Solicitation Amendment FA303024Q00120003 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

Created On:

25 Mar 2024, 11:21 AM Central Daylight Time

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Time 02:00 PM 03:00 PM Response Due Date 15 Mar 2024 26 Mar 2024

Deliveries or Performance

The delivery information for the following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) / ELIN(s) were modified:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 21 Mar 2024 to 30 Jun 2024 03 Apr 2024 to 30 Jun 2024

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 21 Mar 2024 to 30 Jun 2024 03 Apr 2024 to 30 Jun 2024

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 21 Mar 2024 to 30 Jun 2024 03 Apr 2024 to 30 Jun 2024

List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

1. Statement of Work (Updated 25 Mar)

The following attachments were deleted:

1. Statement of Work (Updated 7 Mar)

Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

FA303024Q00120003

The following additions/changes are made to FAR Clause 52.212-1, which is incorporated by reference.

Throughout this solicitation, any reference to offer shall be considered a reference to quote.

OFFER PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

I.INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

To assure timely and equitable evaluation of quotes, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. The quote must bicomplete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The responses shall consist of the following:

A. Price Quotation: Insert proposed unit prices in each Contract Line Item Number in the CLIN Table above. In doing so, the offeror confirms that they have read and understand the terms and conditions as written in the solicitation, and any attachments. Submit one copy.

B. Technical Requirements: The offeror shall provide with his/her quote sufficient documentation (using no more than 50 pages, single spaced, 12-point text size, and one-inch margins) specifically addressing the technical requirements as stated in FAR Clause 52.212-2, EVALUATION-- COMMERCIALITEMS, and its addendum, below.

C. Significant Documentation Required for Evaluation: The offeror must submit a Capabilities Statement that encompasses the following three (3) Phases: Pre-Work, Execution, and Post-Work. The government will not accept a marketing statement from an offeror. If the proposal is deemed a marketing statement and does not include methodologies of the three phase the vendor will be excluded from the competitive range.

II.GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Information regarding submission of quote. Electronic quotes shall be submitted to the contracting office at the email addresses below no later than the due date and time specified in this solicitation. Besure to include company name, prompt payment terms, quote, date, CAGE code, and provide the representations and certifications, if not already in System Award Management (SAM) database. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The provisions FAR 52.212-3 shall be returned along with the quote. For the remainder of the Request for Quote (RFQ), except as elsewhere designated, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

(1) Electronic Mail Offers: Submit no later than 3:00 PM CST 26 Mar 24.

(2) Email addresses for offers (send to both addresses):

robert.cosper@us.af.mil matthew.loffredo@us.af.mil

(3) Questions: Questions about this offer shall be submitted electronically by email to SSgt Robert Cosper at robert.cosper@us.af.mil and Matthew Loffredo at matthew.loffredo@us.af.mil. The Government will not accept any questions after Monday, 11 March 24, 8:00 AM CST. Answers will be provided by Monday, 11 March 24 3:00 PM.

B. Disqualifications. Failure to comply with this directive may result in a "non-responsive" quote and disqualification from the competition.

(End Addendum)

Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

The following is inserted as new paragraph (d) of the provision:

BASIS FOR AWARD: It is in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price. TheGovernment will use the following Trade-Off Methodology to determine the bestvalue for the Government.

The evaluation process will include the following:

1. Technical Requirements: Technical suitability will be evaluated based on the offeror's approach in the Statement of Capabilities and the following three (3) Phases: Pre-work, Execution, and Post-Work as follows:

a. The offeror's capabilities statement approach to Pre-Work, Execution, and Post -Work will be the focal point of evaluation. The evaluation of adequacy is determined by conducting a comparative analysis of the proposal to the Statement of Work and assessing if it meets or exceeds the outlined criteria. The offeror's approach will then be rated according to the following table:

b. The evaluation of proposals will involve an assessment of each subfactor for strengths, deficiencies, weaknesses, Technical Rating Methodology:

and significant weaknesses. Evaluators will thoroughly analyze the content of each subfactor to determine its quality and adherence to the solicitation requirements.

Once the assessment of strengths, deficiencies, weaknesses, and significant weaknesses is completed for each subfactor, evaluators will utilize this information to assign an overall rating to the subfactor. Ratings will be assigned based on the extent to which the subfactor demonstrates exceptional performance, meets the minimum requirements, or falls short of expectations.

Once each subfactor is rated, the overall rating of the factor will be determined based on the aggregated ratings of its constituent subfactors. This comprehensive assessment ensures that all aspects of the proposal are thoroughly evaluated and contributes to the determination of the proposal's overall suitability for award.

1B. Technical Rating: The offeror's technical solution will be rated separately from the risk associated with its technical approach. The technical rating will evaluate the quality of the offeror's technical solution for meeting the Government's requirement and includes consideration of the significant strengths, uncertainties, and deficiencies found in the proposal. The risk rating considers the risk associated with the technical approach to meeting the requirement. The government will utilize the ratings listed in and below:Table 2A Table 2B

Table 2B.

Table 2B. Technical Risk Rating Method

Adje ctiva l Rat ing

Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness/weaknesses which have low potential to cause disruption of schedule, or degradation of performance. Normal contractor emphasis and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Mod erate

Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may have a moderate potential to cause disruption of schedule, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to have high potential to cause significant disruption of schedule, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will unlikely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Unac cepta ble

Proposal contains a deficiency or a combination of significant weaknesses that causes an unacceptable level of risk of unsuccessful performance.

b. The assessment for technical, and risk will determine theextent to which the proposal aligns with or exceeds the specified evaluation criteriabelow as it is related to the Statement of Work.

Factor One (1): Approach Alignment & Adaptability

Subfactor One (1): The offeror's approach to strategic planning must be clearly articulated and demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the requirements outlined in the Statement of Work.

Offerors must detail how their proposed methodologies will effectively address the key components of the strategic planning session, including the development of mission and vision statements, priorities, objectives, and metrics.

Subfactor Two (2): Alignment with Defense Industry Best Practices: Offerors must demonstrate how their proposed methodologies align with recognized best practices in strategic planning within the defense industry. This includes references to established frameworks, methodologies, or industry standards commonly used in the defense sector.

Subfactor Three (3): Adaptability to Defense Industry Challenges: Offerors must outline their approach to identifying and adapting to the limitations and challenges specific to the defense industry. This includes addressing potential obstacles such as changes in leadership, shifts in organizational priorities, or emerging threats and opportunities within the defense sector.

Factor Two (2): Execution Capability

Subfactor One (1): The offeror's ability to execute the strategic planning session will be assessed based on their ability to clearly demonstrated experience, expertise, and resources.

Subfactor Two (2) Facilitation Skills and Techniques: Offerors should demonstrate proficiency in facilitating group discussions, managing diverse perspectives, and guiding participants toward consensus in a strategic planning process. This includes providing examples of tools, methods, and techniques used to foster productive conversation and decision-making during the session.

Subfactor Three (3) Documentation and Reporting: Offerors must outline their approach to documenting and reporting on the strategic planning session. This includes capturing key discussions, insights, action items, and outcomes in a comprehensive post-event report or presentation that aligns with the requirements outlined in the Statement of Work.

Factor Three (3): Innovation Approaches

Subfactor One (1) Utilization of Innovative Tools and Processes: Offerors must provide evidence of successful implementation of innovative approaches and cutting-edge tools available in the defense industry to enhance strategic planning outcomes. This includes examples of how innovative technologies, methodologies, or processes have been leveraged to optimize strategic planning efforts.

Subfactor Two (2) Impact of Innovation on Strategic Outcomes: Offerors must illustrate specific examples where innovative approaches have been effectively employed to maximize strategic planning outcomes.

This includes demonstrating how innovative solutions have contributed to improved decision-making, increased efficiency, or enhanced strategic agility within the defense sector.

Factor Four (4): Environmental Scanning and ContinuousAdaptation

Subfactor One (1) Continuous Environmental Scanning Process: Offerors must outline their process for continuous environmental scanning to identify and monitor factors impacting the defense industry landscape. This includes detailing methodologies, tools, and sources used to gather information on emerging trends, regulations, and potential disruptors relevant to strategic planning.

Subfactor Two (2) Readiness to Adapt to Dynamic Changes: Offerors must provide evidence of their readiness to adapt to quick, drastic changes in the environment post-strategic plan development. This includes describing strategies, protocols, and decision-making frameworks for assessing and responding to unforeseen obstacles or shifts within the defense industry landscape.

Subfactor Three (3) Agility and Flexibility in Implementation: Offerors must outline specific measures taken to maintain agility and flexibility in implementing strategic initiatives in response to evolving circumstances. This includes demonstrating the ability to adjust strategies, allocate resources, and revise plans as necessary to address emerging challenges or opportunities within the defense sector.

Factor Five (5): Training Methodology and Effectiveness

Subfactor One (1): Training Approach Clarity and Coherence: The offeror's approach must be clearly articulated and demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the requirements for training joint and coalition warriors. Offerors must detail how their proposed methodologies will effectively address the diverse needs of trainees, considering varying backgrounds, learning styles, and skill levels.

Subfactor Two (2): Alignment with Training Best Practices: Offerors must demonstrate how their proposed training methodologies align with recognized best practices in training and education, not limited to but including those within the defense sector. This includes references to established frameworks, methodologies, or industry standards commonly used in training and education.

Subfactor Three (3) Training Program Effectiveness: Offerors must provide evidence of the effectiveness of their training programs through metrics such as trainee performance improvement, retention rates, and feedback mechanisms. Additionally, offerors must detail any innovative approaches or technologies utilized to enhance training outcomes.

2. Price: Contractor quotes will be evaluated based on total price proposed. The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) is the total price proposed. The Government evaluation team will conduct price reasonableness based on competitive offers received and the Independent Government Estimate to establish the Competitive Range. Once a Competitive Range is established the Government will evaluate all those offerors that met the established Competitive Range for Technical Capability. The Contracting Officer may establish a competitive range and conduct discussions with all the most highly rated proposals, unless the range is further reduced for purposes of efficiency pursuant to FAR 15.306(c)(2).

3. Past Performance: Offerors will be evaluated using SAM.gov. Offerors with derogatory information such as, but not limited to terminations, will be deemed unacceptable.

Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectiv al Rating

Description

Accepta ble

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown (see note above).

Unaccep table

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Definitions:

is a material failure of a proposal to meet a government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that Deficiency increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror's proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or subfactor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. (For firm-fixed-price contracts, the reference to increased cost may be removed from the risk definition.)

Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal withmerit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to theadvantage of the Government during contract performance.

Significant Strength is an aspect of an Offeror's proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Weakness means a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

Significant Weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

(End Addendum)

The following clauses were modified:

52.212-2Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services.Nov 2021 hereby reads as follows:

As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:

Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(i) Technical capability of the service offered to meet the Government requirement.

(ii) Price.

(iii) Past performance.

Technical and past performance when combined are equal to price.

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

210 SCHERZ BLVD, ADMINISTRATIVE ONLY NO REQUISITIONS

GOODFELLOW AFB, TX 76908-4705

UNITED STATES

ROBERT COSPER, Email: robert.cosper@us.af.mil Telephone: 477-3468 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS:

1. Reopen the solicitation period from 25 March at 12:00 PM CST to 26 March at 3:00 PM CST.

2. Revise Evaluation Criteria and Instructions to Offerors.

3. Update Period of Performance start date to 3 April from 21 March.

4. Update SOW.