Maxwell_BOS_Technical_Requirements.pptx

PPTX presentation 136 KB Posted

Attached to
Maxwell-Gunter BOS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA300213R0012
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

Site Visit Technical Briefing Slides

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Maxwell-Gunter BOS, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA3002-13-R-0012_Conformed_Solicitation_Document.docx DOCX document
FA3002-13-R-0012-0008.docx DOCX document
Maxwell_BOS_PWS_-_Amend_8.pdf PDF
Maxwell_Memorandum_Amendment_0007_CBA_Addendum.docx DOCX document
FA3002-13-R-0012-0007.docx DOCX document
Maxwell_Memorandum_Amendment_0007.docx DOCX document
MFR_correcting_due_date_in_Amend_0007.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0007_Modification_Document.doc DOC document
CBA_M1_and_USW_Maxwell_AFB_April_14_2016_through_June_30_2018.pdf PDF
Vehicle_Replacement_Comment-Question.pdf PDF
MFR-_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
Maxwell_BOS_PWS_Revised_Amend_5_(17_Sep_15).pdf PDF
Maxwell_BOS_RFP_(Conformed_Copy).pdf PDF
Attch_4_PAST_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_PPI_Tool_Instructions.pdf PDF
Maxwell_RFP_Amendment_4_Q A.xls XLS spreadsheet
Maxwell_BOS_PWS_5_Aug_15_-_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
Maxwell-Gunter_Contractor_Workforce_Demographics_.pdf PDF
AFSFMS_Users_Guide_-_June_2008_RevisedMB(13_Nov_08).pdf PDF
MAX_Additional_Operations_Workload_7_Jul_2015.pdf PDF
Real_Property_Report _7115_(22_June_2015)-Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
MFR _Max_Bos _Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
Maxwell_BOS__Past_Performance_(13_May_15).pptx PPTX presentation
Maxwell_BOS_Welcome_(13_May_2015).pptx PPTX presentation
Maxwell_BOS_PWS.pptx PPTX presentation
ppi_tool.accdb —
Maxwell-Gunter_Site_Visit_Letter.pdf PDF
FA3002-13-R-0012_-_Maxwell_RFP_Amend_0001.pdf PDF
SubC_Checklist.pdf PDF
Maxwell_BOS_PWS_9_Apr_15.pdf PDF
Client_authorization_letter.pdf PDF
(Residential).pdf PDF
WD_05-2011_(Rev._-17).pdf PDF
Maxwell-Gunter_Site_Visit_Letter.pdf PDF
Maxwell_Attach_4_Section_J_ManpowerMatrix13_Nov_2014.pdf PDF
Maxwell-Gunter_BOS_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_Form.doc DOC document
Maxwell_BOS_Draft_RFP.doc DOC document
FA3002-13-R-0012_Maxwell_BOS_Pre-Solicitation_Notice_(30_Dec_15).docx DOCX document
Maxwell_BOS_-_Section_L.docx DOCX document
Responses_to_RFI_Comments_on_Maxwell_BOS_DRAFT_PWS_posted_31_Jul_14.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Maxwell_Draft_PWS_14_Nov_14.pdf PDF
10_Dec_13_Tier_Pricing_Industry_Q A.pdf PDF
Sample_-_Maxwell_CLIN_X016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
General_Transformation_Information.zip ZIP file
CE_Technical_Library_Table_Content.doc DOC document
Tier_Pricing_Documents.zip ZIP file
MOUs_and_MOAs.zip ZIP file
DRAFT_Concept_PI_Clause.docx DOCX document
Initial_Draft_PWS_Q A_-_Maxwell_BOS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PWS_Draft_(v1)_-_File_3_of_3.zip ZIP file
Show all 50

Maxwell-Gunter BOS has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Technical Requirements Maxwell AFB Base Operations Support

Ms. Patricia Shelly Program Manager

HQ AETC/A4PM

13 May 15

Develop America's Airmen Today ... for Tomorrow

Aim High...Fly-Fight-Win

Technical Proposal What makes an acceptable proposal Tell us the

HowYour technical approach
Who and how manyYour workforce
WhatThe services you will provide
When(If applicable)

The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but needs to provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet these requirements

Acceptable – Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Technical Capability Executive Summary Plan to provide an effective Mobilization, Technical, Program Management and Staffing, and Performance Management/Quality Control approach State understanding of all BOS requirements over the life of this contract Approach for working with other contractors in support of the 42 ABW mission

During evaluations, each proposal will be assigned a rating of either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”.

A rating of unacceptable in one or more technical subfactors will constitute an overall unacceptable rating for the technical evaluation.

TECHNICAL RATINGDEFINITION
AcceptableProposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
UnacceptableProposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following Technical Capability subfactors:

Subfactor 1: Mobilization Approach Subfactor 2: Technical Approach Subfactor 3: Program Management and Staffing Approach Subfactor 4: Performance Management/Quality Control Approach

Subfactor 1: Mobilization Approach This subfactor evaluates the Offeror’s plan to facilitate full performance on first day of contract; requirement is met when:

The Offeror provides a detailed strategy which results in a fully-staffed & qualified workforce to perform on contract start date Ensure equipment and vehicles are available on first day of contract start A realistic time-line schedule with sound supporting rationale; fully addresses start and completion of each key scheduled event

Subfactor 2: Technical Approach This subfactor evaluates the Offeror’s plan to provide multi-functional contracted workforce; requirement is met when:

Understanding of the requirement Ability to adapt to new and/or changing requirements Support of critical assets

Subfactor 3: Program Management and Staffing Approach This subfactor evaluates the adequacy of the Offeror’s proposed staffing by shift, skill classification and work unit; requirement is met when:

Detailed descriptions of roles are sufficient to meet projected workload/PWS requirement Completed Manpower Matrix supports workload/PWS requirement Provides process/rational which supports proposed staffing Strategy that addresses continuous coverage of “critical one-deep positions Strategy for continuous recruitment and retention of labor force A complete Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) to meet workload Description of subcontractor teaming arrangements or joint ventures

Subfactor 4: Performance Management/Quality Control Approach This subfactor evaluates the Offeror’s approach to meet the Government’s requirements identified in the PWS without introducing unacceptable risk; the requirement is met when:

Effective QC strategy Evaluates compliance, documents deficiencies, monitors corrective actions; ensures timely problem resolution, and explains how problem recurrence problems will be prevented Ensures effective QC and customer relations through efficient processes, performance measurement, analysis, and data management

Technical Proposal Helpful Hints Address all the RFP requirements in Section L Read and understand PWS requirements Do not over use “how wonderful your company is” Do not use old proposal that addresses another location or service not in the RFP Provide methodology to include calculations for manpower Remember: The technical team is made up of technical experts -- Tell us your technical approach in meeting the PWS requirements

Air Education and Training Command “The First Command” image3.jpeg image1.jpeg image2.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .