DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - Self-scoring Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA872125F0079_002
About this file
This is a self-scoring matrix template for FOPR 79 supporting the AFLCMC/EB Armament Directorate. The matrix outlines evaluation criteria with a maximum possible score of 42,500 points across multiple technical categories. Key scoring elements include CPAR ratings (with points ranging from 7,500 for "exceptional" to -3,500 for "unsatisfactory"), financial stability (1,000 points), work samples demonstrating geographical dispersion (3,000 points), SAP program support (5,000 points), SCI program support (5,000 points), and armament support (4,000 points).
Additional evaluation criteria include number of positions supported (2,000 points), engineering support personnel (3,000 points), lines of accounting (2,000 points), security violations (-1,000 points per violation), foreign military sales support (4,000 points), personnel transition metrics (2,000 points), DCSA vulnerability assessment rating (1,000 points), and positions requiring Top Secret clearance (3,000 points). The template includes a cross-reference section for offerors to provide technical volume references and government points of contact for each work sample submitted.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - LOE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 ITO.pdf | ||
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - PWS.pdf | ||
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - UPT.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| EPASS EB FOPR 79 - RFI_2 QandA.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT EPASS EB FOPR 79 - Evaluation Criteria.pdf | ||
| EPASS FOPR 79 - RFI Dec 2024.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Self Score Sheet
FOPR 79 - AFLCMC/EB
SELF-SCORING MATRIX - ATTACHMENT XX
| OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE] |
| Note: See Attachment XX, Evaluation Criteria, for additional information |
| Note: Offerors only fill in the orange shaded cells |
| Eval Criteria Section | Criteria | Percentage of CPAR Ratings | |
| (Total Cannot Exceed 100.00%) | Points for Each Rating | Offeror's Weighted |
Self-Score
| Technical/General (CPAR) | ||||
| 3.2.1.1 | CPAR categories rated "exceptional" | 7,500 | 0 | |
| CPAR categories rated "very good" | 6,000 | 0 | ||
| CPAR categories rated "satisfactory" | 1,000 | 0 | ||
| CPAR categories rated "marginal" | (1,500) | 0 | ||
| CPAR categories rated "unsatisfactory" | (3,500) | 0 | ||
| Totals | 0.00% | 0 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Criteria | Proposed Counts/Scores | Max Count | Points per count (±1,000 Points/Max. Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| Technical/General | |||||||
| 3.2.1.2 | Financial Stability | 25 | 40 | 1 | 1,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.3 | Number of work samples with at least 2 geographically separated Government locations supported by at least 15 positions | 5 | 200 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.4 | Number of work samples with SAP program support | 5 | 200 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.5 | Number of work samples with SCI program support | 5 | 200 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.6 | Number of work samples with Armament Support | 5 | 200 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.7 | Greatest number of positions on a single work sample | 500 | 2 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.8 | Number of personnel providing engineering support across all work samples | 400 | 3 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.9 | Number of Lines of Accounting on a single work sample | 300 | 3 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.10 | Number of security violations across all work samples | N/A | -1000 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.11 | Number of work samples with foreign military sales support | 5 | 200 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.12 | Number of personnel transitioned within 30 days | 500 | 2 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.13 | Most recent DCSA vulnerability assessment rating | 3 | 333 | 1 | 1,000 | 0 | |
| 3.2.1.14 | Number of positions requiring a Top Secret clearance across all work samples | 1000 | 1 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 |
| Maximum Total Score | 42,500.00 |
| Offeror's Total Self-Score | 0.00 |
Cross Reference
| Cross Reference Information | |||||||||||
| WS-1 | WS-2 | WS-3 | WS-4 | WS-5 | WS-1 | WS-2 | WS-3 | WS-4 | WS-5 | ||
| Criteria | Tech Vol Page(s) and Paragraph(s) | Contact Information for Relevant Government Point of Contact (minimum 2 POCs) | |||||||||
| 3.2.1.1 | CPAR categories rated "exceptional" |
CPAR categories rated "very good" CPAR categories rated "satisfactory" CPAR categories rated "marginal" CPAR categories rated "unsatisfactory"
| 3.2.1.2 | Financial Stability |
| 3.2.1.3 | Number of work samples with at least 2 geographically separated Government locations supported by at least 15 positions |
| 3.2.1.4 | Number of work samples with SAP program support |
| 3.2.1.5 | Number of work samples with SCI program support |
| 3.2.1.6 | Number of work samples with Armament Support |
| 3.2.1.7 | Greatest number of positions on a single work sample |
| 3.2.1.8 | Number of personnel providing engineering support across all work samples |
| 3.2.1.9 | Number of Lines of Accounting on a single work sample |
| 3.2.1.10 | Number of security violations across all work samples |
| 3.2.1.11 | Number of work samples with foreign military sales support |
| 3.2.1.12 | Number of personnel transitioned within 30 days |
| 3.2.1.13 | Most recent DCSA vulnerability assessment rating |
| 3.2.1.14 | Number of positions requiring a Top Secret clearance across all work samples |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .