Questions and Answers 2 - 14 Nov 2022.pdf
PDF 141 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EGLIN AFB, AEROSPACE GROUND EQUIPMENT SUPPORT
- Solicitation number
- FA248623RA001
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to a solicitation for aerospace ground equipment support services at Eglin Air Force Base. The solicitation is for a single award indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contract to provide dispatching, maintenance, inspection, cleaning, corrosion control, modification and training services for powered/non-powered aerospace ground equipment and munitions material handling equipment. The North American Industry Classification System code is 488190 and it is set aside as a 100% small business opportunity with a size standard of $35 million. All proposals must be submitted electronically by a specified date via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment website. The questions and answers provide clarification on the pre-solicitation conference and site visits, submission dates, labor categories and rates, historical workload details, transition timelines and costs, and other contractual terms.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA248623RA001-02
Questions and Answers 02
14 Nov 2022
1. Will a site visit be scheduled for this effort?
Response: No. Previous solicitations and awards for this requirement have been made without a site visit to contractors who have not had experience working on Eglin AFB.
2. When is the latest date and time to submit questions?
Response: Attachment L Instructions to Offerors has been revised. See Amendment 01.
Paragraph 1.3.8. has been added to address the timeframe for receipt of questions. Questions are due seven (7) calendar days prior to the date designated for receipt of proposals.
3. With regards to Appendix D-Workload Data specifically; we have determined that the inspections presented by the government representing a “reasonable estimate” for powered and non-powered equipment is approximately 66% less than actuals as performed by Lakota year to date on contract FA2486-22-C-0006 at Eglin AFB. Additionally, we have noted a discrepancy in two additional categories “Notable Major MX Actions” and “Corrosion Control Operations”: roughly 87% and 63% respectively less actions than actuals. Lastly, the equipment listing in the PWS does not have the 209NP, non-powered account, or the 617MD, Ammo Trailer account listed.
Response: Appendix D-Workload Data updated. CA/CRL accounts are listed in PWS para. 12.1 and Government Furnished Property (GFP) is embedded within the PWS as an attachment.
4. The CBA referenced in the solicitation is not the current CBA under contract FA2486-22-C-0006. The CBA referenced in the solicitation expired 7/31/2022. The current CBA for contract FA2486-22-C- 0006 was sent to the KO on 7/28/2022.
Response: Attachment 3 Collective Bargaining Agreement dated has been updated. See Amendment 01.
5. Attachment L7 of the solicitation makes reference to 4 labor categories that are not in the current CBA. The current CBA incorporates labor categories that retain and attract a stable, motivated, certified, experienced, top-quality workforce.
Response: The labor categories provided on Attachment 7 are the Government’s Estimated Staffing Matrix. As specified in Attachment L Instructions to Offerors paragraph 3.7, The Offeror can propose the “Government Estimated Staffing Matrix” or provide an alternate solution to staffing. If an alternate solution to staffing is provided, then explain how the proposed labor category/skill mix has been derived.
6. Do both the Prime and the Sub need an DCAA/DCMA government approved accounting system?
Response: The prime contractor needs to have an approved purchasing system. A first-tier subcontractor would need to have an approved system if they were subcontracted to perform the purchasing functions required by the PWS.
7. Reference: Attachment L, Instructions to Offerors 1.3.2, Page Size and Format. In the 1st paragraph “font size for all tables, charts, graphs and foldouts shall be written in no less that 12-point font. In the 3rd paragraph “tables charts, graphs and figures, the text shall be no smaller and eight (8) point.
Please clarify the size for all tables charts, graphs and figures.
Response: The reference to eight (8) point is intended to be for any tables, charts and graphs in 11” x 17” format. All other tables, charts and graphs not formatted to 11” x 17” are to be in 12-font..
8. Reference: Attachment L, Instructions to Offerors 2.4, Subfactor c. “Submit a plan to fill all key and essential personnel billets.” No key or essential personnel billets are identified in the PWS. Please clarify.
Response: Project Manager, Assistant Project Manager, Quality Control Manager and section leads.
9. Reference: PWS 2.9 Computer Information Technology Equipment. Within the first 20 days of the transition period.” A transition period is mentioned in the PWS, however there is no CLIN in the cost workbooks. Is the cost of transition to be included in the pricing? How long is the transition period?
Response: The transition period is 30-days from award of the first task order. Offerors may include the cost of transition in the price of the first task order. Note that the Government intends to award the first task order concurrent with the award of the basic IDIQ.
10. Reference: Attachment L6 Cost Format A-C. The pricing indicates shift differentials for
Service/Dispatch and Equipment Painters. Are there other roles staffed on swing shifts not indicated by Attachment L6? Should Attachment L6 include lines for both day and swing shifts for all positions?
Response: : The labor categories provided are the Government’s Estimated Staffing Matrix. As specified in Attachment L Instructions to Offerors paragraph 3.7, The Offeror can propose the “Government Estimated Staffing Matrix” or provide an alternate solution to staffing. If an alternate solution to staffing is provided, then explain how the proposed labor category/skill mix has been derived.
11. Reference: Attachment L6 Cost Format A-C. The government has provided labor categories by shift for Cost Review and Formatting. In the event a service provider proposes swing shift staffing for other roles, how will the government evaluate these roles and verify CBA compliance for shift differentials?
Response: In accordance with Section M CBA compliance will be evaluated be evaluated by comparing the unburdened rate against the current Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) Wage determination to ensure that covered personnel will be paid minimum CBA wages and benefits. If the CBA specifies shift differential pay, then that will be taken into consideration when evaluating.
12. Reference: Attachment L6 Cost Format A-C. The government format currently is based entirely on labor hours to derive the Total Proposed Amount (TPA). There is not a separate line item for ODC costs. Will the government amend the pricing template to include ODCs separate from labor costs in TPA? If not, please confirm that all ODC costs must be included in the hourly FBLR rate proposed?
Response: The total proposed amount and the labor hours are separate calculations. The total proposed amount is the for the total price/cost of the effort which includes both direct and indirect costs. The FBLRs are intended to be used in the event additional work or task orders need to be awarded due to additional short term mission requirements or special testing needs. Offerors are required in accordance with Section L to provide their price/cost information to include all ODCs that make up their total proposed amount.
13. Reference: PWS Part III, Page 48. “The following checked items are required elements…” No items are checked?
Response: Updated PWS Appendix F, Page 45.
14. Reference: PWS Part II, Page 7. “The service provider shall support special events, such as exercises, inspections and higher headquarters requests.” What is the historical workload?
Response: Workload is about six times per year. Examples are: HAZMAT inspection, Fire inspections, Wing Safety inspections, Active Shooter Exercises, Hurricane prep exercises. Every 18 Months UEI.
14 Nov 2022
15. Reference: PWS 16.1 Hours of Operation and Shift Differentials. PWS 16.1 indicates corrosion work is conducted between 0600 – 2400 but L6 Cost Format A-C does not include a position shift differential for corrosion control personnel nor do these roles correlate with CBA positions for corrosion control specific workloads. Will there be a shift differential added for corrosion control personnel?
Response: The labor categories provided are the Government’s Estimated Staffing Matrix. As specified in Attachment L Instructions to Offerors paragraph 3.7, The Offeror can propose the “Government Estimated Staffing Matrix” or provide an alternate solution to staffing. If an alternate solution to staffing is provided, then explain how the proposed labor category/skill mix has been derived. If shift differential pay is specified in the CBA then Offerors will be required to add the differential to any labor hour calculations.
16. Reference: Solicitation, SCH B. Schedule B indicates that CLIN 0001 is Firm-Fixed Price. Please confirm hours used in TPA calculation are not expected as a level of effort proposal but a firm fixed price arrangement per FAR 16.202.
Response: CLIN 0001 is a firm-fixed price CLIN. See response to Question 12 above.
17. Reference: Attachment L6 Cost Format A-C. The government TPA calculation spans three workbooks and attachments. Will the government merge all pricing workbooks into a single file for submission?
Response: No. The spreadsheets were separated purposefully.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .