Exhibit M - Past Perf Questionnaire - Bismarck CBOC.pdf

PDF 146 KB Posted

Attached to
Bismarck, ND CBOC Request for Lease Proposals
Solicitation number
36C26325R0020
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Community Based Outreach Clinic (CBOC) lease proposal in Bismarck, North Dakota, solicitation number 36C26325R0020. The questionnaire is designed to collect and evaluate past performance information from previous contractors, with the goal of assessing the potential performance risk for the upcoming Veterans Health Administration lease opportunity.

The document provides a comprehensive rating scale ranging from Exceptional (Very Low Risk) to Unsatisfactory (High Risk), with assessors asked to rate the contractor's performance across multiple dimensions including quality of service, schedule adherence, and business relations. The questionnaire requires detailed feedback on contractual compliance, delivery timeliness, invoice accuracy, business practices, and overall contractor performance, with space for explanatory rationale for each rating. The completed questionnaire will be used by the Regional Procurement Office West to evaluate proposals for the Bismarck CBOC lease project.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Exhibit P - Mobile MRI Specifications.pdf PDF
RLP - Bismarck CBOC - Final Updated - 8-14-2025.pdf PDF
Exhibit O - Bismarck Sample Floor Plans.pdf PDF
_RLP Amendment 1 - Bismark CBOC .pdf PDF
Exhibit B.3 - Equipment List Space Plan (2).pdf PDF
Exhibit Q - Response - RFIs - Bismarck CBOC.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - GSA From L100 - Bismarck CBOC.pdf PDF
Exhibit E - Form 1364 Proposal to Lease Space Jan. 2023.pdf PDF
Exhibit F - Form 1217 - Lessors Annual Cost Statement Nov. 2016.pdf PDF
Exhibit I - DOL Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Exhibit D.1 - 3516 Solicitation Provisions Feb. 2025.pdf PDF
Exhibit H - Security Unit Price List FSL II Oct 2024.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit J - Tenant Improvements Cost Summary TICS Table Oct 2024.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit N - FAR 52.204-24 Representation Digital Nov. 2021.pdf PDF
Exhibit B.1 - Agency Specific Requirements.pdf PDF
Exhibit B.3 - Equipment List Space Plan.pdf PDF
Exhibit C - VA Security Requirements FSL Level II Oct 2024.pdf PDF
Exhibit D.2 - 3517B General Clauses Feb. 2025.pdf PDF
Exhibit K - SF 330.pdf PDF
Exhibit L - GSA 527 Contractors Qualifications and Financial Information.pdf PDF
RLP - Bismarck CBOC - Final 7-25-2025.pdf PDF
Exhibit B.2 - Bismarck MS-CBOC Detailed Space Plan-Final.pdf PDF
Exhibit G - Prelease FPLS Evaluation Form 12000 Part A and Part B May 2015.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – 36C26325R0020

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for BISMARCK CBOC, Bismarck, North Dakota

PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS

The Regional Procurement Office West has issued a solicitation to provide leased space for a BISMARCK CBOC, Bismarck, North Dakota. Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror.

Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes the release of this information to Regional Procurement Office West. The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Offeror shall only submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Section A of the questionnaire as provided to the assessors.

Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor (s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit it to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.

Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than the due date of the RLP. Assessor is requested to send electronically to garry.alexander@va.gov.

Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.

mailto:garry.alexander@va.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for whom past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)

Solicitation Number 36C26325R0020 Project/Requirement Community Based Outreach Clinic (CBOC) Customer/Agency Veteran’s Health Administration

1. Prospective Government Contractor’s __________________ Name and Address: __________________

2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________

3. Phone number (with area code): _________________________________

4. Assessor Contract Award number: _______________________________

5. Description of Services provided under contract: ____________________

6. Contract award date: ______ Contract Amount: Initial ________Final __________

7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: ________________________________

ASSESSOR INFORMATION:

Assessor Name Title Phone Number/Email Address

8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to Regional Procurement Office West

(Signature) (Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).

RATING SCALE Definitions

Past Performance Ratings and Definitions

E Exceptional/Very Low Risk Offer’s past performance record provides essentially no doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

S Satisfactory/Low Risk Offer’s past performance record provides little doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

M Marginal/Moderate Risk Offer’s past performance record, although satisfactory, provides some doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

U Unsatisfactory/High Risk Offer’s past performance record provides substantial doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

N Neutral/Unknown Risk The offeror has no relevant past performance record. A thorough search was unable to identify any past performance. Will not rate favorably or unfavorably.

The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. E S M U N

2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. E S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

SCHEDULE

1. Delivery of service was within required time-period specified by contract requirements. E S M U N

2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control costs and submit invoices.

Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely? E S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Overall rating of contractors’ business practices (e.g., maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.) E S M U N

2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e., contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). E S M U N

3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner. E S M U N

4. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. E S M U N

5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. E S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?

______ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.

______ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.

______ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.

______ Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.

______ Would not award another contract to this contractor.

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

VII. General Comments:

ASSESSOR:

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role Period of Involvement Contract Specialist/LEASE

CONTRACTING OFFICER

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

OTHERS

(Signature) (Date) (Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)

(Phone Number)

Assessor Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .