RFI-Combined_Spec Updates.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 5 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA301626R0018
About this file
This is a Request for Information (RFI) responses and specification updates document for a Design-Build project to repair and renovate Building 2263 (B2263), a multi-service troop facility located at JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
The project encompasses interior renovation of the existing historical building, correction of deficiencies from previous renovation efforts, installation of a standby generator, and various site work items. The contractor must provide complete design services progressing from 35% through Issue for Construction (IFC) submittals, plus all construction labor, materials, installation, and performance. Key scope elements include: redesign of fire alarm and mass notification systems; interior finishes including wall framing, ceiling heights, and door installations; mechanical systems (HVAC, plumbing, hydronic piping); electrical and telecommunications infrastructure including an Operations Center classified as a Special Access Program Facility (SAPF) requiring STC-rated partitions and security entrapments; and restoration work on historical elements subject to Section 106 cultural resources review. The Operations Center, preferably located on the third floor, requires dual independent Intrusion Detection System (IDS) sides, CAT6A cabling for NIPR, OM3-4 multimode fiber for SIPRNET, and dedicated design for video teleconference systems, PA system pathways, CATV outlets, and cell phone lockers. Furnishings and Equipment (FF&E) design must include workstations, modular furniture, seating, and storage; equipment purchases are excluded from the initial contract award but must be included in the FF&E design package. The project must comply with UFC standards (UFC 4-021-02, UFC 4-010-06, UFC 4-010-05, UFC 3-580-01, UFC 3-600-01, and UFC 1-200-01) and accommodate approximately 220 occupants. Historical preservation requirements apply to specific exterior and interior elements, with multiple items requiring Cultural Resource Office and SHPO consultation. This document contains 22 RFI responses and corresponding specification paragraph changes addressing contractor questions on fire protection, interior finishes, ceiling heights, door framing, telecommunications, building furniture layout, general construction, mechanical systems, historical restoration, quality control staffing, and communications systems.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Non-RFI updates
| Non-RFI Changes | |||
| SPEC | Thoughts | Para | Change |
| 01 11 00 | Clarify CID requirement to include MEDCOM future purchase equipment (e.g. ACS, CCTV, breakroom, etc.) | 1.4.1.2.1.13.1.a(1) |
1.4.1.2.1.8.c ADD "Purchase of equipment not serving the Operations Center is not part of the initial contract award, but must be included in the FF&E package."
NO CHANGE
| 01 11 00 | Clarify Lenel certified technician for install, refer to SFS email | 1.4.1.2.1.13.1.a(2) | ADD "IDS installer must be Lenel certified." |
| 01 45 00 | Clarify Lenel certified technician for QC specialist, refer to SFS email | 1.6.8 TABLE | EDIT LOW VOLTAGE ROW |
COLUMN 2 "2-1. Installation of IDS; 2-2. Installer must be Lenel certified."
| 01 11 00 | From MEDCOM narrative, clarify at least one dual receptacle on each wall for offices, at least two per cubicle, scale for conference rooms | 1.4.1.2.12.c(1) | Provide convienience outlets in each space, in location and quantity that allow for intended use and flexibility of the space. |
| 01 11 00 | From MEDCOM narrative, clarify request for PA system. Possibly a MEDCOM equipment item. | 1.4.1.2.13.2 | TITLE "PA System" |
TEXT "Provide design for PA system pathways. Purchase of PA system equipment is not part of the initial contract award, but must be included in the FF&E design package."
| 01 11 00 | MEDCOM Narrative | 1.4.1.2.8.c(1) | Purchase of FF&E is not part of the initial contract award, but must be accounted for as part of the CID. Refer to Section [DSN AFTER AWARD] for general CID package requirements. |
| 01 11 00 | From MEDCOM narrative, clarify Ops Center requires multiple COAX drops for CATV | 1.4.1.2.13.1.a(2)(b) | Provide CATV outlets to this space. Exact locations to be determined during design. This is the only area of the facility that requiresCATV outlets. |
| 01 11 00 | From MEDCOM narrative, clarify that requested space allocations per section can be adjusted to fit into existing building footprint. | 1.4.1.2.7.a | REPLACE "Provide floor plan layouts that provide the functional spaces outlined by the end user's requirements in ATT-6 and ATT-7. Requested square footage of each functional space is not a fixed requirement. Given that this an existing building footprint, the sizes of each functional space may be altered to accomodate existing conditions." |
| 01 11 00 | From MEDCOM narrative, clarify that breakrooms should be close to existing plumbing. Need to minimize new plumbing runs. | 1.4.1.2.7.a(4) | MEDCOM Narrative, ATT-7, makes reference to the inclusion of breakrooms as part of the overall floor plan. Breakrooms shall me located as such to minimize the extent of new plumbing and additional building structure penetrations. |
| 01 11 00 | Delete | 1.4.1.2.7.a(3) | DELETE |
| 01 11 00 | Include modular/system furniture in the list. | 1.4.1.2.8.c | REPLACE "Provide an FF&E design package to meet the end user's requirements in |
ATT-6 and ATT-7. FF&E includes, but is not limited to, workstations, modular/system furniture, seating, tables, storage and shelving, filing, and other items identified by the Government."
| 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.1.a(2)(a) | Operations Center shall be split into two sides, as shown in the conceptual layout in ATT-7. Each side is independent from an IDS perspective, and shall be monitored as such. | |
| 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.1.a | REPLACE "Provide ACS, IDS, CCTV, and CATV systems in accordance with UFC 4-021-02 and UFC 4-010-06." | |
| 01 11 00 | Clarify location of ABA sidewalk and access to B2263 | 1.4.1.2.5.c (3) | running along B2264 and crossing over - crosswalk markings should be written into the SOW |
001-FA
Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-001 Fire Alarm System Questions Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation Government Response SPEC Para Change
| Specification Section 01 11 00, paragraph 1.4.1.2.9.e states that the "Fire alarm and mass notification system shall be redesigned to meet the requirements and hazard levels of the new floor plans. A new combination FA/MNS panel was installed by the previous contractual effort. Assume reuse of the current FA/MNS panel." | |||||
| During our site walk it was confirmed that there are existing fire alarm devices. These devices were originally procured in 2019 | No question seen in this section of text. | N/A | |||
| 1. These devices are our of any factory warranty. If these devices are to be reused, will the Government require a warranty? | The Government will only require the installation labor to be warranted under the warranty required by FAR 52.246-21 Warranty of Construction. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.9.g | No existing installed fire alarm panels shall be reused. Make the existing equipment available to the Government for salvage. Items or components not salvaged shall be properly disposed of by the contractor. | |
| 2. The previously procured signal devices and power supplies have been discontinued for newer models. Will the Government accept the discontinued signaling devices and power supplies that are to be reused? | Confirmed that the Government will accept use of the discontinued devices. | 01 11 00 | ↑ | ||
| 3. The existing Gamewell-FCI E3 series Fire Alarm Control Panel and the Monaco radio transceiver are currently active and monitoring the sprinkler system. Are these panels to be reused for the new construction? If yes, will the Government require a warranty? | Confirmed reuse of control panel and transceiver. Refer to response to Item #1 for response to warranty question. | ||||
| 01 11 00 | ↑ | ||||
| 4. The drawings provided in the solicitation show the stair halls as being open to all levels. As such, are these areas to be classified as a "stairwell"? If yes, will the govenrment NOT allow any Text signs or LOCs to be mounted in the stair halls, AND these Text signs and LOCs will be required to be mounted in all offices, corridors and rooms that open or lead into the stair halls? | This is a design question that the Government cannot give a definitive answer. Contractor's designer must provide a system design that complies with UFC 1-200-01 and is coordinated through Governments Cultural Resources Office (CRO) for SHPO consultation. Preliminary code analysis is showing stairwells cannot have text signs or LOCs. | ||||
| 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.9.g(2) | Placement of fire alarm and mass notification devices will require consultation through the Section 106 review. Full narrative commentary shall be provided to explain the effort to meet code requirements and historic preservation requirements, as well as documenting mitigations made. |
002-ID
Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas Interior Finish Questions
| Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation | Government Response | SPEC | Para | Change |
| Interior Finishes | ||||
| Specification Section 01 11 00 addresses the new work to be performed under this project. Based the soliciattion documents provided to Potawatomi there are existing walls that were constructed under the previous contract that may be able to be left in place and incorporated into the new interior configuration. | No question seen in this section of text. | |||
| 1. To the extent possible, and for those walls that can be left in place, will Potawatomi be allowed to leave the existing studs and gypsum board/tile backer board in place for re-use? | Yes if: Refer to SOWSpecs 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.1.a.(1) & 02 41 00 para 1.10 | Same | Same | None |
| 2. Per the original contract plans and specifications, the metal stud framing was to be 20 GA with a G60 coating. During the site walk it was noted that the studs are 20 GA but have a G40 coating. |
a. For those walls that may be able to be reused, will these existing metal studs be acceptable for use?
| b. Please advise if any new metal studs to be provided are to have a G40 or a G60 coating. | a. Yes | ||||
| b. DOR must determine new material requirement to meet applicable codes. | 01 11 00 | Project Desc. / Design Guidelines / Architectural / 1.4.1.2.7.a | (1) - add stud walls | ||
| 3. Per the previous project drawings provided, many of the interior partition walls were to have an STC rating. Is it the intention for all new walls constructed by Potawatomi to be STC rated? | Refer to ATT-7 MEDCOM Narrative for areas requiring STC & UFC 3-101-01 | ||||
| 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7 | a(1) - in accordance with ATT for narrative (sound atten & Ops Center) | |||
| 4. The basement exterior walls are not currently insulated. The have not had spray foam or vapor/air barrier coating applied to them. Is it the intent of this contract to have a vapor barrier coating applied to the exterior basement wall? | DOR to determine if required. Consultation through CRO for potential 106 review is required. | ||||
| No update to SOW | |||||
| 5. There are existing walls that have been constructed as a type 1F which are to be 2 hour rated walls. The detail shows this with only 1 layer of 5/8" type X on each side. If these walls are to be left in place are they constructed correctly? | Refer to SOWSpecs 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.1.a.(1), DOR to determine proper wall detailing. | Same | Same | See #6 | |
| 6. Existing corridor walls have not been extended to the deck above. They terminate just above the ceiling height. Are these walls to be extended to the deck above? | Refer to answer in Item #5. | N/A |
003-AD
Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-003 Ceiling Height Questions
| Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation | Government Response | SPEC | Para | Change |
| Existing Ceiling | ||||
| Specification Section 01 11 00 addresses the new work to be performed under this project. Based on the documents provided, and the final accepted design, there are questions on the existing ceiling framing and heights. | No question seen in this section of text. | |||
| 1. In many areas the existing ceiling framing is below the height of the top of the arched windows. Please confirm that where ceiling heights cannot be raised that it will be acceptable to construct a bulkhead in the ceiling at the window at least 1 foot away from the wall. Any utilities that may be within the bulkhead area will have to be relocated. Details for the construction of this bulkhead will be included in the design documents. | Confirmed: Refer to Item 10 in ATT-11 of Spec 01 11 00. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.j | This section replaces the former ATT-11. |
| 2. Please confirm that any existing framing for the arched windows that is bent or damnaged, effecting the ability to apply the wall finishes, is to be repaired or replaced. | Yes | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.d | unless existing conditions prevent application/ installation of new work |
004-AD
Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-004 Door Frames at 2 1/2" Stud Walls Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation Government Response SPEC Para Change
| 1. There are a number of locations there are doors shown to be installed where the existing wall framing is constructed of 2 1/2" wide metal studs. There is abuts existing CMU framing. There are no door frames that can be installed in this framing configuration. Is it acceptable to revise the framing in this area to accomodate a standard door frame?. | Refer to SOWSpecs 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.1.a.(1) | ||
| Revisions require consultation through CRO for potential 106 review. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7 j | Items added to address options for repair/ restoration |
005-COMM
Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-005 Telecommunications Questions
| Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation | Government Response | SPEC | Para | Change |
| NIPR Technology | ||||
| 1. Does the government want the contractor to supply new NIPR fiber switches? | No, Government IT equipment is Government-Furnished/Government-Installed. Only the IT equipment racks, where needed, are part of the scope of the project. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.4.10.b | Telecommunications equipment, e.g. switches, UPS, etc., are not part of the project scope. Government will provide their own equipment. |
| 2. Does the government want one or two uplink module(s) installed in each of the new fiber switch? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 3. Does the government want the contractor to supply 10G uplink modules? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 4. Does the government want redundant power supplies installed in each of the new fiber switches? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 5. Does the government want the switches stacked in the comm rooms where there is more than one switch in a TR? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 6. Does the government want the contractor to provide UPS in each of the NIPR comm rooms? If yes what size? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 7. Does the government want the contractor to provide a PDU in each of the NIPR comm rooms? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.e | Provide all required equipment rack and cabinet accessories, to include basic power distribution units (i.e. power strips) and patch panels. |
| 8. Does the government want the contractor to provide Drops for any WAPs? | To be addressed during design charrette with end user. | |||
| 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.f | Wireless access points are not part of the project scope. Cabling for any future potential wireless access points is not required. | ||
| 9. If yes, does the government want 2 drops or one drop placed to the WAP? | Refer to response in Item #8 | ↑ | ||
| 10. Does the government want the contractor to provide the WAPs. | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 11. If yes, can the government provide model/part number? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 12. Is the government supplying the WAPs? | If end user decides to utilize, then yes. Otherwise N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 13. If yes, how many and in what areas? (remember the Operations Area requires a minimum of a 30’ bubble around it, No WAPs). | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 14. Does the government have existing/available WAP manager ports for these WAPs? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 15. Does the government have enough licenses for the number of WAPs required? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 16. Does the government want VTC in the NIPR Conference rooms? | Yes; MEDCOM requirements are for a video wall, computer and monitor, digital signage, white nosie generator (where required) room/table mics, etc. Traditional VTC HW (CODECs, etc.) not required. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.g | Provide deign for video teleconference systems in all conference rooms, and must be inlcuded as part of the CID package. Systems shall be Cisco type, and compatible with Microsoft Teams. Purchase of video teleconference equipment is not part of the initial contract award. |
| 17. Does the government want Teams VTC in the NPIR conference rooms? | Yes; Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | ↑ | ||
| 18. Does the government want Cisco type VTC’s in the conference rooms? | Yes; MEDCOM requires certified room and desk devices from Cisco that integrates with Microsoft Teams and provides augmented camera and audio intelligence, intuitive controls, and seamless device management. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | ↑ |
| SIPRnet Technology | ||||
| 19. Is the Operations Center going to be an Open Storage design? | Yes, refer to ATT-7 of specification 01 11 00. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.b | Provide design of Operations Center in accordance with UFC 4-010-05 and DoDM 5200.01 Vol 3. The Operations Center is considered a Special Access Program Facility (SAPF) and shall be designed to meet the requirements for Open Storage. Locate the Operations Center on the third floor of the facility. Conceptual layout is provided in ATT-7. Certain elements of the design may also be subject to historic preservation requirements. |
| 20. Is the Operations Center going to be on the 3rd floor? | That is the desired location referenced in ATT-6 of specification 01 11 00. | ↑ | ||
| 21. Will the Operations Center have a separate SIPR Comm Room? | Yes, refer to the conceptual layout provided in ATT-7 of specification 01 11 00. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.d(1) | ADD "Conceptual layout is provided in ATT-7." |
| 22. Will the Operations center require a new IPS container? | No | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.d(2) | Per UFC 3-580-01, an IPS container is not required when secure telecommunications spaces are present. |
| 23. Will the Operations Center SIPR Comm Room be large enough for the IPS Container to be housed there? | N/A, refer to response in Item #22. | ↑ | ||
| 24. Will there be an elevator large enough to get the container to the third floor Operations center? | N/A, refer to response in Item #22. | ↑ | ||
| 25. Does the government want a dedicated electrical circuit for the ISP container? | N/A, refer to response in Item #22. | ↑ | ||
| 26. Will the Operations Center have a separate (its own) NIPR Comm Room? | To be addressed during design. Only a conceptual layout of the space has been generated. Design specifics are not fully known. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.d(3) | The Operations Center is not required to have a dedicated NIPR telecomm room within its footprint. NIPR connections can be routed from a telecomm room outside the space, that is serving the rest of the building floor. |
| 27. Does the government want JWICs in this area? | No | |||
| N/A | ||||
| 28. Does the government want JWICs to be on Single mode fiber or multimode? | No | |||
| N/A | ||||
| 29. Does the government want JWICs and SIPR in the same outlet? | No | |||
| N/A | ||||
| 30. Does the government want one JWICs and one SIPR in the same outlet for every user/desk? | No | |||
| N/A | ||||
| 31. Does the government want two JWICs and two SIPRs in the same outlet for every user/desk? | No | |||
| N/A | ||||
| 32. Does the government want NIPR to be CAT6, CAT6A, or fiber in the Operations Senter? | Copper is the intended cabling type. NIPR shall be CAT6A per requirements in UFC 3-580-01. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.e | All horizontal cabling for data and voice from the applicable telecomm room to the workstation shall be CAT6A. Provide CAT6A patch coords for all work stations, to include future modular/system furniture. |
| 33. If CAT6 or CAT6A, does the government want this to be shielded drop wire? | CAT6A does not normally require shielding for NIPR. UFC 3-580-01 makes note that design shall evaluate if any specific situations may require shield twisted pair (STP) CAT6A cabling. Assumption is vast majority of NIPR cabling will be copper UTP. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.e(1) | Use of STP CAT6A shall be evaluated during design based on analysis of UFC 3-580-01 and finalized space layout. Referenced UFC requires the designer to determine if a situation has been created that would require STP CAT6A. |
| 34. Does the government want the contractor to supply new SIPR fiber switches | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 35. Does the government want one or two uplink module(s) installed in each of the new fiber switch? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 36. Does the government want the contractor to supply 10G uplink modules? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 37. Does the government want redundant power supplies installed in each of the new fiber switches? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 38. Does the government want the switches stacked in the SIPR comm room? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 39. Does the government want the contractor to provide UPS in the SIPR comm room? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 40. If yes what size UPS? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 41. Does the government want the contractor to provide a PDU in the SIPR comm room? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 42. How many conference rooms does the government want in the Operations Center? | End user desires 2 conference rooms as intended by the conceptual layout in ATT-7 of specification 01 11 00. | N/A | ||
| 43. Does the government want NIPR, JWICs and SIPR in the conference table? | NIPR = Yes; JWICS = No; SIPR = will be a SIPR over NIPR connection via CSfC Thin Client. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.b(1) | As part of the CID package, design Operations Center conference tables to include NIPR and SIPR outlet receptacles. Cabling shall be run through over-floor raceway. Purchase of over-floor raceway is not part of the initial contract award, but must be include in the FF&E package. |
| 44. Does the government want Power, NIPR, JWICs and SIPR run to the conference table via floor molding? | Yes; Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.12.k | As part of the FF&E package, design Operations Center conference tables to include power outlet receptacles. Cabling shall run through over-floor raceway. Purchase of over-floor raceway is not part of the initial contract award, but must be include in the FF&E package. |
| 45. Does the government want Power, NIPR, JWICs and SIPR run to the conference table via cutting the concrete floor and placing EMT? | No | ↑ | ||
| 46. Does the government want the contractor to provide Teams VTC? | No. Conference rooms will be dual purpose so will leverage NIPR HW to support SIPR Teams meetings. | N/A | ||
| 47. If yes, how many large Teams VTCs? | Undetermined; Depends on the audience and room size. | N/A | ||
| 48 If yes, how many medium Teams VTCs? | Undetermined; Depends on the audience and room size. | N/A | ||
| 49. If yes, how many small Teams VTCs? | Undetermined; Depends on the audience and room size. | N/A | ||
| 50. What size HVAC Ducts are in or running through the Operations center? | KTR's DOR responsibility to be determined during design. | N/A | ||
| 51. Are any of the ducts running into or through the Operations Center over 96 Sq Inches? | Refer to response in Item #50. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.11.h | Air ducts penetrating the Operations Center boundary larger than 96 square inches require physical protection installed in the air stream. Refer to UFC 4-010-05 for allowable methods. Where one of the duct dimensions measures less than 6 inches, physical protection is not required. |
| 52. If yes, where will the HVAC installers place the “man-bars” on the ducts over 96 sq inches? | If required, yes. | |||
| ↑ | ||||
| 53. How many Cell Phone Repositories does the government want? | Undetermined; depends on location and anticipated # of users. Evaluate during design process. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.b(1) | Provide lockable metal personal electronic device cabinets outside each entrance to the Operations Center. Cabinets must be surface mounted instead of recessed. Each cabinet shall have 36 compartments. |
| 54. Does the government want Metal or plastic Cell Phone Repositories? | Metal; if available, prefer sound blocking / absorbing padded lockers. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | ↑ | ||
| 55. Is the government providing a dedicated fiber circuit for the Lenel Panel to the SIPR Comm Room? | Government is providing no work for this project. All work and its incidentals shall be required to be provided by the KTR. | N/A | ||
| 56. Are PRI’s required in the ceiling? | No; all primary circuits should terminate within the MDF and be routed accordingly via riser cabling. | |||
| 57. Does the government need solid wood doors for X-10 doors? | KTR's DOR responsibility to be determined during design and as required by UFC 4-010-05, AR 380-5, AR 190-13, AR 190-51, and DoD 5200.02 v3. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.b(3) | Doors on the perimeter and interior of the Operations Center shall meet the requirements of UFC 4-010-05. Referenced UFC allows for specific types of wood or steel doors. Associated hardware requirements are also specified in the UFC, to include specifics for applicable hardware on the unprotected side of the space. |
| 58. Does the government need solid wood door hinges on the inside of the door? | Refer to response in Item #57. | ↑ | ||
| 59. Does the government want media converters for the SIPR/JWIC printers? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 60. If yes, how many? | N/A, refer to response in Item #1. | N/A | ||
| 61. Does the government want the contractor to provide any secure class 5 filing cabinets? | No | N/A | ||
| 62. How many secure entrance(s) (entrapments) does the government want into the Operations Center? | 2 entrapments as intended by the conceptual layout in ATT-7 of specification 01 11 00. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.b(1) | Space shall include two entrapments for entry, as shown in the conceptual layout in ATT-7. |
| 63. Will any windows need to be “Black out”? | Refer to response in Item #57. Must also be coordinated with Cultural Resource Office. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.b(5) | Physical security requirements from UFC 4-010-05 for the windows in the space will require consultation through the Section 106 review. |
| 64. If yes, how many? | Refer to response in Item #63. | ↑ | ||
| 65. Does the government want scrolling signage at each Secure Entry (entrapment)? | Yes. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.12.l | Provide visual notification method to alert of the presence of non-indoctrinaed personnel that meets the requirements of UFC 4-010-05. |
| 66. What dB rating is required for the exterior walls of the Operations Center? | Refer to response in Item #57. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.b(4) | Perimeter must meet requirements for STC 45 at a minimum. Conference rooms require a STC 50 at a minimum. Where this rating cannot be met, supplemetal sound transmission mitigations must be utilized. Refer to ICD/IDS 705 for a list of potential mitigations. |
| 67. Does the government want a White Nosie system installed? | Refer to response in Item #57. | ↑ |
| Back-Bone Cables & Cable Trays | ||||
| 68. Does the government want the contractor to provide a 12 strand SM fiber cable from the MDF to each IDF? | KTR's DOR responsibility to be determind during design. | N/A | ||
| 69. Does the government want the contractor to provide a 50 pair cable from the MDF to each IDF? | Refer to response in Item #68. | N/A | ||
| 70. Is the designer going to design cable trays for all of the drops? | Yes | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.f | Provide design for all telecomm pathways. |
| 71. Keeping in mind the space above the drop-down ceiling is very tight, can the government identify what other cables/drops can be in the cable try with the NIPR CAT6 Drops so the cable tray can be sized properly? Please | NIPR and voice can be in the same cable tray. SIPR must be in it's own cable transport/support. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.f(1) | Provide separation of telecomm systems in accordance with UFC 3-580-01. |
| 72. Can the coax and the CAT6 drops be in the same cable tray? | No, since COAX cabling is inly being requested in the Operations Center. | ↑ | ||
| 73. Does the government want separation placed in the cable tray for the CAT6 drops and the coax drops? | Refer to response in Item #72. | ↑ | ||
| 74. Can the access control cables be in the cable tray with the coax and the CAT6 drops? | No | ↑ | ||
| 75. Can the CCTV camera drops be in the cable tray with the coax and the CAT6 drops (and Access Control)? | No | ↑ | ||
| 76. Does the government want the conduit for new voice and data drops taken from the wall outlet to the cable tray? | Refer to response in Item #68. | N/A | ||
| 77. O will the government allow “J” hooks from the stub-ups to cable tray? | Refer to response in Item #68. Preliminary read of UFC 3-580-01 is J-hooks can be utilized as part of the design solution for proper support of cabling. | N/A | ||
| 78. Does the government want A/V cabinets placed in the conference rooms? | Yes. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.i(1) | Provide design for A/V cabinets in all conference rooms. Purchse of these cabinets is not part of the initial contract award, but shall be included as part of the CID package. |
| 79. If yes, how many conference rooms does the government want A/V cabinets in? | Refer to ATT 07 for number of conference rooms required by MEDCOM. Each conference should contain A/V cabinet. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | ↑ | ||
| 80. If yes, does the government want 6 strands or 12 strands of SM fiber run to them? | No. Cooper CAT6A data drops will be used. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | N/A | ||
| 81. If yes, does the government want 2 data drops run to these cabinets? Or more? | Yes. Costs should be allocated toward CLIN 0003. | N/A |
| Comm Room | ||||
| 82. Does the government want the contractor to provide two comm rooms per floor? | KTR's DOR to determine the required number of comm rooms per floor and their suitable locations. Initial Government estimate is at least two comm rooms per floor will be required based on the size and layout of this existing facility. | N/A | ||
| 83. Does the government want the contractor to provide 7’ open data racks or 7’ data cabinets in the NIPR MDF and each of the IDFs? | See UFC 3-580-01, standard is to provide a minimum of two standard 19-inch (0.5-meter) racks per TR. Can be discussed during design if space limitations prevent this from being achieved. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.e | ADD "Telecomm rooms shall be provided with equipment racks. If design determines floor space is insufficient, alternate solution can be discussed. Existing racks may be reused." |
| 84. Does the government want the contractor to provide 7’ open data racks or 7’ data cabinets in the SIPR comm room? | Refer to response in Item #83. As stated in response to Item #43 SIPR will be over NIPR connection via CSfC Thin Client. Comm Rooms requirements in the Ops Center will be beased on NIPR network. | ↑ | ||
| 85. If cabinets, does the government want the contractor to provide fans for/in the cabinets? | N/a Refer to response in Item # 83. | ↑ | ||
| 86. The OSP cable enters the building on the Wilson Street side in the middle of the building so this room cannot be used as one of the basement comm rooms. This means that there will be three comm rooms in the basement, one MDF and 2 IDF’s | Government is aware the space where the OSP enters the building cannot be used as comm room. It should be noted that the OSP enter the facility on the Stanley Rd side of the facility. | N/A | ||
| 87. Are the comm room going to be stacked from the basement to the 3rd floor? | Refer to response in Item #82. | N/A | ||
| 88. Does the government want the contractor to provide Kaba locks on all of the NIPR comm rooms? | No | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.d(4) | Provide heavy-duty, mechanical combination lockset for all telecomm rooms. Exception for telecomm rooms in the Operations Center that must be provided with lockset the meets the requirements of UFC 4-010-05. |
| 89. Does the government want the contractor to provide static dissipative tile floors for all of the comm rooms? | No | N/A | ||
| 90. Does the government want the contractor to provide a commercial closet on each floor for access control and CATV? | Yes; DOR to determine based on the requirements in ATT 07. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.d(5) | Telecomm rooms for CATV shall be provded as separate spaces from other telecomm rooms containing Government network equipment. |
| User Outlets Room | ||
| 91. Does the government want the contractor to provide dual outlets throughout the building? | If the question is asking if data and voice should be terminated at the same outlet, then yes. | |
| 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.d(6) | Provide two (2) data outlets and two (2) voice outlets at each workstation and modular/system furniture. |
| 92. Many of the rooms on the prints do not show their usage. Does the government want the contractor to assume all of these empty rooms will have 10x10 cubicles in them with one dual outlets in each cubical? | As noted by section 1.4.1.2 of specification 01 11 00, new floorplan is required for the new end user. This includes layout of spaces for cubicles. Data provided in Appendix C is only to show the magnitude of effort required by the project. Open floor spaces are intended for cubicle to be placed there. Intended cubicle size 80 sqft per ATT 07 of Specification 01 11 00. Cubicles shall have two data drops and two voice drops at each cubicle. | N/A |
| 93. Does the government want the contractor to run all of the comm drops through the furniture or leave it terminated in wall outlets. | Data and voice cabling shall be designed to be run through the furniture. However, per section 1.4.1.2.13 of specification 01 11 00 only the design portion of this work is in scope. The cable installation piece for the cubicles shall be part of separate furniture acquisition. | N/A |
| 94. If just terminated in the walls, does the customer want the outlets located up high on the walls to avoid the furniture covering the outlets? | N/A, refer to response to Item #93. | N/A |
| 95. Does the government want the contractor to provide EMT from the outlet to the cable tray or will the customer accept J hooks from the stub up in the wall to the cable tray? | Accepted design solution will be whatever is in accordance with UFC 3-580-01. | N/A |
| 96. Does the government want the contractor to provide CATV outlets anywhere in the building? These were not identified on the prints. | No | N/A |
| OSP Comm | ||
| 97. There are four OSP fiber cables that are cut off right where they enter the building (at the entrance duct). Does the government want the contractor to pull tall four fiber cables back into the MH and splice them in the MH? | Yes | |
| 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.13.d(7) | Provide new OSP cables that are damaged at the entrance facility. |
| 98. There is a 600 pair OSP cable entering the building and terminated on PETs right where the cable enters the building. Does the government want the contractor to leave the PET as is (where they are? | Configuration of the entrance facility shall be altered as required for other telecommunications work in the facility. If PET position does not interfere with other work, then it can remain in-place. | N/A |
| 99. Is the current location acceptable to the government or does the government want the contractor move the PETs. | Refer to response in Item #98. | N/A |
| 99. Is the current location acceptable to the government or does the government want the contractor move the PETs. | Duplicated question. Refer to the first instance of this question for its response. | |
| N/A | ||
| 100. Does the government want the riser fiber placed in orange plenum inner-duct to each comm room? | Yes | N/A |
| 101. Does the government want “Voice” patch panels? Or just terminate the drops as all data on the patch panels? | Yes, refer to section 1.4.1.2.13c of specification 01 11 00. | N/A |
| Design/Prints | ||
| 102. Does the government want the contractor to provide Data rack details for each comm room? | Yes | |
| N/A | ||
| 103. Does the government want the contractor to provide the comm room overhead and wall layouts for each comm room? | Yes | |
| N/A | ||
| 104. Does the government want the contractor to provide a riser detail for the building? | Yes | |
| N/A | ||
| 105. Does the government want the contractor to provide a cable tray layout for each floor? | Yes | |
| N/A | ||
| 106. Does the government want the contractor to provide grounding detail/riser detail for the comm rooms? | Yes | |
| N/A | ||
| 107. Does the government want the contractor to provide a ground wire to be run in each cable tray or is bonding the cable tray together sufficient? | KTR's DOR to determine based on the requirements of UFC 3-580-01. | N/A |
| 108. Can the IFC drawings be used as the Shop drawings? | Only if sufficient detail is provided. | N/A |
| 109. Will the contractors get to review the Specs before they are submitted to the government? | That is up to the General Contractor. The Government does not control the extent of internal review before design packages are submitted to the Government. | N/A |
006-ID
Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-006 - Building Furniture Layout
| Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation | Government Response | SPEC | Para | Change |
| Furniture Layout | ||||
| Section C of the Solicitation Docoument, SF 1442, states that this is a Design-Build Project for the renovation of the interior of B2263, tp include correction of interior and minor exterior deficiencies from previous renovation efforts. It is understood that, as a result of changes to the end user, the interior configuraiton of the buildilng will change based on the new users needs. Potawatomi has been advised that the end user intends to have a staff of approximatley 220 people occupy the building. | No question seen in this section of text. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7 a | |
| Does the Air Force or the end user have any conceptual drawings or documents that would show potential occupancy loading and furniture layout for the building? This would assist in determining anticpated electrical, lighting and HVAC loads as well as communicatins needs. | Refer to ATT 06 & 07 of Specification 01 11 00 for occupancy loading. There is no furniture layout except for conceptual layout for Ops center in ATT 07. | MEDCOM | Narrative |
007-Gen Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-007 General Questions
| Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation | Government Response | SPEC | Para | Change |
| General Questions | ||||
| 1. Please verify exact doors and/or windows to be replaced. | Refer to Items 1 & 2 from ATT-11 of Specification 01 11 00 | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.j | NEED LIST BREAKDOWN AS SUBITEMS |
REPLACE "A breakdown of items under the purview of the Cultural Resources Office and requiring consultation through the Section 106 review is provided below. List is not all inclusive, as other sections in the scope of work identify non-historic work that still requires consultation.
| 2. Please verify there is no requirement to repair cracked or damaged windows or doors. | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.7.d. Additionally see response to Item 1. | Same | Same | |
| 3. We need to be able to remove items from Conex and redistribute to allow for inventory to be completed. Please provide the approval to do so. | If you are stating you will need additional connexes to perform the inventory, CONS to approve when that will be allowed. | |||
| 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.1.a(2) | REPLACE "All excess material left behind in the facility and associated conex boxes shall be removed and properly disposed of by the contractor." | ||
| 4. Flooring seems to be in one Conex, please verify if the government would like to use this flooring, or take it off site to their storage or landfill. | If material is deemed re-usable then intent is to install. If not, then KTR is to despose of or recycle. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.1.a(2) & 1.4.1.4 | No change to SOW |
| 5. Will the government require payment for water, sewer or electrical usage at the construction trailer? | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.1.2 & 01 50 00 / 3.2.2 for Privatized Utilities | Same | Same | No change to SOW |
| 6. There are many walls that have sheetrock that was not removed by previous contractors, this is old, textured and in some places seems to have growth. Should the contractor assume removal of this older sheetrock for the new construction? | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.2.d Hazardous Materials | Same | Same | No change to SOW |
| 7. Please provide exact areas of expansion foam removal and to what depth? | Three entrance stairwells, to the surface level of the existing historical wall. All other spray foam to remain. | Answered | In other | RFI replies |
| 8. Many walls in the basement have tar paper/felt on them, is this to be removed prior to new work being installed? | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.2.d Hazardous Materials & 1.4.1.3.3.a | Same | Same | No change to SOW |
| 9. Existing FCU's throughout seem to be new, do this need to be replaced as per the RFP or is an inspection, and test permitted to see about possible reuse? This could be established as an allowance on our pricing | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.1.a. DOR is to perform their own evaluation of existing equipment to determine if it is sized appropriately for the new layout. | N/A | ||
| 10 Lead paint, are we do include just encapsulation, or should we assume removal of a large percentage and encapsulate the remaining short of removal to original material surface? | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.2.c. Emphasis is on the more cost effective option. | Same | Same | No change to SOW |
| 11. Please provide all as-builts. | Provided in Appendix C | |||
| 12. Please provide all submittals, submittal register and RFI's from previous contract. | Not available. USACE did not provide | No change to SOW | ||
| 13. Are we to remove all duct work and chill water piping throughout the building? | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.11 | N/A | ||
| 14. What is the point of demarcation for the inlets of the chill water/HW lines coming into the building and continuing the loop? | Gov owned, there is no demarcation. | |||
| N/A | ||||
| 15. Please provide the estimated type of ceiling SF - ACT vs Hard Lid and specify locations i.e. entry, stairwells, etc. | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.7 & 1.4.1.2.8. DOR shall determine during design, but preference is for ACT. | Same | Same | update 1.4.1.2.8 a wording |
| 16. Will the contractor be provided access to operate the arm gates for deliveries? | Will reconfirm, but last word from mission partner in that area was that at least one arm gate will be allowed to be used by a contractor. Likely the manually operated arm gate. | See no reason to update SOW | ||
| 17. Please provide the proposed laydown for the project. | KTR to provide preferred location(s) and estimated area dimensions they are requesting. Gov will advise before officially submitting for approval if preferred locations are not acceptable. | Need to Ref other spec | What is the other name? Contractors Site something? | |
| 18. Please provide the proposed fencing requirements for the project bubble. | Refer to Specification 01 50 00 para 3.5 | N/A | ||
| 19. Will the contractor be permitted to set dumpsters near the facility for ease of access? | If fence layout allows for it, then yes. Access to surrounding facilities must not be obstructed. | N/A | Spec 01 50 00 already speaks to this in sufficient detail. | |
| 20. Please provide a list of all known Historical Requirements and provide any designs/Submittals that have been provided to the Historical Dept for review or that may have been rejected. | Refer to Specification 01 11 00 para 1.4.1.2.7.j. for requirements. There are no previous submittals for this topic. | Same | Same | Same as others ?s |
| 21. Would the government entertain the idea of paying for an advanced survey of existing equipment for usability? | Government's request for funds must capture entire project cost. It cannot be separated into mutliple funding requests. | |||
| See no reason to update SOW | ||||
| 22. Will the contractor be provided designated parking areas for the duration of the project? | Only within the space requested for contractor laydown. Otherwise, no space outside that area will be gauranteed contractor parking. | See no reason to update SOW | ||
| 23. We have noted several items installed on the exterior that we do not feel would meet the Historical Requirements, are these items grandfathered in, or should we assume replacement or concealment of these items such as disconnects? | Refer to Item 8 of Att-11 of Specification 01 11 00. | Same | Same | Same as others ?s |
| 24. Is the contractor responsible for the sealing and air barrier of the existing windows and doors already installed? | Refer to Item 4 of Att-11 of Specification 01 11 00. Backer rods an caulking to be provided finish out windows on interior facing side. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7 | will add to d. |
008-FP
Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-008 Fire Protection Questions
| Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation | Government Response | SPEC | Para | Change |
| Fire Protection System | ||||
| 1. Existing Branch piping, sizes 2” and smaller were observed in the field as being schedule 10. Per UFC 3-600-01 9-7.6.2, steel pipe 2” and less must be minimum schedule 40. Will the branch piping be required to meet UFC 3-600-01? | Yes, refer to specification 01 11 00 section 1.4.1.2.1. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.9.c | REPLACE "Fire suppression system shall be redesigned to meet the requirements and hazard levels of the new floor plans. This includes any required modifiction or deficiency correction to the wet-pipe system in the facility and dry-pipe system and its supporting equipment that serves the attic space." |
| 2. Existing piping contained saddle fittings and size on size welded outlets. Both items are not permitted per UFC 3-600-01 9-7.6.6. Will piping utilizing unapproved methods be required to be replaced? | Refer to response to item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 3. Existing system design incorporates a 100gpm hose stream allowance as noted on hydraulic placards hanging from system control zones. UFC 3-600-01 9-7.3.5 references table 9-4, Light hazard hose demand requirements for buildings with ceilings less than 60’ is required to be 250gpm. Will the design of the existing system be required to meet UFC standards for fire protection? | Refer to response to item #1. | ↑ | ||
| 4. While the majority of the existing piping and components appear to be in new condition an extensive amount of surface corrosion was observed on vertical standpipe and components feeding floor system controls. Extent and/or impacts of corrosion is unknown and it is suggested to replace with new. How does end user wish to proceed? | Concur that new material shall be installed given the information presented in this question and previous questions. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.9.c(1) | Existing piping with extensive amounts of surface corrosion shall be replaced. |
| 5. Fire pump assembly not in accordance with UFC 3-600-01, 9-5.8 and NFPA 20 figure A.4.21.1.2(b) arrangement for utilizing flow meter loop. Flow meter in existing installation only exits through test header, nullifying the need to have a flow meter as the test header will always be utilized to flow water. A closed loop circulation should be utilized 3 out of every 3 years and every third-year flow should be run through test header and used to verify calibration of flow meter gauge. Does the government want corrective action included with this RFP or leave pump house assembly as is? | Referenced figure from NFPA 20 could not be located. It is assumed that Figure A.4.22.1.3(b) from NFPA 20-2025 was the intended reference. Correction of flow meter configuration is not part of this scope. | N/A |
009-AD
Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-009 Existing Conditions
| Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation | Government Response | SPEC | Para | Change |
| Windows | ||||
| Specification Section 01 11 00, Paragraph 1.4.1.2.7.d states that "Repairs to damaged windows are not par of the design effort, except as nobed by the following: (1) Oval window facing Stanely Rd aboe the center building entrance…." | No question seen in this section of text. | |||
| 1. It has been noted that is at least one broken window in he building., See photo of exisitng Broken Window below. Does the Air Force want this widow and any other windows that are damaged replaced? | Replacement of this window is not part of the scope. Only the items identified in ATT-11 of specification 01 11 00, and section 1.4.1.2.7. | 01 11 00 | 1.4.1.2.7.j | This section replaces the former ATT-11. |
| ERROR:#VALUE! | No question seen in this section of text. | Same | 1.4.1.2.7. | reenforce item d |
| Srpay Foam | ||||
| Specification Section 01 11 00, Paragraph 1.4.1.3.3.b sttates that "Where removal of spray foam is required, elements tha tare part of the historic fabric shall have spray foam removed by dry-ice blasting, or other approved method approved through Section 106 review, to prevent damage. | The NPS historic preservation briefs address the methods can not harm the fabric or detailing. The issue of the spray foam at the main entry points (historic interior space of the 1st floor is to remove the spray foam and other fur out to maintain the historic volume of space and avoid the use of ex-posed conduits. (This same fur out has impact to the egress width related to NFPA 101. | |||
| Same | 1.4.1.2.7. | Updates to j. & reference made to 01 32 33 | ||
| 1. Based on discussions during the site walk, it is understood that the spray foam at the main entry door is to be removed. See the picture of the Entryway Spray Foam below. What are the desired limits of spray foam removal at the entryway area? | Remove to the surface level of the existing historical walls. | |||
| Same | 1.4.1.2.7. | Updates to j. & reference made to ATT for Redlined IFC Dwgs to estimate sqft | ||
| Picture | No question seen in this section of text. |
Irina Ness Alt. PM: Ask KTR to send the picture.
| 2. All of the exterior walls have closed cell spray foam applied to them. See the sample picture of the Exterior Wall Spray Foam below. To what extent is the spray foam within the building to be removed? | In areas where walls are furred out there is to be no removal of spray foam. | Same | 1.4.1.2.7. | Updates to j. & reference made to 01 32 33 |
| ERROR:#VALUE! | No question seen in this section of text. | |||
| 3. If the exiting spray foam is to remain, will we be allowed to make repairs to it or apply additional spray foam where in areas where required? | Spray foam in historical buildings is banned. There will be no additional spray foam allowed. | |||
| 01 32 33 | 1.3 |
| Safe | ||||
| There is an existing safe within the building. See the picture of the Existing Safe below. It is not known if this is a built in place safe or a complete safe unit with walls consturcted around it. What is to be done with this safe? Is it to stay in place or be removed? If removed, does the contractor turn it over to the govenment or dispose of it? | Safe it to remain as is. Treat walls accordingly. Installation of finishes is not required within the interior of the safe. | 01 11 01 | 1.4.1.2.7.a(4) | reinforced language |
| ERROR:#VALUE! | No question seen in this section of text. |
010-Mech Project Title: DB - Repair Multi-Service Facility B2263 Project Location: JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas RFP-RFI-010 Mechanical Systems Questions
| Contractor Question/RFI or Recommendation | Government Response | SPEC | Para | Change |
| General | ||||
| 1. Is the Government open to existing conditions assessment of the buildings HVAC & Plumbing systems prior to bid or are we to assume worst case scenarios? Items to be studied – Underground plumbing conditions (sanitary sewer), domestic water flow test, testing/certification of existing backflow preventers, incoming natural gas pressure, confirmation & condition of inventoried plumbing materials, basement hydronic piping pressure tests, verification of functionality of the basement BACnet controls, and a sampling of basement HVAC equipment and it’s functionality. | Government is open to an existing conditions assessment, per specification 01 11 00 section 1.4.1.2.1. | N/A |
| HVAC Controls |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .