Exhibit 3.1 - Service Level and Deliverable Matrix
134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PennDOT Mainframe Services
- Solicitation number
- 3525R03
- Issued by
- Pennsylvania
About this file
This is a Service Level and Deliverable Matrix exhibit for Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Mainframe Services under RFP 3525R03, establishing performance standards and deliverable requirements for IBM-compatible mainframe hosting, management, infrastructure support, disaster recovery, and security compliance services supporting approximately 100 applications. The exhibit defines twelve critical service levels with performance targets ranging from 97% to 99.99% availability, including incident resolution, root cause analysis, batch processing, mainframe availability, server availability, patch compliance, data backups, and managed hosted systems response times. Eight key service levels are also established covering change management effectiveness, invoice dispute resolution, incident response times, license renewal timeliness, and security incident notification with performance targets between 97% and 100%. One-time deliverables include transition planning and milestone documentation due 14 days after the effective date, Service Management Manual documentation in three phases with the final phase due 60 days after commencement, mainframe disaster recovery plans due at commencement, and system security plans due prior to production implementation, with completion fees ranging from $10,000 to $15,000 per deliverable.
Recurring deliverables span the contract term and include annual refresh plans, quarterly refresh plan updates, third-party information security attestations submitted 30 days prior to data storage and annually thereafter, annual system security plan reviews, quarterly Service Management Manual currency reports, annual disaster recovery test plan updates with evaluation of prior year testing, training documentation for application upgrades and enhancements prior to production deployment, quarterly technology plan and roadmap updates, termination assistance plans submitted upon request, and annual capacity management plans. The exhibit establishes a critical service level at-risk percentage of 12% with a 200% pool percentage available for allocation across the defined service levels, with service level credits ranging from 0.60% to 4.20% of monthly invoices for non-compliance. All critical service levels commence at month zero with responsibility applying immediately upon contract commencement, and most key service levels are subject to continuous improvement provisions unless otherwise noted in the matrix documentation.
Text of this file
Title Page
| Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) |
| Mainframe Services |
| Exhibit 3.1 |
| Service Level and Deliverable Matrix |
| RFP 3525R03 |
Introduction Introduction
This Exhibit 3.1 (Service Level and Deliverable Matrix) sets forth the following:
| 1. For Critical Service Levels: Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions): |
| - The numeric measurements for Performance Targets |
| - The timing regarding the commencement of obligations for each Critical Service Level; |
| - A cross-reference to Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions) where the qualitative description of the Critical Service Level can be found. |
| 2. For Key Service Levels: Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions): |
| - The numeric measurements for Performance Targets; |
| - A cross-reference to Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions) where the qualitative description of the Key Service Levels can be found. |
&"Calibri,Regular"&K000000Exhibit 3.1 (Service Level Matrix)
&"Calibri,Regular"&K000000Page &P of &N
1. Critical Service Levels Critical Service Levels
| At-Risk Percent | 12% |
| Pool Percentage Available for Allocation | 200% |
Exhibit 3.2 Section Reference Service Level Categories Comm + mos(1) Performance Target (PT) (2)
| Measurement | |||||||||||
| Window | Continuous Improvement Application (3) | Service Level Credit Allocation Percentage | % of Invoice | Mainframe Services | Server Services | ||||||
| Incident, Problem and Request | |||||||||||
| 1.1 | Incident Resolution Time - Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents | 0 | 99.00% | Monthly | No | 30.00% | 3.60% | Yes | Yes | ||
| 1.2 | Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Delivery | 0 | 98.00% | Monthly | No | 10.00% | 1.20% | Yes | Yes | ||
| 1.3 | RCA Corrective Action Implementation | 0 | 99.00% | Monthly | No | 10.00% | 1.20% | Yes | Yes | ||
| 1.4 | Service Request Fulfillment | 0 | 99.00% | Monthly | Yes | 10.00% | 1.20% | Yes | Yes | ||
| Projects | |||||||||||
| 1.5 | Solution Proposal Delivery | 0 | 97.00% | Monthly | Yes | 10.00% | 1.20% | Yes | Yes | ||
| 1.6 | Solution Implementation | 0 | 98.00% | Monthly | Yes | 10.00% | 1.20% | Yes | Yes | ||
| Operations | |||||||||||
| 1.7 | Batch Processing | 0 | 99.50% | Monthly | Yes | 20.00% | 2.40% | Yes | Yes | ||
| 1.8 | Mainframe Availability | 0 | 99.99% | Monthly | Yes | 35.00% | 4.20% | Yes | No | ||
| 1.9 | Server Availabilty | 0 | 99.90% | Monthly | Yes | 5.00% | 0.60% | No | Yes | ||
| 1.10 | Patch Compliance | 0 | 99.00% | Monthly | Yes | 20.00% | 2.40% | Yes | Yes | ||
| 1.11 | Data Backups Completed | 0 | 99.90% | Monthly | Yes | 20.00% | 2.40% | Yes | Yes | ||
| 1.12 | Response Time of Managed Hosted Systems | 0 | 99.00% | Monthly | Yes | 20.00% | 2.40% | Yes | Yes | ||
| Check sum ==> | 200.00% | 24.00% | |||||||||
| Notes | |||||||||||
| 1 | Number of Months after Commencement Date of Services when the Service Provider is responsible for Service Level performance and Service Level Credits apply upon failure. | ||||||||||
| 2 | PT will have the same meaning as Performance Target. | ||||||||||
| 3 | The SLA is subject to continuous improvement as set forth in Exhibit 3.0 (Performance Model), unless noted as an exception, "No", in this continuous improvement application column. |
Exhibit 3.1 (Service Level Matrix)
2. Key Service Levels Key Service Levels
Exhibit 3.2 Section Reference Service Level Categories Comm + mos(1) Performance Target (PT) (2)
| Measurement | |||||||||
| Window | Continuous Improvement Application (3) | Mainframe Services | Server Services | ||||||
| Service Management | |||||||||
| 2.1 | Change Management Effectiveness | 0 | 98.00% | Monthly | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| 2.2 | Invoice Dispute Resolution | 0 | 97.00% | Monthly | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| 2.3 | Invoice Accuracy and Timeliness | 0 | 100.00% | Monthly | No | Yes | Yes | ||
| Incident, Problem, Request | |||||||||
| 2.4 | Incident Resolution Time - Priority 3 and Priority 4 Incidents | 0 | 99.00% | Monthly | No | Yes | Yes | ||
| 2.5 | Incident Response Time Level 2 and Level 3 - (Priority 1-4) | 0 | 98.00% | Monthly | No | Yes | Yes | ||
| 2.6 | License and Maintenance Renewal Timeliness | 0 | 99.50% | Monthly | No | Yes | Yes | ||
| 2.7 | Security Incident Notification Timeliness | 0 | 99.90% | Quarterly | No | Yes | Yes | ||
| 2.8 | Incident Communication Notification Timeliness | 0 | 99.90% | Quarterly | No | Yes | Yes |
| Notes: | |
| 1 | Number of Months after Commencement Date of Services when the Service Provider is responsible for Service Level performance and Service Level Credits apply upon failure. |
| 2 | PT will have the same meaning as Performance Target. |
| 3 | The SLA is subject to continuous improvement as set forth in Exhibit 3.0 (Performance Model), unless noted as an exception, "No", in this continuous improvement application column. |
3. One Time Delivery
| One-Time Deliverables | |||||
| Ref ID | Deliverable Name | Description | Minimum Acceptance Criteria | ||
| (Specific, Measurable, Time bounded Outcomes) | Critical (C) | Time-Critical (T) | Payment Deliverable (to be determined during Negotiations and instantiated in Ex. 4.1) | Due Date |
(mm/dd/yy)
| (Enter actual Dates at negotiations) | Deliverable Credit | Frequency Credit Applies | Proposed # of Deliverable reviews | ||
| 1.1 | Transition Plan & Transition Milestone Document | The documents shall include the Service Provider's transition tasks and activities necessary to successfully migrate, implement and take over all applicable Services deployed in support of Exhibit 2.1 Mainframe Services Statement of Work, Article 9 Transition Services. | The detailed Transition Project Plan must include: |
- Detailed task/Work Breakdown Structure for transition, inclusive of all activities, deliverables, dependencies;
- Risk Register;
- Project Integration – among PennDOT, reliant or dependent Service Components;
- Stakeholder goals and expectations;
- Project Scope, Project Time, Project Schedule Management Plan, Project Change Management;
- Project Quality Measures and Management Plan, Project/Transition Staffing Plan, Project Communications;
- Documentation of required 2 reviews conducted with PennDOT prior to final submission.
- Plan for validating inventory, and implementing automated discovery tools for tracking and reporting on all operational hardware, software, appliances, etc. on supported Service elements and devices;
- Plan and associated timelines for developing APIs and other system integrations to support automated reporting, data feeds, etc. into the PennDOT tools, including any known interdependencies or resource requirements PennDOT or other Service Components.
- A description of the documentation, methods and procedures, personnel and organization the Service Provider will use to perform the Transition;
- Validation of successful Transition inclusive of user acceptance and assessment of acceptable performance with respect to comparison to baseline operational and performance attributes collected during preceding phases (i.e., design, build, test) outlined herein;
- Project Communications, Action Items, Decisions and Risks/Issue Management; and Project Procurement
- Completed Deliverable Table document capturing transition milestone objectives, Acceptance Criteria, dates, dependencies, owners, and review teams.
| Yes | No | Yes | 14 days after Effective Date | $ 15,000 | Weekly | 2 | |
| 1.2 | SMM Documentation | ||||||
| Phase 1 | The Service Provider shall document appropriate policies, processes, and procedures for inclusion in the SMM. | ||||||
| Publication of document that achieve the Phase 1 SMM requirements as listed in Exhibit 1.3 Service Management Manual. |
This documentation requires 1 review conducted with PennDOT prior to final submission.
| Yes | No | Yes | 14 days after Effective Date | $ 10,000 | Monthly | 1 | |
| 1.3 | SMM Documentation | ||||||
| Phase 2 | The Service Provider shall document appropriate policies, processes, and procedures for inclusion in the SMM. | Publication of document that achieve the Phase 2 SMM requirements as listed in Exhibit 1.3 Service Management Manual. |
This documentation requires 2 reviews conducted with PennDOT prior to final submission.
The documentation includes .doc documents that detail the processes support the SMM requirements, including:
- Publication of required Phase 2 SMM documents;
- SMM content is aligned with the SMM contents and structure (e.g., Process, Procedure, Work Instruction);
- Processes reflect the requirements of the this contract;
- Detailed descriptions of policies, processes, and procedures are documented in the manual;
- Roles and responsibilities are defined for Service Provider, PennDOT, and/or other Service Components as appropriate;
- Dependencies and relationships are documented;
- Risks associated with procedures are identified and mitigation strategies documented for each risk;
- The policies and procedures are consistent with the proposed transition and solution.
| Yes | No | Yes | 30 days prior to Commencement Date | $ 10,000 | Monthly | 2 | |
| 1.4 | SMM Documentation | ||||||
| Phase 3 | The Service Provider shall support the State's efforts to document appropriate policies, processes, and procedures for inclusion in the SMM. | Support the publication of document that achieve the Phase 3 SMM requirements as listed in Exhibit 1.3 Service Management Manual. |
This documentation requires 2 reviews conducted with PennDOT prior to final submission.
The documentation includes support for .doc documents, developed by PennDOT, that detail the processes support the SMM requirements, including:
- Publication of required Phase 3 SMM documents;
- SMM content is aligned with the SMM contents and structure (e.g., Process, Procedure, Work Instruction);
- Processes reflect the requirements of the this contract;
- Detailed descriptions of policies, processes, and procedures are documented in the manual;
- Roles and responsibilities are defined for Service Provider, PennDOT, and/or other Service Components as appropriate;
- Dependencies and relationships are documented;
- Risks associated with procedures are identified and mitigation strategies documented for each risk;
- The policies and procedures are consistent with the proposed transition and solution.
| Yes | No | Yes | 60 days after Commencement Date | $ 10,000 | Monthly | 2 |
| 1.5 | Mainframe Services Disaster Recovery Plan | The Service Provider shall create a Mainframe disaster recovery plan and processes for all Equipment, Network, Software, Applications, and Services at Commencement Date. The Service Provider shall have created or updated all Disaster Recovery Plans to reflect Service Provider changes where appropriate to maintain a viable Disaster Recovery Plan for Service Provider Services. By the Commencement Date, Service Provider shall update, or create as needed, all Mainframe Services-specific Disaster Recovery Plans (DRPs) and Technical Recovery Guides (TRGs) to reflect all Mainframe Services implemented prior to or during the performance of Transition Services. For Applications lacking tested Disaster Recovery Plans, Service Provider shall work with PennDOT to complete a gap analysis and test schedule of the Disaster Recovery Plans and Technical Recovery Guides compared to the requested Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO), as specified in the SMM. | Define the following: |
1) Detailed Disaster Recovery Strategy and target Disaster Recovery design document that describes the strategy and design requried to achieve the PennDOT-approved disaster recovery levels for Mainframe Services.
2) Detailed Disaster Recovery Plan, including detailed Disaster Recovery Plans (DRPs), Technical Recovery Guides (TRGs), and SMM processes for use in recovering Service Provider Services as defined in Exhibit 2.1 Mainframe Services SOW, Section 6.13 IT Service Continuity Management, including:
- DRPs and TRGs for Service Provider Services upon Commencement.
- Published IT Service Continuity Management SMM documents.
| - Documentation of required 2 reviews conducted with PennDOT prior to final submission. | Yes | No | Yes | Commencement Date | $ 10,000 | Monthly | 2 |
| 1.6 | Transition Milestones Complete | Transition Milestones are completed On-time with no critical issues or defects outstanding. |
| The submission of this deliverable is confirmation by the parties that all milestones, due to be completed on or before the Commencement Date are both submitted by Service Provider and accepted by PennDOT in writing in accordance with Acceptance Criteria defined. | Yes | No | No | Commencement Date | $ 10,000 | Monthly | 2 |
| 1.7 | System Security Plan | Prior to System implementation in the Production environment, for Systems where the Service Provider is the Information Custodian, the Service Provider shall document the System Security Plan that provides an overview of the security requirements and describes the security controls, in alignment with Exhibit 2.1 Mainframe Services SOW, Article 3 Security Services and Article 8 Information Security Management for Service Provider Services, including: |
- security control status including those that are in place or planned for deployment,
- plans of actions to achieve control compliance, and
- plans to correct deficiencies in the System Security Plan. Create or update a System Security Plan, in PennDOT agreed format(s), including:
- System description including its architecture, components, and data it handles.
- System boundaries specifying what is included and what is not.
- Security objectives including the security goals and objectives of the system.
- Security controls as required including Exhibit 2.1 Mainframe Services SOW, Article 3 Security Services and Article 8 Information Security Management for Service Provider Services
- Risk assessment including the risks and threats that the system faces and how they will be mitigated.
- Incident response referring to the SMM processes and procedures for detecting, reporting, and responding to security incidents.
- Security training and awareness programs for personnel involved with the system.
- Security policies, procedures and standards relevant to system security.
- Security testing including how security testing, vulnerability assessments and penetration testing, will be conducted.
- Authorization including description or reference to the SMM describing the process for obtaining authorization to operate the system.
- System Monitoring and Audit including details how the system will be monitored and audited to ensure ongoing security.
- Contingency and Disaster Recovery including the architecture and plans for system recovery and continuity in the event of disruptions.
| Develop a plan and schedule to mitigate items found missing or inaccurate and complete each System Security Plan as set forth in PennDOT Information Security policies. | Yes | No | Yes | Commencement Date | $ 10,000 | Monthly | 2 |
| Definitions of Fields | |||||||
| Reference ID | Unique identifier | ||||||
| Deliverable Name | Name of the Deliverable | ||||||
| Description | Description of the activities comprising the Deliverable | ||||||
| Minimum Acceptance Criteria | Description of Acceptance Criteria that will indicate completion of the Deliverable. | ||||||
| Critical (C), Payment (P), or Time-Critical (T) | As defined in Section 3.5 of Master Services Terms and Exhibit 1.1 (Definitions) | ||||||
| Due Date (mm/dd/yy) | Date when the Deliverable will be completed in mm/dd/yy format. | ||||||
| Deliverable Credit | The amount of the Credit due by Service Provider to PennDOT in the event Service Provider fails to meet the Acceptance Criteria. | ||||||
| Frequency Credit Applies | The frequency at which the Deliverable Credit applies in the event of continued Non-Compliance. | ||||||
| Proposed # of Deliverable Reviews | The number of reviews PennDOT requires by Service Provider of Deliverable prior to final submission. |
4. Recurring Delivery
| Recurring Deliverables | |||||
| Ref ID | Deliverable Name | Description | Minimum Acceptance Criteria | ||
| (Specific, Measurable, Time bounded Outcomes) | Critical (C) | Payment Deliverable (to be determined during Negotiations) | Due Date | ||
| (mm/dd/yy) | Deliverable Credit | Frequency Credit Applies | |||
| 2.1 | Annual Refresh Plan | The Service Provider, shall deliver, a refresh plan that addresses refresh for all Equipment and Software for which a refresh cycle is provided in Exhibit 4.2 Financial Responsibility Matrix and the SMM for the Service Provider. |
As a part of the refresh plan, the Service Provider shall provide a recommendation to upgrade Software to supported levels and to refresh Infrastructure in accordance with the Technology Plan and technology roadmap. Provide PennDOT with the Service Provider's annual refresh plan in the required format, to be included in the complete annual refresh plan deliverable submission to PennDOT.
Publication and agreement on the annual refresh plan captured in a .docx document and project plan that includes:
- Refresh forecast eligibility, dependencies, and recommendations for refreshing technology (infrastructure and software) in the Services environment for the upcoming year.
- Preliminary business-level assessment of the solutions, plans, cost estimates, and schedules for achieving refresh goals (including software to n/n-1 levels) for Services or as required in Exhibit 4.2 Financial Responsibility Matrix.
| - A report identifying all refresh planned vs. completed in the prior calendar year | Yes | No | Annually as approved by PennDOT | $ 10,000 | Monthly |
| 2.2 | Quarterly Refresh Plans | The Service Provider shall deliver quarterly updated Refresh Plans and refresh completion reports demonstrating Service Provider progress toward attaining refresh goals identified in the annual refresh plan. | Publication and agreement on the quarterly refresh plan and refresh completion reports captured in a .docx document and project plan that includes: |
- Refresh progress, dependencies, and recommendations for accomplishing objectives set forth in the annual refresh plan.
- Identify delays caused by Change Management or other Service Provider dependencies..
| - A report identifying all refresh performed in the prior calendar quarter (planned versus completed); since the last submitted quarterly refresh plan for avoidance of doubt. | No | No | Quarterly | N/A | N/A |
| 2.3 | Third Party Information Security Attestation | Service Provider shall complete PennDOT questionnaire if they are storing PennDOT data within Service Providers or Third Party to the Service Providers information system. Provide an attestation of compliance with PennDOT's information security policies, standards, and procedures. | Provide PennDOT the Service Provider's completed attestation in the required format (PennDOT Third Party Information Security Attestation template). |
Publication and agreement with PennDOT Information Security requirements as described in Exhibit 2.1 Mainframe Services SOW, Article 8 Information Security Management for Service Provider Services and captured in a PennDOT agreed format that includes:
| - All questions responded to with evidence of compliance as requested on the questionnaire. | Yes | No | 30 days prior of vendor's system storing PennDOT data, annually thereafter | $ 10,000 | Monthly |
| 2.4 | System Security Plan (Annual Review) scheduled quarterly | The Service Provider shall comply with the Information Security team's established annual schedule for reviewing and refreshing System Security Plans for Systems where the Service Provider is the Information Custodian. |
The Service Provider shall document the System Security Plan that provides an overview of the security requirements and describes the security controls, in alignment with Exhibit 2.1 Mainframe Services SOW, Article 3 Security Services and Article 8 Information Security Management for Service Provider Services, including:
- those that are in place or planned for deployment,
- plans of actions to achieve control compliance, and
- plans to correct deficiencies in the System Security Plan. Provide PennDOT the Service Provider's completed System Security Plan in the required format, including:
- System description including its architecture, components, and data it handles.
- System boundaries specifying what is included and what is not.
- Security objectives including the security goals and objectives of the system.
- Security controls as required including Exhibit 2.1 Mainframe Services SOW, Article 3 Security Services and Article 8 Information Security Management for Service Provider Services.
- Risk assessment including the risks and threats that the system faces and how they will be mitigated.
- Incident response referring to the SMM processes and procedures for detecting, reporting, and responding to security incidents.
- Security training and awareness programs for personnel involved with the system.
- Security policies, procedures and standards relevant to system security.
- Security testing including how security testing, vulnerability assessments and penetration testing, will be conducted.
- Authorization including description or reference to the SMM describing the process for obtaining authorization to operate the system.
- System Monitoring and Audit including details how the system will be monitored and audited to ensure ongoing security.
- Contingency and Disaster Recovery including the architecture and plans for system recovery and continuity in the event of disruptions.
| Develop a plan and schedule to mitigate items found missing or inaccurate and complete each System Security Plan as set forth in PennDOT Information Security policies. | Yes | No | Annually as approved by PennDOT | $ 10,000 | Monthly |
| 2.5 | Service Management Manual Currency - Quarterly Report | The Service Provider shall comply with PennDOT's established annual schedule for reviewing and updating the SMM. The Service Provider shall support PennDOT in providing a quarterly report of the review findings which demonstrates the currency and accuracy of the SMM sections reviewed in that quarter. At the beginning of each calendar year, PennDOT will provide a schedule for the year that outlines the sections of the Service Management Manual that will be reviewed in each quarter. PennDOT's schedule may be modified throughout the year. The Service Provider shall provide content and updates according to PennDOT's timeline to ensure SMM validity and currency. | Publication of the SMM review plan for the upcoming four quarters and report on the findings and updates made in the most recent quarter, including: |
- SMM review plan, agreed by PennDOT, by topics (e.g., sections, processes or functional area) with timeline and participants. Plan is to include a listing of all documents or content included in the review (e.g., policies, processes, procedures, work instructions, templates).
- Report of the review findings and updates made over the previous quarter.
| - Materials to support training, e.g., posters; video, communication plan, training plan for SMM changes that result in the way Service Components or PennDOT interface with or use the Service Provider processes and/or tools. | Yes | No | Quarterly | $ 10,000 | Monthly |
| 2.6 | Disaster Recovery Test Plan and Schedule | Service Provider shall develop and provide a consolidated disaster recovery test plan and schedule in accordance with the approach outlined in the Statement of Work. The disaster recovery test plan and schedule shall be updated annually thereafter. |
Service Provider shall plan and lead PennDOT and Service Components in disaster recovery exercises and providing any needed information for the disaster recovery test plan and schedule. Publish .doc/.xls document(s) that describes the annual Disaster Recovery test plan and schedule including:
- Improvements from Previous year - A narrative evaluation of the previous years' testing against the DR program objectives to determine areas of risk, indicating any DR program or process changes to be incorporated in the next years' test plan schedule.
- Scope changes - List of major changes in requirements and new Applications implemented since the previous year's test, and a list of eligible Applications not scheduled for testing
- Proposed new schedule developed for the upcoming year inclusive of RTO/RPO for each System/Application
- Proposed test objectives and criteria for demonstrating RTO/RPO achievement
- Proposed test roles and responsibilities for Service Provider, PennDOT, and Service Components.
After PennDOT approval, publish DR test plan and schedule.
| Yes | No | Annually as approved by PennDOT | $ 10,000 | Monthly | |
| 2.7 | Training Documentation | For each training planned and/or conducted as related to application Upgrades (e.g., N/N-1), including configuration updates, minor and major Enhancements, and projects. | |||
| Service Provider shall provide training documentation artifacts. | Publish documents in the required format including: |
Report including but not limited to:
- Release Notes showing specific application upgrade details
- Training design, schedule, logistics, and post-training feedback plan;
- List of training attendees;
- Documentation resulting from training, including handbooks, self-service materials, and evidence of sharing on PennDOT learning management platform;
- Materials to support training, e.g., posters; video, communication plan, training plan
- Recommendations for next steps for the Service Provider and for PennDOT;
- Lessons learned to be implemented into following trainings.
- Service Desk support process
| - Recorded training session with walkthrough | No | No | Prior to Production deployment of the Change. | N/A | N/A |
| 2.8 | Annual Technology Plan and Roadmap Update | The Service Provider, in support of PennDOT, shall deliver annual updated Technology Plans and Roadmap reports as deliverables demonstrating progress toward attaining goals identified in the plan as well as variances from standards. | Publication and agreement on the annual Technology Plan and Roadmap as captured in a .docx document and project plan that includes updates to: |
- Schedules, dependencies, and requirements for introduction of new technology changes into the environment including the acquisition, support, and retirement of Software and Hardware.
- Specification of the solutions, plans, cost estimates and schedules for achieving Technology Evolution goals
- CMDB extract of Software and tools used in providing Services along with the targeted vision for each
| - CMDB extract of Mainframe and Managed Server services used in providing Services along with the targeted vision for each | Yes | No | Quarterly | N/A | N/A | |||||
| 2.9 | Termination Assistance Plan | Termination Assistance Plan, and associated termination schedule as set forth in Section 3.3 of Master Services Terms. | As set forth in Section 3.3 of Master Services Terms. | Yes | No | As requested by PennDOT, following an Assistance Event in accordance with Section 3.3 of the MST | $ 15,000 | Weekly | ||
| 3.0 | Capacity Management Plan | A written deliverable that details forecasted Service capacity requirements based on Mainframe Services demand, and Application strategies and plans. | The plan shall include necessary Software, Services, compute, storage, and networking resources, along with resources needed to fulfill forecasted Services. Identify optimum resources to fulfill planned Services, including reduction in inefficiencies associated with under-utilized resources | No | No | Annually as approved by PennDOT | N/A | N/A | ||
| Definitions of Fields | ||||||||||
| Reference ID | Unique identifier | |||||||||
| Deliverable Name | Name of the Deliverable | |||||||||
| Description | Description of the activities comprising the Deliverable | |||||||||
| Minimum Acceptance Criteria | Description of Acceptance Criteria that will indicate completion of the Deliverable. | |||||||||
| Critical (C), Payment (P), or Time-Critical (T) | As defined in Section 3.5 of Master Services Terms and Exhibit 1.1 (Definitions) | |||||||||
| Due Date (mm/dd/yy) | Date when the Deliverable will be completed in mm/dd/yy format. | |||||||||
| Deliverable Credit | The amount of the Credit due by Service Provider to PennDOT in the event Service Provider fails to meet the Acceptance Criteria. | |||||||||
| Frequency Credit Applies | The frequency at which the Deliverable Credit applies in the event of continued Non-Compliance. |
image1.emf
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .