Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hurlburt Field - Dormitory Demolition Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA441720Q0018
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor that performed dormitory demolition services. The questionnaire requests information about the contractor's performance on quality, schedule, management, regulatory compliance, liquidated damages, and whether the respondent would rehire the contractor. It is to be completed by an evaluation respondent for a contractor that performed demolition of two three-story dormitory buildings at Hurlburt Field in accordance with the attached statement of work. Responses to the questionnaire are due by the closing date and time of July 27, 2020 for Solicitation FA441720Q0018 issued by the Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Bldg 90334 Toxic Substance Survey Report (Sep 2011).pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work Updated 22 July.pdf | ||
| FA441720Q00180002 Updated 22 July.pdf | ||
| 90334 renovation demo drawings.pdf | ||
| Demolition Q and A.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA441720Q00180002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - FA441720Q00180001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Instructions to Offerors (updated 21 July).pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA441720Q00180001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Surveys and Reports.pdf | ||
| Site Visit Sign-In Sheet.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Wage Determination 2015-4531 (Rev 13).pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Pictures.pdf | ||
| FA441720Q0018.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - Evaluation of Offerors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Site Maps.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Instructions to Offerors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
When filled this document is
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Past/Present Performance Questionnaire
FA441720Q0018
ATTACHMENT 8
SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
1. Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)
1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:
2. Respondent’s Name:
3. Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail:
4. Award Amount:
Final Amount:
5. Project Title:
Project Number:
6. Brief Project Description:
7. Period of Performance:
Start Date:
End Date:
SECTION C: EMAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO:
| Contract Specialist: |
| Robert Rogers |
| Email: |
| Robert.rogers.70@us.af.mil |
| Contracting Officer: |
| Christopher Smith |
| Email: |
| Christopher.smith.110@us.af.mil |
THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: The closing date and time of solicitation.
SECTION D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL RATINGS.
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Exceptional (Outstanding) Very Good (Above Average)
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Available |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented |
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
1. QUALITY: Access conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of Good Workmanship. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.
☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
2. SCHEDULE: Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the established schedule.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
3. MANAGEMENT: Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements. Adequately coordinate and controlled performance of subcontractors. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
4. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: Contractor complied with Financial, Environmental, Safety, and Reporting Requirements. Contractor was compliant with labor standards, posting of EEO, labor rates, minimum wage. Payrolls were completed properly and received in a timely matter. Paid subcontractors in a timely manner Contractor had an adequate safety plan and it was implemented properly. No safety discrepancies were noted.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
5. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages? ☐YES ☐NO (If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
6. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? ☐YES ☐NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:
Signature of Respondent: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________ FOUO Page 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .