Bldg 90334 Toxic Substance Survey Report (Sep 2011).pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Hurlburt Field - Dormitory Demolition Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA441720Q0018
About this file
This solicitation requests demolition services for two three-story dormitory buildings at Hurlburt Field in accordance with the attached statement of work. Services include demolishing the buildings, which encompass approximately 29,000 square feet each. Interested offerors must attend a site visit on July 9, 2020 and submit any questions by July 15. Proposals are due by July 27, 2020. The soliciting agency is the Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA441720Q00180002 Updated 22 July.pdf | ||
| 90334 renovation demo drawings.pdf | ||
| Demolition Q and A.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA441720Q00180002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work Updated 22 July.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - FA441720Q00180001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Instructions to Offerors (updated 21 July).pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA441720Q00180001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Site Visit Sign-In Sheet.pdf | ||
| Surveys and Reports.pdf | ||
| FA441720Q0018.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - Evaluation of Offerors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Site Maps.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Instructions to Offerors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Wage Determination 2015-4531 (Rev 13).pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 - Pictures.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Tetra Tech EM Inc.
1999 Harrison Street, Oakland, CA 94612
Tel 510.302.6301 Fax 510.433.0830 www.tetratech.com
TETRA TECH
September 13, 2011
Mr. Tim Boone, P.E.
Project Manager Tetra Tech Inc.
1634 E. Port Plaza Dr.
Collinsville, IL 62234
Subject: 4P A-E 08 Task Order, Contract FA8903-08-D-8781, Task 0147
Title I Design Services for Repair Dormitory 90334 (Tier 2) Hurlburt Field, Florida, Project Number FTEV 09-1126 Hazardous Materials Survey Including Sampling and Analysis Plan for Asbestos Survey, and Lead-Based Paint Survey
Dear Mr. Boone:
Tetra Tech EM Inc. is submitting the enclosed Hazardous Materials Survey for the 90334 Dormitory building located at Hurlburt Field, Florida. If you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal, please call Mr. Jeffrey Mitchell at (816) 412-1773 or Mr. Yohji Ono at (510) 302-6301.
Sincerely, Jeffrey Mitchell Certified Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Inspector cc: Yohji Ono, Tetra Tech Project Manager
Enclosure: Draft Hazardous Materials Survey Report
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY
DORMITORY 90334
HURLBURT FIELD, FLORIDA
CONTRACT # FA8903-08-D-8781-0147
September 13, 2011
Prepared By:
Tetra Tech EM Inc.
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 500 Oakland, California 94612
(510) 302-6301
103IG1987 i
CONTENTS
Section
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... ES-1
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 SITE STRUCTURE
3.0 ACM FIELD SURVEY AND ANALYTICAL PROTOCOLS
4.0 LBP SCREENING AND ANALYTICAL PROTOCOLS
5.0 ACM FINDINGS
6.0 LBP FINDINGS
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 ACM
7.2 LBP
8.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND DEVIATIONS
9.0 REFERENCES
103IG1987 ii
CONTENTS (Continued)
APPENDICES
A FIGURES
Appendix
B ACM ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORMS
C LBP ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORMS
D PHOTOLOG
E LABORATORY AND INSPECTOR CERTIFICATIONS
FIGURES (in Appendix A)
1 SITE LOCATION MAP
Figure
2 SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION MAP FIRST FLOOR
3 SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION MAP SECOND FLOOR
4 SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION MAP THIRD FLOOR
5 SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION MAP ROOF
TABLES
Table Page
1 SUMMARY OF SUSPECT ACM LABORATORY ANALYSIS
2 SUMMARY OF LBP SCREENING
103IG1987 ES-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Tetra Tech EM Inc. (Tetra Tech) was tasked by the U.S. Air Force to conduct a Hazardous Materials
Survey (survey), specifically an asbestos survey and a lead-based paint (LBP) survey in Dormitory 90334 at Hurlburt Field in Okaloosa County Florida (subject property). The survey was conducted as part of the project Title I Design Services for Repair Dormitory 90334 (Tier 2) (Project No. FA8903-08-D-8781-
0147, Task 100-AMC-T98781.0147), to provide architectural and engineering design for renovations of the dormitory building.
The installation hosts Headquarters Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), the 1st Special
Operations Wing (1 SOW), the United States Air Force Special Operations School (USAFSOS), and the
Air Combat Command's (ACC) 505th Command and Control Wing; the installation has been in operation as an U.S. military base since September 1942. Dormitory 90334 is currently used to house U.S. military personnel stationed at the base, and is surrounded by a mix of other types of buildings on base. The footprint of the dormitory encompasses approximately 9,700 square feet or 0.22 acre. The dormitory is bounded by a parking lot and office building to the north, green space and a food court to the east, an office building to the south, and green space and an office building to the west. Tetra Tech worked with
Hurlburt Field representatives to obtain access to interior areas of the building in order to conduct the survey.
During the survey, Tetra Tech collected 96 samples of suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM) and
11 samples of suspect LBP for laboratory analysis.
The following findings were based on survey observations and analytical results from samples collected during the survey of the dormitory:
• Regulated ACM was identified in the subject property building at the following locations:
Red sheet flooring with backing on the first floor in the custodial closet underneath 12x12 brown floor tile
Tetra Tech recommends no specific abatement actions for this confirmed ACM prior to renovation of the subject property building. According to the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations, if the ACM identified is less than 160 square feet, no notification is necessary and the material does not have to be removed by a licensed asbestos abetment contractor.
Per information provided by base representatives, previous abatement of asbestos containing 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic occurred at the dormitory. The base http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Special_Operations_Wing� http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Special_Operations_Wing� http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAF_Special_Operations_School� http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Combat_Command� http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/505th_Command_and_Control_Wing�
103IG1987 ES-2
representatives could not confirm that all the asbestos containing 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic was removed. During the survey, Tetra Tech did not observe any remaining 9x9 floor tile, but because of limitations on destructive sampling some asbestos containing 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic could be present under existing flooring materials.
Tetra Tech recommends that if during renovations any 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic is encountered, it be assumed to contain asbestos and be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor before any renovation work disturbs the floor tile and associated mastic.
• According to the laboratory results, all painted surfaces sampled contained less than 1 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2) lead; therefore, no LBP was identified during the survey. Since some levels of lead were detected in the paint, the contractor performing the renovation work must comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Lead in Construction Standard, Title 29 of CFR, Part 1926.62.
Survey specifics, analytical protocols, complete findings, and recommendations from the survey are detailed throughout the remainder of this report.
103IG1987 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Tetra Tech EM Inc. (Tetra Tech) was tasked by the U.S. Air Force to conduct a Hazardous Materials
Survey (survey), specifically an asbestos survey and a lead-based paint (LBP) survey in Dormitory 90334 at Hurlburt Field near Fort Walton Beach, Florida (subject property). The survey was conducted as part of the project Title I Design Services for Repair Dormitory 90334 (Tier 2) (Project No. FA8903-08-D-
8781-0147, Task 100-AMC-T98781.0147), to provide architectural and engineering design for renovations of the dormitory building. The primary purpose of the survey was to assess potential impacts to the subject property from hazardous substances. The scope of the survey included an inspection of the subject property building for the presence of asbestos containing building materials (ACM) and LBP.
The survey was completed in accordance with industry standard practice for hazardous materials surveys.
Tetra Tech’s Project Manager for the survey was Mr. Jeffrey Mitchell, Certified Asbestos and LBP
Inspector. The survey team included Mr. Jeffrey Mitchell and Ms. Lona Pearson, Certified Asbestos and
Lead-Based Paint Inspector. The survey strategy and sample methodology were developed based on the possibility that all parts of the subject property building, both inside and out, could be impacted by future renovation or demolition plans. Due to limitations on destructive sampling methods, additional suspect materials not detected may be located in walls, voids, or other concealed areas. Assumptions and deviations regarding the subject property building surveyed are identified in Section 8.0. Further survey work may be needed to comply with all local, state, and federal requirements regulating ACM and LBP prior to any renovation/demolition of the building not cited in this survey report.
Tetra Tech conducted the survey from August 30 through August 31, 2011. One purpose of the survey was to evaluate the subject property for the presence, quantity, locations, and characterization of ACM that may require abatement prior to any renovation/demolition activities, in accordance with National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations as adopted by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The intent of the asbestos NESHAP regulations is to protect the public (and workers) by minimizing release of asbestos fibers during activities involving processing, handling, and disposal of ACM.
Tetra Tech also conducted a screening for the presence, quantity, and locations of LBP exceeding lead hazard levels, which would require Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) worker safety precautions during remodeling activities. The subject property building was constructed prior to
1978, and LBP likely was used in the build-out of these structures. The LBP survey was conducted
103IG1987 2
according to protocols similar to the single-family housing inspection procedures in Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines (HUD 1997).
Tetra Tech provided these services consistent with the level and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document, the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. Although a reasonable attempt has been made to identify suspect ACM and LBP in all parts of the building, the inspection techniques used are inherently limited in the sense that only full demolition procedures can reveal all building materials of a structure and therefore all areas of potential ACM or LBP. This survey report does not warrant against future operations or conditions that may not be consistent with its recommendations. Moreover, because of some limitations on destructive sampling during the survey, completion of the survey does not guarantee identification of all hazardous materials, ACM, or LBP—hazardous materials may be present in voids of walls or ceilings.
Section 2.0 of this report discusses the site structure. Section 3.0 specifies field survey and analytical protocols for the asbestos survey. Section 4.0 presents the field survey and analytical protocols for the
LBP screening. Section 5.0 presents the asbestos findings. Section 6.0 describes the LBP findings.
Section 7.0 offers recommendations based on the survey findings. Section 8.0 specifies assumptions and deviations. Section 9.0 lists sources referenced in developing this report.
103IG1987 3
2.0 SITE STRUCTURE
Dormitory 90334 is located at Hurlburt Field in Okaloosa County, Florida. Dormitory 90334 is a three-story structure that encompasses approximately 29,000 square feet. The building was constructed in the
1950s of concrete and some cinderblock walls with a rolled asphalt roof. Some renovations have occurred to the building, including covering the roof with a pitched steel roof. Interior finishes include concrete, drywall, and cinder block walls. Flooring materials include carpet, floor tile with associated mastic, and concrete. The bathrooms in each dorm room have ceramic tile on the walls and floors. The building is currently occupied and is used as military housing (see Appendix A, Figure 1).
103IG1987 4
3.0 ACM FIELD SURVEY AND ANALYTICAL PROTOCOLS
Tetra Tech made every effort to inspect all areas of the subject property building. Minor demolition of materials (destructive sampling) was required during the survey effort. The inspector took care to ensure that the subject property remained unoccupied during sample collection. Asbestos samples were collected in accordance with NESHAP as adopted by EPA and the Asbestos Hazard and Emergency
Response Act of 1986 (AHERA) protocols. AHERA defines “asbestos containing building material”
(ACBM) as any building material or product that contains more than 1 percent (%) asbestos. Suspected
ACMs were grouped as homogeneous areas if the material was similar in appearance and texture;
however, if the inspector decided that a material (for example, wall texturing) was not similar in appearance and texture to other materials in the building, the inspector distinguished the material as unique and collected samples of each unique material accordingly. Due to limitations on destructive sampling methods, additional suspect materials not detected may be present in walls, voids, or other concealed areas. Assumptions and deviations regarding the building surveyed are identified in
Section 8.0.
Bulk samples of suspected ACM were collected to ensure that each distinct layer of material was represented in the sample. A wetting agent was applied to friable surfaces prior to sample collection to reduce the potential for fiber release. All samples collected were placed in plastic bags, labeled, and sealed immediately upon collection. To prevent cross-contamination between samples, the sampling instruments were wiped clean using a wet, lint-free cloth after collection of each sample. A unique sample identification number was assigned to each sample.
The samples remained in the inspector’s custody until sent to the laboratory. Upon completion of sampling activities, the bulk samples were sent, along with Tetra Tech’s chain-of-custody documentation, to EMLab P&K in San Bruno, California. Suspect ACM samples were analyzed per EPA Method
600/R-93/116 by EMLab P&K using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis. EMLab P&K is a member of the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)-certified laboratory, certification number 200728-0. For Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) purposes, Tetra Tech analyzed one duplicate sample for every 20 samples. Section 5.0 of this report summarizes the ACM analytical results. Sample locations are shown on Figures 2 through 5 in Appendix A. Appendix B includes the ACM analytical results and chain-of-custody forms for the bulk samples. Appendix D includes a photolog of suspect ACM sampled, and Appendix E includes laboratory and asbestos inspector certifications.
103IG1987 5
4.0 LBP SCREENING AND ANALYTICAL PROTOCOLS
Tetra Tech made every effort to inspect all areas of the building. HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of LBP in Housing (1997) suggests that paint applied before 1978 could contain lead.
A screening of suspected LBP was performed according to protocols similar to the single-family housing inspection procedures in the HUD Guidelines. Tetra Tech collected LBP chip samples of suspect painted surfaces that possibly would be impacted during renovation/demolition activities. Paint containing greater than or equal to 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2
A 2-square-inch-square template was used to accurately measure the sample size. The template was placed on the painted surface where the paint was observed. While held in place manually, the template was outlined with a permanent marker. A clean piece of paper was taped to the bottom of the template to create a funnel effect. The paint inside the template area was scraped off using a small chisel. The paint chip samples were collected in hard plastic containers, labeled, and sealed immediately upon collection.
To prevent cross-contamination between samples, the sampling instruments were wiped clean using a wet, lint-free cloth after collection of each sample. A unique sample identification number was assigned to each sample. The inspector took care to ensure that the subject property remained unoccupied during sample collection.
) or 0.5% by weight lead by laboratory analysis is considered LBP.
The samples remained in the inspector’s custody until sent to the laboratory. Upon completion of sampling activities, the samples were sent, along with Tetra Tech’s chain-of-custody documentation, to
Quantem in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Quantem is a member of the Environmental Lead Lab
Accreditation Program (ELLAP). The paint chips collected were analyzed for total lead. The results are summarized in Section 6.0. Screening and sampling locations are shown on Figure 2 in Appendix A.
Copies of the analytical results and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix C, and Appendix E includes laboratory and LBP inspector certifications.
103IG1987 6
5.0 ACM FINDINGS
The laboratory report in Appendix B identifies the PLM results for the ACM samples collected from the subject property building, which are summarized in Table 1 below. The bolded results in Table 1 indicate where asbestos was detected at a concentration greater than 1 percent.
103IG1987 7
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF SUSPECT ACM LABORATORY ANALYSIS
DORMITORY 90334, HURLBURT FIELD, FLORIDA
Figure Key Sample ID Material Description Material Locations
Analytical Result
(% ACM*)
Friability/ Category Quantity
Estimated Abatement
Cost 1 H-1-100A-CT-1 2 x 4 Ceiling Tile
Day Rooms on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
ND
Floors
NA NA NA
2 H-2-200A-CT-2 2 x 4 Ceiling Tile ND NA NA NA 3 H-3-300A-CT-3 2 x 4 Ceiling Tile ND NA NA NA 4 H-1-100A-CB-1 Cove Base Mastic
Day Rooms on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
ND
Floors
NA NA NA
5 H-2-200A-CB-2 Cove Base Mastic ND NA NA NA 6 H-3-300A-CB-3 Cove Base Mastic ND NA NA NA
7 H-1-100A-WM-1 Wall Mastic Behind Carpet
Day Rooms on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
ND
Floors
NA NA NA
8 H-2-200A-WM-2 Wall Mastic Behind Carpet ND NA NA NA
9 H-3-300A-WM-3 Wall Mastic Behind Carpet ND NA NA NA
10 H-1-100A-DW-1 Drywall Build-out Ceilings and Exterior South Walls in
Day Rooms on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Floors; 1st Floor
Laundry and Custodial Closets in Hallways on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
ND
Floors
NA NA NA
11 H-2-200A-DW-2 Drywall ND NA NA NA
12 H-3-300A-DW-3 Drywall ND NA NA NA
13 H-1-100A-DWJC-1 Joint Compound Build-out Ceilings and Exterior South Walls in
Day Rooms on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Floors; 1st Floor
Laundry and Custodial Closets in Hallways on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
ND
Floors
NA NA NA
14 H-2-200A-DWJC-2 Joint Compound ND NA NA NA
15 H-3-300A-DWJC-3 Joint Compound ND NA NA NA
16 H-1-100A-CA-1 Carpet Adhesive Day Rooms on 1st, 2nd, and
3rd
ND
Floors
NA NA NA
17 H-2-200A-CA-2 Carpet Adhesive ND NA NA NA 18 H-3-300A-CA-3 Carpet Adhesive ND NA NA NA
TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
103IG1987 8
Key Sample ID Material Description Material Locations
Analytical Result
(% ACM*)
Friability/ Category Quantity
Estimated Abatement
Cost 19 H-1-100A-CTX-1 Ceiling Texture Above Drop Ceiling in
Day Rooms on 1st and 2nd
ND
Floors; and on Ceilings in all Dorm Rooms
NA NA NA
20 H-2-200A-CTX-2 Ceiling Texture ND NA NA NA
21 H-3-300A-CTX-3 Ceiling Texture ND NA NA NA
22 H-1-EXT-WC-1 Window/Door Caulking All Exterior Doors and
Windows
ND NA NA NA
23 H-2-EXT-WC-2 Window/Door Caulking ND NA NA NA 24 H-3-EXT-WC-3 Window/Door Caulking ND NA NA NA 25 H-1-EXT-PL-1 Plaster
All Exterior Door and Window Panels
ND NA NA NA
26 H-2-EXT-PL-2 Plaster ND NA NA NA 27 H-3-EXT-PL-3 Plaster ND NA NA NA 28 H-1-112-DW2-1 Drywall (Brown)
All Exterior Door and Window Panels
ND NA NA NA
29 H-2-219-DW2-2 Drywall (Brown) ND NA NA NA 30 H-3-313-DW2-3 Drywall (Brown) ND NA NA NA 31 H-EXT-ST-1 Stair Tread with Mastic
All Stairs in Hallway and Ends of Buildings
ND NA NA NA
32 H-EXT-ST-2 Stair Tread with Mastic ND NA NA NA
33 H-EXT-ST-3 Stair Tread with Mastic ** ND NA NA NA
34 H-1-112-DW3-1 Drywall All Dorm Room Ceiling Build-out and in Dorm Room Wall Adjacent to Hallway on All Floors
ND NA NA NA
35 H-2-219-DW3-2 Drywall ND NA NA NA
36 H-3-313-DW3-3 Drywall ND NA NA NA
37 H-1-112-DWJC2-1 Joint Compound All Dorm Room Ceiling Build-out and in Dorm Room Wall Adjacent to Hallway on All Floors
ND NA NA NA
38 H-2-219-DWJC2-2 Joint Compound ND NA NA NA
39 H-3-313-DWJC2-3 Joint Compound ND NA NA NA
40 H-1-111-CB2-1 Cove Base Mastic All Dorm Rooms
ND NA NA NA
41 H-2-219-CB2-2 Cove Base Mastic ND NA NA NA 42 H-3-313-CB2-3 Cove Base Mastic ND NA NA NA 43 H-1-111-CA2-1 Carpet Adhesive All Dorm Rooms ND NA NA NA 44 H-2-219-CA2-2 Carpet Adhesive ND NA NA NA
103IG1987 9
Key Sample ID Material Description Material Locations
Analytical Result
(% ACM*)
Friability/ Category Quantity
Estimated Abatement
Cost 45 H-3-313-CA2-3 Carpet Adhesive ND NA NA NA
46 H-1-112-DWSC-1 Blue/White Speckled Skim Coat
All Dorm Rooms on One Wall
ND NA NA NA
47 H-2-219-DWSC-2 Blue/White Speckled Skim Coat ND NA NA NA
48 H-3-313-DWSC-3 Blue/White Speckled Skim Coat ND NA NA NA
49 H-EXT-STU-1 Stucco All Exterior Walls
ND NA NA NA
50 H-EXT-STU-2 Stucco ND NA NA NA 51 H-EXT-STU-3 Stucco ND NA NA NA 52 H-1-L-FT-1 White 12 x 12 Floor Tile
Laundry Room 1st
ND
Floor
NA NA NA
53 H-1-L-FT-2 White 12 x 12 Floor Tile ND NA NA NA 54 H-1-L-FT-3 White 12 x 12 Floor Tile ** ND NA NA NA 55 H-1-L-CB3-1 Cove Base Mastic
Laundry Room 1st
ND
Floor
NA NA NA
56 H-1-L-CB3-2 Cove Base Mastic ND NA NA NA 57 H-1-L-CB3-3 Cove Base Mastic ND NA NA NA 58 H-1-L-CT2-1 2 x 2 Ceiling Tile
Laundry Room 1st
ND
Floor
NA NA NA
59 H-1-L-CT2-2 2 x 2 Ceiling Tile ND NA NA NA 60 H-1-L-CT2-3 2 x 2 Ceiling Tile ND NA NA NA
61 H-1-C-FT2-1 12 x 12 Brown Multiple Layer Floor Tile
1st
Brown Floor Tile – ND; Red Sheet Flooring with
Backing – 30% Chry; Yellow Mastic - ND Floor Custodial Closet
Category I – Non-Friable
30 SF $120
62 H-1-C-FT2-2 12 x 12 Brown Multiple Layer Floor Tile
Stop on 1st Positive NA ***
63 H-1-C-FT2-3 12 x 12 Brown Multiple Layer Floor Tile
** Stop on 1st Positive NA ***
64 H-EXT-RT-1 Roof Tar Original Roof ND NA NA NA 65 H-EXT-RT-2 Roof Tar ND NA NA NA
103IG1987 10
Key Sample ID Material Description Material Locations
Analytical Result
(% ACM*)
Friability/ Category Quantity
Estimated Abatement
Cost 66 H-EXT-RT-3 Roof Tar ** ND NA NA NA 67 H-EXT-RS-1 Roof Material
Original Roof
ND NA NA NA
68 H-EXT-RS-2 Roof Material ND NA NA NA 69 H-EXT-RS-3 Roof Material ND NA NA NA 70 H-1-112-PC-1 Caulking Penetration Caulking
Associated with HVAC Systems Above Build-out
Drywall Ceilings on 1st and 2nd
ND
Floors
NA NA NA
71 H-2-219-PC-2 Caulking ND NA NA NA
72 H-1-112-PC-3 Caulking ** ND NA NA NA
73 H-1-112-DW4-1 Drywall (Brown) In All Dorm Room
Bathrooms
ND NA NA NA
74 H-2-219-DW4-2 Drywall (Brown) ND NA NA NA 75 H-3-313-DW4-3 Drywall (Brown) ND NA NA NA
76 H-1-100E-TSI-1 Black Thermal System Insulation In Mechanical Rooms (100
E, 100 D, 200 D, and 300D) on Exposed Chilled
Water Pipe Runs and Joints
ND NA NA NA
77 H-2-200D-TSI-2 Black Thermal System Insulation ND NA NA NA
78 H-3-300D-TSI-3 Black Thermal System Insulation ND NA NA NA
79 H-1-100E-TSI2-1
Thermal System
Insulation White Joint Jacket Wrap In Mechanical Rooms (100
E, 100 D, 200 D, and 300D) on Exposed Chilled
Water Pipe Runs and Joints
ND NA NA NA
80 H-2-200D-TSI2-2
Thermal System
Insulation White Joint Jacket Wrap
ND NA NA NA
81 H-3-300D-TSI2-3
Thermal System
Insulation White Joint Jacket Wrap
ND NA NA NA
82 H-1-100D-TSI3-1 White Boiler Jacket Wrap Mechanical Room 100 D
ND NA NA NA
83 H-1-100D-TSI3-2 White Boiler Jacket Wrap ND NA NA NA 84 H-1-100D-TSI3-3 White Boiler Jacket Wrap ND NA NA NA
103IG1987 11
Key Sample ID Material Description Material Locations
Analytical Result
(% ACM*)
Friability/ Category Quantity
Estimated Abatement
Cost 85 H-1-112-SC-1 Skim Coat 1st and 2nd ND Floor Ceiling on
Concrete Decking Where CTX is Not Present
NA NA NA
86 H-2-219-SC-2 Skim Coat ND NA NA NA 87 H-2-219-SC-3 Skim Coat ND NA NA NA
88 H-1-100A-DWSC2-
1 Drywall Skim Coat Build-out Ceilings and
Exterior South Walls in Day Rooms on 1st, 2nd, and
3rd Floors; 1st Floor Laundry and Custodial
Closets in Hallways on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
ND
Floors
NA NA NA
89 H-2-200A-DWSC2-
2 Drywall Skim Coat ND NA NA NA
90 H-3-300A-DWSC2-
3 Drywall Skim Coat ND NA NA NA
91 H-1-111-DWSC3-1 Drywall Skim Coat All Dorm Room Ceiling Build-out and in Dorm Room Wall Adjacent to Hallway on All Floors
ND NA NA NA
92 H-2-219-DWSC3-2 Drywall Skim Coat ND NA NA NA
93 H-3-313-DWSC3-3 Drywall Skim Coat ND NA NA NA
94 H-1-112-CTM-1 Ceramic Tile Mastic All Dorm Room Bathroom
Shower Walls
ND NA NA NA
95 H-1-112-CTM-2 Ceramic Tile Mastic ND NA NA NA 96 H-1-112-CTM-3 Ceramic Tile Mastic ND NA NA NA
Notes:
Bolded results indicate that ACM was detected.
* AHERA defines ACM as any material or product that contains more than 1 percent asbestos.
** Duplicate sample
Laboratory had a “stop on first positive” order in place.
% Percent ACM Asbestos-containing material AHERA Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act of 1986 Chry Chrysotile asbestos ID Identification NA Not applicable ND Not detected SF Square feet
103IG1987 12
6.0 LBP FINDINGS
The laboratory report in Appendix C identifies the analytical results for the LBP samples collected from the subject property building, which are summarized in Table 2 below.
103IG1987 13
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF LBP SCREENING
Figure Key Sample ID Paint Color Room Component Substrate Damaged Laboratory
Analytical Result (mg/cm2)
Quantity Estimated Abatement
Cost
L1 H-EXT-L-1 White Hallway
Firehouse Cabinet
Wall Metal NA < 0.00518 NA NA
L2 H-EXT-L-2 Brown Exterior – throughout
Door and Door frames Metal NA < 0.00698 NA NA
L3 H-INT-L-3 Beige Interior Dorm Rooms
Door and door frames Metal NA 0.00788 NA NA
L4 H-INT-L-4 Beige Interior Dorm Rooms Walls Drywall NA < 0.00796 NA NA
L5 H-INT-L-5 Blue/White Spec
Interior Dorm Rooms Walls Drywall NA < 0.00888 NA NA
L6 H-INT-L-6 Beige Interior Dorm Rooms Walls Cinder Block NA < 0.00634 NA NA
L7 H-EXT-L-7 Cream Exterior Walls Cinder Block NA 0.0870 NA NA L8 H-INT-L-8 Light Green Electrical Room Walls Concrete NA 0.0940 NA NA
L9 H-INT-L9 Gray Electrical and Mechanical
Room Ceiling Concrete/Plas ter NA 0.0272 NA NA
L10 H-INT-L-10 Gray Mechanical Room Pipes Metal NA 0.128 NA NA
L11 H-INT-L-11 Beige Day Rooms Door Metal NA 0.0595 NA NA
Notes:
< Less than laboratory reporting limit mg/cm2
ID Identification Milligrams per square centimeter
NA Not applicable
103IG1987 14
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on survey observations and the sample analytical results, Tetra Tech recommends the actions summarized below before renovation of the subject property building.
7.1 ACM
• Approximately 30 square feet of red sheet flooring with backing is located in the first floor custodial closet under 12x12 brown floor tile. The flooring material is represented by samples H-1-C-FT2-1, -2, and -3. Laboratory results indicated that the flooring material contained 30 percent chrysotile asbestos. Tetra Tech recommends no specific abatement actions for this confirmed ACM prior to renovation of the subject property building. According to the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations, if the ACM identified is less than 160 square feet, no notification is necessary and the material does not have to be removed by a licensed asbestos abetment contractor prior to renovation activites.
• Per information provided by base representatives, previous abatement of asbestos containing 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic occurred at the dormitory. The base representatives could not confirm that all the asbestos containing 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic was removed.
During the survey, Tetra Tech did not observe any remaining 9x9 floor tile, but because of limitations on destructive sampling some asbestos containing 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic could be present under existing flooring materials. Tetra Tech recommends that if during renovations any 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic is encountered, it be assumed to contain asbestos and be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor before any renovation work disturbs the floor tile and associated mastic.
7.2 LBP
According to the laboratory results, all painted surfaces sampled contained less than 1 mg/cm2 lead;
therefore, no LBP was identified during the survey. Since some levels of lead were detected in the paint, the contractor performing the renovation work must comply with the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) Lead in Construction Standard, Title 29 of CFR, Part 1926.62.
103IG1987 15
8.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND DEVIATIONS
The entire dormitory building was visually surveyed for suspect ACM and LBP. The building is currently in use for housing military personnel in training at the base. Not all dorm rooms were accessible because the building is currently occupied. A representative number of dorm rooms and all common areas were accessible to conduct the survey. Access to these representative dorm rooms, along with information provided by the base representative, provided the survey team with sufficient information to complete the survey. According to information provided by base representatives, ACMs have been removed from the dormitory, specifically 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic present throughout the dormitory in the past. No specific dates when the material was removed could be provided. Signs of this floor tile can be seen in the hallways. Base representatives could not confirm if all this flooring material had been removed. Because not all dorm rooms were accessible, some of this asbestos containing 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic may still be present under carpet or other floor coverings in the dormitory. If during renovations any 9x9 floor tile and associated mastic is encountered, Tetra Tech recommends it be assumed to contain asbestos and be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor before any renovation work disturbs the floor tile and associated mastic. The removed waste must be transported to a disposal site able to accept non-friable ACM.
103IG1987 16
9.0 REFERENCES
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1997. Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing.
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
_̂̂_ Facility Location
Source: USGS Mary Esther, FL 7.5 Minute Topo Quad, 1994
Hazardous Materials Survey For Asbestos and Lead-based Paint
Dormitory 90334 Hurlburt Field, Florida
Date: 09/02/11 Drawn By: Nick Wiederholt Project No: 103IG1987.01
Figure 1 Facility Location Map±0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Okaloosa County
X:\
I\IG
\01 \Pr oje cts
\m xd
\Fi gu re1 .m xd
101 103 105 107 109 111 113 115 117 119 121 123
124122120118116114112110108106104102
Custodial Closet
Mechanical Room (100D) Laundry Room
Day Room (100A)
Mechanical Room (100E)
Electrical Room
70,72 34,37
76,79
10,13
25,26,27
94,95,96
82,83,84
58,59,60
55,56,57 52,53,5461,62,63
L7
L1
L8
L3 L9
L5
L2
L6
L4
L11
L10
Hazardous Materials Survey For Asbestos and Lead-based Paint
Dormitory 90334 Hurlburt Field, Florida
Figure 2Sample Locations and ACM/ Lead-based Paint Areas - First Floor
Date: 09/09/11 Drawn By: Nick Wiederholt Project No: 103IG1987.01Source: Renovate Dorm 90334, Demolition Floor Plans, June 1995.X:\
I\IG
\01 \Pr oje cts
\m xd
\Fi gu re2 .m xd
Not to Scale
Legend !( Asbestos containing material sample location !( Non-asbestos containing material sample location #* Lead-based paint sample location
Area containing asbestos ACM Asbestos containing material
201 203 205 207 209 211 213 215 217 219 221 223 225
224222220218216214212210208206204202
Mechanical Room (200D)
Storage
Day Room (200A)
35,38
11,14
77,80 71,86,87
Hazardous Materials Survey For Asbestos and Lead-based Paint
Dormitory 90334 Hurlburt Field, Florida
Figure 3Sample Locations and ACM/ Lead-based Paint Areas - Second Floor
Date: 09/09/11 Drawn By: Nick Wiederholt Project No: 103IG1987.01Source: Renovate Dorm 90334, Demolition Floor Plans, June 1995.X:\
I\IG
\01 \Pr oje cts
\m xd
\Fi gu re3 .m xd
Not to Scale
Legend !( Non-asbestos containing material sample location
301 303 305 307 309 311 313 315 317 319 321 323 325
324322320318316314312310308306304302
Mechanical Room (300D)
Storage
Day Room (300A)
42 30
78,81 36,39
12,15
Hazardous Materials Survey For Asbestos and Lead-based Paint
Dormitory 90334 Hurlburt Field, Florida
Figure 4Sample Locations and ACM/ Lead-based Paint Areas - Third Floor
Date: 09/09/11 Drawn By: Nick Wiederholt Project No: 103IG1987.01Source: Renovate Dorm 90334, Demolition Floor Plans, June 1995.X:\
I\IG
\01 \Pr oje cts
\m xd
\Fi gu re4 .m xd
Not to Scale
Legend
65,66
67,68,69
Hazardous Materials Survey For Asbestos and Lead-based Paint
Dormitory 90334 Hurlburt Field, Florida
Figure 5Sample Locations and ACM/ Lead-based Paint Areas - Roof
Date: 09/08/11 Drawn By: Nick Wiederholt Project No: 103IG1987.01Source: Renovate Dorm 90334, Demolition Floor Plans, June 1995.X:\
I\IG
\01 \Pr oje cts
\m xd
\Fi gu re5 .m xd
Not to Scale
Note: The drawing depicted and samples taken are on the original peaked roof under the installed metal casing.
Legend
APPENDIX B
ACM ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORMS
EMLab P&K
Approved by:
Lab Manager Dr. Kamashwaran Ramanathan
Report for:
Jeff Mitchell Tetra Tech-KCMO 415 Oak Street Kansas City, MO 64106
Regarding: Project: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
EML ID: 824552
EMLab P&K
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data can be provided when requested.
EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.
Document Number: 200091 - Revision Number: 5
Dates of Analysis:
Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116: 09-06-2011
Service SOPs: Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116 (EPA-600/M4-82-020 (SOP 01264))
EMLab ID: 824552, Page 1 of 21EMLab P&K, LLC
1150 Bayhill Drive, Suite 100, San Bruno, CA 94066
(866) 888-6653 Fax (650) 829-5852 www.emlab.com Client: Tetra Tech-KCMO C/O: Jeff Mitchell Re: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
Date of Sampling: 08-30-2011 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2011 Date of Report: 09-06-2011
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116
Total Samples Submitted: 93 Total Samples Analysed: 93
Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 1
Location: H-EXT-RT-1, Roof tar Lab ID-Version‡: 3659834-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Tar ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 3% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-EXT-RT-2, Roof tar Lab ID-Version‡: 3659835-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Tar ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 3% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-EXT-RT-3, Roof tar Lab ID-Version‡: 3659836-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Tar ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 3% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-EXT-RS-1, Roof material Lab ID-Version‡: 3659837-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 45% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab ID: 824552, Page 2 of 21EMLab P&K, LLC
The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
(866) 888-6653 Fax (650) 829-5852 www.emlab.com Client: Tetra Tech-KCMO C/O: Jeff Mitchell Re: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
Date of Sampling: 08-30-2011 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2011 Date of Report: 09-06-2011
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116
Location: H-EXT-RS-2, Roof material Lab ID-Version‡: 3659838-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 45% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-EXT-RS-3, Roof material Lab ID-Version‡: 3659839-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 45% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-3-300A-WM-3, Wall mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659840-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Mastic ND
Gray Non-Fibrous Material ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-2-200A-WM-2, Wall mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659841-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Mastic ND
Gray Non-Fibrous Material ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab ID: 824552, Page 3 of 21EMLab P&K, LLC
The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is
(866) 888-6653 Fax (650) 829-5852 www.emlab.com Client: Tetra Tech-KCMO C/O: Jeff Mitchell Re: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
Date of Sampling: 08-30-2011 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2011 Date of Report: 09-06-2011
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116
Location: H-1-100A-WM-1, Wall mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659842-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Mastic ND
Gray Non-Fibrous Material ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-100A-CB-1, Covebase/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659843-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Mastic ND
Blue Baseboard ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-2-200A-CB-2, Covebase/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659844-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Mastic ND
Blue Baseboard ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-3-300A-CB-3, Covebase/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659845-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Mastic ND
Blue Baseboard ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab ID: 824552, Page 4 of 21EMLab P&K, LLC
The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is
(866) 888-6653 Fax (650) 829-5852 www.emlab.com Client: Tetra Tech-KCMO C/O: Jeff Mitchell Re: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
Date of Sampling: 08-30-2011 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2011 Date of Report: 09-06-2011
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116
Location: H-1-100A-DWJC-1, Joint compound Lab ID-Version‡: 3659846-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Joint Compound with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-2-200A-DWJC-2, Joint compound Lab ID-Version‡: 3659847-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Joint Compound with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-3-300A-DWJC-3, Joint compound Lab ID-Version‡: 3659848-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Joint Compound with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-100A-DW-1, Drywall Lab ID-Version‡: 3659849-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Off-White Drywall ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 3% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-2-200A-DW-2, Drywall Lab ID-Version‡: 3659850-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Off-White Drywall ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 3% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab ID: 824552, Page 5 of 21EMLab P&K, LLC
The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is
(866) 888-6653 Fax (650) 829-5852 www.emlab.com Client: Tetra Tech-KCMO C/O: Jeff Mitchell Re: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
Date of Sampling: 08-30-2011 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2011 Date of Report: 09-06-2011
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116
Location: H-3-300A-DW-3, Drywall Lab ID-Version‡: 3659851-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Off-White Drywall ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 3% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-100A-CA-1, Carpet adhesive Lab ID-Version‡: 3659852-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Adhesive ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Synthetic Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-2-200A-CA-2, Carpet adhesive Lab ID-Version‡: 3659853-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Adhesive ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Synthetic Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-3-300A-CA-3, Carpet adhesive Lab ID-Version‡: 3659854-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Adhesive ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Synthetic Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-100A-CTX-1, Ceiling texture Lab ID-Version‡: 3659855-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Texture with Paint ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 5% Vermiculite Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab ID: 824552, Page 6 of 21EMLab P&K, LLC
The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is
(866) 888-6653 Fax (650) 829-5852 www.emlab.com Client: Tetra Tech-KCMO C/O: Jeff Mitchell Re: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
Date of Sampling: 08-30-2011 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2011 Date of Report: 09-06-2011
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116
Location: H-2-200A-CTX-2, Ceiling texture Lab ID-Version‡: 3659856-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Texture with Paint ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 5% Vermiculite Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-3-300A-CTX-3, Ceiling texture Lab ID-Version‡: 3659857-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Texture with Paint ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Fibrous Content: 5% Vermiculite Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-L-CB3-1, Covebase/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659858-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Off-White Mastic ND Gray Baseboard ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-L-CB3-2, Covebase/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659859-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Off-White Mastic ND Gray Baseboard ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-L-CB3-3, Covebase/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659860-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Off-White Mastic ND Gray Baseboard ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab ID: 824552, Page 7 of 21EMLab P&K, LLC
The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is
(866) 888-6653 Fax (650) 829-5852 www.emlab.com Client: Tetra Tech-KCMO C/O: Jeff Mitchell Re: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
Date of Sampling: 08-30-2011 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2011 Date of Report: 09-06-2011
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116
Location: H-1-EXT-PL-1, Plaster Lab ID-Version‡: 3659861-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Plaster ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-2-EXT-PL-2, Plaster Lab ID-Version‡: 3659862-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Plaster ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-3-EXT-PL-3, Plaster Lab ID-Version‡: 3659863-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Plaster ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-112-DWSC-1, Skimcoat Lab ID-Version‡: 3659864-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Skim Coat with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-2-219-DWSC-2, Skimcoat Lab ID-Version‡: 3659865-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Skim Coat with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
EMLab ID: 824552, Page 8 of 21EMLab P&K, LLC
The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.
Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is
(866) 888-6653 Fax (650) 829-5852 www.emlab.com Client: Tetra Tech-KCMO C/O: Jeff Mitchell Re: Hurlburt Field, Dorm 90334
Date of Sampling: 08-30-2011 Date of Receipt: 08-31-2011 Date of Report: 09-06-2011
ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116
Location: H-3-313-DWSC-3, Skimcoat Lab ID-Version‡: 3659866-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Skim Coat with Paint ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-L-FT-1, Floor tile/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659867-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Mastic ND
Beige Floor Tile ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: H-1-L-FT-2, Floor tile/mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 3659868-1
Sample Layers Asbestos Content Tan Mastic ND
Beige Floor Tile ND…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .