ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit B Respondent Experience CALIR.docx

DOCX document 39 KB Posted

Attached to
IT Research and Advisory Subscription Services & Computer Assisted Legal and Investigative Research
Solicitation number
DIR-CPO-TMP-573
Issued by
Travis County, Austin City, Texas

About this file

This document is the Exhibit B Respondent History and Experience for a Request for Offer (RFO) issued by the Department of Information Resources (DIR) for CALIR services. The RFO requests information on the company's history, related services, customer and technical support experience, product capabilities, and qualifications of the support analysts. Respondents are asked to provide details on their experience and delivery model for each related service proposed, as well as to indicate the most popular topics requested by market segment and any sales to Texas state agencies, local governments, independent school districts, and institutes of higher education in the last 12 months. Respondents are also asked to indicate if they hold contracts for the same services in other states or cooperative contracts.

The response is limited to a total of 15 pages and requires the use of provided tables to summarize certain information. The RFO does not include any pricing terms, set asides, or funding requirements, and there is no indication of an incumbent contractor or the current environment. The contract term and any renewal options are also not specified in the provided document.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ESBD_File_317494_DIR-CPO-TMP-573 IT Research and CALIR PreBid ConferenceSlides.pdf PDF
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit I Policy Driven Adoption for Accessibility (PDAA).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ESBD_File_317494_DIR-CPO-TMP-573 Pre-Solicitation Attendee List.pdf PDF
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit J Accessibility Conformance Report (ARC).doc DOC document
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit G Respondent Release Liability.docx DOCX document
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit B Respondent Experience R and A.docx DOCX document
ESBD_File_317494_DIR-CPO-TMP-573 Addendum 1.pdf PDF
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit A1 Exceptions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ESBD_File_317494_Attachment 2 Standard Terms and Conditions.pdf PDF
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit D HSP Sample Form.pdf PDF
ESBD_File_317494_DIR-CPO-TMP-573 RFO.docx DOCX document
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit F Reference Forms.docx DOCX document
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit E Itemized Pricing - Per Addendum 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit A Respondent Information.docx DOCX document
ESBD_File_317494_Attachment 3 Service Agreement Template.docx DOCX document
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit E Itemized Pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ESBD_File_317494_Attachment 1 Sample Contract.docx DOCX document
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit C Customer Marketing and Support Plan.docx DOCX document
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit H EDGAR Certification Form.pdf PDF
ESBD_File_317494_Exhibit K VADSIR (For Non-COTS).pdf PDF
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Department of Information Resources Request for Offer DIR-CPO-TMP-XXX <RFO Name> Exhibit B Respondent History and Experience – CALIR only

1) In no more than five (5) pages, provide a detailed history of your company. Include a high-level summary of your business model. Include how your company will meet the scope for CALIR services as outlined in Section 2.1.1 of the RFO and how your products/services have been used by customers.

2) Indicate Related Services your company is proposing:

Table 1: Related Services

Related Services
Submitting Response?
Product Installation
☐
Integration
☐
Maintenance and support
☐
Managed Services
☐
Product Training
☐
Other (provide description)
☐

3) For each Related Service selected/included in Table 1 and in no more than three (3) pages total, provide a brief summary of the Respondent’s experience and delivery model. Each summary should clearly indicate which service discussed by highlighting the work completed by the Respondent either as the prime or as a subcontractor. Experience should focus on projects completed within the past five (5) years. If serving as a subcontractor, Respondent should clearly indicate the percentage of work for which the Respondent was directly responsible.

4) Describe respondent’s experience in providing customer and technical support as outlined in Section 2.1.1.1.2 of the RFO. Limit response to two (2) pages total.

5) Describe the respondent’s products’ capabilities in terms of the following functionality. Limit response to no more than one (1) page per function.

a) Search Functionality Ability to search databases using natural language and/or Boolean search logic and ability to search multiple databases at the same time.

b) Download Functionality Ability to download materials to users’ systems, and allow for the printing, copying to computer-related media, and emailing of downloaded documents. Vendor must describe the formats available to users for downloading of documents (i.e., Rich Text Format (.rtf), Word Document (.doc), WordPerfect (.wps), Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), etc.)

c) Research Session Data What kinds of data, if any, will reside on the desktop, both during and after an application session.

d) Software Combability The minimum desktop/laptop configuration required and any required software necessary to access services. Configuration descriptions should provide the minimum versions of browsers, operating systems and any other software required to access services, as well as any known limitations, non-default settings, features and plug-ins required.

e) Anti-Virus/Firewall Combability Any known compatibility issues with anti-virus and anti-spam software or firewall hardware or software. Vendor should describe what assistance is available to the State in addressing these known compatibility issues.

6) Include a summary (no more than 3 pages total) of the qualifications and experience of the analysts dedicated to support the DIR customers.

7) Using Table 2, provide the most popular topic requested for each market segment in the last 12 months. (This response is not scored as part of the evaluation) Table 2: Topic Request Products and Related Services

Market Segment
Topic Request

All Sectors

Texas State Agencies

Local Governments

Independent School Districts

Institutes of Higher Education

8) Using Table 3, indicate if, in the last twelve (12) months, your company has sold the requested products/services to the Market Segments listed below. Include the entity name and total sales. (This response is not scored as part of the evaluation) Table 3: Sales to Texas State Agencies, Local Governments, etc.

Market Segment
Total Sales

Texas State Agencies

Local Governments

Independent School Districts

Institutes of Higher Education

9) Using Table 4, indicate whether your company holds a contract for use by public entities (state agencies, local governments, independent school districts, public universities) in any other states for the same services requested in this RFO. (This response is not scored as part of the evaluation).

Table 4: Sales to Other State Public Entities State

State 1

State 2

State 3

State 4

10) Using Table 5, indicate whether your company holds another cooperative contract? (example: GSA, NASPO, TIPS, etc.) and include the list of the contracts and the links to the contract pages. (This response is not scored as part of the evaluation).

Table 5: Other Cooperative Contracts

Cooperative Contract
Contract Number
Link to Contract Page

GSA

NASPO

TIPS

Etc.

<END OF EXHIBIT B>

Exhibit B Respondent History and Experience Page 2 of 8

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .