BIP_4290-023P_College_Creek_Bridge.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Colonial National Historical Park Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-13-B-00033
About this file
BIP 4290-023P College Creek Bridge
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1)_Amendment_003.pdf | ||
| VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1)_Amendment_002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_001.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_FAR_66_(additional_info).doc | DOC document | |
| VETS-100A_Form.pdf | ||
| BIP_4290-024P_Mill_Creek_Bridge.pdf | ||
| Plans_VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1).pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| IFB_Solicitation_VA_ERFO_COLO_2011-1(1).pdf | ||
| FP03_Eng_.pdf | ||
| Cert_Program_for_Bridge_Temp_Works.pdf | ||
| FP03_Errata.pdf | ||
| BIP_4290-026P_Isthmus_Bridge.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
COLLEGE CREEK BRIDGE
COLONIAL PARKWAY OVER COLLEGE CREEK
COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/16/11
Federal Highway Administration
Report prepared by: ED
MILE POINT:
KILOMETER POINT:
16.04 25.81
Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
COLLEGE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/16/11
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 7 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 87.0 FT (26.5 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 87.0 FT (26.5 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.3 FT (11.1 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1D18 / 3003B SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 30 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1985-JOINT REPAIR. 2011-SUPERSTRUCTURE CLEANED AND PAINTED; CONCRETE
REPAIRS TO CURBS, RAILINGS AND SUBSTRUCTURE; RIPRAP PLACED AT ABUTMENTS.
LOCATION
COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 16.04 (KM PT 25.81)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.6 MILES SOUTH OF VA ROUTE 199.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ COLONIAL PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COLLEGE CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This steel multi-beam bridge is in good structural condition overall. Since the previous inspection, the superstructure has been cleaned and painted; however, surface rust was observed on the bearing sole plates and beam bottom flanges. The grout pads below the bearings at the south abutment were deteriorated at the time of inspection, particularly at Beams #5 and #6, likely a result of the cleaning process for the painting. However, grout pads at Beam #3, #5, and #6 have been repaired since the inspection. Concrete repairs have been made to the curbs, railings, and substructure and riprap has been placed along the west wingwalls.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: C.A. ROBERTS, N.M. WILLIAMS (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
CHRISTOPHER A. ROBERTS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/27/11
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL DECK EXPANSION JOINTS AS NECESSARY. 16 LF
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 7
1. DECK SLAB G
2. EXPANSION JOINTS F
3. WEARING SURFACE N
4. RIDEABILITY G
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE G
8. UTILITIES P
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G
10. OTHER N
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10. ALIGNMENT
11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
2. PILE BENTS
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
5. FOUNDATIONS
6. WINGWALLS
7. WEEP HOLES
8. EXPANSION JOINTS
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
11. SLOPE PROTECTION
12. OTHER
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14. PILE BENTS
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16. FOUNDATIONS
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19. OTHER
F G N N N G G G G G N
G N G G N G G N F G N N
N N N N N N N
58.1
58.2
58.5
58.6
58.8
59.1,2,6,7
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE AND
UNDERSIDE. MINOR EDGE SPALLING OF DECK SURFACE ALONG
SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT.
MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF DECK UNDERSIDE AT END
DIAPHRAGMS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.
MINOR ADHESION FAILURES OF BOTH DECK EXPANSION JOINT
SEALS WITH GRAVEL ACCUMULATION PRESENT. JOINT MATERIAL
IS SAGGING AT WEST END OF SOUTH JOINT.
WIDESPREAD MINOR CRACKING AND SCALING OF CURBS. MINOR
SPALL ON WEST CURB AT SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT. SPALLING OF
WEST CURB AT NORTH EXPANSION JOINT HAS BEEN REPAIRED
SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION. SURVEY MARKER ON NORTH END
OF EAST CURB.
SEVERAL PATCHED AREAS ON RAILINGS AT ALL FOUR CORNERS
OF BRIDGE. MINOR SPALLING OF RAIL POSTS WITH EXPOSED
REBAR DUE TO INADEQUATE CONCRETE COVER AT ISOLATED
LOCATIONS. MINOR SPALL ON TOP OF WEST PARAPET AT NORTH
APPROACH.
UTILITY CONDUIT RUSTED AND SEPARATED AT BOTH ENDS OF
BOTH ABUTMENTS.
SUPERSTRUCTURE HAS BEEN CLEANED AND PAINTED SINCE LAST
INSPECTION; MINOR RUSTING OF BEARING SOLE PLATES AND
UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM FLANGES AT BEAM ENDS. MINOR RUST
DEVELOPING ALONG EDGES OF BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES AT
ISOLATED LOCATIONS. MINOR RUSTING OF BOTTOM FLANGE OF
END DIAPHRAGM IN BAY #1 AT NORTH ABUTMENT.
MODERATE DETERIORATION OF GROUT PADS BELOW BEARINGS
AT SOUTH ABUTMENT EXTENDING UP TO 1" UNDER MASONRY
PLATES. SEVERE DETERIORATION OF GROUT PAD BELOW BEAM
#5 BEARING EXTENDING UP TO 5" UNDER MASONRY PLATE;
APPROXIMATELY 12% OF BEARING AREA REMAINING. MODERATE
TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF GROUT PAD BELOW BEAM #6
BEARING EXTENDING UP TO 3" UNDER MASONRY PLATE;
APPROXIMATELY 65% OF BEARING AREA REMAINING. GROUT PADS
AT BEAMS #3, #5, AND #6 HAVE BEEN REPAIRED SINCE THE
INSPECTION.
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 6
G F N G N
MED
INSUFF
29 FT.
SILT, ROCK
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. G
G F G F G G F N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.8 MINOR MAP CRACKING OF EAST CONCRETE FASCIA. SPALLING OF
WEST CONCRETE FASCIA HAS BEEN REPAIRED SINCE PREVIOUS
INSPECTION.
60.1,6 MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS AND WINGWALLS; MODERATE BARNACLE GROWTH
BELOW WATERLINE.
2' X 2' DELAMINATED AREA AT WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL. TWO MINOR SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON
SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.
VEGETATION HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM WINGWALLS SINCE
PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
MODERATE DELAMINATION (2'L X 6"H) OF NORTHWEST CHEEK
WALL.
60.3 MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH
ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT AREA, EAST END. MINOR
EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH ABUTMENT. MINOR DELAMINATION
OF BEAM #6 BEARING SEAT AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.
60.9 LARGE RIPRAP PLACED ALONG WEST WINGWALLS SINCE LAST
INSPECTION. MODERATE EROSION ALONG EAST WINGWALLS.
61.2 SEVERE EROSION OF NORTH DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK;
SEVERAL TREES LEANING TOWARD CHANNEL.
61.6 CHANNEL IS CONSIDERABLY LARGER THAN OPENING IN
STRUCTURE.
222.1 JOINTS BETWEEN APPROACH SLAB AND CURBS HAVE BEEN
RESEALED SINCE LAST INSPECTION; JOINTS ARE FILLED WITH
GRAVEL AND DEBRIS. MODERATE SPALL AT EAST EDGE OF NORTH
APPROACH SLAB ALONG EXPANSION JOINT.
222.2 MINOR GRAVEL ACCUMULATION AND MINOR TO MODERATE
VEGETATION GROWTH IN RELIEF JOINTS.
222.3 MODERATE TO SEVERE CHECKING AND SPLINTERING OF TIMBER
APPROACH GUARDRAILS WITH WIDESPREAD MINOR DECAY.
222.5 UNDERMINING ALONG LENGTH OF EAST CURB AT SOUTH
APPROACH. UNDERMINING OF NORTH APPROACH CURBS HAS
BEEN FILLED SINCE LAST INSPECTION.
222.6 UP TO 1" SETTLEMENT AT FREE END OF APPROACH SLABS.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
222.7 REFLECTOR AT END OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL BROKEN AND HIDDEN BY GUARDRAIL. TYPE 3 OBJECT
MARKERS INSTALLED AT ENDS OF TIMBER APPROACH GUARDRAILS SINCE LAST INSPECTION.
"COLLEGE CREEK" SIGN AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH APPROACH AND EAST SIDE OF SOUTH APPROACH.
222.8 CURVES AT BOTH APPROACHES.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 21 19 35 32
TYPE 3 20 18 33 30
TYPE 3S2 24 22 41 37
TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COLLEGE CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 095 - JAMES CITY
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 4290-023P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... COLLEGE CREEK
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 023P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. COLONIAL PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 4290023P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.6 MILES SOUTH OF VA ROU
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1D18 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 16.04 (KM PT 25.81)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3003B (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
87.0 FT (26.5 M)
87.0 FT (26.5 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 20.9 TONS (18.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 4 - POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 34.8 TONS (31.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/11 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. YES
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: 60 MONTHS - LAST INSP. : 6/08
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°13'33.90" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 76°41'41.00" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.3 FT (11.1 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 50.0 FT (15.2 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 10.0 FT (3.0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 10.0 FT (3.0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 3274 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 30 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2007 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 3601 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2027 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.50 FT (0.76 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0111
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
7 - Countermeasures installed to
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1985-JOINT REPAIR. 2011-SUPERSTRUCTURE CLEANED AND PAINTED; CONCRETE REPAIRS TO CURBS, RAILINGS AND
SUBSTRUCTURE; RIPRAP PLACED AT ABUTMENTS.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:76�41'41.00 http:37�13'33.90
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 4290-023P
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD WILLIAMSBURG
PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE; NOTE CHANNEL WIDER THAN
STRUCTURE OPENING
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - EDGE SPALLING OF DECK
SURFACE ALONG SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT;
ALSO NOTE GRAVEL ACCUMULATION IN
EXPANSION JOINT
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF CURBS; WEST CURB AT NORTH
APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF RAIL POSTS WITH EXPOSED
REBAR; WEST RAILING NEAR NORTH EXPANSION JOINT SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION
AND VEGETATION GROWTH IN RELIEF
JOINTS; NORTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL CHECKING,
SPLINTERING, AND DECAY OF TIMBER
APPROACH GUARDRAILS; WEST GUARDRAIL
AT NORTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - UNDERMINING ALONG LENGTH OF EAST CURB AT SOUTH
APPROACH
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE; BAY #4 NEAR
SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - REPAIRED GROUT PAD UNDER BEAM #3 BEARING AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #13 - DETERIORATION OF GROUT PAD UNDER BEAM #5
BEARING AT SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #14 - REPAIRED GROUT PAD UNDER BEAM #5 BEARING AT
PHOTO #15 - DETERIORATION OF GROUT PAD UNDER BEAM #6
PHOTO #16 - DETERIORATION OF GROUT PAD UNDER BEAM #6
PHOTO #17 - REPAIRED GROUT PAD UNDER BEAM #6 BEARING AT
PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND SPALLING OF DECK UNDERSIDE
AT END DIAPHRAGMS; BAY #2 AT NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BEARING SOLE PLATES AND
UNDERSIDE OF BOTTOM FLANGES AT BEAM ENDS; BEAM #6 AT
NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL RUST DEVELOPING ON EDGES OF BOTTOM
FLANGES AT RANDOM LOCATIONS; BEAM #3 AT MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #23 - RUSTED AND SEPARATED
UTILITY AT WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT;
ALSO NOTE RUSTING OF DIAPHRAGM
BOTTOM FLANGE
PHOTO #24 - MAP CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST
WINGWALL
PHOTO #25 - EROSION OF NORTH DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK
PHOTO #26 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #27 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .