Attachment_6_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(APP_B).pdf

APPENDIX B

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposal: FA2823-14-R-6024 Construct Variable Height Tower, FTFA 13-3005, Eglin AFB, FL 32542

1. Name of Contractor:

Contract or Identifying Number:

Title/Description of Contract:

Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract described on Appendix A. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.

2. Brief description of scope of work:

EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Assessment Definition

Substantial Confidence

(SC)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

(SAT)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

(LC)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

(NC)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) (UC)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: ___________________________

01 Contractor developed realistic progress schedules & completed the project within the established schedule.

SC SAT LC NC UC

02 Contractor provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

SC SAT LC NC UC

03 Contractor provided timely and accurate payrolls with no known labor violations (Davis-Bacon Act) or labor claims.

SC SAT LC NC UC

04 Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SC SAT LC NC UC

05 Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed them.

SC SAT LC NC UC

06 Contractor identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation to solve problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.

SC SAT LC NC UC

07 Contractor provided effective quality control, which resulted in a quality-finished product.

SC SAT LC NC UC

08 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain in comments section, SC SAT LC NC UC

09 Would you hire this contractor again? If no, explain in comments section

SC SAT LC NC UC

OVERALL RATING: ______________________________

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Name of Person Completing Evaluation:

Base/Company: Date:

Position Title/Grade: Phone:

Email: Fax: