BA_MFF_-_Follow-on_RFI__-_04_Nov_16.pdf
PDF 14 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-16-R-0023
About this file
BA MFF - Follow-on RFI - 04 Nov 16
View the file
Other files
Show all 40
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Follow-On
Request for Information
Battlefield Airman (BA) Military Free Fall (MFF)
This is a Follow-On Request For Information (RFI). Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract.
The Government has previously posted RFIs for this requirement under the link https://www.fbo.gov/notices/0b92fc8041dfb6398916a36bf65d7c43 - AFICA Battlefield Airman
Military Freefall Aircraft Lift RFI. However, continuing developments have contributed to significant changes in the requirement. The Battlefield Airman Military Freefall (MFF) and
Aircraft Lift Service Requirements have been separated into two requirements. This link will only be used for the Battlefield Airman MFF requirement.
In addition to the information provided under the original RFI posted on 23 Apr 15, updated on
27 May 15 and 10 Dec 15, under the link listed above, the Government is requesting industry response in the form of comments/questions on portions of the draft Request for Proposal (RFP) documents to include the Performance Work Statement (PWS) dated 04 Nov 16, Section L and
M, and Pricing Model. The Government is also requesting reponses to the attached Contractor
Survey. Responses received by the due date listed below will be considered for the final RFP.
Late responses may or may not be considered. Industry is encouraged to submit responses as early as possible.
Requested Information regarding this RFI is due NLT 3:00 pm CST on 21 Nov 16.
Questions relative to this posting should be addressed to the POCs identified below. All interested business concerns shall indicate interest in responding to this RFI by providing a completed Contractor Survey (attached), to 338 SCONS, Ms. Jaclyn G. Rodriguez, jaclyn.rodriguez@us.af.mil and Tina WatsonTarver, tina.watsontarver@us.af.mil. Responses are due NLT 3:00 pm CST on 21 Nov 16. E-mail replies are required.
NOTE: At this time the Government does not have an anticipated date for posting a final RFP for this requirement. It is the responsibility of interested parties to monitor www.fbo.gov for updates. This is not a Request for Proposal (RFP), solicitation or an indication that the
Government will contract for this requirement. The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred as a result of the response to this RFI and is in no way obligated by the information received. Not responding to the RFI does not preclude participation in any future solicitation.
The information provided in this RFI is subject to change and is not binding on the Government.
https://www.fbo.gov/notices/0b92fc8041dfb6398916a36bf65d7c43 https://www.fbo.gov/notices/0b92fc8041dfb6398916a36bf65d7c43 http://www.fbo.gov/ http://www.fbo.gov/
Follow-On
CONTRACTOR SURVEY
Battlefield Airman (BA) Military Free Fall (MFF)
Part II. Additional Survey Questions
Please answer each question as it pertains to the Battlefield Airman (BA) Military Free Fall
(MFF) Draft PWS, Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Sections L and M, and Draft Price Model.
1. Does your company anticipate difficulty with providing a Statement of Assurance certifying that proposed locations to be used to conduct specified activities do not present unique environmental circumstances identified in 32 CFR§ 989, Appendix B, A2.2? See Draft RFP
Section L paragraph L.3.10.8. Provide your rationale for your response.
2. Does your company anticipate difficulty with meeting the Contractor/Instructor General
Requirements regarding Physical Fitness listed in PWS paragraph 2.1.13.? Provide your rationale for your response.
3. Does your company feel that additional information is required to provide a sufficient plan on running a course schedule? Please state what information your company feels is needed.
4. Does your company have any concerns with the CLIN structure/Price Model for the requirement? Provide your rationale for your response.
5. Do any sections of the PWS appear to be overly restrictive? Provide your rationale for your response.
6. Do any sections of the PWS appear to add unnecessary costs to the Government?
Provide your rationale for your response.
7. Please provide any general comments and/or questions regarding the PWS, Sections L and M, and the Pricing Model that will assist the Government with developing a refined RFP.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .