Attachment_9_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

For Official Use Only

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 7 FA3002-16-R-0023, Battlefield Airman Military Free Fall Attachment 9

The 338th Specialized Contracting Squadron of the Air Force is in the process of competitively selecting a source for an Air Force Battlefield Airmen (BA) Military Free Fall (MFF) course. The MFF Training program is an initial skill required for BA training pipelines. The objective of the BA MFF program is to graduate students that meet

United States Special Operations Command/United States Army Special Operations Command

(USSOCOM/USASOC) curriculum requirements.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 10 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to tina.watsontarver.1@us.af.mil and jaclyn.rodriguez@us.af.mil. Please call Jaclyn Rodriguez at

(210) 652-4259, or Tina WatsonTarver at (210) 652-1358 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

JACLYN RODRIGUEZ, NH-III, DAF

Contracting Officer

1Atch http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:tina.watsontarver.1@us.af.mil mailto:jaclyn.rodriguez@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 7 FA3002-16-R-0023, Battlefield Airman Military Free Fall Attachment 9

NOTE: Please clearly mark above which area(s) this PPQ addresses .

Section 1: Contract Identification (filled out by the Offeror)

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Period of Performance:

H. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

I. Description of work performed:

J. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

K. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, COR, etc.):

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 7 FA3002-16-R-0023, Battlefield Airman Military Free Fall Attachment 9

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 7 FA3002-16-R-0023, Battlefield Airman Military Free Fall Attachment 9

Questions E V S M U N/A

1. How well did the contractor meet the mobilization milestones/schedules submitted?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. How effective was the contractor in recruiting, hiring, training personnel and acquiring all property/equipment necessary to support the requirement prior to contract performance?

3. How well did the contractor plan, coordinate, and implement all aspects of the mobilization as stated in their proposal?

4. How effective was overall contract staffing management (including ability to provide employees who are qualified, trained and certified)?

5. How effective was the contractor in recruiting, hiring, training and retaining personnel to support the on-going requirement?

6. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract staffing problems?

7. How effectively did the contractor provide security services in terms of protecting facilities and/or equipment and /or students?

8. How effectively did the contractor provide lodging support services in terms of availability, amenities and cleanliness?

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 7 FA3002-16-R-0023, Battlefield Airman Military Free Fall Attachment 9

9. How effectively did the contractor provide food support services in terms of nutritional options, number of days available and flexibility in hours of support?

10. How well did the contractor provide transportation support services in terms of availability and flexibility?

11. How adequate/effective were the contractor’s safety programs/procedures?

12. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

13. How well did the contractor implement and manage training areas, routes, and primary/auxiliary air fields/Drop Zones/Wind Tunnels, etc?

14. How effectively did the contractor manage aircraft maintenance to meet technical performance and schedules?

15. How well did the contractor perform academic, ground and flying training?

16. How adequate/effective were the contractor’s emergency support services?

17. How adequate/effective were the contractor’s environmental compliance and safety procedures/programs?

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 7 FA3002-16-R-0023, Battlefield Airman Military Free Fall Attachment 9

18. How effective was the contractor at maintaining training and flying schedules, to include handling deviations in class sizes?

19. How well does the contractor manage CARB certification and processes?

20. How effective was the contractor in establishing a cooperative business relationship with customer personnel, responsiveness to customer requests, and overall customer service?

21. How effective and supportive was the contractor’s management of personnel? Schedules? Handling problems/issues?

22. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING of the contractor’s performance pertaining to all areas of performance.

For Official Use Only Page 7 of 7 FA3002-16-R-0023, Battlefield Airman Military Free Fall Attachment 9

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what they promised in their proposal, I

[ click and select an item ] award to them today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: tina.watsontarver.1@us.af.mil and jaclyn.rodriguez@us.af.mil http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:tina.watsontarver.1@us.af.mil mailto:jaclyn.rodriguez@us.af.mil