ESBD_365998_1721660205189_07 Attachment F - Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 145 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 608-24-91551A
- Issued by
- Travis County, Texas
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria Attachment for a Request for Offers (RFO) issued by the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles (TxDMV) for the maintenance, support, enhancement, and hosting of the agency's existing web-based Texas Permitting and Routing Optimization System (TxPROS). TxPROS is utilized by trucking companies to apply for and obtain Texas oversize/overweight (OS/OW) permits and routing information for traveling on Texas roads. The evaluation criteria outlined in this document include the Respondent's ability to meet the state's needs, the qualifications of the Respondent's staff and key personnel, the Respondent's remediation procedures, the Respondent's continuity of operations and disaster recovery plan, and the Respondent's escalation protocol. The contract will be awarded to the Respondent with the highest total evaluation score.
The Respondent's Completed Price Sheet (Attachment F) is worth 40 points of the total evaluation score. The contract is expected to begin implementation no later than September 1, 2024. The jurisdictions involved are the State of Texas and Travis County.
View the file
Other files
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment F – Evaluation Criteria
RFO No. 608-24-91551A
Motor Carrier Oversize/Overweight Routing and Permitting System
The following sections will serve as an outline for Respondents’ responses. At a minimum, Respondents must address all following sections in their responses to be considered for evaluation. Respondents must clearly denote which section and subsection their responses pertain to, for example, Section A.7.1 Scope of Work (“SOW”), etc.
Respondent’s Responses points available: 60 points
Respondent’s Completed Price Sheet (Attachment F) points available: 40 points
A. Proof of Ability to Meet State Needs (40 points)
1. Respondent shall provide documentation that demonstrates Respondent has the capability and experience to meet the requirements of this Solicitation, including but not limited to:
a. Documentation detailing the number of contracts as well as duration of the contracts that Respondent has executed with public entities for similar commodities within the last five years.
b. A summary of Respondent’s experience providing products/services similar to those requested by this RFO.
c. Documentation detailing the following from the statement of work, Section 4:
ability to provide both primary and backup data center facilities that meet the following requirements: Primary Data Center and Backup Data Center;
Production Environment that provides web servers with user interface; a routing engine component for routing; tile server; database servers; load balancer; email functionality; facsimile functionality; real-time backup services; ArcGIS geodatabase environment; data repository environment;
testing and training environments; test servers; training servers; maintaining test database data; system monitoring; subcontractor management; data security; payment card industry data security standard compliance;
performance tuning; software license; software release levels; hardware refresh intervals; data backup procedures; controlled data changes; business interrupt/disaster recovery plan; software maintenance and support (including corrective maintenance, bug fixes, root-cause analysis); software maintenance and enhancements; transition from test to production; database tuning;
software backup; software escrow; documentation updates; system use assistance; online ticket systems; a helpdesk; data queries; data provisions;
mapping data maintenance; and biannual GIS date updates.
d. Respondent’s statement of guarantee to be able to begin implementation of the software no later than 12:01 a.m., September 1, 2024.
e. Respondent must state whether any of Respondent’s clients have terminated a contract with Respondent for default within the last five (5) years and whether any of Respondent’s clients have assessed liquidated damages against
Respondent within the last five (5) years. Also provide the following information:
i. Name of client
ii. Contact title, name, business address, phone number and email address.
iii. A brief description of the project (includes SOW performed and indicate whether Respondent was the prime contractor or a subcontractor
B. Qualifications of Staff and Key Personnel (5 points)
1. The Respondent must provide documentation demonstrating staff capability specific to this Solicitation including but not limited to:
a. Key personnel resume illustrating qualifications to perform the services described in the solicitation. Resumes should include experience levels as well as any certification documentation in relevant areas.
b. Respondent must identify key partnerships and subcontractors it intends to leverage for the project and specify the tasks/ activities and level of responsibility each will have with the project.
2. Respondent shall provide documentation that states the qualifications and capabilities of each of their key personnel. Information may include but is not limited to:
a. Each individual’s name and title
b. Education
c. Training
d. Specific work to be performed and services to be provided, if awarded
e. Qualifications and relevant experience that makes the proposed individual suitable for their designated role on this Contract, if awarded
f. Whether the person is an employee or a subcontractor of the Respondent
g. Any additional information that indicates the individual’s ability to successfully perform the services required under this Solicitation.
C. Respondent Remediation Procedures (5 points)
1. Respondent shall describe its procedures for remedying scenarios that may arise throughout the life of the Contract including:
a. Delayed implementation
b. Delayed component shipments
c. Incomplete component shipments
d. Shipments with missing and/or erroneous sequential numbers
e. Sourcing new supplier(s) on short notice (e.g., the current supplier has a quality control issue or supply chain issue)
D. Continuity of Operations and Disaster Recovery Plan (5 points)
1. Respondent shall describe its disaster recovery plan for a variety of scenarios, including but not limited to:
a. A backup facility providing any software/hardware components that are destroyed or rendered inoperable by a natural disaster (e.g., hurricane, flood, tornado, etc.)
b. Manufacturing of hardware equipment of the Deliverables is rendered inoperable by mechanical breakdown of the equipment/components or workforce shortages.
E. Escalation Protocol (5 points)
1. Respondent’s Proposal shall describe an escalation protocol for TxDMV’s consideration to collaboratively resolve issues encountered during the term of any
Contract resulting from this Solicitation. The escalation protocol must explain how issues or complaints are prioritized and resolved and the average amount of time required for resolution.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .