FA2550-18-R-1004_JFP_CODI_RFP.pdf

A. General Requirements, Section 01000, and 13 additional attachments.

B. Period of Performance: Base Period - 19 Sep 18 to 18 Sep 23; Option Period - 19 Sep 23 to 18 Sep 25

C. Place of Performance: Colorado Front Range Department of Defense (DoD) Installations.

D. Competition: Competitive 8(a).

E. 8(a) Geographical Restriction: It has been determined that competition w ill be limited to 8(a) f irms located w ithin Region VIII -Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota, North Dakota, & Utah, and other 8(a) construction f irms w ith a bona f ide place of business w ithin the geographical competitive area, and the assigned NAICS code. All other 8(a) BD Participants are deemed ineligible to submit offers.

F. Type of Contracts: Firm-Fixed Price, Multiple Aw ard Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity.

G. NAICS: 237310, Highw ay, Street, and Bridge Construction.

H. SBA Size Standard: $36.5M.

I. In block 11 below ; the number of calendar days for the "performance begins" and "completed w ithin" shall be determined at the Task Order level.

PATRICIA HALES 719-567-3820

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

01-Mar-2018

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______ calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

YES X NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________02 Apr 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______200 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

50TH CONTRACTING SQD PATRICIA HALES

210 FALCON PKWY STE 2116

SCHRIEVER AFB CO 80912-2116

FA2550

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

08:00 AM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

719-567-3153FAX:TEL: 719-567-3820 TEL: FAX:

FA255018R1004 62

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 1 Lot Paving for Colorado DoD Installations

FFP

As described in task orders issued under this contract, the Contractor shall furnish all management, supervision, labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals required for maintaining and repairing existing paved and unpaved structures and constructing new paved and unpaved structures, including but not limited to paved and unpaved roadways, bridges, sidewalks, parking areas, motorpools, airfields, and runways to include subsequent services and typical features that promote safe and efficient transportation (trails, ditches, curbs and gutters, traffic signals, traffic signs, street lights, and drainage features). Projects may include landscaping, electrical, and drainage work. Fort Carson, Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site (PCMS), Pueblo Chemical Depot (PCD), Peterson Air Force Base (AFB), Cheyenne Mountain Air Station, Schriever AFB, Buckley AFB, and The United States Air Force Academy (USAFA), which includes Farish Recreation Area and the Bullseye Auxiliary Airfield, are “installations” for purposes of work to be ordered under this contract.

FOB: Destination

SIGNAL CODE: A

MAX

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

1001 UNDEFINED Lot OPTION Paving for Colorado DoD Installations

FFP

As described in task orders issued under this contract, the Contractor shall furnish all management, supervision, labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals required for maintaining and repairing existing paved and unpaved structures and constructing new paved and unpaved structures, including but not limited to paved and unpaved roadways, bridges, sidewalks, parking areas, motorpools, airfields, and runways to include subsequent services and typical features that promote safe and efficient transportation (trails, ditches, curbs and gutters, traffic signals, traffic signs, street lights, and drainage features). Projects may include landscaping, electrical, and drainage work. Fort Carson, Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site (PCMS), Pueblo Chemical Depot (PCD), Peterson Air Force Base (AFB), Cheyenne Mountain Air Station, Schriever AFB, Buckley AFB, and The United States Air Force Academy (USAFA), which includes Farish Recreation Area and the Bullseye Auxiliary Airfield, are “installations” for purposes of work to be ordered under this contract.

SIGNAL CODE: A

MAX

NET AMT

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

$2,000.00 $200,000,000.00

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

1.00 $2,000.00 $30,000,000.00

CLIN MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN VALUE

The minimum quantity(s) and CLIN value(s) for all orders issued against the CLIN(s) on this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity(s) and CLIN value(s) stated in the following table. The maximum quantity(s) and CLIN value(s) for all orders issued against the CLIN(s) on this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity(s) and CLIN value(s) stated in the following table.

CLIN

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

0001 1.00 $2,000.00 $200,000,000.00 1001 $200,000,000.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

0001 1.00

$2,000.00

$30,000,000.00

$30,000,000.00

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government 1001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 19-SEP-2018 TO

18-SEP-2023

N/A TO BE DETERMINED AT THE TASK

ORDER LEVEL

TBD AT THE TASK ORDER LEVEL

TBD

TBD CO

TBD AT THE TASK ORDER LEVEL

TBD

1001 POP 19-SEP-2023 TO

18-SEP-2025

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

TBD

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES

Attachment 1 General Requirements (01000) 10 Attachment 2 Organizational Guidance (01030) 2 Attachment 3 Contractor Quality Control (01440) 3 Attachment 4 Safety, Security, Health, and Environmental Requirements (01510) 2 Attachment 5 Airfields and Hangars (01540) 1 Attachment 6 Task Order Close-Out (01700) 5 Attachment 7 CODI PP Questionnaire 6 Attachment 8 Ft Carson Sample Project 35 Attachment 9 PAFB Sample Project SOW 16 Attachment 10 PAFB Sample Project Drawings N/A Attachment 11 PAFB Sample Project Submittal Schedule 1 Attachment 12 Acronyms 3 Attachment 13 Contract Management 3 Attachment 14 Task Order Procedures 3

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Part 1, INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 Proposal Preparation. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals, as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal.

2.0 General Instructions. The Offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested, and must be submitted in accordance with (IAW) these instructions. The Offeror shall be compliant with, and shall describe how, they will satisfy the solicitation requirements. A proposal that is sufficiently documented to support performance in a complete, orderly, and detailed manner will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation. Non-compliance with the instructions and solicitation is grounds for eliminating the proposal from consideration for contract award.

2.1 Proposal Clarity. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation of the Offeror’s capabilities and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The Offeror’s proposal shall not simply rephrase, reiterate, or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to describe the requirements and address how the Offeror intends to meet the requirements. The Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of its capabilities, facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror’s proposal.

2.2 Proposal Depth. The Offeror is advised that its proposal is presumed to represent its best efforts and most complete responses to this solicitation. The Offeror is advised not to provide simple cursory responses which merely reiterate the solicitation requirements. Alternate proposals will not be accepted. The Offeror is reminded that the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines that it is necessary. By submission of a proposal, the Offeror represents that its team is capable of performing all requirements specified in the solicitation.

2.3 Proposal Detail. Elaborate brochures, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and not desired.

2.4 Proposal Acceptance Period. The Offeror shall clearly specify the proposal acceptance period, in Block 13.A. of the solicitation, for a minimum of 200 days from proposal submission.

2.5 Proposal Retention. IAW the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all proposals IAW the Federal Records Disposition Schedule, and unless otherwise requested will destroy all other copies at the end of the source selection process.

2.6 Size Standard. This acquisition is an 8(a) small business set aside under NAICS code 237310, Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction, with a $36.5M size standard. As mandated by the Small Business Administration acceptance letter dated 11 January 2017, it has been determined that competition will be limited to 8(a) firms located within Region VII – Colorado, Wyoming, montana, South Dakota, North Dakota, & Utah, and other 8(a) construction firms within a bona fide place of business within the geographical competitive area, and the assigned NAICS code. All other 8(a) BD Participants are deemed ineligible to submit offers.

2.7 Acquisition Strategy. This acquisition will utilize a Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) source selection strategy IAW the FAR 15.101-1, as supplemented by the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) 215.3, the DoD Source Selection Procedures, the Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS) 5315.3, and AFFARS Mandatory Procedure (MP) MP5315.3. Offers will be evaluated using the factors under RFP Section 00100, Part 2 Past Performance is significantly more important than Price. The Technical Factor will be evaluated on an “Acceptable/Unacceptable” basis. If an Offeror receives less than a minimum acceptable criteria rating under RFP Section 00100 Part 2, in any factor, the proposal will be deemed unawardable.

3.0 General Information.

3.1 Points of Contact (POC). The POC for this acquisition is Patricia Hales (Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) whose contact information is listed below:

Patricia Hales (PCO) (patricia.hales@us.af.mil) Phone: 719-567-3456

50 CONS/LGCA

210 Falcon Parkway, Suite 2116 Schriever AFB, CO 80912-2116

In accordance with the DoD Source Selection Procedures, paragraph 1.4.2.2.6, the PCO shall serve as the single point of contact for all solicitation-related inquiries from actual or prospective offerors. Government personnel will not engage in discussions with industry concerning the source selection unless the PCO has authorized such discussions. In order to notify others that an RFP has been released, the PCO shall send a notification announcing that the final RFP has been issued. The RFP will be posted on FBO.gov, and notices sent to interested parties.

3.2 Debriefings. IAW FAR 15.505 (Pre-award Debriefing of Offerors), unsuccessful Offerors will have three days from the date of Government notice of exclusion from the competition to submit a written request for a debriefing; Offerors may request either a pre-award or post award debriefing. IAW FAR

15.506 (Post award Debriefing of Offerors), unsuccessful Offerors will have three days from the date the Offeror was notified of contract award to submit a written request for a debriefing. Offerors will only receive one debriefing.

3.3 Reference Documents. Documents necessary for performance of the contract will be made available on FedBizOpps.gov (FBO). FBO will only be used for pre-award and award information for this acquisition.

3.4 Revisions and Amendments. The Government reserves the right to revise the solicitation. Such revisions will be communicated by formal amendment (Standard Form 30) to this solicitation. If such amendments require material changes in quantities or price, the solicitation closing date may be extended, if found necessary, to enable an Offeror to revise its proposal. In such cases, the amendment will include an announcement of the new solicitation closing date and time. The Offeror shall provide acknowledgement in Block 19 of the SF 1442 of any solicitation amendments issued by the Government.

3.5 Discrepancies and Ambiguities. If an Offeror believes that the solicitation contains errors, omissions, or is otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale no later than the due date specified in the solicitation for receipt of questions.

3.6 Mistakes. Mistakes in contractor’s proposal shall be handled IAW FAR 15.508 Discovery of Mistakes.

3.7 Proposal Preparation and Format Instructions. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals, as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. Each volume shall be complete in their entirety. Proposals shall be submitted in hard copy and soft copy format IAW this paragraph and paragraph 4 of this section.

3.7.1 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits. The Offeror’s proposal shall consist of five (5) proposal volumes: a General volume, Technical volume, a Price volume, a Past Performance volume and a Contract Documentation volume. The Offeror shall prepare the proposal volumes as set forth in paragraph 4.0 below.

3.7.2 Binding and Labeling. Offeror’s proposals shall comply with the instructions detailed in paragraph

4.0. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed IAW FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data.

3.7.3 Electronic Copies (E-Copies). The Offeror shall submit a complete copy of the proposal, including all proposal volumes and attachments, in electronic format, using non-re-writable CD-ROM or DVD. For the purposes of Electronic Copies (E-Copies), CD-ROM will be used to mean “CD-ROM or DVD.” The Government will not accept proposals sent via electronic mail (E-mail).

a. The content and page size of electronic copies shall be identical to the hard copies. If there is a variance, the printed document will take precedence. Indicate on each CD-ROM the volume number and title.

Use separate files and folders and ensure the file-naming convention is simple and straightforward to permit rapid location of all portions, to include exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. Each volume shall be on a separate CD-ROM. All files must be uncompressed. Ensure the electronic documents stored on CD-ROMs can be opened by Government personnel and that all information is accessible on Government computers. Offerors shall ensure that the CD-ROMs submitted to the Government are finalized such that no changes can be made to the information.

b. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by MS Office 2013® applications (e.g. Microsoft (MS) Word 2013®, MS Excel 2013®, and MS-Power Point 2013®) and/or Adobe Acrobat®). The proposal may be submitted in portable document format (PDF), but if used must be formatted to allow the text to be selected (i.e. not as an image). Electronic copies of price tables and spreadsheets shall be provided in MS Excel® to allow Government evaluation and review of equations. In the technical proposal volume, simple list tables can be included in the volume file (i.e. as part of the MS Word® or Adobe Acrobat® file) and need not be separately included in MS Excel. Ensure formulas and clarifying notes used to calculate price are reflected in the spreadsheets. If files contain links, the links shall be maintained in all revisions.

3.7.4 Page Limitations. Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. Total page count will be based on the printed proposal submission. If page limitations are exceeded, excess pages will not be read, nor considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Page limitations may be placed on responses to evaluation notices (EN) if required.

The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the Offeror.

3.7.5 Page Size and Format. Page size will be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts, with 1-inch margins around the page perimeter.

a. Pages will use single spaces. Pages shall be printed as double sided where possible (i.e., do not print on both sides if the next page would be a foldout, tab break, etc.).

b. Each printed side of information on a page of paper shall count as one page (single-sided pages count as one page, double-sided pages count as two pages). Foldout pages will count as two (2) pages for each 8.5 x 11 section.

c. The paper color of the original proposal submission shall be white only. Use Times New

Roman, with a font no smaller than 11 point with normal proportional spacing.

d. Text embedded in graphics can vary from the font style and size requirement.

3.7.6 Table of Contents, Indexing and Glossary. Each volume shall contain a detailed Table of Contents to delineate the tabs, subparagraphs, figures and tables within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to separate and identify sections. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all definitions as applicable, and abbreviations and acronyms used with an explanation for each. The Table of Contents, tabs, index, and glossary are excluded from volume page limitations.

3.7.7 Stand Alone Volumes. Each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

3.7.8 Revised Pages after Initial Proposal Submission. When revising pages of the proposal, submit only those changed pages, in lieu of the entire volume. Ensure the page(s) that is/are being replaced are clearly identified on the replacement pages when submitting the replacement page(s) (e.g. “These four (4) pages, replace pages 7-10 of Volume II). The date of the revision and revision number shall be reflected on each changed page (preferably on, or next to, the vertical change line). Make spreadsheet revisions obvious by highlighting cells that change.

3.7.9 Pricing Information. All pricing information shall be addressed only in the Price and Contract Documentation volumes.

3.7.10 Classified Information. Although not anticipated, proposals shall not include any classified data in any proposal volume.

3.7.11 Proposal Delivery. Paper and electronic copies, only, shall be delivered directly the POC identified in paragraph 3.1 at 50 CONS, 210 Falcon Parkway, Suite 2116, Schriever AFB, CO 80912-2116. The Government will not accept proposals sent via electronic mail (E-mail). If using a courier, submit the name of the individual hand carrying these volumes 24 hours in advance to the POC identified in paragraph 3.1. The courier will be required to provide identification at the time of delivery. The delivered package(s) shall be labeled “To Be Opened by Addressee Only.” These volumes must be received no later than the date and time specified in the solicitation posted to FBO.

Due to Schriever Air Force Base’s mail security processes, the Contracting Officer cannot guarantee that proposals mailed, and not hand-delivered, will be processed and received by the proposal deadline.

a. Therefore, the Government strongly encourages the Offeror to hand-carry the required documents and information. Please call the POC identified in paragraph 3.1 at least two hours prior to your anticipated arrival time to ensure there will be personnel available to receive your proposal.

b. Offerors should speak personally with the POC identified in paragraph 3.1, and not rely on voice mail or E-mail.

c. Contractor personnel delivering proposals are advised that they may be unable to access SAFB without a valid U.S. Uniformed Services Identification Card or DoD Force Common Access Card (CAC).

d. Be advised that vehicles may be subjected to random vehicle searches, and/or you may encounter unexpected delays at the gates and should plan accordingly.

3.7.12 Site Visits. An organized site visit has been scheduled for Tuesday 20 February 2018 from 9:00 am to 2:00 pm (Mountain Time). Offerors are to meet at 9:00 am at the Ft. Carson Gate 1 Visitor Center, located at 6013 Nelson Blvd, Ft. Carson CO 80913. A bus will transport attendees onto the installation, to the site, and then onto Peterson Air Force Base. The bus will return to Ft. Carson Gate 1 at the conclusion of the site visit. Interested parties are limited to three (3) attendees who must present valid photo identification to security personnel in order to gain entrance onto the installations.

All questions regarding the site visit shall be submitted in writing (mail or E-mail) to the POC identified in paragraph 3.1 not later than 7:00 am Mountain Time on 27 February 2018.

All questions and answers will be posted to FBO. Answers that change the requirements of this solicitation will be posted via solicitation amendment on FBO.

3.7.13 Safeguarding Information. Proprietary information, appropriately marked and submitted in response to this solicitation is restricted from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act.

3.7.14 Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ). Each Offeror shall submit PPQs for recent and relevant performance in accordance with the format contained in RFP Attachment 7. The Offeror is responsible for sending PPQs to the points of contact included in RFP Attachment 7 for the past efforts they identify, who will subsequently submit information to the Government to be received no later than the proposal due date.

3.7.14.1 Offerors shall instruct the respondents that all responses are to be provided directly to the Government POC identified in paragraph 3.1, NOT THE OFFEROR.

3.7.14.2 The number of PPQs submitted shall be limited to six (6) total efforts. This is to include projects submitted in accordance with the requirements identified in paragraph 4.4.2 below (e.g. Four

(4) PPQs associated with paragraph 4.4.2 and no more than two (2) additional PPQs for different projects, not to exceed six (6) total). The responsibility to send out and track the completion of the PPQs rests solely with the Offeror.

3.7.14.3 Completed PPQs shall be E-mailed or mailed to the point of contact identified in the questionnaire. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring the receipt of the PPQs and providing a list of the proposed respondents. This will be accomplished by utilizing the contact information in Paragraph

3.1.

4.0 Specific Proposal Instructions and Format:

4.1 Volume I – General

Para # Title Page Limit Hard

Copies E-

Copies

4.1.1 Tab A – Executive Summary 5 4 1

4.2 Volume II – Technical

4.2.1 Tab A – Table of Contents, Glossary Unlimited

4 1

4.2.2 Tab B - Technical Approach 25

4.3 Volume III – Price

4.3.1 Tab A – Table of Contents, Glossary

Unlimited 4 1

4.3.2 Tab B - Pricing

4.4 Volume IV – Past Performance

4.4.1 Tab A – Table of Contents, Glossary Unlimited

4 1

4.4.2 Tab B – Relevant Contracts 2

4.5 Volume V – Contractual Documentation

4.5.1 Tab A – Table of Contents, Glossary

Unlimited

4.5.2 Tab B – Completed Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

4.5.3 Tab C – Completed RFP Section 00700 – Contract Clauses

4.5.4 Tab D – Completed RFP Section 00600 – Representations and Certifications

4.5.5 Tab E – Other Representations of Offerors

4.5.6 Tab F – Other Information Required

4.5.7 Tab G – Financial Documentation

4.1 Volume I – General. The Offeror shall submit a General volume consisting of an Executive Summary.

4.1.1 Tab A - Executive Summary. The Offeror shall provide a narrative summary of the proposal.

Any summary material presented here shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any other portions of the proposal.

4.2 Volume II – Technical. The Offeror’s technical proposal shall address each of the following:

4.2.1 Tab A – Table of Contents, Glossary

4.2.2 Tab B – Technical Approach. The Offeror shall address their proposed approach to meeting the solicitation requirements.

FACTOR 1 – Technical. The Offeror’s technical proposal shall address each of the following:

SUBFACTOR 1 – Technical Capability. The Offeror’s proposal shall describe their approach, strategy and practices that will be utilized in performing the overall contract effort toward satisfaction of the evaluation factors listed in this part and 00100, Part 2 of this solicitation.

General Requirements (Section 01000):

a. Work Interruptions and Delays: Describe the approach to work around operational requirements and installation events (e.g. outages, special events). Address necessary Government personnel coordination and site preparation to ensure successful project delivery.

b. Project Proposal: Describe how the offeror will respond to no less than 80% of FOPRS issued at each installation each calendar year. Provide detail on how the offeror will submit fair and reasonable offers on multiple task orders that have simultaneous site visits and/or due dates.

c. Construction Schedule: Describe how the offeror will submit realistic construction schedules. The contractor shall detail how they will provide realistic schedule durations that take into account typical construction delays, typical weather, critical path, and realistic time requirements of that type of activity.

The offeror shall describe how they will react to unexpected delays that impact the critical path to include the scheduling of subcontractors.

d. Traffic Control: Describe how the offeror will coordinate all traffic management tasks with the

Government in accordance with required standards.

Organizational Requirements (Section 01030)

a. General Organizational Requirements: Describe the approach to ramp up personnel staffing levels to perform work under multiple task orders issued by multiple installations simultaneously at any given time.

Quality Control (Section 01440)

a. Quality Control: Describe the major components of their Quality Control System.

Task Order Closeout Requirements (Section 01700)

a. Warranties/Warranty Response: Describe the approach to honoring all warranty requirements by responding and initiating corrective action in the required timeframes. This shall include how the contractor will make the appropriate personnel, equipment, and materials available when necessary.

SUBFACTOR 2 – Task Orders. The Offeror’s proposal shall describe their ability to successfully complete the sample task orders. The approach for each task order shall include:

- Material Quantities and Types

- Concrete (CY, CDOT Class) (Ft Carson Sample Task Order Only)

- Base Course (Ton, CDOT Class) (Both Sample Task Orders)

- Ashpalt (Ton, CDOT Gradiation, CDOT PG) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

- Inlet (Number, Type) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

- Pipe (Linear Feet, Type) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

- Technical Approach

- Phasing of Work (Both Sample Task Orders)

- Compaction of Subgrade (Density to Achieve, Method) (Both Sample Task Orders)

- Concrete and Asphalt Placement (Environment Parameters) (Both Sample Task Orders)

- Dowel Placement (Anchoring Approach) (Ft Carson Sample Task Order Only)

- Concrete Placement (Ft Carson Sample Task Order Only)

- Concrete Joint Construction (Type of Joints at Perimeter, # of Cuts/Purpose) (Ft Carson Sample Task Order Only)

- Pipe Demolition (Asbestos Abatement) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

- Asphalt Joint Construction (Treatment of Irregular Joints) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

4.3 Volume III – Price. The Offeror’s price proposal shall address each of the following:

4.3.1 Tab A – Table of Contents, Glossary

4.3.2 Tab B – Pricing. The Offeror’s price proposal shall include a total price for each sample task order.

FACTOR 2 – Price. The Offeror’s price proposal shall reflect whole dollar amounts associated with breakouts of equipment, materials, labor, fringes/overhead, and profit; and, the Offeror’s estimating processes to include the judgmental factors applied and the mathematical or other methods used in the estimate, including those used in projecting from known data.

a. All dollar amounts in the proposal shall be rounded to the nearest dollar. Offerors shall identify any assumptions and exceptions taken to the pricing requirements stated in this solicitation.

b. Provide complete rationale for each assumption and exception. Information provided for exceptions and assumptions will assist the price evaluation team in determining price reasonableness, balance, and completeness.

c. If applicable, annotate that no assumptions or exceptions apply.

4.4 Volume IV – Past Performance. The Offeror’s past performance proposal shall include each of the following:

4.4.1 Tab A – Table of Contents, Glossary

4.4.2 Tab B – Relevant Contracts. Submit information on four (4) recent contracts that includes sufficient detail to demonstrate your ability to perform the proposed effort.

FACTOR 3 – Past Performance. The Offeror’s past performance proposal shall include the following:

1. Two (2) Asphalt Flatwork Contracts

2. One (1) Concrete Flatwork Contracts

3. One (1) Contract of the contractor’s choosing that falls within NAICS 237310

a. The Offeror may include information on up to two (2) recent contracts that fall within the NAICS 237310 that you consider most relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform the proposed effort.

b. Information submitted shall include the name, E-mail address and phone number of the cognizant contracting officer and the contracting officer representative (if one was appointed) associated with each submitted contract.

c. Specific Content. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate. This may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the Offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk.

d. PPQs. PPQs shall be submitted for evaluation in the method and manner prescribed at paragraph

3.7.14 above.

4.5 Volume V – Contract Documentation. This volume shall contain the Offeror’s contract-related documentation. All documentation shall be clearly identified for each member of the Offeror’s team. The Offeror shall format its Contract Documentation volume as follows:

4.5.1 Tab A – Table of Contents, Glossary

4.5.2 Tab B – Completed Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award (Construction, Alteration, or Repair). Complete Block 14, 15, 17, 19, 20A.-C., of the SF1442, as applicable. Signature by the Offeror on the SF 1442 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation, unless specific exception is taken. These sections constitute the model contract.

4.5.3 Tab C – Completed RFP Section 00700 – Contract Clauses. IAW FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting, primes shall submit certification and demonstrate how it is performing at least 15% of the effort for each task order.

4.5.4 Tab D – Completed RFP Section 00600 – Representations and Certifications.

4.5.5 Tab E – Other Representations of Offerors. Complete other statements or representations required by the solicitation.

4.5.5.1 Joint Venture Agreements - Joint Ventures are allowable on competitive Small Business set- asides, however, the joint venture agreement must be received by Small Business Administration (SBA) prior to proposal due date and approved before award of any resulting contract. If you are contemplating a joint venture on this project, you must advise, in writing, your assigned SBA Procurement Center Representative (PCR) as soon as possible. It is also recommended that the agreement be submitted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established regulations. Any corrections and/or changes needed can be made only when your PCR has adequate time for a thorough review before the proposal due date. NO CORRECTIONS AND/OR

CHANGES ARE ALLOWED AFTER TIME OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL.

4.5.6 Tab F – Other Information Required.

4.5.6.1 Authorized Offeror Personnel. Provide the name, title, E-mail address and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to the proposal and who has authority to obligate the Offeror’s company contractually. Also, identify in the same manner, those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

4.5.6.2 Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations. Provide Offeror’s name, company/division's street address, and facility code; CAGE code; data universal numbering system (DUNS) code; size of business (large or small); and labor surplus area designation.

4.5.7 Tab G – Financial Documentation. The Offeror’s proposal shall describe adequate financial resources to perform the prospective contract or demonstrate an ability to obtain adequate financial resources through a commitment or explicit arrangement that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase, or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, other resources, or personnel in accordance with FAR paragraph 9.104-3(a).

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Part 2, EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0 Basis for Contract Award. The Government will evaluate technical on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, and utilize a Performance Price Tradeoff source selection strategy wherein Past Performance is considered significantly more important than price. This acquisition will utilize the source selection strategy IAW the FAR 15.101-1, as supplemented by the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) 215.3, the DoD Source Selection Procedures, the Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS) 5315.3, and AFFARS Mandatory Procedure (MP) MP5315.3. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force FAR Site, http://farsite.hill.af.mil.

a. Each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

The Government intends to award without discussions. Discussions, if necessary, will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.306. To be eligible for award, the Offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, as supplemented; meet all requirements of the RFP; and conform to all required terms and conditions. The Contracting Officer will comply with FAR 19.6 (Certificates of Competency and Determinations of Responsibility) for any Offeror determined to be nonresponsible. While the Government Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) will strive for maximum objectivity, this source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and therefore professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process. The minimum acceptable evaluation ratings to be eligible for contract award is as follows:

1. Past Performance: Satisfactory Confidence

2. Technical: Acceptable

3. Price: Fair and Reasonable

2.0 Evaluation Process. Technical proposals will be evaluated for Subfactor 1 and Subfactor 2, which will determine an overall acceptable or unacceptable rating for the Technical Factor. Past performance will be evaluated based on recency, relevancy and quality to determine an overall confidence rating for the Past Performance Factor. Price will be evaluated individually for each sample task order, but each individual task order price will be added together to determine the Total Evaluated Price (TEP), in order to make a determination that each proposed price is fair and reasonable. Offerors that meet the minimum acceptable evaluation criteria will be ranked in order, first by highest past performance ratings and then by lowest combined price of both task orders. In that order and based on this stratification, no more than six (6) contracts will be awarded. All other ratings held equal, the Offeror whose proposal reflects the greatest relevancy for past performance will be the higher ranked Offeror in the event of a tie.

3.0 Number of Contracts to Be Awarded. The Government intends to award a maximum of six (6), Indefinite-Delivery-Indefinite-Quantity contracts for the Colorado Department of Defense Installations (CODI) acquisition.

4.0 Evaluation Factors.

4.1 Evaluation of Factors. During the evaluation process, the Government will base its evaluation on the responses to the associated factors in RFP Section 00100 Part 1, paragraph 4.0. Each of the Offeror’s responses will be evaluated against the descriptions provided in this section. Past Performance is significantly more important than Price. If a proposal does not meet the minimum acceptable ratings identified in paragraph 1.a. of this section, the Offeror will not be eligible for award.

4.2 Technical Proposal List of Evaluation Subfactors. The Factor 1 - Technical rating provides an assessment of the Offeror’s solution for meeting the Government’s requirement. Per the DoD Source Selection Procedures 1.3.1.2, the Technical Factor will receive either an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” rating, as stated in the following table. If an Offeror receives an ‘Unacceptable” rating in any subfactor, the Technical Factor will be rated “Unacceptable.” If an Offeror receives an “Unacceptable” rating in any factor, the technical proposal will receive an “Unacceptable” rating and the Offeror will NOT be eligible for award.

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

4.2.1 Subfactor 1 – Technical Capability. Subfactor 1 will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the submission demonstrates the following:

SUBFACTOR 1 – Technical Capability.

General Requirements (Section 01000):

a. Work Interruptions and Delays: The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates an effective approach to work around operational requirements and installation events (e.g.

outages, special events) as well as the coordination with Government personnel necessary to ensure successful project delivery.

b. Project Proposal: The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates an effective approach to responding to no less than 80% of FOPRS issued at each installation each calendar year. The Government will also evaluate whether the offeror’s proposal demonstrates an effective capability to generate multiple fair and reasonable proposals on multiple task orders simultaneously.

c. Construction Schedule: The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates how the offeror will submit realistic construction schedules that mitigates any types of potential delays and how they react to unexpected delays.

d. Traffic Control: The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror’s proposal addresses an effective approach to coordinating with the Government on all traffic management tasks and complying with the appropriate standard.

Organizational Requirements (Section 01030)

a. General Organizational Requirements: The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates the capability to ramp up personnel staffing levels to perform work under multiple task orders issued by multiple installations simultaneously at any given time. The Government will also evaluate whether the offerors proposal approach will result in the acquisition of personnel with the requisite level of experience and certifications.

Quality Control (Section 01440)

a. Quality Control: The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror has proposed an effective Quality

Control System that meets contract requirements.

Task Order Closeout Requirements (Section 01700)

a. Warranties/Warranty Response: The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror has proposed an effective approach, including citation of the appropriate required timeframes for corresponding urgencies of work. The Government will assess the efficacy of the approach to make the appropriate personnel, equipment, and materials available when necessary.

4.2.2 Subfactor 2 – Task Orders. Two (2) sample task orders are presented to the Offeror in RFP Attachments 9 and 10-12 to determine the Offeror’s understanding of the type of work therein. The Government will evaluate the proposal to determine if the Offeror demonstrates the following:

A realistic approach to implementing the Material Quantities and Types below.

- Concrete (CY, CDOT Class) (Ft Carson Sample Task Order Only)

- Base Course (Ton, CDOT CLASS) (Both Sample Task Orders)

- Ashpalt (Ton, CDOT Gradiation, CDOT PG) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

- Inlet (Number, Type) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

- Pipe (Linear Feet, Type) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

An effective technical approach to address the elements of work below.

- Phasing of Work (Both Sample Task Orders)

- Compaction of Subgrade (Density to Achieve, Method) (Both Sample Task Orders)

- Concrete and Asphalt Placement (Environment Parameters) (Both Sample Task Orders)

- Dowel Placement (Anchoring Approach) (Ft Carson Sample Task Order Only)

- Concrete Placement (Ft Carson Sample Task Order Only)

- Concrete Joint Construction (Type of Joints at Perimeter, # of Cuts/Purpose) (Ft Carson Sample Task Order Only)

- Pipe Demolition (Asbestos Abatement) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

- Asphalt Joint Construction (Treatment of Irregular Joints) (PAFB Sample Task Order Only)

4.3 Price Proposal. The Government will evaluate price individually for each sample task order, in order to make a determination that each proposed price is fair and reasonable. Prices proposed in response to each task order must both be determined fair and reasonable in order for the Offeror to be considered for award. Each individual task order price will be added together to determine the Total Evaluated Price (TEP), which will be used in determining an Offeror’s ranking.

a. Fair and Reasonable Determination. The Government reserves the right to use one or more of the price analysis techniques defined in FAR 15.404, in order to determine fairness and reasonableness. The price evaluation will document fairness and reasonableness of the proposed price. Offers that include unreasonable (IAW FAR 15.404 and FAR 31.201-3), unbalanced (IAW FAR 15.404-1), or incomplete pricing may not be considered for award.

b. Completeness. A proposal is complete when all pricing information required by the solicitation is provided in the format prescribed.

4.4 Past Performance. The Past Performance evaluation results in an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The Past Performance Factor will receive one of the performance confidence assessments described in Table 5 of the DoD Source Selection Procedures. Offerors must receive a minimum of a SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE rating in order to be considered for award.

Past Performance Confidence Assessments

Substantial Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

4.4.1 Evaluation Process. The past performance evaluation considers the quality of each Offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in performing services that meet the contract’s requirements. Performance confidence is assessed at the overall Past Performance factor level after evaluating aspects of the Offeror’s recent past performance, focusing on relevant performance.