FA3016-16-R-0072-0002_ATCH_1_Questions_and_Answers__20_Oct.pdf

RFP FA3016-16-R-0072 Amendment 02 Questions and Answers

Question 1: My partner and I are also interested in doing a site visit if possible. I did not see a date in which one will be conducted. Please forgive my oversight if I missed it. If it would be possible for us to visit, please let me know what we will need to accomplish in order to do so.

Answer 1: A site visit was conducted IAW FA3016-16-R-0072 ADDEDUM to FAR 52.212-1 paragraph 3.0, “Only one site visit shall be conducted, on 05 October 2016 at 09:00 AM. In no event shall failure to attend the site visit relieve the offeror from the responsibility of properly estimating the cost of successfully performing the work and that in no event shall not attending the site visit constitute grounds for a claim after contract award.”

Question 2: Do you have a list of the "interested parties" I believe that's public information?

Answer 2: Per FBO.gov, the following are parties that have identified themselves as “interested parties”:

1. TRUDYS CUSTOM CREATIONS

8524 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR NE WARREN, OH 444842048 USA

2. LGI Ventures Limited 305 Rock Meadow Trl. Mansfield, TX 76063 US

3. TECH SYSTEMS, INC.

6420 GROVEDALE DRIVE STE 300 ALEXANDRIA, VA 223102500 USA

4. ALL ALTERATIONS & CUSTOM TAILORING

7009 WALL TRIANA HWY MADISON, AL 357577419 USA

5. FRONT LINE APPAREL GROUP, LLC

5 SHAW'S COVE STE 220 NEW LONDON, CT 063204974 USA

6. BILLY STONE

6353 MONTGOMERY DR SAN ANTONIO, TX 782393200 USA

7. ALLIANCE EXPRESS LOGISTICS LLC

13857 HIGH MESA RD ROANOKE, TX 762624561 US

Question 3: The USG is requesting 3 projects in order to determine whether prospective contractors are responsible. In order to provide greater insight into responsibility, we suggest that the USG require the 3 projects to be recent and relevant in size and scope to the Alteration and Fitting Services program.

Answer 3: The past performance information requested is not part of the evaluation criteria.

The Contracting Officer will determine prospective contractor responsibility IAW FAR Part 9.

Question 4: Request that 6 pages (2 pages per Project) be added to the 40-page count for the Technical Proposal in order to accommodate the new Attachment 5. Increasing page count to 46.

Answer 4: The past performance information requested is not part of the evaluation criteria.

Separate pages submitted which only include this requested information will not be counted against page count for Technical Information.

Question5: Please confirm that the Government will allow the use of subcontractor past performance in Attachment 5.

Answer 5: The Contracting Officer will determine prospective contractor responsibility IAW FAR Part 9.

Question 6: Is there any way I can get a condensed list of required documentation to be submitted for the solicitation. And possibly an example of each or explanation of each. I want to make sure I don't mess anything up and do everything correct to be considered for the award.

Answer 6: Please refer to ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-1 Instruction to Offerors – Commercial Items.