FA2521-17-B-0008_-_Q&As.pdf
PDF 74 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Hanger U, FAC 1744
- Solicitation number
- FA2521-17-B-0008
About this file
FA2521-17-B-0008 - Repair Hangar U, FAC 1744 Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA2521-17-B-0008 – Hangar U, FAC 1744
QUESTION AND ANSWER
Question 1: After obtaining waste classification results for the oil absorbant material (Flag Note
2), will this material be collected and turned over to the Hangar U satellite location for disposal in accordance with OPLAN 19-14 Annex D & E?
Ref: SOW/Technical Specification/Drawings paragraph/page _Sheet H-101 Flag Notes 2
Other (Specify): 45 SW OPLAN 19-14
Answer: 1 If contractor anticipates multiple drums of oily absorbent wastes, then that will be directed to a site other than Hgr U. If less than a drum of waste, yes classified oily absorbent pads can be placed in that waste stream. Either disposition needs to be coordinated with Rebecca Fafard, 321-853-6988.
Contractor will need to provide drum and blue nonhaz label for pickup.
Question 2: The Wicket Door Schedule on Sheet A102 note the door and frame to be mill finish.
However, in the remarks column it notes "door/frame shall be shop primed and field painted to match existing". It appears these conflict each other.
Reference: SOW/Technical Specification/Drawings paragraph/page _Sheet A-102
Answer 2a: Primed and painted to match existing
SOW/Technical Specification/Drawings paragraph/page _Sheet A-102
Other (Specify) _45 SW OPLAN 19-14
Question 2b: A proposed door company, Cline Doors, does not manufacture mill finish aluminum doors and frames. They are either anodized or painted. Would this be acceptable?
Answer 2b: Primed and painted to match existing
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .