S10_Attachment_IV-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CommScope Cabling and Networking Project Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- EXIM17Q0056
- Issued by
- Export Import Bank of the US
About this file
Attachment IV-Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| EXIM17Q0056_Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| S01_Attachment_II-BPA_Call_Order_1_SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| S10_Addendum_to_52212-2_Evaluation-Commercial_Items.docx | DOCX document | |
| S10_Addendum_to_52212-1_Instructions_to_Offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| S01_Attachment_III-Data_Drawings_-_Base_Package_001_-_EXIM_COMMScope_Data_Drops.pdf | ||
| S10_Addendum__EXIM17Q0056__Terms_and_Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| S01_Wage_Determinations.txt | TXT text file | |
| S01_Attachment_I-BPA_SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| S10_EXIM17Q0056-Combined_Synopsis-Solicitation.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EXIM17Q0056-ATTACHMENT IV
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE
THIS FORM IS PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING TO
AND SUBMITTAL BY THE OFFEROR’S REFERENCES
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
SOLICITATION NUMBER# EXIM17Q0056
The offeror listed below is being considered in a source selection by the Export-Import Bank of the US, Office of Contracting Services. It would be appreciated if you would provide us with comments regarding the offeror's past performance. In order to maintain the integrity of the source selection process, we respectfully request that you do not divulge the name of the offeror nor discuss your comments on this questionnaire with any other individuals.
This form shall be sent via e-mailed to: Justin Fraser, email to Justin.Fraser@exim.gov. Any questions regarding this matter, please contact Justin Fraser at (202) 565-3412.
Past Project Information:
1. Offeror name and address:
2. Project Title and/or Contract Number:
Evaluator (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. Information will be kept confidential.)
Name of Evaluator:______________________________Date:_____________ Phone Number:__________________Fax Number:________________ Address:________________________________________________________ Position held or function in relation to the project:_______________________
RATINGS:
Please evaluate the Offeror’s performance using the following ratings:
| EXCEPTIONAL (E) |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD (V) |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY (S) |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL (M) |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY (U) |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE/NEUTRAL (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Please rate and provide any supporting information for the following: (Use additional sheets as necessary)
1. The relationship between the offeror and the customer’s contract team.
2. The offeror’s on-site management and coordination of subofferors.
3. The offeror’s overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct.
4. The offeror provided competent program/project manager, supervisor, and workers ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. The offeror’s quality control.
6. The offeror’s ability to meet the performance schedule.
7. The offeror took measures to improve his schedule problems, if any?
8. The offeror’s ability to provide the required work at a reasonable price.
9. The offeror’s compliance with laws, regulations, and policies, if applicable.
10. The offeror rectified identified problems in a timely fashion without further incident of the same.
11. Has the offeror been given any of the following: Cure notice; show cause, letters of reprimand, suspension of payments, termination? If yes, please explain.
12. Would you award another contract to this offeror? If no, please explain.
13. Was the customer satisfied with the end product?
14. Was the offeror provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
15. The offeror maintained a professional working relationship with Government personnel.
16. The offeror was reasonable and cooperative in resolving customer complaints.
17. OVERALL RATING: ____________
Please provide any additional comments.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .