Exhibit 11 - PastPerfQues_.pdf

DRAFT RFP # 80GSFC25R7003

EXHIBIT 11

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

HYDROSPHERE, BIOSPHERE AND GEOPHYSICS SUPPORT

SERVICES II (HBG II)

CONTRACT NO. TBD

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS

(Updated May, 2018)

Sections 1-3 provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator.

Section 4 lists the major work elements within our Statement of Work (SOW). Please provide your assessment of the “relevant experience” and “performance” associated with our SOW evidenced within the contract for which you are a reference. “Experience” means a contractor who has performed work in the specific SOW Element. “Did not Perform” means that the specific SOW element was not performed under the contract.

Section 5 evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/R” for Not Rated.

The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6:

Very High

(VH)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance is of exceptional merit;

indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance.

High

(H)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Moderate

(M)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Low

(L)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

Very Low

(VL)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas which, adversely affect overall performance.

N/R Not Rated

Section 6 provides for evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.

RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NASA Goddard Space Flight Center BY TBD. Attn: Cassandra K. Moore, Code 178 Greenbelt, MD 20771 e-mail: cassandra.k.moore@nasa.gov

1. Contract Information

A. Name of Company/Division Being Evaluated:_____________________

B. Address:_____________________________________________

C. Contractor Cage Code and/or DUNS number

D. Contract Number:_______________________________________

E. Contract Type:_________________________________________

F. Period of Performance (including options): From:______ To:_______

G. Total Contract Value:_____________________________________

H. Award Information: Competitive: Yes___ No___ Basis of Selection: Technical___ Cost/Price___ Other (specify)_________________________

2. Description of Contract

Briefly describe the services provided under this contract:

The Hydrosphere, Biosphere, and Geophysics (HBG) sub-division in the Earth Sciences Division (ESD) at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) conducts science research that conceives, develops, and applies space, field-deployed (i.e. airborne and in situ) and laboratory based technologies and observations to address issues of importance to society. These include but are not limited to water resources, land and ocean ecosystem health, global and regional sea level change, changes in the Earth’s cryosphere, gravity field, magnetic field, solid Earth, reference frames, and the effects of climate change on life on Earth. This contract is for support of a full range of science and research activities across the breadth of the various Laboratories that make up the HBG sub-division: the Cryospheric Sciences (Code 615), Ocean Ecology (Code 616), Hydrological Sciences (Code 617), Biospheric Sciences (Code 618), and Geodesy and Geophysics (Code 61A) Laboratories. This contract is also for support of science, research and computing activities within the Terrestrial Information Systems Laboratory (TISL) (Code 619), also in the ESD. For the purposes of this document and contract the term HBG will be used to encompass all the Laboratories of the HBG sub-division and the TISL.

During the contract performance being evaluated, this firm was the:

Prime Contractor____ Significant Subcontractor ____ Team Member ____ Other (describe)____________________________________________

Does a corporate or business relationship exist between the firm being evaluated and your organization?

Yes ___ No ___. If yes, please describe: ___________________________

3. Evaluator Information

Name: _____________________________________________________ Title: _______________________________________________________ Agency/Company: ____________________________________________

E-mail Address: _______________________________________________ Phone: ______________ Date Questionnaire Completed: _____________ Role in Program/Contract: ______________________________________ Length of Involvement in this Program/ Contract: _____________________

4. SOW Survey Relevance Ratings: Please check the appropriate blocks for Relevance (Performed or Did Not Perform)

SOW ELEMENT

PERFORMED

DID NOT

PERFORM

Planning and executing field experiments or aircraft or ship campaigns that utilize remote sensing instruments to collect data for the purpose of research, instrument calibration or satellite product validation

Support research field campaigns utilizing remotely sensed data products from ground-based, aircraft or satellite instruments.

Operate a state-of-the-art facility for the calibration of remote sensing instruments.

Characterize satellite instrument performance through pre-launch testing.

Characterize performance of satellite instruments through post-launch analysis of products and support for calibration and validation of the sensors.

Develop software to produce calibrated and geolocated products from satellite or aircraft sensors.

Develop data systems and cloud computing environments on premise or in the cloud to produce, archive and distribute data products from aircraft or satellite sensors.

Develop instrument systems to obtain remotely sensed data during field experiments using in situ, shipboard, aircraft or unmanned airborne platforms.

Operate data systems to produce data products from aircraft or ground-based instruments.

Perform quality assessment of remotely sensed products from aircraft or satellite instruments.

Provide general engineering support as well as interfacing with engineers for the development and testing and active or passive remote sensing instrument systems for use in ground-based, airborne or spacecraft applications.

Design, maintain and enhance web sites for individual projects, missions, field campaigns, and organization units.

Develop materials for informal education and public outreach, including presentations and activities with the general public.

Provide analytic and logistical support to projects or organizations in the following areas: property management, developing schedules and work breakdown structures, tracking finances and status of open action items

Support science investigations through analysis of in situ field and satellite data sets.

Perform modeling, simulation and data assimilation process studies using a variety of spatial scales and model complexity, ranging from regional process studies to global scale climate studies.

Provide support for publication of scientific results, development of media resources, and provide technical writing and editing capability for technical and scientific documents and reports

Support investigator-led scientific studies using data analysis, numerical modeling, in situ instrument operations or laboratory-based studies.

Provide technical support for laboratory analysis of biological or chemical samples.

5. General Performance Survey

NO PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS PERFORMANCE RATING

(Please Circle)

QUALITY

1. Quality of services and support provided VH H M L VL N/R

2. Timely identification and mitigation of risks VH H M L VL N/R

3. Ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner VH H M L VL N/R

4. Demonstrated understanding and compliance with mission safety requirements VH H M L VL N/R

Comment:

SCHEDULE

5. Timeliness, quality, and accuracy of schedule estimates and reporting VH H M L VL N/R

6. Ability to meet/exceed schedule milestones VH H M L VL N/R

COST

7. Ability to establish realistic cost estimates and adhere to estimated costs VH H M L VL N/R

8. Ability to anticipate, identify and control cost growth. VH H M L VL N/R

BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT

9. Communicating/interfacing with Government and overall responsiveness to Government requests VH H M L VL N/R

10. Ability to effectively manage the contract including subcontractor performance, if applicable VH H M L VL N/R

11.

Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner.

VH H M L VL N/R

12. Adequacy of Contractor’s system(s) for processing task orders and/or changes. VH H M L VL N/R

13. Ability to meet Small Business Subcontracting Plan Goals VH H M L VL N/R

Section 6:

What is the Contract Value:

Initial Value Current Value Estimated Cost: $___________ $____________

Fee: $___________ $____________

Total Value: $___________ $_____________

What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?

What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?

For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):

Assume your contract is a current five year contract, is still ongoing, and the latest cost report reflects a cost/fee of $43,500,000 through the first 2 years and 4 months (to date). In this example, current/total Contract Expenditures incurred to Date are $43,500,000 and associated period of performance for those expenditures, expressed in years, is 2.33 years.

Therefore, the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)

Was there a cost overrun? ( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, please explain:

If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries.

Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost). If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Very High, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided.

Overall Contract Performance Rating (circle one)

Very High High Moderate Low Very Low

If less than Very High Performance Rating, please explain:

Please add any other comments you may feel are pertinent.

Rater’s Signature Date