BIP_4290-024P_Mill_Creek_Bridge.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Colonial National Historical Park Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-13-B-00033
About this file
BIP 4290-024P Mill Creek Bridge
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1)_Amendment_003.pdf | ||
| VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1)_Amendment_002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_001.pdf | ||
| Cert_Program_for_Bridge_Temp_Works.pdf | ||
| FP03_Errata.pdf | ||
| BIP_4290-026P_Isthmus_Bridge.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Synopsis_FAR_66_(additional_info).doc | DOC document | |
| VETS-100A_Form.pdf | ||
| BIP_4290-023P_College_Creek_Bridge.pdf | ||
| Plans_VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1).pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1).pdf | ||
| FP03_Eng_.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
MILL CREEK BRIDGE
COLONIAL PARKWAY OVER MILL CREEK
COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
LW
STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/17/11
Federal Highway Administration
Report prepared by: SD
MILE POINT:
KILOMETER POINT:
19.09 30.72
Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
MILL CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/17/11
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 6 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 55.0 FT (16.8 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 54.0 FT (16.5 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.5 FT (11.1 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1D6 / 3002 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1985-JOINT REPAIR. 2003, 2008-UNDERWATER INSPECTION. 2011-SUPERSTRUcTURE
CLEANED AND PAINTED, CONCRETE REPAIRS TO SUBSTRUCTURE.
LOCATION
COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 19.09 (KM PT 30.72)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 4.6 MILES SOUTH OF VA ROUTE 199.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ COLONIAL PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. MILL CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This steel multi-beam bridge is in good condition overall. Since the previous inspection, the superstructure has been cleaned and painted; however, surface rust was observed on the bearing sole plates and beam bottom flanges.
Concrete repairs were also made to the substructure. The remaining problems include minor erosion at the wingwall slopes, adhesion failure of the deck expansion joint seals, and deterioration of the grout pad below the Beam #6 bearing at the west abutment. It should be noted that the channel is considerably wider than the structure opening, and additional riprap should be placed along the abutments in order to prevent scour along the abutments.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: C.A. ROBERTS, N.M. WILLIAMS (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
CHRISTOPHER A. ROBERTS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/27/11
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK SURFACE. 1,760 SF
58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL DECK EXPANSION JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS. 72 LF
59.2 REPAIR GROUT PAD UNDER BEAM #6 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT. 1 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
61.2 EXTEND RIPRAP TO CORNERS OF ABUTMENTS. 100 CY
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
G G N N N G G G G
N G
G G G G G F
N
F
G
F
58.1 HAIRLINE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE AND
UNDERSIDE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR DELAMINATION OF
DECK SURFACE AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
58.2 MINOR ADHESION FAILURE ALONG BOTH DECK EXPANSION JOINT
SEALS; MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN ENDS OF JOINTS.
MODERATE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN
PARAPETS.
58.5 MINOR MAP CRACKING AND SCALING OF TOP FACE OF CURBS;
MINOR SPALLING IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
SURVEY MARKER ON NORTH CURB NEAR WEST END AND SOUTH
CURB NEAR EAST END.
58.6 MINOR SPALL ON EAST END OF SOUTH RAILING WITH EXPOSED
AND RUSTED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER.
MINOR SPALL ON WEST END OF SOUTH RAILING. IMPACT DAMAGE
TO SOUTH RAILING (10'L AREA) WITH ONE POST CRACKED.
58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG BOTH CURBLINES. MINOR
VEGETATION GROWTH AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN APPROACH
CURBLINES.
58.8 UTILITY CONDUIT RUSTED AND SEPARATED AT NORTH END OF
EAST ABUTMENT.
59.1,2,6,7 GROUT UNDER BEARING BREAKING UP WITH 8"L X 1-1/2"W SECTION
MISSING AT BEAM #6, WEST ABUTMENT.
SUPERSTRUCTURE HAS BEEN CLEANED AND PAINTED. MINOR
RUSTING OF BEARING SOLE PLATES AND UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM
FLANGES AT BEAM ENDS. MINOR SURFACE RUST DEVELOPING
ALONG EDGES OF BOTTOM FLANGES AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
59.8 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF CONCRETE FASCIAE. MINOR
DELAMINATION OF SOUTH FASCIA BELOW RAIL POST.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G
PILE BENTS2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. F
FOUNDATIONS5. N
WINGWALLS6. G
WEEP HOLES7. G
EXPANSION JOINTS8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION11. N
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
N14. PILE BENTS
N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
N16. FOUNDATIONS
N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N19. OTHER
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G G N
MED
INSUFF
14 FT.
SILT, ROCK
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1.
(APPR. ROADWAY JOINT)
G G F G G G F G F
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.1 WIDESPREAD MINOR MAP CRACKING OF ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS; MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING AND BARNACLE
GROWTH BELOW WATERLINE. MODERATE MAP CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON CORNERS OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.
60.3 MINOR SPALLING OF EDGES OF BEARING SEATS AT ENDS OF BOTH
ABUTMENTS.
60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS. MINOR
MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST BACKWALL,
NORTH CORNER. DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF EAST
BACKWALL HAS BEEN REPAIRED; MINOR CRACKING OF REPAIRS.
60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL WINGWALLS,
PRIMARILY NEAR BEARING AREAS. MINOR SPALLING OF
NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS DUE TO OLD PIECES
OF TIMBER FORM EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE; MINOR SPALL WITH
EXPOSED REBAR IN SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MODERATE
VEGETATION GROWTH ON NORTHEAST WINGWALL; MINOR ON
SOUTHWEST AND NORTHWEST WINGWALLS.
60.7 ALL WEEP HOLES UNDERWATER AT HIGH TIDE.
60.9 MINOR EROSION OF ALL WINGWALL SLOPES.
61.3 RIPRAP ALONG ALL CHANNEL BANKS.
61.6 CHANNEL CONSIDERABLY LARGER THAN OPENING IN STRUCTURE.
222.2 MINOR DETERIORATION OF RELIEF JOINT POURABLE SEALS.
222.3 MODERATE TO SEVERE CHECKING OF TIMBER APPROACH
GUARDRAILS WITH MINOR DECAY THROUGHOUT.
222.6 UP TO 1" SETTLEMENT OF WEST APPROACH SHOULDERS.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
222.7 REFLECTORS ON NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST PARAPET ENDS HIDDEN BY TIMBER APPROACH GUARDRAIL;
REFLECTOR BROKEN AT NORTHEAST PARAPET END.
TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS INSTALLED AT ENDS OF TIMBER APPROACH GUARDRAILS SINCE LAST INSPECTION.
"MILL CREEK" SIGN AT SOUTH SIDE OF WEST APPROACH AND NORTH SIDE OF EAST APPROACH.
222.9 ADHESION PROBLEMS AND HOLES IN WEST APPROACH ROADWAY JOINTS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 19 17 31 28
TYPE 3 17 16 29 26
TYPE 3S2 26 23 43 39
TYPE 3-3 32 29 53 48
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... MILL CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 095 - JAMES CITY
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 4290-024P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... MILL CREEK
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 024P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. COLONIAL PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 4290024P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 4.6 MILES SOUTH OF VA ROU
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1D6 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 19.09 (KM PT 30.72)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3002 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
54.0 FT (16.5 M)
55.0 FT (16.8 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 18.8 TONS (17.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 3 - POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 31.3 TONS (28.4 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/11 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. YES
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: 60 MONTHS - LAST INSP. : 6/08
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°12'53.40" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 76°44'37.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.5 FT (11.1 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 50.0 FT (15.2 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 10.0 FT (3.0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 10.0 FT (3.0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 2118 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2007 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 2330 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2027 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.50 FT (0.76 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0111
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
7 - Countermeasures installed to
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1985-JOINT REPAIR. 2003, 2008-UNDERWATER INSPECTION. 2011-SUPERSTRUcTURE CLEANED AND PAINTED, CONCRETE REPAIRS
TO SUBSTRUCTURE.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:76�44'37.80 http:37�12'53.40
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EASTBOUND TOWARD WILLIAMSBURG
PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE CHANNEL WIDER THAN
STRUCTURE OPENING
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST; NOTE DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINE
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DECAY AND CHECKING OF TIMBER APPROACH
GUARDRAILS; NORTH GUARDRAIL AT WEST APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - ADHESION FAILURE AND EDGE
SPALLING ALONG EXPANSION JOINT OVER
EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #6 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO
PHOTO #7 - SPALLING ON SOUTH CURB ADJACENT TO EAST
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF CURBS; SOUTH CURB, EAST
APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - IMPACT DAMAGE TO SOUTH RAILING
PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO; NOTE CRACKED RAIL
POST
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE;
BAY #3 AT EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL SURFACE RUST DEVELOPING ALONG EDGES OF
BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES; BEAM #4 NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BEARING SOLE PLATES AND
UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM FLANGES; BEAM #2 AT EAST ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - DETERIORATED GROUT BELOW BEAM #6 BEARING AT
WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #16 - UTILITY CONDUIT RUSTED AND SEPARATED AT NORTH
END OF EAST ABUTMENT; ALSO NOTE CRACKING OF REPAIRED AREA
IN BACKWALL
PHOTO #17 - DELAMINATION OF SOUTH FASCIA BELOW RAILPOST
PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #19 - MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH
CORNER OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
WINGWALLS; SOUTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON
NORTHEAST WINGWALL
PHOTO #22 - EROSION OF SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL SLOPE
PHOTO #23 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #24 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .