EPASS EB FOPR 79 - RFI_2 QandA.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA872125F0079_002
About this file
This file is a Questions and Answers spreadsheet containing three tabs related to RFI-2 for the AFLCMC/AZS EPASS FOPR 79 supporting the Armament Directorate. The first tab contains questions for potential offerors about their ability to compete under GSA OASIS+ Small Business, preferences regarding geographic splitting of requirements, page limitations for technical proposals, impact of work sample requirements, and the value of extending the relevant work sample period from 5 to 7 years.
The second and third tabs contain space for contractors to provide comments on the PWS and other documents, as well as backup questions from RFI-1 covering capabilities like security clearances, DCAA-approved accounting systems, facility access, transition capabilities, and subcontracting intentions. The spreadsheet is designed to gather market research from potential GSA OASIS+ Small Business contractors about their ability to perform engineering, administrative and professional support services for the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - LOE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 ITO.pdf | ||
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - PWS.pdf | ||
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - UPT.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - Self-scoring Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - Evaluation Criteria.pdf | ||
| EPASS FOPR 79 - RFI Dec 2024.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Tab 1 RFI-2 Questions
| Company Name | Business Size | Is your company a potential awardee under a GSA OASIS+ SB domain? | If this requirement was split into 3 requirements based on location, would your company be: more likely, less likely to propose or nuetral? | Does consolidation into 1 contract prevent/restrict you from competition? | Based on all attachments in the RFI, is your company able to sufficiently validate their self-score for all Evaluation Criteria? | Would limiting pages at the sample level affect your proposal? | |
| (Please provide additional comments in the FOPR 79 tab.) | Would limiting pages for the entire technical volume (vice at the sample level) affect your proposal? | ||||||
| (Please provide additional comments in the FOPR 79 tab.) | Would reducing the number of work samples to 3 or 4 affect your ability to submit a highly self scored proposal? | ||||||
| (Please provide additional comments in the FOPR 79 tab.) | On a scale of 1, not at all helpful, to 5, extremely helpful: How helpful would it be to your company to extend the relevant work sample period from 5 to 7 years? |
(Please provide additional comments in the FOPR 79 tab.)
Tab 2 FOPR 79 Comments
| Company Name | Document | |
| (PWS, LOE, UPT, Other) | Paragraph | Comment/Issue |
| (One per row) | Rationale/Suggested Change |
Tab 3 Back-up (RFI-1 Questions) Company Name Business Size Socio-economic Categories Applicable to your GSA OASIS+ SB Contract Based on the provided information, would your company submit a proposal if this requirement was issued under your GSA OASIS+ SB contract? Does your company provide this service commercially? Is your company a potential awardee under a GSA OASIS+ SB domain? Does your company have experience managing a contract that covers multiple geographically separated locations? Does your company have the capability to perform all required services in the draft PWS? Does your company have similar or previous experience with the type of work outlined in the draft PWS? Does your company have the capability to provide personnel with the requisite security clearances? Does the draft PWS contain information that would enable your company to adequately respond to a RFP? Does your company have experience working on/with DoD bases/facilities and does your company have the ability to obtain access to Government facilities? In order to successfully meet all of the performance objectives outlined in the PWS would your company require significant subcontracting or teaming arrangements? Does your company possess the expertise to ensure a successful contract transition within 30 days of award? Does your company have a current DCAA approved accounting system necessary for performing cost type contracts? Which GSA OASIS+ SB Domain would you recommend is applicable to this requirement? Which NAICS code(s) would you determine are appropriate for this requirement? How much of this potential requirement would your company need to subcontract to other companies? Optional: Please provide a URL to a capability website for your company.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .