Attachment__6_-_Asbestos_Survey_dated_12-22-2014.pdf

PDF 9 MB Posted May 18, 2016

Attached to: Repair HVAC System, Training Facility, Bldg. 2400 (NNPTC)
Solicitation number: FA4418-16-R-0005
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

From the source

Attachment 6 - Asbestos Survey dated 12-22-2014 for Solicitation FA4418-16-R-0005 Repair HVAC System Training Facility B2400 NNPTC

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
FA4418-16-R-0005-0004.pdf	PDF	Jun 17, 2016
Pre-bid_QA_FA4418-16-R-0005_2016-06-17.pdf	PDF	Jun 17, 2016
FA4418-16-R-0005-0003_Incorporate_Addendum__2_dated_15_June_2016.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
Attachment__8_-_Addendum__2_dated_10_June_2015.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Slides.pdf	PDF	Jun 6, 2016
Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf	PDF	Jun 6, 2016
Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Sign-in_sheet.pdf	PDF	Jun 6, 2016
Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Photos.pdf	PDF	Jun 6, 2016
FA4418-16-R-0005-0002__Repair_HVAC_System _Training_Facility_B2400 _NNPTC.pdf	PDF	May 25, 2016
Attachment__7_-_Addendum__1_dated_25_May_2016.pdf	PDF	May 25, 2016
FA4418-16-R-0005-0001_Change_Section_A.pdf	PDF	May 19, 2016
Attachment__4_-_AF_Form_66_dated_7-22-2015.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__2_-_Drawings_Dated__7-22-2015_Part2.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__5_-_Wage_Determination_dated_2-21-2016.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__2_-_Drawings_Dated__7-22-2015_Part3.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__1_-_Specifications_dated_3-23-2016.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
FA4418-16-R-0005_Repair_HVAC_System _Training_Facility_B2400 _NNPTC.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__2_-_Drawings_Dated__7-22-2015_Part1.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__3_-_Green_Procurement_Form_dated_4-22-2016.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__2_-_Drawings_Dated__7-22-2015_Part4.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__2_-_Drawings_Dated__7-22-2015_Part5.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016
Attachment__2_-_Drawings_Dated__7-22-2015_Part6.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2016

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT

REPAIR HVAC SYSTEM, TRAINING FACILITY

BUILDING 2400

.JBC - NUCLEAR POWER TRAINING SCHOOL

GOOSE CREEK, SOUTH CAROLINA

S&ME Project No. 4213-14-209

Prepared for:

Stubbs Muldrow Herin Architects, Inc.

400 Hibben Street Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464

(843) 884-5021

Assessment Performed by and Report Prepared by:

~illing;wo (SCDHEC Accreditation #MP-20232)

Date

620 Wando Park Boulevard Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464

(843) 884-0005

December 22, 2014

Attachment #6 FA4418-16-R-0005

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. BACKGROUND

Asbestos Assessment

1.2 Lead-based Paint Testing

2. ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

2.1 Assessment Procedures

2.2 Findings and Results

2.3 Abbreviations and Hazard Assessment Key

3. LEAD-BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT

3.1 Procedures

3.2 Findings

4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Asbestos Recommendations

4.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations

APPENDIX I ................................................................................................................... I-1 APPENDIX 11 ................................................................................................................ II-1 APPENDIX III ............................................................................................................. 111-1 APPENDIX IV ............................................................................................................. IV-1

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment S&ME No. 4213-14-209 Building 2400; JBC- Nuclear Power School December 2014 Goose Creek, South Carolina

SUMMARY

An asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was conducted on December 15, 2014 at Building 2400 (Nuclear Power Training School) located at Joint Base Charleston - Naval Weapons Station Base in Goose Creek, South Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paints, prior to planned design work order titled "Repair HVAC System, Training Facility; Project: DKGV 13-2153 ". The design work order requested the assessment of ACMs and lead-based paint in those interior and exterior areas that may be affected by the planned work under this project.

Asbestos Assessment

The asbestos assessment included the bulk sampling and analysis of suspect ACMs, which included fire proofing on structural beams, duct mastic, sheetrock and associated joint compound, floor tile and associated mastic, mastic on vinyl cove base and tread, and ceiling tiles. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) define materials as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent(> 1 %) is detected in a representative sample.

Based on the bulk sampling and analyses performed as part of this assessment, no asbestos was detected in the representative materials assessed, sampled and analyzed.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) define materials as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (> 1 % ) is detected in a representative sample. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned renovation activities, bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content. This report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

Lead-based Paint Assessment

A lead-based paint assessment was performed on December 18, 2014 ofrepresentative interior painted components associated with the structure. The components were analyzed via direct read X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology. For the purpose of this assessment, painted surfaces with lead concentrations exceeding the SCDHEC limit (0.7 mg/cm2

) are considered lead-based paint. Detectable levels of lead are applicable to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction).

Of the representative painted components tested, no surfaces or components exhibited lead concentrations meeting or exceeding the SCDHEC disposal limit of 0.7 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2

). For the purposes of this report, lead-based is defined in accordance with the SCDHEC definition applicable to renovation activities.

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Building JBC- Nuclear Power School Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME No. 4213-14-209 December 22, 2014

Detectable levels of lead were present in the ceramic wall tiles via the XRF testing.

Based on our understanding of this planned project there should be no disturbance to these finishes.

Destructive actions to coatings or paint containing detectable levels of lead (component removal, manual demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.), require the contractor comply with the standards of OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62, including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.

The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level. A copy of this report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist in compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

1. BACKGROUND

An asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was conducted on December 15 and 18, 2014 of Building 2400 (Nuclear Power Training School) located at Joint Base Charleston -Naval Weapons Station Base in Goose Creek, South Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of ACMs and lead-based paints that could be disturbed during the destructive and disposal activities as to facilitate the intent of construction activities described as "Repair HVAC System, Training Facility; Project:

DKGV 13-2153 ". The assessment was performed in general accordance with the Design Work Order (DKGV 13-2153) and S&ME Proposal 42-1400930, dated August 28, 2014.

The referenced structure is approximately 650,000 square feet in size and currently used as a training facility and the main facility for the Nuclear Power Training School. The three-story building is constructed of steel framing, a reinforced concrete on-grade, with a brick veneer exterior and pitched metal roof. The interior was extremely homogeneous in material type and use. The flooring consisted of terrazzo hallways on the first floor, and remaining flooring was vinyl composition tile, with exception to the restrooms which were ceramic tile. The wall systems were sheetrock with a concrete masomy unit (CMU) support walls. The ceilings were predominantly suspended ceiling systems with sheetrock in the restrooms and select offices.

1.1 Asbestos Assessment

The asbestos assessment was conducted to sample and identify ACMs in accordance with regulatory requirements prior to renovation activities. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of the Federal Regulations, part 61, and State regulation 61-86.l enforced by the SCDHEC, along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926 enforced by OSHA.

Building 2400; JBC- Nuclear Power School Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME No. 4213-14-209 December 22, 2014

The following sections describe the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed, confirmed ACMs located in the structure, and conclusions and recommendations regarding the subject structure as related to ACMs.

1.2 lead-based Paint Testing

The purpose of the testing was to identify existing lead-based paint finishes associated with the structure, which will be adversely affected by HV AC repairs. The identification of these materials will aid in the compliance of occupational exposure (OSHA) and/or environmental releases of airborne lead dust in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) and provide information to facilitate proper disposal of lead-based paint coated components and debris in accordance with the SCDHEC and EPA.

ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT

2.1 Assessment Procedures

The assessment was performed by observing and sampling suspect ACMs associated with the subject structure. There was an emphasis during the assessment to perform sample collection in common and service areas to avoid damage to the finishes and to prevent disruption to on-going activities and conduct work in sensitive areas. Significant destructive testing was not performed, therefore the possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as chases or wall voids.

If additional suspect materials not identified in this report are discovered during the planned renovations (destructive activities), bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials.

A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples in accordance with SCDHEC and EPA requirements. Bulk samples were then extracted from suspect ACMs and recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to our in-house laboratory in Charlotte, North Carolina for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis and subsequent confirmation of negative results by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) for those non-friable organically bound materials by EMSL Laboratories, also in Charlotte, North Carolina. The laboratories are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I (1-1-87 edition), Part 763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics:

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment S&ME No. 4213-14-209 Building 2400; JBC- Nuclear Power School December 201 Goose Creek, South Carolina morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors. The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Suspect non-friable and organically bound materials, exhibiting negative results via PLM analysis, were analyzed by trained microscopists by TEM using EPA 600 Method in accordance with ASTM E2356. Typical examples of this material include, but are not limited to; floor tile and associated mastic, sheet flooring (linoleum) and mastic/adhesive, roof shingles, roof materials, glazing, caulking, and cove base mastic.

2.2 Findings and Results

The asbestos assessment included the bulk sampling and analysis of suspect ACMs associated with the subject structure and included fire proofing on structural beams, duct mastic, sheetrock and associated joint compound, floor tile and associated mastic, mastic on vinyl cove base and tread, and ceiling tiles.

Based on the assessment, sampling and analysis of the representative suspect materials, no asbestos was detected.

Diagrams of the asbestos bulk sample locations are provided in Appendix I, and a copy of the inspector's SCDHEC license is provided in Appendix II. The laboratory analyses and chain-of-custody records are provided in Appendix III.

The following summary table (Table 1) exhibits the sample number, location, type of material tested, approximate quantity of the material sampled, condition of the material, and corresponding result for each sample.

Building 2400; Nuclear Power Training School Goose Creek, South Carolina

TABLE I: SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS

Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample 4Location Material 2Approx. Asbestos

Number Quantity Type

SRJC-01 Attic ND

SRJC-02 Attic ND

SRJC-03 Attic ND

SRJC-04 Attic Sheetrock and Joint

+800,000 SF ND

Compound

SRJC-05 Attic ND

SRJC-06 Attic ND

SRJC-07 Attic ND

FP-01 Attic ND

FP-02 Attic ND

FP-03 Attic ND

FP-04 Attic Fireproofing on

50,000 SF ND

Structural Beams

FP-05 Attic ND

FP-06 Attic ND

FP-07 Attic ND

1 Percent Condition

NA NA

S&ME Project No. 4213-14-209 December 22, 2014

Potential for Hazard Disturbance Assessment

NA NA

Goose Creek, South Carolina

TABLE I: SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS (continued)

Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample 4Location Material 2Approx. Asbestos

Number Quantity Type

WM-01 Attic (ducts and units) ND

WM-02 Attic (ducts and units) White Mastic 1,000 SF ND

3WM-03 Attic (ducts and units) ND

FT-01

3rd Floor - Restroom

Foyer

FT-02 2nd Floor -

Floor Tile (12") 350,000 SF

White Mastic

3FT-03

1st Floor - Break Room

CBM-01 3rd Floor Bath Foyer ND

CBM-02 2nd floor - Stairwell Mastic on Cove

100,000 LF ND

base and Tread

3CBM-03 1st Floor - Stairwell ND

1 Percent Condition

NA NA

S&ME Project No. 4213-14-209 December 22, 2014

Potential for Hazard Disturbance Assessment

NA NA

Goose Creek, South Carolina

TABLE I: SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS (continued)

Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample 4Location Material 2Approx. Asbestos

Number Quantity Type

CT-01 3rd Floor Bath Foyer ND

CT-02 2nd Floor - Hallway Ceiling Tile (2x2)

375,000 SF ND

CT-03

1st Floor - Break

Room

ND = no asbestos detected NA = not applicable LF= linear feet

1 Percent Condition

NA NA

SF= square feet

S&ME Project No. 4213-14-209 December 22, 2014

Potential for Hazard Disturbance Assessment

NA NA

1 Note: The EPA, SCDHEC, and OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1 %) is detected in a representative sample.

2Note: The quantities are estimated, and should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified.

3Note: Samples analyzed by TEM to confirm negative results reported by PLM analysis.

4Note: See drawings for specific bulk sample locations.

Building 2400; Nuclear Power School Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME 4213-14-209

December 22, 2014

2.3 Abbreviations and Hazard Assessment Key

In accordance with the EPA and SCDHEC, confirmed ACM is assigned a hazard assessment based on its present condition and potential for disturbance. The hazard assessment is used as a tool for prioritization in remedial actions regarding the identified ACM(s). The following key exhibits the criteria that compose the hazard assessment.

Since no ACM was identified in the representative materials the use of the key was not required.

Present Condition F =Friable NF = Non-friable G = Good (Very localized limited damage) D = Damaged (Damage of less than 10% distributed and less than 25% localized) SD= Significantly Damaged (Damage equal to or greater than 10% distributed, 25% localized)

Potential for Future Disturbance

LPD = Low Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, and Air Erosion all of Low Concern) PD =Potential for Damage (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of Moderate Concern) PSD = Potential for Significant Damage (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of High Concern)

Significantly Damaged

PSD

Hazard Assessment

Damaged (D)

5 4

3. LEAD-BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT

3.1 Procedures

Good (G)

2 1

Lead-based paint testing was performed on representative interior and exterior painted components. The components were analyzed with a Niton XLP-302 X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) spectrum analyzer (serial #25 910). The suspect painted finishes were selected based on the color of the topcoat and the underlying paint layers and/or the substrate on which it was applied. The possibility exists that lead-based or lead-containing paint

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME 4213-14-209

December 22, 2014 finishes are present in those inaccessible areas such as pipe chases, wall voids, etc.

SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as any paint containing lead at concentrations equaling 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater by XRF testing. For the purpose of the assessment, paint containing 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater was considered lead-based paint due to the planned activities. Lead-based paint, as defined by SCDHEC, requires appropriate testing and disposal.

OSHA does not recognize a threshold level oflead for definition purposes, only the airborne exposure to lead by workers. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of thirty micrograms per cubic meter (30 µg/m3

) during an eight hour day and a permissible exposure limit of fifty micrograms per cubic meter (50 µg!m\

3.2 Findings

A lead-based paint assessment was performed on December 18, 2014 at the referenced building to identify lead-based paints and lead-containing paints. No lead-based paints were identified on the representative surfaces and components.

Some of the surfaces tested exhibited lead levels applicable to OSHA regulation 29 CFR

1926.62 (Lead in Construction). It should be noted that the ceramic wall tile in the restrooms contained small amounts oflead. Additionally, other paint coatings may contain lead that cannot be detected by x-ray fluorescence and may be applicable to OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction). Destructive actions to paint containing any amount of lead (component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, welding, paint preparation, etc.), require compliance with the standards of OSHA, including, but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance, unless objective airborne exposure monitoring indicates otherwise. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, i.e. the lower the level of lead found in the paint, the less likely disturbance will result in exposure in excess of the OSHA Action Level.

The summary of the paint readings analyzed by the XRF spectrum lead analyzer are provided in Appendix IV, along with the memorandum of approval for use of a radioactive device (XRF) on JBC- Nuclear Power Training Facilities.

4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The asbestos and lead-based paint assessment conducted of Building 2400 located at the Nuclear Power Training complex in Goose Creek, South Carolina, did not identify the presence of ACMs or lead-based paints applicable to SCDHEC requirements. OSHA requirements may be applicable for the Contractor depending upon the planned impacts to the coated surfaces.

2400; Nuclear Power Training School

South Carolina

4.1 Asbestos Recommendations

S&ME 4213-14-209

December 22, 2014

The asbestos assessment performed at the referenced site on December 15, 2014 did not identify the presence of ACMs in the specified areas. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned renovation activities, bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content. This report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

Lead-based Paint Recommendations

The ceramic wall tile in the restrooms contained small amounts of lead which may be applicable to OSHA dependent upon the planned renovation activities. Based on our understanding of this planned project there should be no disturbance to these finishes.

Destructive actions to coatings or paints containing detectable levels of lead (e.g.

component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulations 29 CFR

1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance. Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels oflead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, which may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.

Also, accumulations of paint waste (chips, dust, or flakes) must be tested by TCLP to determine if the waste is classified as hazardous, which requires disposal in a Subtitle C (hazardous waste) landfill. Lead waste, at a minimum, must be disposed in a Class II or III landfill.

MATCH LINE

FIRST FLOOR

NOTE: NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED FROM THE SUBJECT AREA.

NO LEAD-BASED PAINT DETECTED(AS DEFINED BY

SCDHEC OR EPA)

... l!llll

40'

MATCH LINE

80 ' tS&ME

ENGINEERING · TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

BUILDING 2400 - FIRST FLOOR

JOIN BASE CHARLESTON

NORTH CHARLESTON , SOUTH CAROLINA

SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: LAJ APPROVED BY:

PROJE~T2N1°3-1 4-209 DATE: 12-05-201 4

FIGURE NO.

FIRST FLOOR

l!llll llllBI l!llll l!llll l!llll

MATCH LINE

NOTE: NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED FROM THE SUBJECT AREA.

NO LEAD-BASED PAINT DETECTED(AS DEFINED BY

~ SCDHEC OR EPA)

0 40' 80' l!llll l!IZI l!ll!I

MATCH LINE

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

BUILDING 2400 - FIRST FLOOR

JOIN BASE CHARLESTON

NORTH CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA tS&ME SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: LAJ APPROVED BY:

ENGINEERING ·TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PROJECT NO. DATE: FIGURE NO.

4213-14-209 12-05-2014

1!111

NOTE: NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED FROM THE SUBJECT AREA.

NO LEAD-BASED PAINT DETECTED(AS DEFINED BY

SCDHEC OR EPA)

SECOND FLOOR

0 40' 80' ll!/ZI tS&ME

ENGINEERING · TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

l!ID

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

BUILDING 2400 - SECOND FLOOR

JOIN BASE CHARLESTON

NORTH CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: LAJ APPROVED BY:

PROJECT NO. DATE: FIGURE NO.

4213-14-209 12-05-2014 2A

THIRD FLOOR

MATCH LINE

NOTE: NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED FROM THE SUBJECT AREA.

~ NO LEAD-BASED PAINT DETECTED(AS DEFINED BY

SCDHEC OR EPA)

0 40 ' so·

111:111

CBM-0 1

MATCH LINE

tS&ME

ENGINEERING ·TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

BUILDING 2400 - SECOND FLOOR

JOIN BASE CHARLESTON

NORTH CHARLESTON , SOUTH CAROLINA

SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: LAJ APPROVED BY: ,,l,A~--

PROJECT NO. DATE: FIGURE NO.

4213-14-209 12-05-2014 28

NOTE:

NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED FROM THE SUBJECT AREA.

NO LEAD-BASED PAINT DETECTED(AS DEFINED BY

SCDHEC OR EPA)

0 40 ' 80 ' tsaME

ENGINEERING · TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

BUILDING 2400 - THIRD FLOOR

JOIN BASE CHARLESTON

NORTH CHARLESTON , SOUTH CAROLINA

SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: LAJ

PROJECT NO. DATE: FIGURE NO.

NOTE:

11111 -l!lill

MATCH LINE

NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED FROM THE SUBJECT AREA.

NO LEAD-BASED PAINT DETECTED(AS DEFINED BY

SCDHEC OR EPA)

0 40' 80 '

CBM-01

MATCH LINE

tS&ME

ENGINEERING ·TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

BUILDING 2400 - THIRD FLOOR

JOIN BASE CHARLESTON

NORTH CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: LAJ APPROVED BY:

PROJECT NO.

4213-14-209

DATE:

12-05-2014 .

FIGURE NO.

!ATTIC FLOOR

NOTE: NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED FROM THE SUBJECT AREA.

NO LEAD-BASED PAINT DETECTED(AS DEFINED BY

SCDHEC OR EPA)

0 40 ' 80' tS&ME

ENGINEERING ·TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

BUILDING 2400 - ROOF

JOIN BASE CHARLESTON

NORTH CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: LAJ APPROVED BY:

PROJECT NO. DATE: FIGURE NO.

ATTIC FLOOR

;<J IX

MATCH LINE

NOTE: NO ASBESTOS WAS DETECTED IN THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED FROM THE SUBJECT AREA.

NO LEAD-BASED PAINT DETECTED(AS DEFINED BY

SCDHEC OR EPA)

0 40' 80'

MATCH LINE

tS&ME

ENGINEERING · TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

BUILDING 2400 - ROOF

JOIN BASE CHARLESTON

NORTH CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: LAJ APPROVED BY:

PROJECT NO. DATE: FIGURE NO.

4213-14-209 12-05-2014 4B

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SHEETS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY

RECORDS

S&ME

9771 D Southern Pine Boulevard

Charlotte, NC 28273

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929

NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0

Asbestos Analysis Summary Client Name

Client Job

Job Number

Charleston Branch

NNTC Bldg 2400

4213-14-209

Peiformed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method

620 Wanda Park Blvd. Date Received 12/16/2014 Mt. Pleasant SC 29464

Date Analyzed 1211512014

Asbestos Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab JD: Sample #: Appearance Comments %/Type %/Type %/Type

14-10823 WM-1

14-10824 WM-2

14-10826A FT-1-1

14-10826B FT-1-1

Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski

Additional Comments:

BEIGE NONFIBROUS

BLACK NONFIBROUS

TILE ND

MASTIC ND

·.r"'~-·-

Jane Wasilewski Laboratory Manager

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND= None Detected (Asbestos Not Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining) (Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (f EM) to verify results of <1°/o or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

100 OTHER

Page I of 6

Job Number 4213-14-209

Asbestos Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance Comments %/Type <Jj[[ype %/Tvpe

14-10827A FT-1-2

14-108278 FT-1-2

14-10829 CMB-1

14-10830 CMB-2

14-10832 CT-1

14-10833 CT-2

_,,._.,,._~c::.· - ,., ••'' v, ""'·'·W~V."W~N.<.;; ... N.N'~""'" """'"'""'"" hW

Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski

Additional Comments:

BEIGE NONFIBROUS TILE

BLACK NONFIBROUS MASTIC

CREAM NONFIBROUS

GREY FIBROUS

55 MINERAL WOOL

30 CELLULOSE

55 MINERAL WOOL

30 CELLULOSE

Jane Wasilewski Laboratory Manager

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining) (Method EPA 600/R-931116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1°/o or "None Detected 11 for these materials is recommended.

100 OTHER

15 PERLITE

Page 2of6

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance Comments %/Type %/Type %/Type

14-10834 CT-3

14-10835 FP-1

14-10836 FP-2

14-10837 FP-3

14-10838 FP-4

14-10839 FP-5

Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski

Additional Comments:

GREY FIBROUS

55 MINERAL WOOL

30 CELLULOSE

20 CELLULOSE

··.r"""''':_:

Jane Wasilewski Laboratory Manager

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND;;:;: None Detected (Asbestos Not Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining) (Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <l 0/o or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

15 PERLITE

80 OTHER

Page 3o.f6

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance Comments %/Type %/Type %/Type

14-10840 FP-6 GREY FIBROUS ND 20 CELLULOSE 80 OTHER

14-10841 FP-7

14-10842A SR/JC-1

14-10842B SR/JC-1

14-10843A SR/JC-2

14-10843B SR/JC-2

A~at:Y~~(j iiy:J3'fie wasiie~ski

Additional Comments:

GREY FIBROUS

BEIGE NONFIBROUS

WHITE NONFIBROUS

BEIGE FIBROUS

WHITE NONFIBROUS

SHEETROCK ND

JT COMPOUND ND

SHEETROCK ND

JT COMPOUND ND

20 CELLULOSE

CELLULOSE

<1 GLASS

2 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

Jane Wasilewski Laboratory Manager

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining) (Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (fEM) to verify results of <l 1!10 or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

80 OTHER

99 GYPSUM

100 OTHER

96 GYPSUM

100 OTHER

Page 4of6

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance Comments %/Type %/Type %/Type

14-10844 SR/JC-3 WHITE NONFIBROUS

14-10845A SR/JC-4 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS

14-10845B SR/JC-4 WHITE NONFIBROUS

14-10846A SR/JC-5 BEIGE FIBROUS

14-10846B SR/JC-5 WHITE NONFIBROUS

14-10847A SR/JC-6 BEIGE FIBROUS

A~i1y:le<l b'r:Ja~ewli~·iie~~k.i Additional Comments:

JTCOMPOUND

(ONLY)

SHEETROCK

JT COMPOUND

SHEETROCK

JTCOMPOUND

SHEETROCK

20 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

2 CELLULOSE

GLASS

<1 CELLULOSE

·· Ja~e.wasiiew;i<r Laboratory Manager

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining) (Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of<l%1 or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

100 OTHER

78 GYPSUM

100 OTHER

97 GYPSUM

100 OTHER

100 GYPSUM

Page 5 of6

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance Comments %/Type %/Type %/Type

14-10847B SR/JC-6

14-10848A SR/JC-7

14-10848B SR/JC-7

Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski

Additional Comments:

WHITE NONFIBROUS

BEIGE FIBROUS

WHITE NONFIBROUS

JT COMPOUND

SHEETROCK

JTCOMPOUND

CELLULOSE

Jane Wasilewski Laboratory Manager

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining) (Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1 °lo or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

100 OTHER

99 GYPSUM

100 OTHER

Page 6of6

CUSTODY RECORD

PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME

~::> ·/J'';J s, </,;? /3 . / ~/ :i t:> 7 /V/l7~;_ A/~tt;. .. ~>~t;:~~) /.l!~Y::::·w . . ~' j' . ·, --7 - f;,/;fo;/~ ·'""'" ,,r,',>'

FACILITY .// ,VHEUNQU1SHED BY: DATE TIME ~OBY:

/'f"' / #"'; . -2"7/Jf c:? I i ' l

SAMPLER(S}/ DATE TAKEN REUNQU!SHED BY: DATE I TIME , RECEIVED BY:

//:z):, -r;r4J-7;d;;t//~/~>1 rA/c>1/ L,;;> IS-:/~ I I

S~MPLE~// HOMOGEf:j£-0US M~r-1- i LAB DATE ANALYSTS ASBESTOS ARCHIVE DATE ARCHIVER SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS ARE'A I NUMBER ANALYZED INITIALS + N/D NUMBER ARCH INITIALS uill4 ~ I I ! "+- (Ulf~j I

~?._ I .:w.rl ';~ 1. I ,.,(. !

:e;~- /- i )-rH

'2_ ".!,./ ife" ff'& I ! i I l

/',,t;,,,lJ5 J )-1 l

'"'· 3o ,w ,,3·' ir< l ue '31 --i I l I -···---·---··-

I ALL SAMPLES WILL BE DISPOSED OF NINETY DAYS AFTER ANALYSIS UNLESS OTHERWlSE REQUESTED

MATERIAL TYPES

A - <4" Pipe Fitting G - 9-14" Pipe M - A.H.U. Exp. JL B - 4-8" Pipe Fitting H - >14" Pipe N - Ceiling /Wall Tile C - 9-14" Pipe Fitting I - Spray-On/Trowel 0 - Fiberboard D - >14" Pipe Fitting J - Floor Tile P - Other E - <4" Pipe K · Tanks/Boiler (See notes - Front F - 4-8" Pipe L - A.H.U. lnsul. or back) } ;

S&ME SFl·002 This document was prepared pursuant to a specific agreement to address the unique requirements of an S&ME client _,.,/

(REV. 5/93) Prior to further use, an S&ME professional should be contacted for a complete explanation of its preparation and contents.

OF CUSTODY RECORD

! PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME RELINQUISHED BY: DAT:J TIME RECEIVED BY:

~J3•, /'}/· Zt/ 7T //N~~ I? /c/ "* . 2 '}/i,:r C,' bJ~, Lf,t . ;:;> ;/f:. /ttfr;t::; ~/!?ll<r FACILITY ./ " REUNQUlSHED BY:

DATE l~ ~VEDBY:

g/~. 25/d!e::/

'lER(S)U DATE TAKEN REUNQU!SHED BY: DATE I TIME I RECEIVED BY:

£1,l ~£<>/_,Mr·</;(, . . /s;t1/"' /,4 __ -.t:?·/. /y/ ;

! SAMPLE#,/ HOMOGENEOUS [/ MATERIAV LAB DATE ANALYSTS ASBESTOS ARCHIVE I DATE ARCHIVER SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AREA TYPE NUMBER ANALYZED INITIALS + N/D NUMBER ' ARCH INITIALS

CT- I /'-ef' -1v1f<l

~ 2-. 3$ I

.3 Ji, i l y f._..

PP ~I Jf;;' I I i I

-z. 1(,, :17 ~ 'i 2k" i I

- 5-- J7 i I --~ Yo i

~ l dlf 't-1 i t

I I I !

ALL SAMPLES WILL BE DISPOSED OF NINETY DAYS AFTER ANALYSIS UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUESTED

I Yrt::::.

A - <4" Pipe Fitting G - 9-14" Pipe M - A.H.U. Exp. Jt.

B - 4-8" Pipe Fitting H - >14" Pipe N - Ceiling/Wall Tile C - 9-14" Pipe Fitting I - Spray-On/Trowel 0 - Fiberboard T_,h'

D - >14" Pipe Fitting J - Floor Tile P - Other E - <4" Pipe K - Tanks/Boiler (See notes - Front F - 4-8" Pipe L - A.H.U. lnsul. or back)

S&ME SFl-002 This document was prepared pursuant to a specific agreement to address the unique requirements of an S&ME cl'lent (REV. 5193) Prior to further use, an S&ME professional should be contacted for a complete explanation of its preparation and contents.

OF CUSTODY RECORD

ENGINEERING • TESTING

PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME REUNQUJSHEO BY: I :~

~#/!?/;¥' i)C~'/,.3'• ! Yr zo9 A//tl/C- /1>t.f. t .? o/,;;?d .~ . ./'~ ~,,,,/ ;:[; ·/$':/· df{!t;;

! FAClUTY (_,,) 1tREUNQUISHED BY: DATE ! T!M~ ~1AfEDBY·

I f)JrJ.,. 2;1t:JO v' I SAMPLER{S} r../ DATE TAKEN I RELINQUISHED BY: DATE TIME RECEIVED BY:

I ~ I I i I ~· ,b .. ;:;-;; /Y 1 r1r.~,..s,./.rfi/) &?V/L ~· I

I ~· SAMEk~# )0'FJOGENEOUS /ATERIAL LAB DATE ANALYSTS ASBESTOS ARCHIVE DATE ARCHIVER SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS / AREA TYPE NUMBER ANALYZED INITIALS + N!D NUMBER ARCH INITIALS -· I i I

{5~/7;: I {Le -f of; Lr iJ-

-z.. 4-} J

-:s '-t'f

-·'-I lf)' I

-s~',., tf[,, i

-- ~ 4:-7

~ :;:£ I 1..t-- !utlfi

I I I J

I i I I

All SAMPLES WILL BE DISPOSED OF NINETY DAYS AFTER ANALYSIS UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUESTED •--····---·•••·~··-~·--·---~• --~·•••n • n,. ... -----•

MATERIAL TYPES --

A - <4" Pipe Fitting G - 9-14" Pipe M - A.H.U. Exp. Jt.

B - 4-8" Pipe Fitting H - >14" Pipe N - Ceiling/Wall Tile C - 9-i 4" Pipe Fitting I - Spray-On/Trowel 0 - Fiberboard D - >14" Pipe Fitting J - Floor Tile P - Other E - <4" Pipe K - Tanks/Boiler (See notes - Front F - 4-8" Pipe L - A.H.LJ_ lnsul. or back)

S&ME SFH)02 This document was prepared pursuant to a specific agreement to address the unique requirements of an S&ME client (REV 5/93} Prior to further use, an S&ME professional shou!d be contacted !or a complete explanation of its preparation and contents, EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: 411408244

376 Crompton Street, Charlotte, NC 28273 CustomerlD: SME154

Phone/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382 CustomerPO: 61526 b!.!~·a~ EM~b com charlottelab@emsl com ProjectlD:

Attn: Jane Wasilewski Phone:

S&ME, Inc. Fax: (704) 565-4929

9771 D Southern Pine Blvd. Received: 12/17/14 10:35 AM

Charlotte, NC 28273 Analysis Date: 12/20/2014

Collected:

Project: 4213-14-209

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1

SAMPLE ID DESCRIPTION APPEARANCE

WM-3 Mastic Beige

411408244-0001 Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

CBM-3 Mastic Tan/White

411408244-0002 Fibrous Heterogeneous

FT1-03 Tile Gray

411408244-0003 Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

FT1-03 Mastic Tan/Black

411408244-0004 Fibrous Heterogeneous

Analyst(s)

Aaron Hartley (4)

% MATRIX

MATERIAL

% NON-ASBESTOS ASBESTOS

FIBERS TYPES

<0.43 Fibrous (other) No Asbestos Detected

<0.28 Fibrous (other) No Asbestos Detected

None No Asbestos Detected

<0.16 Fibrous (other) No Asbestos Detected

Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

This laboratory is not responsible for% asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The abo\i9 report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full , without wntten approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted . Unless requested by the client, building matenals manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC

[ Initial report from 12/22/2014 08:20:22

Test Report EPANOB-7.24.0 Printed: 12/22/2014 8:20:22 AM THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

Or derI D: 4114 082 44

EMSL ANALYTICA L, INC.

tAllOU.Ttitw·~·'IWA'T°

Company : S&ME Inc.

Street: 97710 Southern Pine Blvd.

Asbestos Chain. of Custody EMSL Order Number (Lab Use Only):

EMSL ANALYTICAL, INC.

376 C ROMPTON ST

CHARLOTTE, NC 28273

PHONE: 704-525-2205

FAX: 704-525-2382

EMSL-Bill to: 0 Same [81 Different If Bill to is Different note Instructions in Comments"

Third Party Billing requires written authorization from third party

City: Charlotte ! I State/Province: NC Zip/Postal Code: 28273 I Countrv:

Report To (Name):! Jane Wasilewski Telephone#: 704-940-1830 j

Email Address: lwasilewski~smeinc.com Fax#: I Purchase Order: C.1S-::i l Project Name/Number: Pleas~Results: 0 Fax [81 Email U.S. State Sample!t Taken: CT..-8"amples: I J\Commercial/Taxable D Residential/Tax Exempt

' I Turnaround Time (TAT);Option~edse Check 03Hour I 06Hour I 024Hour I 048Hour l I ,_,,... 72 HouY' I 0 96 Hour I 0 1 Week I 0 2Week •For TEM Air 3 pr through 6 hr, please call ahead to schedule. •There is a premi _ .~r 3 Hour TEM AHERA or EPA Level II TAT. You will be asked to sign an authorizatioh form for this service. Analysis comoleted in accordance with EMSL's Terms and Conditions localed in the Analvtlcal Price Guide.

PCM - Air D Check if samples are from NY TEM -Air 0 4-4.Shr TAT (AHERA only) TEM-Dust

0 NIOSH 7400 I 0 AHERA 40 CFR, Part 763 0 Microvac - ASTM D 5755

0 w/ OSHA ~hr. TV'/ A 0 NIOSH7402 D Wipe -ASTM 06480 PLM - Bulk (rel!orti'ng'limit} 0 EPA Level 11 D Carpet Sonication (EPA 600/J-93/167)

0 PLM EPA 600/Rl93/116 (<1%) m l~U,0312 ~ Soil/RockNermiculite

0 PLM EPA NOB (<1%) ( TEM-Bulk ~ 0 PLM CARB 435 - A (0.25% sensitivity) Point Count 18) TEM EPA NOB 0 PLM CARB 435 - B (0.1 % sensitivity) ,_ D 400 (<0.25%) 0 1000 (<0.1%) u '" 'o NUti 198.4 (non-friable-NY) 0 TEM CARB 435 - B (0.1 % sensitivity) Point Count w(Gravi!Jletric 0 Chatfield SOP 0 TEM CARB 435 - C (0.01 % sensitivity) D 400 (<0.25%) 0 '1000 (<0.1%) D TEM Mass Analysis-EPA 600 sec. 2.5 D TEM Qual. via Filtration Technique

0 NYS 198.1 (friatile in NY) TEM-Water: EPA 100.2 D TEM Qual. via Drop-Mount Technique

D NYS 198.6 NoB!(non-friable-NY) Fibers >10µm D Waste D Drinking Other:

0 NIOSH 9002 (<1%) All Fiber Sizes D Waste 0 Drinking D

D Check F~r Positive Stop - Clearly Identify Homogenous Group I Filter Pore Size (Air Samples): DO.Sum D o.451-1m

Samplers Name: ! I Samplers Signature:

Volume/Area {Air) Date/Time Sample# Sample Description HA#(Bulk) Sampled w ft1 - .:3 Mc...~ ./-r'i.

[1)111-3 /11 w .\ f; (/

FT!-0"3 1 -/.L-

! /t"r/"<- I I

' I I l

Client Sample .# (s): I - Total# of Samples: /__£.

I ./ I tf'-/17 /;7'

Relinquished (Client): -- ....... Date: Time:

Received. (Lab): ~N\J.__ Date: I ~ \ 1111-1 Time: \er. ~.SA..,, J,,.J Comments/Special Instructions: Bill to S&ME, Inc., 9751 Southern Pine Blvd., Charlotte NC 28273

' 4-d-t 5 -1t.r- ;;... 0 'j ! I

Controlled Oocumont -~s COC - R& - 4111/2012 i Page 1 of _j_ pages