ITO Attachment 1.3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Exterior and Interior Painting IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2823-20-R-0010
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO) FOR EGLIN, AFB EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR PAINTING IDIQ
ITO ATTACHMENT 1.3
Past Performance Questionnaire
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor: _________________________________
Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
Contract number: _______________________________________
Contract type: ______________________________ (If multiple types (i.e. Firm-Fixed Price with Time & Material), list percentage and dollar amount of Firm-Fixed Price portion)
Contractor performed as: Prime Contractor _____ Sub-Contractor _____
Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
Did this contract include exterior and/or interior painting? Yes _____ No _____
Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
Initial contract price: $____________________________
Current/final contract price: $_______________________________
Reasons for differences between initial contract price and final contract price: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Description of service provided: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________
Customer or agency description (if applicable): _________________________________________________________________
Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________________ Evaluator's title: __________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________ Evaluator’s email: __________________________________________________________________
Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: ___________________________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Contractor’s ability and qualifications to manage and execute light and heavy exterior/interior painting projects. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated sound staffing approach to include subcontractor and teaming arrangements. |
| 3. |
| Demonstrated ability to staff appropriate key positions in management/administrative staff as well as field construction staff; such as Project Manager, Project Superintendent, Safety Manager and Quality Control Manager. |
| 4. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, manage, retain, and replace personnel who have the knowledge, experience, and required certifications, inclusive of the ability to meet any surge requirements. |
| 5. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 6. |
| Demonstrated ability to provide and execute Safety Plan that proves commitment to safety, training, and incident reporting and methods/procedures for implementing safety. |
| 7. |
| Demonstrated ability to provide and execute Quality Control (QC) Plan that provides qualifications, responsibilities, and authority levels of each position assigned to the QC function. |
| 8. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 9. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 10. |
| Demonstrated ability to provide a description of procedures, processes and methods for tracking progress of the project, with attention to quality, timeliness, and cost control. |
| 11. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 13. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 14. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 15. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 16. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS (Federal contracts only)? |
| YES/NO |
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE SUMMARY FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
No ___ Yes___ for Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Evaluator’s Signature Date__________________________
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AFTC/PZIOC ATTN: Ronald Wilson / Timmothy Allred Eglin, AFB FL 32542 ronald.wilson.22@us.af.mil and timmothy.allred@us.af.mil
ITO – 1.3 Page 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .