Q A Amendment 4 MFR.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

47TH FLYING TRAINING WING (AETC)

01 Jul 21

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

SUBJECT: FA3099-21-R-0002, Repair Overruns on Center Runway, Amendment 04; Questions and

Answers (Q&As)

Question 1: Plan E-3.10, detail 4, note 5 states to coordinate with the manufacturer of the existing system. In order to price this feature of work, contractor needs to know the make, model, and any other pertinent details for this existing system.

The current existing equipment within this system are:

· SIEMENS - L-850D Style 2 Runway Threshold & Runway End Light

· ADB SAFEGATE – PAR-56 Steady-Burning Approach Light – Part Number:

44D1661/2121 Options: 20 AMP shorting device

· ADB SAFEGATE – FAA L-850E IRTA Runway Threshold/Military Approach –

Part Number: 44A6248/3210, Military Red

· ADB LIGHTS – FAA L-850E IRTA Runway Threshold/Military Approach –Part

Number: 44A6248/2210, Military White

· ADB SAFEGATE – FAA L-850E IRTA Runway Threshold/Military Approach –

Part Number: 44A6248/1210, Green

It is still the contractor’s responsibility to obtain pertinent details from the manufacturer of the existing system.

Question 2: Please confirm that FAA AC150/5370-10H, more specifically, Part 6 - Flexible

Pavements Item P-401, Item P-403 and Item P-404 are applicable to this contract.

Section 32 12 14.13 Hot-Mix Asphalt Airfield Paving is to be referenced for

“Flexible Pavements.”

Question 3: Please confirm that TxDOT standard specification requirements for asphalt pavement are acceptable for this contract.

Section 32 12 14.13 Hot-Mix Asphalt Airfield Paving is to be referenced for

“Flexible Pavements.”

Question 4: Contractor respectfully requests a 7 day extension to the proposal submission deadline to allow for proper pricing of asphalt materials and placement.

The Government issued Amendment 03 to extend the proposal submission deadline by 14 days.

Question 5: Based on requests for material pricing, Asphalt pavement for this contract is not currently available without drastic changes to the currently issued technical specifications.

Contractor respectfully request the option to substitute the proposed asphalt pavement with

Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP).

Disapproved, even with the high flux of prices due to the current economic hardships, this must be asphalt pavement.

Question 6: Based on the Governments response to Question 2 of Amendment 01 regarding

11"x17" page size for the project schedule, will the government please confirm that 1 - 11x17 page is considered 1 page towards the proposal page limitation or 2 pages?

The Government reconfirms that one 11” x 17” page for the project schedule will be considered one page towards the proposal page limitation. Only the project schedule shall be on an 11” x 17” page.

JOSHUA CENTILLI

Contract Specialist