.

SATISF ACTORY CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror's perfonnance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfullY oerfonn the required effort.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror's perfonnance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfullY oerfonn the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror's perfonnance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to suo;essfullv nerfonn the reauired effort.

UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE No perfonnance record is identifiable or the offeror's perfonnance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment ratin!! can be reasonablv assilmed. ~

Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will not be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. Offerorswith no relevant past or present performance history or the offeror's performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating "Unknown Confidence," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

Page 7 of.7

E. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

F. Ifthe lowest priced technically acceptable offeror is judged to have a Substantial Confidence performance assessment, that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point.

Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

G. If the lowest priced technically acceptable offeror is judged to have other than a Substantial Confidence performance assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until a technically acceptable offeror is judged to have a "Substantial Confidence" performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

H. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to offerors. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects oftheir proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

I. The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest

C. The Performance Work Statement (PWS) dated 15 December 2009, is hereby replaced with the PWS dated 24 February 2010.

The PWS updates the workload history for FY 09 & the 151 quarter of FY 10 at Section E, pages 24- 26 and add provisions to Appendix 3, Government Furnished Property, for Grease and Oil, Page 31.

EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PA.GES DATE

Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement 32 24 Feb 2010 Attachment 2 Wage Determination No. 2005-2069 (Rev. 8) 10 26 Mav2009 Attachment 3 Performance Plan 22 . 21 Apr 2009 Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire 3 15 Dec 2009

****NOTE: The performance Plan is provided as an attachment to the solicitation for informational purposes only.

It is an evolving document and is not a contractual document and will be removed from resultant award.

D. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Type OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Total

C-5

TOW 3 4 2 4 5 5 3 5 4 4 5 4 48

PRE 3 4 2 4 5 5 3 5 4 4 5 4 48

WS-I 3 4 2 4 5 5 3 5 .4 4 5 4 48

WS-2 3 4 2 4 5 5 3 5 4 4 5 4 48

WS-3 3 4 2 4 5 5 3 5 4 4 5 4 48

POST 3 4 2 4 5 5 3 5 4 4 5 4 48

FS-I II 10 5 2 .1 8 7 5 2 5 9 10 75

FS-2 I O. 0 0 0 I 1 0 0 1 2 1 7

FS-4 29 27 17 19 17 25 26 30 25 30 22 25 292

FS-5 28 26 13 17 18 19 20 25 24 27 20 24 261

FS-6 25 23 19 13 12 19 22 23 21 30 16 21 244

eS-1 302 165 155 236 163 231 170 174 150 194 161 221 2322

LUBE 3 4 2 4 5 5 3 5 4 4 5 4 48

I Table E12. C-5 Historical Data FY09 Actual Workload

Type OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Total

KC-I0

TOW 4 5 3 4 2 1 3 5 3 2 4 2 38

PRE 4 5 3 4 2 1 3 5 3 2 4 2 38

WS-l 4 5 3 4 1 1 3 5 3 2 4 2 38

WS-3 4 5 3 4 2 1 3 6 3 2 4 2 38

POST 4 5 3 4 2 1 3 5 0 2 4 2 35

FS-l 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 6

FS-2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 4

FS-3 2 6 2 0 2 0 4 2 0 4 4 1 27

FS-4A 2 6 2 0 2 0 6 2 0 4 4 1 27

FS-4B 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

FS-5 1 6 2 0 2 0 3 2 0 4 4 1 25

FS"6 1 2 2 0 2 0 3 2 0 4 4 1 21

CS-I 25 21 4 9 15 32 41 50 26 43 50 54 370

LUBE 4 5 3 4 2 1 3 5 3 2 4 2 38

.1 Table E13. KC-IO Historical Data FY09 Actual Workload

Type OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Total C-17

TOW 4 2 2 3 1 4 2 4 3 3 1 0 29

PRE 4 2 2 3 1 4 2 4 3 3 1 0 29

WS-I 4 2 2 4 1 4 2 4 3 3 1 0 29

WS-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 4 7 17

WS-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

POST 4 2 2 3 1 4 2 4 3 3 1 0 29

FS-l 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 3 6 15

FS-2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3

FS-3 13 18 13 19 17 14 15 16 14 16 15 23 193

FS-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CS-I 0 54 47 48 18 45 115 25 8 42 76 148 626

LUBE 4 7 7 6 3 7 4 4 3 3 1 0 49

1 Table E14. C-17 Historical Data FY09 Actual Workload

Amendment 0006 Dated: 04 Mar 2010 24

•Table E1S. C-S Historical Data FY10 Actual Workload as or01 Dec 2009 Type OCT NOV DEC Total

C-5

TOW 3 5 4

PRE 3 5 5

WS-I 3 5 5

WS-2 3 4 5

WS-3 3 5 5

POST 3 5 5

FS-I 6 3 I

FS-2 4 I 0

FS-4 31 15 17

FS-5 30 14 15

FS-6 29 10 12

CS-l 15 154 110

LUBE 2 4 3

Table E16. KC-10 Historical Data FY10 Actual Workload as or01 Dec 2009 TotalSEP

- .~.~,~.~i :. " '1

JUN JUL AUG..~j~~'~"

4~,~;;:

)"";:,;: ';"~:",;';i"\::::

o o o o o o

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR

:"ii~,", '",i '.' . ' ....~.':,<

3 « ',' "", .', 3 ~,., ''::' 1:,:' ",' ,,'

0," ,. " i 2 ~:..' ':", "'I

3 " o 3',' o ~:,;."".

2 . ., jr>«~

Tvpe'

KC-I0

TOW

PRE

WS-l

WS-3

POST

FS-I

FS-2

FS-3

FS-4A

FS-4B

FS-5

FS-6

CS-I

LUBE

Table E17. C-17 Historical Data FY10 Actual Workload as or01 Dec 2009 Tvoe OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG1 SEPT Total C-17 f,,~

'" I " ,I""

TOW 2 2 3 ". ,.,,' f,;,: 'r.":,~-:'l~r- PRE 3 2 3 v , .", .:.

WS-I 2 2 2 ", l , ." i ,; ~;' . :;", " ',.

WS-2 2 4 3 ',ii: " , .. -, '1

WS-3 0 0 0 "

" .- "',t. """,i r~, ';',',.' :;' ;;.•,"l~:'" ',''.' , :r;:' .-

POST 3 I 4 .'. .. ,-' 'P ..".

FS-I 4 5 4 -" I. "

',' :',.. i.,,, FS-2 0 2 0 .', It,' " " "< i "

J'. "'?

,_,,"J

' ' ,""' ..:j

FS-3 19 24 18 .h,,, . ,,:' ",' :\ :' ~-{~'::~,'~" IIFS-4 0 0 0 ";',i":, 'T', : .e'...· :,:,',CS-I 58 22 0 ;" "

",' :"" ::;:':""':"1" 'j

LUBE 4 2 3

~ '\, ';':'K" Y"" :::',,'ij'", l~, Dated: 04 Mar 2010 25

E1.3. Complete Was In Frequencies-Projected (all aircraft) FYIO E1.3.1. The following table is the projected workload for complete wash services for all airframes assigned to TAFB. Due to new requirements on deployment and total assigned aircraft numbers the following should be used for FYI 0 complete wash services to be required at TAFB.

Table El8 Complete Wash Fre( uencies-Pro.iected (all aircraft) FYlO Airframe OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Total

C.5 5 5 4 5 6 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 64 C-17 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 .2 2 3 3 30 KC-lO 5 3 3 4 5 4 5 3 4 4 2 3 45

. El.4. 60 Day Gear LubricationlWash Frequencies-Projected (C-l7) FYlO E1.4.1. The following table is the projected workload for 60 day gear lubrication/wash services for C-17s assigned to TAFB. Due to new requirements no data exists for previous workloads, the following is only an estimate.

Table E19. 60 Day Gear LubricationlWash FreQuencies-Pro'ected (C-17) FYIO Airframe OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Total.

C-17 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 48

Dated: 04 Mar 2010 26

Note: The contractor will notify 60 MXG QAP when government furnished computer equipment, tools and government equipment becomes unserviceable. Each AMXS Squadrons will provide grease at their CTKs and the contractor will coordinate and pick up the amount of grease needed for each airframe from the squadron CTKs.

Nomenclature

1. Grease

2. Oil

Quantity As required for all airframes As required for all airframes

Government-furnished grease and oil must be stored in storage cabinets in Hangar 811 when not being used by the contractor.

E3.1 The Government will provide the following equipment items which will be available for use by the contractor during the contract duration. The contractor WIll have priority use.ofGFP.

If equipment is not available for the contractor's use and non-avaIlability adversely impacts the contractor's performance of the work, the government will grant an excusable delay at no cost to the contractor. The government Quality Assurance Personnel (QAP)will coordinate a revised schedule with the contractor.

AGE

Air Conditioners External Electrical Power Units

Amendment 0006 Dated: 04 Mar 2010

Stock Number 412001 5066202 283501 5255157