BIP_4290-024P_Mill_Creek_Bridge.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Colonial National Historical Park Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-13-B-00033
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

BIP 4290-024P Mill Creek Bridge

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Colonial National Historical Park, newest first.
File Type Posted
VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1)_Amendment_003.pdf PDF
VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1)_Amendment_002.pdf PDF
Amendment_001.pdf PDF
Cert_Program_for_Bridge_Temp_Works.pdf PDF
FP03_Errata.pdf PDF
BIP_4290-026P_Isthmus_Bridge.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Synopsis_FAR_66_(additional_info).doc DOC document
VETS-100A_Form.pdf PDF
BIP_4290-023P_College_Creek_Bridge.pdf PDF
Plans_VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1).pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1).pdf PDF
FP03_Eng_.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

MILL CREEK BRIDGE

COLONIAL PARKWAY OVER MILL CREEK

COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

LW

STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/17/11

Federal Highway Administration

Report prepared by: SD

MILE POINT:

KILOMETER POINT:

19.09 30.72

Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

MILL CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/17/11

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 6 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 55.0 FT (16.8 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 54.0 FT (16.5 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.5 FT (11.1 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1D6 / 3002 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1985-JOINT REPAIR. 2003, 2008-UNDERWATER INSPECTION. 2011-SUPERSTRUcTURE

CLEANED AND PAINTED, CONCRETE REPAIRS TO SUBSTRUCTURE.

LOCATION

COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 19.09 (KM PT 30.72)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 4.6 MILES SOUTH OF VA ROUTE 199.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ COLONIAL PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. MILL CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This steel multi-beam bridge is in good condition overall. Since the previous inspection, the superstructure has been cleaned and painted; however, surface rust was observed on the bearing sole plates and beam bottom flanges.

Concrete repairs were also made to the substructure. The remaining problems include minor erosion at the wingwall slopes, adhesion failure of the deck expansion joint seals, and deterioration of the grout pad below the Beam #6 bearing at the west abutment. It should be noted that the channel is considerably wider than the structure opening, and additional riprap should be placed along the abutments in order to prevent scour along the abutments.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: C.A. ROBERTS, N.M. WILLIAMS (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CHRISTOPHER A. ROBERTS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/27/11

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK SURFACE. 1,760 SF

58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL DECK EXPANSION JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS. 72 LF

59.2 REPAIR GROUT PAD UNDER BEAM #6 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT. 1 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

61.2 EXTEND RIPRAP TO CORNERS OF ABUTMENTS. 100 CY

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G G N N N G G G G

N G

G G G G G F

N

F

G

F

58.1 HAIRLINE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE AND

UNDERSIDE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR DELAMINATION OF

DECK SURFACE AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

58.2 MINOR ADHESION FAILURE ALONG BOTH DECK EXPANSION JOINT

SEALS; MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN ENDS OF JOINTS.

MODERATE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN

PARAPETS.

58.5 MINOR MAP CRACKING AND SCALING OF TOP FACE OF CURBS;

MINOR SPALLING IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.

SURVEY MARKER ON NORTH CURB NEAR WEST END AND SOUTH

CURB NEAR EAST END.

58.6 MINOR SPALL ON EAST END OF SOUTH RAILING WITH EXPOSED

AND RUSTED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CONCRETE COVER.

MINOR SPALL ON WEST END OF SOUTH RAILING. IMPACT DAMAGE

TO SOUTH RAILING (10'L AREA) WITH ONE POST CRACKED.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG BOTH CURBLINES. MINOR

VEGETATION GROWTH AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN APPROACH

CURBLINES.

58.8 UTILITY CONDUIT RUSTED AND SEPARATED AT NORTH END OF

EAST ABUTMENT.

59.1,2,6,7 GROUT UNDER BEARING BREAKING UP WITH 8"L X 1-1/2"W SECTION

MISSING AT BEAM #6, WEST ABUTMENT.

SUPERSTRUCTURE HAS BEEN CLEANED AND PAINTED. MINOR

RUSTING OF BEARING SOLE PLATES AND UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM

FLANGES AT BEAM ENDS. MINOR SURFACE RUST DEVELOPING

ALONG EDGES OF BOTTOM FLANGES AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

59.8 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF CONCRETE FASCIAE. MINOR

DELAMINATION OF SOUTH FASCIA BELOW RAIL POST.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. F

FOUNDATIONS5. N

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. G

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N16. FOUNDATIONS

N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G G N

MED

INSUFF

14 FT.

SILT, ROCK

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1.

(APPR. ROADWAY JOINT)

G G F G G G F G F

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.1 WIDESPREAD MINOR MAP CRACKING OF ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS; MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING AND BARNACLE

GROWTH BELOW WATERLINE. MODERATE MAP CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON CORNERS OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.3 MINOR SPALLING OF EDGES OF BEARING SEATS AT ENDS OF BOTH

ABUTMENTS.

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS. MINOR

MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST BACKWALL,

NORTH CORNER. DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF EAST

BACKWALL HAS BEEN REPAIRED; MINOR CRACKING OF REPAIRS.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL WINGWALLS,

PRIMARILY NEAR BEARING AREAS. MINOR SPALLING OF

NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS DUE TO OLD PIECES

OF TIMBER FORM EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE; MINOR SPALL WITH

EXPOSED REBAR IN SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MODERATE

VEGETATION GROWTH ON NORTHEAST WINGWALL; MINOR ON

SOUTHWEST AND NORTHWEST WINGWALLS.

60.7 ALL WEEP HOLES UNDERWATER AT HIGH TIDE.

60.9 MINOR EROSION OF ALL WINGWALL SLOPES.

61.3 RIPRAP ALONG ALL CHANNEL BANKS.

61.6 CHANNEL CONSIDERABLY LARGER THAN OPENING IN STRUCTURE.

222.2 MINOR DETERIORATION OF RELIEF JOINT POURABLE SEALS.

222.3 MODERATE TO SEVERE CHECKING OF TIMBER APPROACH

GUARDRAILS WITH MINOR DECAY THROUGHOUT.

222.6 UP TO 1" SETTLEMENT OF WEST APPROACH SHOULDERS.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

222.7 REFLECTORS ON NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST PARAPET ENDS HIDDEN BY TIMBER APPROACH GUARDRAIL;

REFLECTOR BROKEN AT NORTHEAST PARAPET END.

TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS INSTALLED AT ENDS OF TIMBER APPROACH GUARDRAILS SINCE LAST INSPECTION.

"MILL CREEK" SIGN AT SOUTH SIDE OF WEST APPROACH AND NORTH SIDE OF EAST APPROACH.

222.9 ADHESION PROBLEMS AND HOLES IN WEST APPROACH ROADWAY JOINTS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 19 17 31 28

TYPE 3 17 16 29 26

TYPE 3S2 26 23 43 39

TYPE 3-3 32 29 53 48

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... MILL CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 095 - JAMES CITY

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 4290-024P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... MILL CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 024P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. COLONIAL PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 4290024P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 4.6 MILES SOUTH OF VA ROU

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1D6 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 19.09 (KM PT 30.72)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3002 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

54.0 FT (16.5 M)

55.0 FT (16.8 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 18.8 TONS (17.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 3 - POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 31.3 TONS (28.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/11 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. YES

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: 60 MONTHS - LAST INSP. : 6/08

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°12'53.40" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 76°44'37.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.5 FT (11.1 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 50.0 FT (15.2 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 10.0 FT (3.0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 10.0 FT (3.0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 2118 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2007 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 2330 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2027 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.50 FT (0.76 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0111

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

7 - Countermeasures installed to

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1985-JOINT REPAIR. 2003, 2008-UNDERWATER INSPECTION. 2011-SUPERSTRUcTURE CLEANED AND PAINTED, CONCRETE REPAIRS

TO SUBSTRUCTURE.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:76�44'37.80 http:37�12'53.40

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 4290-024P

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EASTBOUND TOWARD WILLIAMSBURG

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE CHANNEL WIDER THAN

STRUCTURE OPENING

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST; NOTE DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINE

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DECAY AND CHECKING OF TIMBER APPROACH

GUARDRAILS; NORTH GUARDRAIL AT WEST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - ADHESION FAILURE AND EDGE

SPALLING ALONG EXPANSION JOINT OVER

EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #6 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

PHOTO #7 - SPALLING ON SOUTH CURB ADJACENT TO EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF CURBS; SOUTH CURB, EAST

APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - IMPACT DAMAGE TO SOUTH RAILING

PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO; NOTE CRACKED RAIL

POST

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE;

BAY #3 AT EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL SURFACE RUST DEVELOPING ALONG EDGES OF

BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES; BEAM #4 NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BEARING SOLE PLATES AND

UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM FLANGES; BEAM #2 AT EAST ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - DETERIORATED GROUT BELOW BEAM #6 BEARING AT

WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #16 - UTILITY CONDUIT RUSTED AND SEPARATED AT NORTH

END OF EAST ABUTMENT; ALSO NOTE CRACKING OF REPAIRED AREA

IN BACKWALL

PHOTO #17 - DELAMINATION OF SOUTH FASCIA BELOW RAILPOST

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH

CORNER OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

WINGWALLS; SOUTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON

NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #22 - EROSION OF SOUTHEAST

WINGWALL SLOPE

PHOTO #23 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #24 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .