QA_Clarification.pdf
PDF 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Single Award IDIQ - Solicitation Amendment
- Solicitation number
- FA2521-18-R-0020
About this file
This file contains a revised question, two questions that were left out, and clarifications on offeror concerns.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| All_Q&A_-_Response.pdf | ||
| Site_Visit_Company_List.pdf | ||
| Atch17Q&A.pdf | ||
| FA252118R002003.pdf | ||
| FA252118R002002.pdf | ||
| Atch14RuleofEngagementR1.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch9PPI.docx | DOCX document | |
| 18R002001_(SF30).pdf | ||
| Atch43052.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Atch2FL180001_1June2018.pdf | ||
| Atch13Q&A.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch14RuleofEngagement.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch7GPP.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch12Client.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch3HazWasteForm.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch15EAL.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch16AMRDEC_Instructions.pdf | ||
| FA252118R0020.pdf | ||
| Atch9PPI.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch1IDIQSATOCSOW.pdf | ||
| Atch5SXHT161280Spec.pdf | ||
| Atch6Drawings.pdf | ||
| Atch11Consent.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch10PPQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch8BadgeRequest.pdf | ||
| Atch13Q&A.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch14RuleofEngagement.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch15EAL.doc | DOC document |
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 13
FA2521-18-R-0020
Single-Award, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity General Construction Contract, Patrick AFB, FL
Revised Questions/Clarifications
RFP Section N/A Paragraph N/A
SOW Paragraph N/A
Other (Specify) C-101, C-102, C103 and C104
Question: The contract drawings C-101, C102, C103, and C104 shows a 7-ft and 8-ft asphalt sidewalk. The existing is 7-ft. and 8-ft. sidewalks are currently concrete, please advise.
Answer: The existing sidewalks do not need any work other than where indicated on the drawings or necessary because of deadman installation. Any repairs to the sidewalk should be of matching material and size.
RFP Section __________ Paragraph _________
SOW Paragraph ___________
Other (Specify) Drawing Sheet C-503, Detail C4
Question: Project documents detail that in areas contained by "Clear Zone," contractor is to provide material to the government for all "frangible connections." Are these connections to be installed by government or contractor? If by government, what connection types are to be installed by contractor in the interim?
Answer: The "frangible connections" are to be supplied to the government, they are not to be installed at this time. Details on "frangible connections" are in C4 on sheet C-503. The connections used in the "Clear Zone" should be the same as the rest of the connections, as detailed in B2 on sheet C-502.
RFP Section: Amendment 1 Paragraph: D Volume III- Price Proposal, 1. General
SOW Paragraph ___________
Other (Specify) _____
Question: Could you provide level of detail required for the submittal of Attachment 4. The referenced paragraph states to fill in the proposed prices for each cost element on the excel sheet. Would a cost element be ‘upgrade fence by linear feet’ or is the intent to have further breakdown of this (and other) cost elements? If additional breakdown is required, can you provide an example of detail to be included?
Answer: Cost Element would need to be the task or item required. For example, cost elements could be labeled Labor, Materials and Other than Direct Costs. An example of the labor category would be “Superintendent 40 hrs at $45/hr”, etc.
Attachment 13
There were many questions about the part of the solicitation in regards to Offeror/Joint Venture/Teaming. So, the following is for the clarification on Offeror/JointVenture/Teaming. An Offeror is anyone who submits and offer in response to the solicitation. Teaming of prime and subcontractors is not the same as a Joint Venture.
In accordance with the solicitation, Past Performance Information is required for any offeror. A Joint Venture is considered an offeror. If you are submitting past performance information as a joint venture it will be in accordance with the Past Performance FACTS Sheet. (See pg 49 C.Volume II – Past performance)
If there is teaming of prime and subcontractors, the prime will submit the past performance information as required and will be considered the offeror. If you are teaming, the prime must submit a Past Performance FACTS Sheet along with the consent letter executed by each of its proposed teaming members authorizing release of adverse past performance information to allow the prime offeror to respond. If there is teaming, then submit the consent forms for the subcontractors used for the intial project, not the entire SATOC. (See pg 50 para 5)
File details come from the government source that posted it.