Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Slides.pdf

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON

Naval Nuclear Power Training Command (NNPTC), Joint Base Charleston – Weapons Station, SC

SITE VISIT

Solicitation: FA4418-16-R-0005

Agenda 1 June 2016

Introductions Emergency Procedures, Rest Rooms Contracting Solicitation Review Civil Engineer Project Review NNPTC Information Overview All questions must be made in writing Proceed to Site Visit

SSgt Christopher Tate/Rozella Johnson

628 CONS/LGCB

843-963-5180/5173

In case of Emergency and evacuation is necessary exit auditorium and proceed to the nearest Exit. Exit the building and meet in the parking lot in front of the building.

Rest Rooms

Contracting Request for Proposal Review

• 100% Small Business

• Project DKGV 13-2153 (FIRM FIXED PRICE)

Repair HVAC NNPTC, Bldg 2400

• “Funds are not presently available for this contract. The Government’s obligation under this contract is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for contract purposes can be made.

No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for this contract and until the Contractor receives notice of such availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.”

• All amendments to the RFP will be posted on FedBizOpps (fbo.gov)

• Please submit any questions in writing to:

christopher.tate.6@us.af.mil or rozella.johnson.1@us.af.mil

• Proposals Due No Later Than 1:00 PM EST on 21 June 2016

Fedex, UPS or Hand deliver Hand carrier – Expect delays “ALWAYS” Mail – Do not rely on USPS. Use FedEx, UPS, or any other door to door service company.

• Faxed or Emailed Proposals will NOT be accepted

• Specifications & Drawings to the Solicitation

Located on FedBizOpps

• All badge procedures will apply to this project Special badges will be required for this project as well

• Questions in writing deadline is 11:00 AM EST on 8 June 2016

Joint Base Charleston – Weapons Station, SC

Bonds

The contractor shall submit a Proposal Bond (Standard Form 24) Performance Bond (Standard Form 25) and a Payment Bond (Standard Form 25-A) with good and sufficient surety and sureties to the Government within 15 days of award. The penal sum of such bonds will be as follows:

PROPOSAL BOND: In the amount of 20 percent (20%) of the proposal price. The Proposal Bond penalty may be expressed in terms of a percentage of the proposal price or may be expressed in dollars and cents.

PERFORMANCE BOND: The penal amount of the performance bonds shall equal one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price.

PAYMENT BOND: The penal amount of the payment bonds shall equal one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price.

Project Time Allowed

Period of Performance will begin performance within 10 calendar days and complete it within 497 calendar days after receiving notice to proceed.

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $955 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

WHAT TO SUBMIT TO CONTRACTING

(Preparation Instructions)

• IAW Proposal Preparation Instructions 1 original signed and 1 copy

• Signed confirmation of amendments

• Faxed signature pages will be accepted for amendments ONLY, and will have to be followed with the original via mail

• Price Proposal Information (Schedule B)

• Past Performance Information

Past Performance Information (Proposal Preparation

Instructions):

• Past Performance must be recent and relevant

• Performance/Price Trade-Off procedures apply

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing offerors' past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than cost or price considerations. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and representations and certifications. All such offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Price Evaluation. Initially offers shall be ranked according to price, including any option prices if applicable. An offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in Section B by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number or Subcontract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each. The extended amounts will be added together to determine the total evaluated price. When applicable, the price evaluation adjustment for HUBZone small business concerns will be applied in accordance with FAR 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns, to arrive at an evaluated price. The price evaluation will document (for the offers evaluated under paragraph B below) the reasonableness and affordability of the proposed total evaluated price.

Performance Confidence Assessment B. Performance Confidence Assessment. The contracting officer shall seek relevant performance information on the lowest priced offerors (usually the lowest two to five) based on (1) the past and present efforts provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from the offeror, as solicited, questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition, and sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases;

interview with Program Managers, Contracting officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency. The Government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receive a Substantial Confidence performance assessment.

C. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving HVAC including air handling units, electric duct heaters, filter modules, fan terminal and/or VAV units, and selective demolition and repair/ replacement of acoustical tiles that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the offeror’s ability to perform the effort described in this solicitation, based on the offeror’s demonstrated present and past performance. There are four levels of relevancy as shown in Table 4. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

D. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence,Neutral Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence, as defined in DOD source selection procedures, Table 5. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will not be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror.

Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history shall receive the rating "Neutral Confidence," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

E. In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

F. If the lowest priced evaluated offer is judged to have a Substantial Confidence performance assessment, that offer represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

G. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance confidence assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

H. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offers. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or expectations in the FPR are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

Phasing requirements:

All AHUs must be replaced between 15 October and 15 March.

At least 5 of the 9 AHUs must be replaced during the first 15 October to

15 March period The remainder must be completed during the following 15 October to

15 March period.

If these time periods are not met LD’s will be accessed to recoup government losses.

Joint Base Charleston – Weapons Station, SC

SITE VISIT

EM 385-1-1 dated 30 Nov 2014 Contractor Quality Control Person can be the SSHO QC/SSHO can not have any other job Superintendent MAY NOT perform the duties of QC/SSHO IAW EM 385-1-1 SSHO requires Five (5) years of continuous construction industry safety experience Section 01 35 26 Pre-Con Submittals APP Mandatory approval prior to any construction work

NNPTC Information Overview Outside pictures - OK for Ktr personnel to take pictures outside.

No photography allow inside B2400. NNPTC will arrange to have photographs taken and they will be provided after security processing.

Civil Engineer Project Review

Questions in writing deadline - 11:00 AM EST on 8

June 2016