Evaluation of Past Performance.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91QF523R0001
About this file
This document contains an evaluation template for assessing past performance on federal contracts as well as details of a solicitation for maintenance and inspection services of fire protection systems at Fort Lee, Virginia. The evaluation template includes rating categories for compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, customer satisfaction, and general comments.
The solicitation seeks non-personal services for maintenance, inspection, testing, service and repair of fire alarm, sprinkler, and protection systems at Fort Lee under an 8(a) contract. Services are to be provided to standards specified in the Performance Work Statement. The contractor will be responsible for all personnel, equipment, supplies, transportation, tools, materials, and non-personal services to perform preventative maintenance and repairs. The buildings and facilities list may increase or decrease over the contract term. Interested parties must submit a response by December 16, 2022 at 3:00 PM EST to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer. The solicitation number is W91QF523R0001.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
Record of Interview: (to be filled out by PPT member)
| ( | ) Discussed recentness and relevance of information | ||||
| ( | ) Read summary to person contacted | Date: | ( | ) Sent copy to person contacted | Date: |
PPT Member Signature Typed or Printed Name
Telephone Fax
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .