Exhibit B Performance Requirements.docx
DOCX document 272 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WSF Travel Wait Times Assessment Project
- Solicitation number
- RFQQ 2024 0327
- Issued by
- Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington
About this file
The document is an Exhibit B - Performance Requirements for a competitive solicitation (RFQQ 2024 0327) issued by Washington State Ferries (WSF). The solicitation seeks consulting services to evaluate current operational processes, provide high-level requirements, conduct market research, and summarize findings in a Concept of Operations document for a system-wide Ferry Terminal Wait Time Traveler Information System. Bidders must respond to various requirements related to their qualifications, expertise, project management methodology, project delivery approach, and past performance. The performance requirements are defined as Mandatory Pass/Fail, Mandatory Scored, or Desirable Scored, and bidders must comply accordingly.
The document does not provide details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbent information, funding requirements, or other financial aspects of the contract opportunity. The focus is on the technical and management capabilities required from the bidder to successfully deliver the requested services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Exhibit D Contract.pdf | ||
| RFQQ 2024 0327_Vendor Q&A.pdf | ||
| Exhibit D-1 Contract Issues List.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit E Client Reference Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit G Diversity Inclusion Plan.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit F_Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A-2 Bidders Profile.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit C Bid Price.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A-1 Bidders Certification.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit H Form FHWA 1273_Contract Provisions.pdf | ||
| RFQQ 2024 0327_WSF Travel Wait Times.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT B – PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
| Competitive Solicitation: |
| No. RFQQ 2024 0327 |
| Bidder: |
| _________________________________ |
Type/print full legal name of bidder company
Instructions:
Bidders submitting a proposal must complete and submit an Exhibit B for evaluation purposes.
Performance Requirements: Bidder must respond to each requirement as noted in the instructions below.
1. Review all requirements, priorities and provided definitions:
· Mandatory Pass/Fail (M): Minimum requirement; Bidder that does not meet this requirement will not be considered any further.
· Mandatory Scored (MS): Critical requirement; evaluators will score based on the degree to which Bidder's response meets the requirement.
· Desirable Scored (DS): Desirable requirement; evaluators will score based on the degree to which Bidder's response meets the requirement.
1. Using the Bidder Meets Requirement column, Bidder must select either a "Yes" or "No" to indicate the Bidder's ability to meet the requirement. Any entry that is not either a "Yes" or "No", may be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered any further.
1. Bidder must respond in the Written Response column for every requirement that indicates a "Written Response Required”. If additional space is necessary than what is provided, please attach all written responses in order by REQ ID and compile into one document named Exhibit B- Performance Requirements Response, with this document as the preceding pages. If additional writing space is utilized, indicate in the response column below which page that the response is indicated. Written responses must not reference any material present elsewhere. The written response shall be considered complete and stand on its own merits or may be deemed non-responsive.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND FACTORS
| REQ ID |
| Performance Requirement and |
Stated Business Need
| Points Available |
| Priority |
| Bidder’s Compliance |
| Written Response |
| 1. |
| Qualifications/Expertise of Bidder on Team |
· List the type(s) of expertise that the Bidder can provide.
· How long has the Bidder provided these type(s) of expertise; and
· Provide an organization chart of the bidder and include the respective roles that each individual will provide
· Identify current availability of key staff and resources from the Bidder. The availability of staff must be identified as hours available per month for the length of the project, not in percentages of time available.
· Provide a list of up to three (3) projects that the Bidder has completed within the last three (3) years. The project(s) must demonstrate the required expertise needed for this project. Include the work/services provided on the project(s) and the approximate amount received for each project.
25 points
| MS |
| ☐ Yes |
☐ No Written Response Required.
| 2. |
| Qualifications of Proposed Project Manager |
· Provide up to three (3) examples for the proposed Project Manager that demonstrates his/her prior experience as a Project Manager on similar projects. Include the date(s) of each project; the name of the client/organization for each project; list the project manager’s responsibilities and tasks on each project.
· Provide up to three (3) examples of the proposed Project Manager’s ability to manage all of the following within a project.
· Project schedule.
· Scope of work/scope creep.
· Budget issues; and
· Potential Changes that arise throughout the life of the project.
| 15 points |
| MS |
| ☐ Yes |
☐ No Written Response Required.
| 3. |
| Key Team Member's Qualifications |
· Bidder must list each key team member’s role/responsibilities on your proposed team.
· For each proposed key team member, provide up to three (3) examples of prior relevant projects. Include the name of project(s); dates of the project(s); and roles/responsibilities for each team member on those project(s); and
· For each key team member on your proposed team, demonstrate his/her understanding of government regulations
| 15 Points |
| MS |
| ☐ Yes |
☐ No Written Response Required.
| 4. |
| Bidder’s Project Management Methodology |
· Describe the Bidder's Quality Assurance/Quality Control processes.
· Describe the Bidder's tracking system(s) to monitor the project’s budget and/or scope.
· Describe the Bidder's process for interacting with your internal project team; and
· Describe the Bidder's ability to provide interaction with your client and/or stakeholders.
| 20 Points |
| MS |
| ☐ Yes |
☐ No Written Response Required.
| 5. |
| Project Delivery Approach |
· How does the Bidder develop a work plan for this project?
· Who is involved with the decision-making process for the development of the work plan?
· Describe each of the elements of the proposed work plan for this project; and
· Describe how your work plan addresses contingencies that may arise during the project.
· Identify any key issues and potential risks you see for the project.
| 25 Points |
| MS |
| ☐ Yes |
☐ No Written Response Required.
| 6. |
| References/Past Performances (Prime Consultant Only) |
· EXHIBIT E - Bidders shall Provide a minimum of three (3) with a maximum of five (5) performance evaluations for either WSDOT projects, non-WSDOT projects, or a combination of both that are either currently active projects or that has a project completion date within the last three (3) years.
| 0 Points |
| M |
Return this exhibit to Procurement Coordinator at:
johnsch@wsdot.wa.gov
EXHIBIT B – PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS: RFQQ 2024 0327 PAGE 2
image1.png image2.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .